This attitude
is common even here, amongst people who presumably
should know better.
The finger points to me?
Just because VMS was around thirty years ago,
that means it's a
thirty-year-old OS. "Wow, I can't believe we're still using
cars. They're so old! Since there were cars in 1908, that means
ALL cars are from 1908!"
I never said VMS is dead - if I did, please point it out and
acknowledge. I did say VMS is a "sinking ship". Not only is the
market share tiny and shrinking, but its installation base (number
of machines running VMS in production) is also shrinking. There are
pretty much no new VMS customers. VMS is speeding along to being
insignificant.
And yes, OS/400, VM, MVS (yes, keeping the old names here) are also
sinking ships for much the same reason, although they are still
viable products. Yes, they are important, and are still cutting
edge, but the truth is still that there will be a day in the future
when these OSes are in the same league as MCP or TOPS-20. Hopefully
that day will be long off.
Here is a challenge to the whole list membership. Lots of folks
here are well embedded into the industry, so I think this is a good
sample. Try to think of as many new customers (not upgrades) for
the following OSes (again, keeping the old names): AOS/VS, MCP,
TOPS-10, TOPS-20, OS/2200, VM, MVS, VSE, OS/400, Multics, PrimOS.
Lets keep this to year 2009. I bet we can not even get to twenty.
-- Will
And when I said the other OSes had died, this is what I meant.
Glad to see that someone is objectionably rooted in reality.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkoxYiEACgkQF9H43UytGiYyRgCgrfrLApsR+LIt2/Eg6ofJCp5u
TIoAoJiDEjZgJ1bkvRuLpxUE3BTvmrRW
=Ltud
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----