9 Apr
2013
9 Apr
'13
3:45 p.m.
On 04/08/2013 06:50 PM, MG wrote:
On 8-apr-2013 23:56, Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
Coward? Nah, cowards don't come back for more. And I didn't call you a
nut, I just implied in a round-about way that you seem to be a person in
the conspiracy theory camp.
As for admitting or not, Just having a little fun with words.
As for your claim of IBM "...don't want people (and the /little people/
in particular) to find out that they've been providing the "mainframe"
backbone for all those /nice/ bailed-out banks..." it does strike me as
a conspiracy theory, hence my wise-crack.
However, if you can provide evidence to back this up (not counting
blogs from some unknown guy & dubious news articles) I will change my mind.
As for their bank customers, couldn't one find that info out from IBM's
SEC filings?
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- AIM - woyciesjes
--- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech - http://certification.comptia.org/
--- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst - http://www.ThinkHDI.com/
Registered Linux user number 464583
"Computers have lots of memory but no imagination."
"The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back."
- from some guy on the internet.
Nope, I didn't tell you anything. Merely
asked a question of the
group; regarding the allowed headgear when participating here.
It'd be kinda cramped to live under a mainframe, but I'd stay warm
at least.
Have a good day, Mr. Troll. :)
Said the coward who called someone a nut, not even willing to say
why (or let alone substantiate such claims/smears), but is too
yellow to even admit having done so.
- MG