On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Jules Richardson wrote:
Diane Bruce wrote:
Can we move on to the next weird offbeat
conspiracy theory? This one is
boring.
OTOH, there is no conspiracy, but I find reading about potential meanings /
sources of this particular book's symbol* interesting (Zane, do you have a
photo?)
* and that includes the possibility that it's entirely random and intended
for decorative purposes only, of course :-)
I'll have to see about taking a photo of it tonight. Due to the time frame
of when the book would have been published, I'm inclined to think it is just some
random design, and someone not
thinking. Still it's strange. It's also strange to have something like
that on the spine of the book given that it's from a publisher I recognized.
Zane