7 Jan
2014
7 Jan
'14
2:50 p.m.
On 6 January 2014 03:18, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
I would have to agree.
But then again, it does fit perfectly with the smug, condescending,
patronizing tone of many other RPN users I've met online. They are not
pleasant people, in my general experience. Of course, there are
exceptions, but Ken here is not one.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
So, an
ad-hominem attack is your idea of a balanced reply, is it?
Even though I agree that RPN calculators are superior to algebraic ones, I think that
Ken's message was thoroughly condescending and rude. RPN vs algebraic is a matter of
opinion, not a law of nature or an indicator of personal worth.