3 Nov
2000
3 Nov
'00
3:21 p.m.
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, ajp166 wrote:
From: Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com>
Nifty, Allison!
- don
Now Allison, he just proved the point that ZCPR
does not increase the
bulk of CP/M, whereas Win3.1 does. Therefore, ZCPM is better!
Stull no arguement, just not the question at hand. DOS like CP/M
can have any number of user interfaces, size for the moment is
unimportant
as it GUI vs Command line.
You'd like the version I did for laughs that looked a lot like RSTS
running
the BASIC interface rather than DCL. Yes, I mean the user enviornment is
inside basic and the command line would be BASIC. I used LLL BASIC
to do it as its available as source and all. So what if CCP {or ZCPR}
is nominally 2k, I changed the load point in the BIOS and allowed 8k for
that.
Is the user interface different? Yes. Is it CP/M, still? Yes.