From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 3:56 PM
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: 68K ISA project
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Ben <bfranchuk at
jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
The MMU bit reminded about DACK GROUNDED. I think
that was the news
letter I
saw on the web.
Close - DTACK Grounded. DTACK is DaTa ACknowledge,
[...snip...]
If you mean paper copies vs a real chip, maybe not, but for PDFs, the
second google hit reveals all...
http://www.easy68k.com/paulrsm/dg/dg.htm
Cool !! Never heard of DTACK Grounded before, but I quickly read the
first issue. Seems fun to read the others ... Probably known in this group,
I am a fan of Motorola, not Intel. I learned assembler as first language on
an M6800, build my own 6800, 6802, 6809 and finally designed and built
a 68000 (which I upgraded later to 68010). In the end I am using a VME
board with a 68020 at 30 MHz and RAM at 0 (!) "wait states" in my StarShip.
Anyway ...
More than 2 years ago, I started rewriting the 6809-based pdp8/e code
to 68000. I "envisioned" a pdp8/e on a 68000 board with 8 fields RAM,
two serial lines and simulated RX01 (using 3.5" floppy disk drives).
I have actually translated the 6809 code to 68000 (making optimal use
of all registers of course), but never tested it. I am sure it has bugs :-)
I never returned to it due to the FPGA rush and the thought that the 68k
code would be slower than a real pdp8/e. I am sure I have a 12 MHz
68k chip, and for some reason I also think to have a 16 MHz version, but
I doubt Motorola ever made a 68k at 16 MHz ... Motoral chips have quite
some margin in overclocking (I read somewhere).
Would there be interest to run a (slow) pdp8/e on a 68k? I coded ASCII
"art" for the lights display on a VT220 using ESC sequences.
- Henk, PA8PDP