From: korpela at
ssl.berkeley.edu
Every time I see code like this for processors
without a native DIV, I
wonder if the same code ported to x86 would indeed outperform the native
DIV. Would it? I know that on a 286 or higher, where MUL and DIV were
greatly optimized to about 12 cycles, no; but what about on the original
808x, where MUL/DIV could take as much as 144 cycles?
In 286 and 386 you could usually beat IDIV when dividing by small
constants especially if you knew your dividend was of less than the
full range of the possible register values.
Based on an email I just had from the cpm news group, I thought
it might be fun to write some Z80 code to do the 0 to 799 as fast
as one could, with no size restriction. Just clocks count.
Dwight
_________________________________________________________________
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!