a pretty complete set of Casio handhelds, a Juno, an
IBM AT, an HP 9830,
As an aside, the HP9830 is one of my favourites. It's got a claim to
being the first personal computer (I think it was the first all-in-one
machine you could just put on a desk, plug into the mains and start
typing BASIC). It's also one of the few bit-serial machines you're likely
to come across.
Repairing them is interesting, Most parts, the exceptions being the HP
custom ROMa and the Intel 1103 DRAMs are easy to find. But being a
bit-serial machine, tracing the fault is hard without a logic analyser (I
speak from experience having repaired several 9810s, a 9820 and a 9830).
my Linux box, Darth.) My entire shop is gone. So, I
feel naked.
How on earth did that happen?
More than half of current households have a PC. What
percentage have
o'scopes? Quite small, I'm sure. The chances of a person being able to
So? 'socpes are not hard to find, if you wsnt one. Ditto for all the
other tools and equipment you might need.
Okay, Tony, be fair. 'Scopes and other equipment are no more free than
PCs are. More people are likely to have the PC, however, making taking
Not normally, alas. Although I was given my first 'scope. Of course it
didn't work, but it came with a schematic, and used nice simple
components like valves,, so finding the open-circuit resistor in the
timebase unit was not too hard (even though I'd never done much
electronic repair before). I suspect it would be a lot harder to fix a
broken PC...
up emulator jockeying a significantly cheaper
proposition for most people.
I won't argue with that. But then hobbies don't hae to be cheap.
Certainly my other hobbies involve quite expensive equipment (if bought
new).
Put it this
way, I'd rather learn how to do something like that than run
an emulator on an undocumented (to the sort of level I call 'documented')
machine under an OS that I don't have the source for. If I have problems
with that I can't solve them logically. If I am using tools/equipment
that I am capable of understnading and things go wrong, I can use a
logical procedure to sort it out. And I much prerfe that.
Understood. Sounds like you'd be a candidate for an older PC running
Linux....
And just what do you think I am typing this on? It's a real IBM5170
(albeit the 8MHz version) with a 486 kludgeboard in the 80286 CPU socket
running an ancient version of linux. I've done all sorts of hardware mods
to it, piggybacked chips, kludgwires eerywhere. Apart from the hard
drive, I have scheamtics for everything in that box...
It doesn't
stop me getting annoyed when it's assumed I have them. The
next time somebody tells me to 'upload my photos', I am liable to use my
monorail camwera as a substitue clue-by-four :-)
That's no way to treat vintage gear!
No, but it probably wouldn't mind :-)
HA! Well, consider an older PC as an investment,
like a test
instrument.
Except it's not. It's not going to last as long as the sort of tools and
instruments I normally buy.
Yes. Been there, done that. Like you, my favorite
machines are the
older HP gear. I love fine engineering, and it was easier to find in HP
Yes, older HPs are well-built and often well designed (although I am not
convinced the HP120 is a particularly good design for a CP/M box). I feel
the peiod from about 1965 to 9185 was the 'glory days of HP' when they
had some wonderful products. If I can get stuff from that period, I do..
than in any other manufacturer I've known.
Well, there are some HP machines that are hard to find...... I know, I'm
looking for them.
-tony