16 Jun
2013
16 Jun
'13
12:47 p.m.
On 16 Jun 2013, at 15:42, "Josh Dersch" <derschjo at gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/15/2013 6:19 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
To be fair, ?off-topic? seems on-topic here with the list being ?General Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts?.
On 06/15/2013 09:46 PM, MikeS wrote:
A more useful statistic might be "on topic posts." You managed to write a
whopping 15 posts (out of 100) between 6/1 and 6/15 that could be considered "on
topic" for this list (and I'm being generous.)
Is the point becoming more clear now, or shall I be more blunt? I was curious...
Out of 143 people who posted to the list in the first half of June, 116
posted 5 times or less.
On the other hand, only 9 people (and we know who they are ;-) are
responsible for half (462) of the total 923 posts, with Dave easily the
winner...
Must be nice to have so much time to waste...
Oh, tons!
Actually I'm working 100-110hrs/wk now. I just type fast.
Speaking of time to waste, was there a point to this exercise?
- Josh
>
> -Dave