7 Mar
2013
7 Mar
'13
9:25 a.m.
Wikipedia might have a photo of a rule similar to mine along with a
verifiable explanation of what the length of that spiral scale is. I
didn't and my rule was buried. I already said I brain farted an quoted
a bad stat. I was not going to do wikipedia w/o verification or because
the math is too hard. I did it because I have no idea how many times
the scale went round, and didn't want to guess. Is guessing and babble
better than wikipedia even if the math is right?
On 3/6/2013 12:19 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
Would attempting to look up the answer in Wikipedia
increase or
decrease the number of errors? Would it strengthen the strange
belief that "doing the math" is "TOO HARD"?