Bill Pechter skrev:
I'd liked a cross between OS/2 and VAX/VMS...
maybe with FreeBSD
thrown in.
Isn't that Windows NT?
Not if you have to use the GUI to admin it and reboot to change
network addresses.
Always liked OS/2 and always will. IBM was
screwed by M$ who kept
changing Win32 and keeping new apps from running on OS/2.
So what? OS/2 is OS/2 and Windows is Windows. You can't just rely on some
other OS vendor to supply you with the right API and applications.
But M$ promised if you code to Win32S it would be portable to OS/2,
Win3.1 and Win95/NT and kept changing the DLLs to break it.
The only problem in OS/2 was if the Workplace Shell threads blocked and
locked up you'd lose the desktop... but all the server services
like network kept going.
Getting a prompt and login from Telnet was possible on OS/2 when it
wasn't standard in NT.
The ftp and telnet servers made OS/2 pretty compatible to
FreeBSD/Linux/Unix in what it could do on a lan.
Miserable Redmond $%*s.
Bill
---
Bill Gates is a Persian cat and a monocle away from being a
villain in a James Bond movie -- Dennis Miller
bpechter@shell.monmouth.com|pechter@pechter.dyndns.org