Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com> wrote:
All I am asking is that if you have actual proof that
there were different
certification levels for CompacTape and CompacTape II that you
provide such proof along with the additional cost. Otherwise, I
must assume that the only reason for the 40% to 50% increase
in cost was the so-called "standard practice in the entire industry"
of charging more when it was possible to do so.
I don't have "proof". Do you have proof of "standard practice in the
entire industry"?
You can assume whatever you want, but reality won't bend to conform
to your assumptions.