17 Jun
2011
17 Jun
'11
7:10 a.m.
On 17 June 2011 15:05, Phill Harvey-Smith <afra at aurigae.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 17/06/2011 14:34, Ethan Dicks wrote:
You have to be /very/ careful with automation. It was tried once. It
wasn't good.
When the 'Drink' button is pressed it makes an instant but highly
detailed examination of the subject's taste buds, a spectroscopic
analysis of the subject's metabolism, and then sends tiny experimental
signals down the neural pathways to the taste centres of the subject's
brain to see what is likely to be well received. However, no-one knows
quite why it does this because it then invariably delivers a cupful of
liquid that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.
--
Liam Proven ? Info & profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/lproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AIM/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven ? MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? ICQ: 73187508
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Daniel Seagraves
<dseagrav at lunar-tokyo.net> ?wrote:
Which makes me wonder why did Picard always state "Tea, Earl Grey, Hot", I
mean do they not have macros or pre-programmed settings in the 24th centuary
so he could say "normal please" :) :) :) :)
What, no "Kirk vs. Picard"?
You guys disappoint me.
Tea, Earl Grey, Hot ?v ?Romulan Ale.