That thing was built on several Multibus-I cards with LOTS of parts. Each
channel was sampled with a 4-bit shift-register that fed a half an 8-bit
register and a 4kx4 SRAM (55ns, which, for a 16Kb sram was considered very
fast). The whole thing was over 1100 IC's on 12 cards in three
interconnected MULTIBUS cardcages plus a display circuit and a CPU for
interacting with the "console" terminal port and driving the various
controls. It made me regret I never built a Multibus-I wirewrap card of my
own and to my standards. That would have saved a few cards.
The system was intended for monitoring VME bus signals plus various
additional channel signals for a test system. It was a major pain and I'm
glad I've by now forgotten more than I remember about it. I got the thing
to work failrly well, but by that time had much better ideas for a
2nd-generation device which I was never able to get someone to pay me to
build. I did, however, build VME wire-wrap cards, capable of supporting the
at-that-time relatively new IDC ribbon cable connectors most other cards
wouldn't. It also allowed the use of PGA parts without a multi-K-buck
adapter.
I know a lot more about sampling circuits than I ever wanted to know, yet
still don't think I'd like to build a LA without someone else specifying the
triggering modes. I'd go on forever trying to figure out what was needed
and what was just a whim.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: <jpero(a)sympatico.ca>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: Other useful test equipment (was: RE: Scope use...)
Date:
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:57:51 -0600
From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Other useful test equipment (was: RE: Scope use...)
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Reply-to: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Back in '80 or so I needed a very wide LA, wider than what I could
afford
at
> the time, so I built one with the 384-bit width
that was required. It
was
no picnic!
384bits to log? Whew, that would be big PCB with under a hundred
ttl ICs or so and tons of sram ics. What was that needed to do that
logging and what was that project under test hooked up by that
oddball 384bits logger?
>
> It might be interesting to revisit such a problem. An old '486 PC
dedicated
to that
function would almost be worthwhile . . .
What is your propseal logger for this 486 pc idea? I have several.
:-)
Dick
Wizard