2 Dec
2012
2 Dec
'12
10:05 p.m.
At 10:54 PM -0500 12/2/12, David Riley wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012, at 22:32, "Zane H. Healy"
<healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
I had one of the very first SCSI ones for my PowerBook 520c. It was
great while it lasted. IIRC, my G4/450 AGP came with one built in, I
never used it, except to recover some data.
OTOH, I rather liked the Syquest drives I've had.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ |
| My Photography Website |
| http://www.zanesphotography.com |
Wow! I'll admit that having been hit by the
'click of death',
they scare the **** out of me.
I've used them since they first came out and have never
experienced the CoD. Anecdotal evidence suggests
that the later (i.e., 250 and up) drives and/or disks suffered
from either engineering shortcomings or a total lack of QA.
I've never used anything other than the 100s, largely because
those were all the SCSI ones I ever had and I primarily used
them on Macs (somehow I have an ATA internal one
and a SCSI external one as well; I don't recall hearing
good things about the USB ones, even the early ones).