That's
very insightful. The x86 has a fantastic security record. I'd
certainly pick it immediately over some unproven, obscure technology
like VAX.
I had no idea that the VAX instruction set was inherently more secure
than x86.
Well, the sarcasm you appear to be missing (whether deliberately or not
I can't tell) aside, I think it actually may be.
"There are two ways to make something secure: you can make it so simple
there are obviously no deficiencies, or you can make it so complex
there are no obvious deficiencies." While I would hesitate to call the
VAX instruction set simple, at least compared to something like the
PDP-8 or even more modern RISC machines like MIPS or PPC, it is far
more orthogonal and cleanly designed than the horror that is x86, and
correspondingly easier to implement correctly.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B