There was a
perfectly good alternative to ATA/IDE, and has been for
ages. It's called SCSI. It is, and was at the time SATA was
introduced, a mature, proven technology with a huge installed base.
Absolutely. There are several other notable foibles of that
industry...the very existence of (IBM's proprietary) SSA and SAS, which
are both completely pointless in the face of FibreChannel...they are all
just different physical layers for SCSI.
What's wrong with SAS? SSA I can see a big argument against (and you just
made it), but SAS is solid and interconnects with SATA, as Al pointed out.
I like FibreChannel fine, but SAS seems perfectly decent to me.
--
------------------------------------ personal:
http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems *
www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at
floodgap.com
-- BOND THEME NOW PLAYING: "You Only Live Twice" ------------------------------