Add to the fact that paper seems to be far more resilient then say CD
backups (which I've seen several CD's that I created around 97-98 which
are now having problems reading certain sections) and Tape backups of
today I wonder if they are truly as high grade as say the old TU78s of
the past (I've had my share of readying nearly 1,500 tapes that had been
stored in outside storage units for over 10 years - no protection from
heat/cold, frost/humidity) Most of them - astoundingly - were still
actually readable, however some - even with baking - separated from
their transport, others did a major number on the tape heads with globs
of sludge as they read, but still over all, the tapes even well past
their prime and kept in unbearable conditions, still favored well. I
would wonder if todays consumerized backup media would fare as well.
While bulky - I have been printing out nearly 9 years worth of email
correspondence relating to all of the Atari historical research I've
been doing and sorting it out to keep on record, I nearly lost it all
due to a sudden HD failure, but fortunately had a backup image on
another disk, I don't trust digital based storage for archival purposes.
Curt
Al Kossow wrote:
>
"Personal papers" aren't on paper any more, if they exist
> at all they are directories full of email.
Why is this a "huge issue"? My father
made xerox copies of his
important papers; I make regular backups. What's changed?
The volatility of the preservation medium, future ability to recover
a document in obscure formats, and the sheer volume of digital content
vs saved paper.
Is everything you're 'backing up' checksummed? How do you KNOW
it hasn't already been corrupted?