14 Jul
2016
14 Jul
'16
10:21 a.m.
> When IBM decided to take over the personal
computer market, they didn't do their homework very well.
> Intel convinced them to use the 8088, to have a gateway into 16 bit, instead of
building a true 8 bit machine.
> One of the IBM people had seen a "Microsoft Softcard" (a Z80 co-processor
plus CP/M for Apple][).
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Guy Sotomayor Jr wrote:
IBM chose the 8088 because the bus was close enough to
the 8085 that the
peripherals from the S/23 could be re-used with minor tweaks (in many
cases just a re-layout).
They wanted something that would allow > 64KB of RAM without having to
go through the pains of what was done on S/23 (it was an 8085 system
that has 192KB of ROM and upto 128KB of RAM) and none of the 8-bit
micros could do that.
It makes sense to me. Hardware would be same as for an ordinary 8 bit
machine, but lots more (1MB!!) memory map.
Since nobody could possibly need more than 10 times the current RAM, big
chunks of space could be used for memory mapped I/O, such as both a text
display AND an amazing 640x200 graphics display.
IBM had looked at the PC market for a while. It was
actually TJ Watson
Jr that instructed that a ?skunk? team be formed to see how quickly
a PC with an IBM logo could be produced. He was afraid of Apple making
inroads into IBM?s traditional markets and wanted to prevent that.
It was never envisioned to be a huge market for these things?it was
viewed only as a hobbyist thing that had the potential to take away
business from IBM?s traditional machines.
They assumed [correctly] that they could, with trivial ease, simply step
in and dominate that "home computer" market. Particularly useful if
anybody was crazy enough to take in a home computer to work and use it
for some minor office tasks.
I'm glad that Apple survived IBM's entry and presence in that market.