13 Jul
2004
13 Jul
'04
9:25 p.m.
In message <011d01c4575c$6691dea0$5b01a8c0@athlon>
"Antonio Carlini" <arcarlini(a)iee.org> wrote:
I don't know who recommends the Sharp, but the
broken
(crushed screen) Casio fx-83WA that my kids both use
I've got two fairly recent
LCD calculators - a Casio fx-82SX "FRACTION" and
a Sharp EL-531VH "Advanced DAL".
(hence the broken screen...) has x^y and x ROOT y,
10^x and log, e^x and ln, trig functions and their
inverses and the hyperbolic version, and standard
deviation.
My Casio has most of those, except x ROOT y. The Sharp does everything
you
mentioned, but the display contrast is abysmal. Look at it straight-on and
you can barely see anything; look at the display from a 35-degree angle and
you can actually see what it's up to.
I've got a Commodore MM3MW LED calculator - made in the late 70s FWICT. It's
a shame no-one seems to make LED calculators anymore - I could live with the
short time between recharges, but I guess most other people couldn't be
bothered (the Commodore has gone a fair few weeks on a single set of 750mAh
NiMH cells).
Heck, my mobile phone needs recharging every few days, charging a calculator
at the same time wouldn't be a big deal.
Later.
--
Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice,
http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI
... BNFL : Buy No Fish Locally