16 Dec
2014
16 Dec
'14
12:23 p.m.
I think that's just the engineering school experience in general. It may no
longer involve the 6800 or FORTRAN but, believe me, instructors never fail
to find a way to confound undergrads with the tools available to them, LOL.
Best,
Sean
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Dave G4UGM <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> wrote:
-----Original
Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck
Guzis
Sent: 14 December 2014 20:03
To: General at classiccmp.org; Discussion at classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-
Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Favourite text based word processing software
On 12/14/2014 09:10 AM, Peter Coghlan wrote:
Having written X.25 Networking Software in Fortran-77 on an IBM 370 (among
other systems) because my employer wanted it to be portable I think a line
mode editor in Fortran might be fun.
On the other hand I think your experience with Fortran programming at
College is typical of that many received. I remember the classes when I was
an under graduate at Newcastle upon Type poly. Too many students and
inexperienced staff meant many never really learned Fortran properly.
Fortunately I had already learnt Fortran II at school when was 17 , and
Fortran 77 was a simple upgrade.....
Dave
Many years after performing this somewhat less
than useful task, my
advice is:
don't write your word processor in FORTRAN IV
on an IBM S/370.
On the other hand, WPs can be written quite
successfully in BASIC running
on
a 3.5MHz 8085, given the necessary
"hooks" (e.g. direct video displays).
Pretty much full-featured too, with font changes and all of the usual
stuff.
--Chuck