On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At 8:25 AM -0700 4/26/12, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Zane H. Healy wrote:
If this is the effect it has on people, I'll
stick with SQL. :-)
Multi-Value sounds like it might be related to what I dealt with as a DBA
on a Honeywell DPS-8.
Check out
http://www.openqm.com or
http://www.scarletdme.org - Once you get
into a good MVDB, you'll wonder why you ever wasted a minute bashing your
brain into a pulp against SQL.
I see one problem, I tend to enjoy SQL. :-) Besides, MS SQL is the standard
database at work (I'm also inclined to say it's one of the few good products
to come out of MS). I've even used it as the back-end for apps running on
UNIX.
My, your affliction runs deep my friend! :) FYI, it's a good product that
came from SyBase, not MS. :D
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_!
Buying desktop hardware and installing a server OS doesn't make a
server-class system any more than sitting in a puddle makes you a duck.
[Cipher in a.s.r]