30 Jun
2001
30 Jun
'01
1:42 p.m.
Davison, Lee skrev:
We're talking old manuals here. Remember? OLD manuals.
Perhaps not commercial books, as in novels or popular textbooks, but I've got
quite a lot of manuals produced on ancient laser printers.
I must agree here, though. Can't think of many details which wouldn't show up
in 300 dpi as well.
Agreed, but arguing that just because something is printed using equipment
with a low numeric resolution doesn't mean that it should be scanned at the
same resolution. There is no way in which the two grids would overlap
perfectly, so in order to gain every single dot, you need to scan at a higher
resolution than the source was printed at.
Scanning printed material much above 150dpi is usually
a waste
as most printing is done at about 70dpi.
What are you smoking, and is there enough for the rest of us?
600 Dpi with
resolution enhancement is very old technology
for laserprinters
Nobody, commercially, makes books on laserprinters. If you can
manage it, i would say scan at 600 Dpi.
Waste of time, effort and storage space. scanning at
1/2 the target printer resolution is probably
the best you can hope for.
Scanning at just over twice the source resolution is the best you
will ever get. More than that's a waste. ----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a
named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
That's a bloody long .sig you've got there.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
A conservative is a worshipper of dead radicals.