9 Dec
2012
9 Dec
'12
8:57 a.m.
On 9 dec. 2012, at 00:45, "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
I have an ancient 300dpi UMAX scanner out in the
garage, useless for most things, EXCEPT, it has a full size transparency adapter and I
could use it to scan 8x10 sheet film.
I'd consider scanning sheet film at 300 dpi a waste of effort. You'll surely get
much better results scanning them wet on a modern, high dpi flatbed.
.tsooJ
--
Wherever you go, there you are.
--
Joost van de Griek
<http://www.jvdg.net/>