>>>> "Gordon" == Gordon JC Pearce
<gordon(a)gjcp.net> writes:
Gordon> Obviously, the higher the resolution, the slower the
Gordon> conversion. Most A-D converters (and I'm sure many, if not
Gordon> most of you know this) use "successive approximation" to
Gordon> derive the correct value - get a D-A converter and a
Gordon> comparator, then loop through "toggle the MSB, is it too high
Gordon> or too low? Toggle the next bit, too high or too low?" all
Gordon> the way down. You get "flash" converters for video (or you
Gordon> used to) which were 32 or 64 individual comparators and
Gordon> voltage references, and some encoding logic to give you a
Gordon> binary output. Overkill really, but very, very fast. If you
Gordon> found a fast 6-bit flash converter cheaply, that may well be
Gordon> enough resolution for your track scanner. We're not going
Gordon> for Dolby Digital quality here...
Flash converters certainly go up to 8 bits, perhaps more by now.
Also, modern SAR converters are often hybrids -- flash for the high
order bits, SAR tweak for the low order bits.
Then there are sigma-delta converters, particularly well suited for
very high resolution at relatively modest speeds.
"Relatively modest" is subject to change. I just saw an Analog
Devices ad describing their new 2 megasample per second 18 bit SAR
converter, and a 20 bit S-D converter at 2.5 megasamples. I don't
suppose those are "relatively cheap" though...
paul