I'll have
to reserve judgement on Win 3.1 as I've never tried to run it on
an 8088 (I thought Microsoft dropped support for the mode required by the
8088 in Win3.1, though), but OS/2 is right out. It's entire reason for
being is to run on the 286, so an XT won't cut it.
Now if you want to see something really fly, load up Windows 1.03 or 2.0 on
it. Those'll run like lightning on any x86 with 512k or more. I have 1.03
running off a DD 3.5" floppy on a GRiDCASE 3 laptop (XT class, no HD, Gas
Plasma CGA, 512k, DOS in ROM)
Yes, Win 2.0 was quick; code bloat in those days wasn't merely the
inconvienience it is today-- back then it was FATAL! We had a small,
minimalist programming ethic back then.
In addition to
Xenix, CP/M-86, Minix, and a variety of Forths, there are
other Unix clones (Venix, for exmaple), the UCSD P-system, and MP/M-86 (if
you
>can find it!). I don't know offhand whether Concurrent CP/M-86 requires a
>286, but I do not believe it does.
I have a copy of Concurrent. The version I have will ONLY run on a
PC or XT! Hell, I don't think it even supports hard disks! (But I
can check).
Anyone know of a free source for x86 CP/M? or forth? Am I missing
something? Isn't forth a language, not an OS?
- John Higginbotham
-
limbo.netpath.net
Jeff