5 Jan
2012
5 Jan
'12
6:46 p.m.
On 5 Jan 2012 at 17:18, Vintage Coder wrote:
I don't know, I haven't written any FORTRAN to
speak of since IBM
FORTRAN H. I thought you agreed with me, but that must have been
somebody else.
No, just saying that it's FORTRAN 66, FORTRAN 77 and FORTRAN II, but
"Fortran 90", "Fortran 2003" although "FORTRAN 90" is also
okay,
according to ANSI.
Perhaps everyone should follow the trend though and talk about c,
cobol, pl/i, snobol, simscript, basic, jovial, dos, vms...
Maybe they already do...
--Chuck