On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:00 AM, <cctalk-request at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:35:06 -0700
From: Lyle Bickley <lbickley at bickleywest.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: NASA "Open Source"....
Message-ID: <20140415093506.69d27cf5 at asrock.bcwi.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
After posting NASA's "open source" program to this list, I decided to
download some of the "open source" software listed.
To obtain the software I had to fill out a long form: "SOFTWARE USAGE
AGREEMENT (SUA)" - which included an affirmation by me that I was a US
Citizen, etc., etc.
After filling out the form and submitting it, a few days later I got a
terse reply: "Sorry it is for government release only".
I wrote the author of the email and said that NASA had said on their
website that it was "open source". The response was:
"Thank you for your inquiry, However, STRS is labeled specifically as
Government Purpose Only software. At this time it is only available
for a Federal Government purpose use by civil servants or contractors
with a contract number. In the future, if you have need for the
software on a government contract, please feel free to contact our
office again for the software."
The author also included the following NASA Software Catalog (link
below). As you'll see, very little of the software posted on NASA's
"open source" site is actually "open source" as we know it! Most of
it
is "US Government Purpose Release". There is a small subset of software
that are identified as "General Public" or "Open Source":
http://technology.nasa.gov/NASA_Software_Catalog_2014.pdf
He also included a link to this site with truly open source NASA
software:
http://code.nasa.gov/project/
While I was disappointed with NASA's response regarding their "open
source" program, at least they pointed me to the NASA software catalog
and a site with actual open source software.
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 128, Issue 18
***************************************
Note that the article to which you originally referred was from Wired. I
almost didn't bother opening it for that reason - Wired has become the
National Inquirer of the tech world, IMHO - flashy headlines, questionable
content. So it doesn't surprise me that the nature of the release was not
as advertised. -- Ian
--
Ian S. King, MSCS ('06, Washington)
Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School
University of Washington
Madness takes its toll - please have exact change.