On 9 Jan 2007 at 12:39, Jay West wrote:
*grin* I have no sound logical basis for this.
I suspected as much!
Purely subjective gut reaction to the admittedly tiny
amount of exposure
I've had to it.
Fair enough, but you must have examples that provoked that reaction.
Most OS's that I first look at... because I've
had lots of exposure to
lots of other OS's... there is some amount of "oh, yeah, that makes
sense...."
Such as typing "awk" to invoke your string manipulator? :-)
I do not get that sense with RTE for some reason.
I'll mention two things I found non-intuitive with RTE (I'm speaking of the
early RTEs, not the later ones that grafted on Unix commands verbatim).
First, there's no default command interpreter. When you boot RTE, it says,
"SET TIME," and then it just sits there with no prompt (rather like logging
into TSB; I always found the lack of a command prompt disturbing).
Second, when you finally learn that you have to "interrupt the system"
(from doing what?) in order to get a prompt to enter a command, you find
that there are no commands that deal with files. None. RTE has a file
management package and associated command interpreter, but it's run as one
of many user programs. Once you get the file manager running, though, you
have a prompt and the usual assortment of file-manipulation commands (list
directories, copy files, edit, compile, etc.).
At least the command names are mnemonic, rather than whimsical. :-)
Actually, I was interested in your comment because I wondered whether RTE
seemed odd to you compared to _current_ operating systems, or whether it
seemed odd in the context of systems of the 1970s.
-- Dave