14 May
2010
14 May
'10
8:18 a.m.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Brian Lanning <brianlanning at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Liam Proven
<lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
Well, quite.
To be honest, I've not tried my Miggy 1200 in 4-5 years, but it was
fine when I last tried it, and it was pushing 20 then. I tend to find
1980s machines last better than 1990s / early noughties mass-produced
low-quality PCs.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven ? LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? ICQ: 73187508
Is it me or is it just a little odd that PJ finds
it so gosh-wow
AMAZING that a 24-year-old Amiga still works?
I was going to mention that. ?It's interesting to me that the later
amigas have been actually less reliable than the 1000 because of
leaking caps and that crappy battery. ?Cars have made it much (much)
longer than that and still worked, why not computers?