Good point!
It seems to be a bit like the aircraft preservation people. One of
everything but nothing flies. I just hate that. If something was built to
run and can run again with out damage it should.
So do I.
It's also worth think about what the 'damage' could be (in the case of a
classic computer, an aircraft is rather different :-)). Ok, some
irreplacable chip fails. But that will not damage the appearance of the
machine, so even after that you still have an artefact to put in a glass
case. And the chips will fail with time whether you use them or not (they
will fial sooner if you use them, most likely, but even if they are not
powered upo their life ie by no means infinite!). You might as well run
the machine while you can...
I have a book on antique clock repairing that basically says the worst
thing you can do with a (common-ish) antique clock is give it to a
museum. It will never be run again, it probably won't go on show (most
museums have many more artefacts than they have space to display) and so
on.
I feel the same way about classic computers. I'd rather they were in the
hands of enthusiasts who can run them
As to volunteering, it's clear that many of us
would spend as much time
traveling to BP as they would doing something useful whilst there. Not to
mention the cost.
I volunteered at BP for a time some years ago. I gave up when I realised
that seveal of their policies were not conducive to getting machines
working _or_ keeping them in the original state. I found it more
rewarding to work on my own stuff...
-tony