21 Feb
2012
21 Feb
'12
1:32 a.m.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
Much much faster and lower power for multiple low
latency coupled tasks
Right. So call me ignorant, and give me some examples of multiple low
latency coupled tasks that can't be easily implemented as a single low
latency task. Why do you need 2+ cores talking to each other? Why not 1
core that is 2+ times as fast?
Alexey