10 Dec
2003
10 Dec
'03
9:22 a.m.
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 08:42, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
To me, it's pointless to create a design
that's arbitrarily limited to
just one encoding scheme if you don't have to. When you can simplify
the design *and* make it more universal, why not?
To this end, it seems reasonable to have the simulator be given some
knowledge of the thing being simulated, for example, the bit transition
timestamp (delta-T between transitions) could be a small value, and a
DIPswitch (real or virtual) set the granularity (100K/ 1M/
10M/bits/sec), that sort of thing. Generic-enough variables to handle
all or some vast percentage of possible drives.