fwiw, I made
my own format when I archived all my old tapes. [...]
congratulations, you
reinvented .tap format.. badly.
Now, now, no need to be harsh. I daresay this format was intended for
purposes somewhat different from .tap's and thus its tradeoffs were
made differently.
I invented a similar slightly different format myself, once (it was to
represent tapes in a software-simulated tape drive; it was much like
the format whose description I cut, above, except that each record had
its length after as well as before it, to make backward skips easy -
something not important and not worth spending storage space on if
you're just trying to archive existing tapes' data).
how did you handle unreadable blocks.
Quite possibly not at all, since it appears to have been intended for
archiving readable tapes.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B