There are 2 specific places I don't use
[compact fluorescent lights]
-- one is over the lathe (I am worried about a possible stroboscopic
effect making the machine appear stationary when it's not)
I actually wouldn't worry about that, for two reasons: (1) they have a
relatively long "on" time (partly the long-persistence phosphor, partly
the width of the mains voltage peak), and thus a rotating lathe, even
if rotating at a multiple of the strobe rate, will look blurred rather
than stationary, and (2) anyone who depends solely on the appearance of
the moving parts to tell whether a lathe is on is so stupid as to have
no business near power machinery in the first place (look at the power
switch, listen for the motor, find a smooth rotating part and touch it
lightly, the ways to tell are legion).
Most lathes (including mine) have a clutch between the motor and the
chuck. The idea is you keep the motor running most of the time, engage
the clutch when you actually want to do something ;-). So the part could
be stationary even if the motor is running. OK, that's fail-safe (if the
motor is silent, the machine certainly isn't turning), but a lot of the
time you throw the clutch out, measure something with a micrometer, then
let the clutch in again, so you tend not to notice the motor sound.
And of course you test by touching a smooth part first. And then one day
you forget and get caught by one of the chuck jaws or something. Yes, it
_is_ stupid. I admit it's stupid. But I like to have all the clues I can
have.
-tony