> The state
of the art in VoIP and cellular is *better* than POTS lines.
Calling BS on this.
In practice, the delay/bufferbloat, crap echo
cancellation and lossy compression w/ all the in-use codecs sound
like ass compared to a clean AMPS or POTS line.
"The state of the art" does not mean using crap echo cancellers and
crap codecs. Do that and, yes, you will get crap sound. But use POTS
over bad copper, with an el-cheapo phone, and you will get bad sound
out of it too.
I have to agree with you that the best VoI (and cellular) have to offer
is worse than the best POTS has to offer. But, in each case, that best
is very rarely attained, and in any case is so good that most people
can't tell the difference between them; on decent-quality (not the top
of the line but not the made-in-Taiwan el-cheapo crap either) gear, I
find VoI will usually lose to POTS on short-haul calls and beat it on
the long haul (I'm not really competent to comment on cellular).
I have personal experience with this; one of my employers does, among
other things, VoI, and I have been the principal tech behind their
offerings for almost as long as they've offered them. And, now, my
home phone is VoI on their system, in a city two hours' drive away from
them (ping says only about 24ms RTT, but it is still over long-haul
links). The codec they use is not quite the null codec, but close - it
uses u-law range compression, but nothing more than that. It eats
64Kbps of network per direction, but in practice, for their target
market, that is not an issue. (They don't go after the mass-market
individual end user, more small-to-medium businesses.)
Specifications wise, the audio bandwidth would be
better (because of
the lossy compression), and if you could get the delay down to
something lower than transatlantic, it _should_ sound better, but to
find this in the real world is rare.
Your "real world" is very different from mine. Network delay large
enough to be human-perceptible on our system is notably rare, and the
sound is usually quite good. But, as I mentioned in a previous post,
we also generally don't sell low-end phones.
> Is the state-of-the-art [in VoI] actually
full-duplex instead of
> "first talker mutes the other guy.."?
Yes.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B