4 Apr
2012
4 Apr
'12
8:25 a.m.
I'd say zoomfloppy, simply because of nibtools, which is the most feature-rich for
commodore disks I've found.especially where copy-protection is involved.
And, the fact it can write images back to disk gives it a distinct advantage.
this is only for commodore style disks, other platforms would have their preferred
tool(s).
Dan.
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:15:28 -0400
From: keithvz at verizon.net
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: KryoFlux and Commodore Disks
for those of us who arent that familiar with all the mentioned
products,which obvious winner would it be?
Keith.
On 4/4/2012 10:19 AM, Dan Gahlinger wrote:
>
> those are very different from commodore disks,someone already mentioned commodore
have up to 40 tracks,what about half-tracks, and copy-protected disks?
> will they read v-max disks?commodore software got heavily into copy protection,like
rapidlok, and worse in the later days
> I think if you did a feature by feature comparisoncatweasel vs Diskferret vs
KryoFlux vs Zoomfloppythe winner would be obvious.
> Dan.