> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
<> >Any other AM29xx chips on it, like a 2909 or 2910 sequencer? Or is this
<> >just a demo board for a 4-bit ALU chip?
<> >
<> >It sounds like a really interesting find, though. The 29xx series chips
<> >were interesting devices that have been used in all sorts of machines.
<>
<>
<> Yep, there is a 2909 on board too....
<
<Ah, so there's a sequencer. And presumably, therefore, there's some kind
<of control store (ROM or RAM) on the output of that. So it sounds like
<it's a complete processor, albeit a small one.
How small depends on the microcode. It could easily be PDP8 or Nova
emulation with one 2901 though it would be slow. I've seen at one commercal
design that use it as a fast version of TMS1000 4bitter.
It's an interesting chip. I have a bunch of the raw 2901C and 2911 parts.
One day when I have time I'd like to try an extended wordlength PDP-8 like
machine using them. Say something obcenely long like 20 or 32bits. After
all working with that chip 8bits or 80 is as easy from the microcode
perspective. Besides it's the microcontroller that is the complex part.
Allison
>Anyone remember these? Are there copies?
<
<There was a Byte Press book "Threaded Interpreted Languages"
<from back then. I have it on the shelf at the office, if you
<want the ISBN number.
Thats it. The ISBN number is likely useless by now. The articles
were supposed to get you to a working language but I never saw them
all.
I've been thinking about languages and OSs and building one for myself
figuring what I'd seen back then may help. I'm still leaning toward OS/8
RTS-8 as models. Target cpu is of course z80. Though DEC T-11 would make
a good forth engine.
Allison
Still in need of a copy of the docs for an IBM/Lexmark 4033-001 token
ring printer server box. I have 5 units to add to a non-profit group's
network son and without them I'll likely be stabbing in the dark. Each
unit has it's own unique address on the label but I still need either
text, xerox, pdf, or something to go on. Any help is appreciated.
Russ Blakeman
IT Techie
Clarkson, KY
Hi,
After having so many people interested in the Cypher F880 op/maintenance
manual, I spent a couple of hours scanning it tonight (er...last night),
and put it online:
http://www.retrobytes.org/docs/cipher/
I indicated "most of them" in the subject because I haven't found a
satisfactory way to scan the engineering diagrams, which include
schematics and detailed breakdowns, yet. They are 11" x 17" and are very
finely detailed. My Ricoh IS430 will only scan that large at a max 400dpi,
which is still too coarse to show the details legibly (esp. the
schematics) and I think my solution is going to be to scan them in 2
letter-size pieces at 600dpi.
Also, in scanning the illustrated parts breakdown figures, many of which
are also 11" x 17", I scanned them as 2 8.5" 11" pages and included them
inline in the proper section. I have, however, also provided them
seperately in their original 11" x 17" form as well, you can't miss 'em.
I'll try to get the engineering figures up tomorrow; in the meantime, hope
this stuff helps someone!
Cheers,
Aaron
I have a MicroVAX 3100 on which I intend to install NetBSD and a 2000
with a trashed VMS installation.
Is there a way I can create a backup of the VMS installation on the 3100
which I can restore to the 2000, bearing in mind that it probably has a
much smaller hard disk?
--
Regards
Pete
> If anyone out there doesn't think sorting 1000 signed integers
>in 6.8 millisecs isn't fast, code it up on your PC and
>see how fast it is.
It depends a lot on the algorithm you use in the sort, of course :-).
I believe it's in _Numerical Recipes_ that possibly the worst sort
algorithm of all is disucssued: "Bogosort":
1. Take the list of numbers you want to sort.
2. Randomly reorganize them.
3. Check to see if they're sorted. If not, go back to step 2.
This is a Order(n*factorial(n)) algorithm. I've tried, but I've been
unable to come up with anything worse.
For your example of 1000 numbers, it'd take (assuming that each operation
takes a microsecond) about 10^2554 years to complete.
I think the only reason they discuss Bogosort is to emphasize that
just because Bubble Sort is the example used in lots of introductory
classes, that doesn't mean that you should ever actually use it for
anything :-). (Pre-RT-11 5.7 DIR/SORT notwithstanding, of course!)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
At 18:55 01-03-2000 -0500, Bear Stricklin wrote:
<snip>
>The drive is an Archive 5945L-2. What is the significance of this; how
>similar is it to other, older Archive QIC units, what interface did they
>use (it and a similar Archive QIC unit in one of my Convergent NGEN
<snip>
The 5945L series is, if I recall, QIC-02 interface. The local used PC
place near me has a couple of the old 'L' series with intact rollers. If
you'd like, I can see if I can snarf them (probably). They'd be yours for
shipping, pretty much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
In case there is anyone interested in such a machine, I just got
mail from someone who told me that he has seen a VAX6000 which is
otherwise going to be dismantled and discarded... but it is
in Brazil.
If anyone wants it, can afford to ship it, or lives closer to where
it is... contact the I&T people at 55212776000 (that's all I have).
I've asked the person who send me the info to send me anything further
info he can find out...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Howdy;
Last night I discovered with no small amount of chagrin that the rubber
capstan in the Symbolics' QIC drive had turned to proverbial goo.
Fortunately the Genera distribution tape I used to discover this is only
superficially damaged, since it's my only copy. That'll teach me. (:
Anyway, I hoped to take the capstan out of a newer Archive QIC and just
replace the whole assembly, but they are mechanically dissimilar just
enough so this won't work. Enough of the original rubber is gone that I
have no indication of what the original diameter of the capstan is.
The drive is an Archive 5945L-2. What is the significance of this; how
similar is it to other, older Archive QIC units, what interface did they
use (it and a similar Archive QIC unit in one of my Convergent NGEN
machines both use the same, 50-ish conductor IDC edge-connectors), and how
likely is it that this is a common drive?
I need to find out what the thickness of rubber in the capstan (and/or its
full outside diameter) is so I can begin considering how to repair this.
Thoughts, comments, musings? Tony, I think this might be just up your
alley. (:
ok
r.
<he provider, but they use AT&T for content and Sprint for the backbone. Wh
<I first got it, it was like having my own T1 for $40 per month. As they add
<more and more people, they began throttling the rates to fit more slots, an
<now limit uploads to 128K.
I've heard similar in this area. Also to get the bargan rate they want it
all and I'm not comforablt with them being the broker for phone, cable and
internet and they own little if any of the wire.
<You can't put a server on the line, several have tried and they've been kic
<off. They also forbid you to tunnel, although I occasionally do. Instead o
<tunneling through the $40 cable, they want you to buy @work, which is
Of course thats exactly what I'd want (or a IP masqurading router) and
also to hang my whole net here on it (vaxen, PCs and whatnot).
Allison