Anyone have the datasheet for this chip?
I've got one chip + 1 ROM that isn't either of the usual speech
ROMs. This was supposed to have been pulled from a telephone
answering machine.
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
I've got 16 Hitachi HN27C1025HG-85 EPROMs on a board I just salvaged from
a photocopier. I figure these would be useful to someone. Any interest?
Make an offer...
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
In 1977 I started out with an 11/35 with 4 RK05 drives. System was on
one pack, programs on another pack, data was stored on 2 packs.
Software was hard coded to look for 2 Megs of data files at a time.
When we got the RP04 we made it look like 20 RK05's to the application
software.
In about 1980 our R&D lab had upgraded from a PDP11/35 to a PDP11/70
system with one RP04. We were in a computer room in the middle of a
warehouse, when we asked for more AC they said we could have an
additional air conditioner.
About a week later a sawsall blade came through the wall of the computer
room as they cut a hole for a new window air conditioner. The output
side was in the general warehouse space!
We were a little mad because nobody warned us about the dust flying into
the computer room. We shutdown until the AC was installed. It did cool
the room down a lot.
Only having one RP04 was a problem. Whenever a backup was scheduled I
took the system pack and the backup pack in the back of my Toyota to
another computer room a mile away so that I could do a standalone
backup.
Nothing like walking across the parking lot with the system disk in one
hand and the backup copy in the other. I was careful not to drop either
pack.
Later we thought about getting a VAX 11/730 but decide the 11/70 was
fast enough.
Mike
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 04:42:39 +0100 (BST)
From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Re: Pro-Log M422 4040/4004 System Analyzer
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <m1BLwG3-000JAXC@p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
> I have been wanting to play with it, but it seems that anything that
> could be done with an 8085 could be done with a PIC and in one package...
You want to make a Radio Shack Model 100 in a single package using a PIC?
Rather you than me!
-tony
It probably wouldn't be that difficult, with the overblown versions of the PIC that are availble today - 64KRAM/ROM access aren't difficult, it seems.
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Are you still looking for a tray and controller;
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=2662&item=31914004…
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is from MNPA whose registered office is at Ashcombe House, The Crescent,
Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 8LQ.
CAUTION: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended
for use only by the addressee. Any unauthorised dissemination or copying of this
e-mail, and any use or disclosure of information contained in it is strictly
prohibited and may be illegal. Please notify by reply e-mail if this e-mail has
been sent to you in error and delete it together with any backups on your systems
immediately.
While attachments are virus checked, MNPA does not accept any liability in respect
of any virus which is not detected.
Opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of MNPA shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My ability to search the web is hampered by poor sat comms right now, so I'd
like to ask if anyone knows where to purchase an ICL7660 negative voltage
supply chip? My Basicon MC-1N is apparently missing it, but RS-232 comms
being as loose as they are, I can still talk to it even though there's no
negative comms voltage.
Thanks for any pointers,
-ethan
--
Ethan Dicks, A-130-S Current South Pole Weather at 04-May-2004 23:10 Z
South Pole Station
PSC 468 Box 400 Temp -81.4 F (-63.0 C) Windchill -160.3 F (-106.9 C)
APO AP 96598 Wind 19.3 kts Grid 013 Barometer 674.8 mb (10824. ft)
Ethan.Dicks(a)amanda.spole.gov http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html
I acquired a dead VT52 DecScope today and I am going to attempt
to revive it. I have a copy of the VT52 maintenance manual. I
am also getting a second one that "lights up" in about a week.
I am hoping to be able to create at least one functional VT52.
Does anyone here have any experience repairing a dead VT52
DecScope? When I apply power, I hear a mild hum coming from
the transformer area, but there is nothing on the screen..
no cursor, no raster. I just turned it on this evening and
have not followed through the debugging information in the
manual. One thing I did notice is that the manual talks
about a fuse on the back. There is no fuse on mine, but I
do see what appears to be a circuit breaker button on the
right side near the on/off switch.
Any ideas from experienced folk would be welcome!
Thanks,
Ashley
>never mind - stiction it is... I got the bottom board off the drive and
>managed to free up the spindle by hand, it now seems to spin up properly
>by itself...
I have a little story about Stiction ... this is not "cyber legend", this
actually happened, and I was the one who did it!
Way back, sometime in the mid to late 80's, when this stuff was not cheap or
easy to come by, somebody gave me a dead Lapine "Titan" hard drive - I think
it was a 20meg drive. The drive just wouldn't spin up at all.
I tried the "shake and bake" technique, rotating it back and forth about the
spindle axis during power up etc. - no dice, the drive just would NOT spin
up.
So, "this is trash --- lets look inside".
Popped the top off, and immediately discovered that the platters did not want
to turn. On closer inspection, I discovered that the head did not want to budge
>from the platter surface, and came to the conclusion that the head was stuck
to the platter.
Memory is a bit dim on exactly what I did, however during my fooling around the
head eventually came lose, and I could spin the platter - there was a discolored
spot which had been under the head - it was slightly rough due to a bit of
surface corrosion or deposits.
I don't recall why, but "just for kicks", I took a fine cloth, polished the spot
on the platter (IIRC it was still discolored, but I removed the surface deposits).
Blew out the drive with a bit of air, and put the top back on, and installed it
in a machine to "see what would happen".
Not suprisingly the drive spun up right away. So, I low-level formatted the drive
and ran a test --- then I got a suprise --- NO ERRORS!
This was interesting "I wonder how long it will last", so I left it running surface
scans overnight --- in the morning --- NO ERRORS!
So I used it for "non critical" data - months went by and I never got a disk error.
Eventually I gave the machine to a company I worked for who used it as a lab/test
machine, and when I left the place a few years later, it was still going and to my
knowlege had never gotten an error.
"Clean room ... we don't need no steeenking clean room".
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Has anyone seen an altair 8800 with a circular keylock power switch, I
would like to track down the bastard
that ripped me off a long time ago.
This was in Oregon, 20 years from before, He ripped off a bunch of other
people, IMHO, Jim Willing and Mike Boyd.
His position was last reported in Eugene, that was years ago.
Jim Davis.
At 20:40 06/05/2004 +0000, you wrote:
>
>I know very little about these machines, but one just turned up on the
>doorstep for the museum. Power supply checks out, I get a white display
>(so something useful looks to be happening in the video circuitry), but
>I get no spin-up from the hard disk (A Seagate ST-157 SCSI drive) and a
>steady floppy drive light.
>
>I'm not sure if the hard disk is fixable yet - no idea if it's a head
>crash or whatever. There seems to be little about these drives on the
>web, but I did see one comment that they were famous for stiction - in
>which case maybe I can give it a hand in spinning up...
>
>Does anyone have install media if it comes to that though? I can always
>drop a different SCSI drive in it (I think I have a spare 160MB drive
>somewhere), but I don't have any floppies for this machine and I gather
>they never were particularly common, sitting somewhere between the ST
>and the Falcon...
>
>cheers
>
>Jules
Try putting a blank 720K MS-DOS formatted diskette in the floppy drive.
I don't have intimate experience with the TT030 (haven't found one yet), but I
believe it has the operating system in ROM, just like the ST series, which I do
know fairly well.
I do know that with my ST machines, the screen just shows "white" unless there is
a diskette in the drive. Then the system will come up. The ST (and I believe the
TT) uses a FAT format, and can read/write DOS disks - a blank formatted disk works
on the ST, so I'm guessing it might work on the TT as well.
Failing that, I do know someone locally with a TT030 who might be able to send an
install disk image...
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>Anyone got any pretty audio or video demos which will work on the TT030
>machines? (probably not...) Were any games ever produced for them?
>(Again, probably not :-)
Does the TT run ST software?
If so, I've got a few games and other software.
If you want to try, I can email you a few 720k diskette images - you can
make the disks on a PC.
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>Do you
>think Timbuktu would lag on a GB ethernet setup?
I meant to put this on the other email... sorry.
I'm not sure where the lag is happening in Timbuktu. What I find isn't so
much a delay in things happening, so much as it is a delay in me seeing
it. If I click something that should beep, it beeps pretty much right
away... however, if there should also be a window pop open, I won't see
the window open until a good half second or more later.
And I don't notice that the lag is too much worse over a slower
connection (dialup and DSL). So it may just be the way Timbuktu deals
with sending the screen draws.
Also, it seems easy to get ahead of it. If you move the mouse too fast,
it won't show you where it has gone, and then it jumps. So you end up
moving slower so you can target correctly rather than constantly jumping
around the screen hoping to get the right spot. And you have to click
slower or it will accept it as a double click or ignore additional clicks.
None of it is that far off. Maybe by half a second. But when you are
doing long, repetative things, those half seconds add up fast.
Since I can't say that I notice a huge difference in the lag when there
is a huge difference in bandwidth, then I tend to think the lag may be
elsewhere. Either in the remote machine's ability to processes
everything, or in Timbuktu's limit of displaying or sending/receiving the
data.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>Is there any reason an ADB KVM can't be used in this setting?
Only because I toggle between the two often. I think flipping a switch
back and forth will get annoying. I'm not sure that sliding the mouse
across the top of the menu bar won't also... but I just have a feeling
that will be less annoying (mostly because I currently use two monitors
on my one Mac, and already move the mouse between screens all the time,
and I don't find it the least bit annoying, so to me, I just think it
will be like having an additional screen to work on, that just happens to
have the processing happening on another computer).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>That doesn't mean there's no lag (you say "because"). Try it over a
>satellite link, or a slow dialup, sometime.
Oh very very true, over a slow connection.
I know I used it in the past over a localtalk network, and it worked
without lag. Simply because there wasn't enough data being pushed to be
an issue. I'm sure over a slower connection that wouldn't hold true.
However, because this software does NOT push the screen image of the
remote machine back to the primary Mac... you really wouldn't use it over
anything other than a LAN. You need to be able to see the monitor
physically connected to the remote Mac to use it. All this does is allows
you to bypass using a different keyboard and mouse.
>Of course, this does mean that the two machines in question are almost
>certain to be connected by a low-latency high-enough-bandwidth link....
Exactly. Since the machine is unlikely to be more than a few feet away,
you can use Localtalk at the very least, which in my past use, was
sufficient bandwidth (I ran it on a 25 MHz 68040 over localtalk
connecting to a 100 MHz PPC 603 laptop... now I want to use it on a 400
MHz G3 connecting to a 250 MHz PPC 603e over 10Mbs ethernet... so I'd
assume there will be no lag as well... there is only minor lag in
Timbuktu which does FAR FAR more)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
It had been taken before, but I checked recently and found that whoever
registered hp1000.org had let it expire, so I snagged it! :)
Now I got hp2000.org and hp1000.org. Woohoo! Excuse my happy snoopy dance.
Now if I can just find someone who knows html to create a webite for it.. ;)
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>I think we experimented with something like that years back. What we had
>was called Timbucktu (spelling?)
I probably should have mentioned in my original post that I am attempting
to replace Timbuktu.
Timbuktu does a fine job, EXCEPT that I find there to be enough of a lag
that it gets on my nerves when I use it thru the day.
The software I'm looking for was the software equivelent of a KVM switch,
without the V. There was no lag, because all that was being done was
sending the keyboard and mouse commands to the remote machine. You still
viewed the remote machine on its own monitor.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hello Fred van Kempen,
I've seen your post quite some time ago about your problem with the
"locked" battery of the Dec HiNote Ultra.
You wrote that is was kind of "locked" and that DEC came up with a small
tool to "revive" it.
I now have the same problem with my notebook. It doesn't charge...even
in the small LCD-display at the right of the display-chassis the
battery-icon is not displayed. But I can not find this small tool which
should bring up my battery again. The url (revive.com) seems to be replaced.
Could you please help me with a hint or something? That would be very nice.
best regards
Matthias Bauchinger
PS.: Sorry for posting it to several email-adresses...was not sure which
one would work.
PPS.: Your old post:
Ha! DEC noticed a problem with these battery packs "locking up"
after extensive periods of no activity, so they came up with a
small utility (revive.com) to "revive" the batt pack. It worked,
too.. my battery came back to life, and, after a full charge, is
as good as were it new.. !
Lappy is not a portable, ultra-light TCP/LAT/Serial/X11 terminal :)
(muhaha, with 802.11b WLAN ;-)
Cheers,
Fred
I was wondering how much information is around on the
microprocessors HP built in the late 70's/early 80's
I found some information on the MC2 in the Osborne processor
books from '79, and it appears an MC5 is used as the maint
processor in the HP3000 Series 44.
Anyone know what processor is used in the HP64000? One note
on Usenet claimed it was an Inmos part?
Hello,
I came across a screening of 'Wargames', with a presentation afterwards
about the computers and hacks used in the film ... and I was just blown
away by the front panel of the IMSAI :)
Do you know of any programmable computer today which has a programmable
front panel? Are there maybe some machines for education? Or are there
classic computers which have this feature and are less rare (and
expensive) than the IMSAI?
thanks!
Gottfried Haider
PS: Please CC me as I am going to unsubscribe soon.
Once upon a time I had a program for the Mac, older program (System 7
era) that allowed you to "tunnel" your keyboard and mouse to another mac.
The way it worked was, you would move the mouse to the top corner of the
screen, above the Apple menu, and "push" thru to another screen. It would
then move your keyboard and mouse control to another Mac. Basically, it
worked as a software KV switch (no M as it required you to have a monitor
on the other Mac).
I've been unsuccessful in turning up a copy of this program in my
archives. Partly hampered by not remembering what it was called.
Does anyone remember what this software was, and do they have a copy they
can send me?
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
you can buy a IMSAI II new at www.imsai.net which is a second generation copy of the original IMSAI.
best regards, Steve Thatcher
-----Original Message-----
From: Gottfried Haider <gohai(a)gmx.net>
Sent: May 6, 2004 8:04 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: looking for a computer with front panel
Hello,
I came across a screening of 'Wargames', with a presentation afterwards
about the computers and hacks used in the film ... and I was just blown
away by the front panel of the IMSAI :)
Do you know of any programmable computer today which has a programmable
front panel? Are there maybe some machines for education? Or are there
classic computers which have this feature and are less rare (and
expensive) than the IMSAI?
thanks!
Gottfried Haider
PS: Please CC me as I am going to unsubscribe soon.
At 14:04 06/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I came across a screening of 'Wargames', with a presentation afterwards
>about the computers and hacks used in the film ... and I was just blown
>away by the front panel of the IMSAI :)
>
>Do you know of any programmable computer today which has a programmable
>front panel? Are there maybe some machines for education? Or are there
>classic computers which have this feature and are less rare (and
>expensive) than the IMSAI?
>
>thanks!
>Gottfried Haider
>PS: Please CC me as I am going to unsubscribe soon.
It ain't exactly "inexpensive", but they are producing a series-2 IMSAI:
http://www.imsai.net/products/imsai_series_two.htm
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Hi,
Does anyone have any recollections or information
about the DTC MicroFile? Data Terminals and
Communications made it. It's a piece of furniture
on wheels, contains a box with a dual 8" floppy drive and
appears to be designed to sit in between a terminal
and a daisywheel printer -- a primitive word processor?
Haven't had a chance to crack the box open yet, and am
curious if anyone has any concrete information.
Cheers
Brian
>From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
>
>> Why
>> should they make computers that are so heavy?
>
>Or the corrolary to that... why should they make computers that require 220
>3-phase!
>
>J
Most 3 phase is 208, not 220.
Dwight
On May 5, 14:31, Tom Uban wrote:
> At 03:22 PM 5/5/2004 -0400, Ashley Carder wrote:
>
> >Does anyone here currently have a functioning RK05 drive?
> >Has anyone here ever brought one back from the dead?
>
> Yes, I have one which I brought back from the dead by replacing
> the foam, NiCd batteries, debugging the boards, etc.
I had two on an 11/40 that hadn't been used in between 10 and 15 years.
They needed the dust and disintegrated foam vacuumed out, the NiCads
replaced, some replacement foam (some was draught sealing strip from
the hardware shop, some was foam sheet from an upholsery shop) and a
bit of TLC (soapy water and elbow grease for the casing, reseating the
boards, etc) but they worked fine. The packs also were fine; some had
been kept in ziploc covers, some not. The drives are now on an 11/34
which will probably end up running RSTS (the 11/40 used to run RT-11).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
A couple of months ago I found a DEC computer with a front panel. Then I
found a second one a few weeks ago. The panels are painted in two tone blue
Tekronix colors. I finally got around to photograghing one of the front
panels today. I'm posting a picture of it at
<http://www.classiccmp.org/hp/dec-k/cp1160.jpg>. Sorry but I haven't
cleaned it up. It's also missing two switch handles. The first one was
marked as being a 11/35FC but I don't remember seeing a model number on the
2nd one.
Joe
Hello,
I came across a screening of 'Wargames', with a presentation afterwards
about the computers and hacks used in the film ... and I was just blown
away by the front panel of the IMSAI :)
Do you know of any programmable computer today which has a programmable
front panel? Are there maybe some machines for education? Or are there
classic computers which have this feature and are less rare (and
expensive) than the IMSAI?
thanks!
Gottfried Haider
PS: Please CC me as I am not subscribed to the list.
There used to be a program called The Network Eye which let you remotely
control one computer from another over a LANtastic network.
Does such a program exist for MS-DOS over TCP/IP? Preferably, the client
would be Windows based.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
On May 4, 19:11, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 May 2004 17:54, Tony Duell wrote:
> > There is no such thing as ground!.
>
> Sure, there is. It's the voltage potential present on a long
electrode
> inserted into the earth. :)
Measured with respect to what? That wire dangling from your kite, Mr
Franklin? :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> That's what you'd think but it isn't the case. 9825s in paricular are
> nearly indestrucable but I have constant problems with all of the 9845s.
In 1979 I did a data-logging project at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in
central Washington. We had 6 or 7 trailers that collected ground water
measurement on HP 9825s (using the built in tape drive.) The measurement
equipment was connected via HP-IB.
The power was from a mobile generator. Every time the air conditioner
started the line voltage would dip about 25 volts.
This test ran for over a year with out a single failure. I was impressed.
In the spring of 1980 the place was thick with grasshoppers. They would get
into the equipment it you let them. After Mount St. Helens dumped a foot of
ash on the place there wasn't a grasshopper to be found.
Michael Holley
www.swtpc.com/mholley
> I think the first one was the Portable (8088 w/ 256k, then the Portable
>II (smaller but still 8088 and 640K) then the Portable 286 (286 CPU and
>640k(?)), then the Portable III (the small lunchbox sized computer (I don't
>remember if theese were 286s or 386SXs)) and then the Portable 386 (it had
>a full fledged 386DX). FWIW I have a P-II sitting about five feet from me.
FWIW, the Portable III is a 286 machine. I have pictures of mine posted on
my site if anyone wants to see one.
If anyone has the original setup disk for the Portable III, I would love to
get an image of it - the "generic" AT setup disks work in that you can configure
the drives and get it to boot, however Compaq apparently "rolled their own"
checksum algorithm, as once configured with any of the generic disks, it gets a
CMOS Checksum error.
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Hello,
I was wondering if it's possible to use rom dump as binary program
(loaded with loadbin), perhaps with some "relocations" ?
(I have an HP86B and some CS-80 HD but no EMS roms)
Thanks in advance
I have a tape that contains the backup of a Macintosh 8100. I have tried to
use Retrospect to restore it but it doesn't recognize the tape as a valid
format.
I did a raw restore and the header does mention "Macintosh-BU1" and also
"BackUp- 01.74" The tape was made in 1995.
Anyone know what program I can use on my Mac to restore this tape?
-Ken V.
***************************************************************
This E-mail is confidential. It should not be read, copied, disclosed or
used by any person other than the intended recipient. Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying by whatever medium is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please contact the
sender immediately and delete the E-mail from your system.
***************************************************************
Ok, the post from Kevin reminds me of a VT220 question I've been wondering
for some time. Is there a "BREAK" key on the vt220 terminal???? I can't find
it, nothing is labelled "break". I'm not looking for a key combo that
interrupts a specific host platform like ^C or ^P or something, I want to
generate a real electrical "BREAK" signal via the keyboard. What is it?
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> On Mon, 3 May 2004, Scott Stevens wrote:
> > I ran Windows 3.1 on frighteningly underpowered machines for a long
> > time. My 8088 XT Clone ran Windows 3.1 in several configurations:
>
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Fred Cisin wrote:
> You were probably running 3.0!
> 3.1 requires extended memory (286)
IIRC, you DON'T need extended memory to run Win3.1 in "Standard" mode,
just "386 Enhanced" mode. Of course, "Standard" couldn't switch tasks
or do much of what people expect of Windoze now (except crash). I recall
the day I came back from the Rochester (NY) Hamfest with a $5 RAM board
that gave me a whole 1MB on top of my 640K and the chance to turn on the
Enhanced functions...
Bob Maxwell
- still running 3.1 on 486s at home -
Is there a source for new 8in floppy disks? New old stock is fine. I
just would like a box of unused blank disks.
Two reasons, first I have a STD bus computer with a Z80 CPU and dual 8in
drives (one that does not work) that I might like to play with. Second I
have an IBM S/34 that has an 8in drive and I need a box of disk for
someone to copy some disks for me...
-chuck
I picked up another load of early PC software last week. Everything was
in nearly new condition :-) :-) One of the things that I got was a
package of Lotus 123 version 2.01. It's marked as a Government Edition and
has an eagle of the disk labels. Anybody know what this is all about? The
manuals seem to be standard and don't say anything about it having
different features. However I'm thinking that it might be a
non-copyprotected version.
Joe
>>If anyone has the original setup disk for the Portable III, I would love to
>>get an image of it - the "generic" AT setup disks work in that you can
>configure
>>the drives and get it to boot, however Compaq apparently "rolled their own"
>>checksum algorithm, as once configured with any of the generic disks, it
>gets a
>>CMOS Checksum error.
>
> Mike Haas has has the setup disk. I gave it to him along with the P-IIIs
>that I had. The setup program should also be one several of the machines.
>FWIW I once found a third party setup program that worked on them. I don't
>remember the name of it but I'm pretty sure that it was put out by a
>company in Clearwater Florida that was later bought out by Quarterdeck. I
>may still have a copy of it or the Compaq setup program. I'll look and see.
>One thing to be aware of is that only the very first few drive table enties
>match that used by IBM so be carefull setting the hard drive type.
>
> Joe
Thanks Joe, however the one I downloaded from other instructions posted in this
thread appears to do the job, so no need to bother.
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I have a DEC VT102 terminal that I got some time ago from a listmember. On
the right of the keyboard where the numeric keypad is, the keys don't match
the color of the other keys on the keyboard. The upper left key in the
keypad is gold, and the other keys on the keypad are different colors - red,
blue, white - and have editing words on them, I think words like "left,
copy, print", something like that.
My question is - is it likely that someone scavenged keys from another
non-vt100 keyboard to replace missing keys, or was this some option used
with some word processing software? If the later, I'm happy I have something
unusual. If the former, I am going to yank those keycaps off and scavenge
the "correct" keys from one of the other VT100's I'm going to junk.
Anyone know the answer?
Thanks!
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
If anyone could help this woman out with the question of memory options for an original Compaq Portable, please do respond directly back to her, as well as to the list. Thanks, David
My, I'm just full of terminal questions...
I have a Televideo 910.. maybe it's a 950 but I think it said 910 on it.
When the terminal is just sitting there with stuff on the screen, no data is
being sent or received... it will suddenly flip to a "previous screen" all
by itself. I don't know if the terminal supports multiple pages of display
memory, but the symptom is as if it does support multiple display memory and
spontaneously all by itself it switches pages and I see data on the screen
that came by a while ago.
Can anyone point to a likely culprit that may be causing this? The terminal
itself is in perfect mint condition so I hate to get rid of it but this
problem is annoying!
Regards,
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
About a month ago I picked up what I thought were a couple of HP-IB
disk drives made by a compnay by the name of IEM of Ft. Collins Colorado. I
searched the net for information about them but didn't find anything
useful. I also posted message here asking about them but didn't get any
replies.
Last week I got one of my PCs up and running with a HP Hyper Viper card
(a HP 9000 300 computer on a card) in it so I decided to use it to check
out some of the HP-IB drives and such that have been piling up around here.
I found a couple of sites that said what kind of MO disks were supposed to
be used in the IEM MO drive but I didn't have the right ones so I stuck in
a HP MO disk that I had laying round. It worked! The system thinks the
drive is a HP 7935 with 404Mb capacity. Flip the disk over and you've got
another 404Mb to play with. Not bad!
The 2nd IEM drive turned out to be even stranger. In addition to the
HP-IB port it has what looked like a SCSI port on the back. It has a LCD
display on and it keeps saying off-line. There are also three buttons on it
marked Select, Next and Previous. Pressing the buttons did nothing except
make the display say "Next Pressed" etc. I finally turned it off then held
down the Select button and turned it on and it came up in a demo mode. It
says that it's a "Rewriteable Optical Jukebox Controller"!! It says that
it's compatible with the HP 1000, 3000, 9000, etc etc and that it is CS-80
and plug and play with MPE, HPUX, Pascal BASIC, RTE, etc etc. It also says
that it supports the C1700/C1701 HP Library System. So it's not a drive
after all. (I never opened it up, I just assumed that it was!) That also
explains why it has a SCSI connector on it.
Anybody here have any experience with optical jukeboxs?
I've done a lot of searching on the net for IEM but it appears that
they're long gone. I found phone numbers for them but didn't get an answer
on either one. I didn't find ANYTHING about the jukebox controler but found
a couple of sites that gave cross references for disks that can be used in
the MO drive. Of course I'm not using any of those disks but it's working!
Joe