Thanks for the info. I guess for this test I have to find a replacement
high-denisty drive. The drives in the unit are, apparently, high-density
drives but the disks are 360k disks made with another working system.
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Maslin [mailto:donm@cts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:41 AM
To: rcini(a)optonline.net; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic
Posts
Subject: Re: Teac floppy replacement
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> Hello, all:
>
> I'm trying to get my "new" Micromint SB180 to work with
> the floppy drives
> that came with it. I've been given two sets of disks, both of which were
> made on a known-working system but which produce read errors on mine.
>
> The drives pass the internal disgnostics that are in the
> SB180 ROM, but I
> want to eliminate the drive from the problem by swapping another in. It
> appears to use standard 5.25" 1/2-height PC drives except that the "old"
> drive has a head-load solenoid while the new one doesn't.
>
> The model number of the "old" drive is FD55F-03-U and the
> model number of
> the "new" drive is FD55BV-36-U. There are differences in the jumper
> designations between the models so I can't readily map the settings.
>
> Can anyone help with this? Thanks.
Rich, the 55F is a 96tpi drive while the 55BV is 48tpi. That
difference is likely the cause of your problem.
- don
>
> Rich Cini
> Collector of classic computers
> Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
> Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
> /************************************************************/
>
>
>
I picked up the Grid with no documentation. The device boots up and lets me choose an OS (either MS-DOS 2.11 with BIOS Version C or Version 134.1.4 GRiD-OS / Version 31.0.0 of Common Code).
If I boot into MS-DOS, I get an A: prompt. If I do a "dir" command, it brings up 3 files but that's it.
If I boot into the GRiD-OS, I can get to some menus, but then it needs a password to continue. Does anyone know a hack to bypass the password? Or does anyone have access to the GRiD-OS software so I can reinstall?
I would like to get this thing working but it is very difficult to find any information. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jeff
Hi
OK, I do have one that is going to be an unusual one
that is significant in its insignificance.
It is a SDK development machine for Intel's 2920 ( not to
be confused with AMD's 2920 of the 2900 family of parts ).
This was Intel's only attempt at the DSP market. It
is only unique in that it is rare enough that few even
know it existed. It was a time when Intel chose it's
direction to be a mostly X86 processor company and began
to leave the side markets alone ( for good or bad ).
There may be others out there but I've not seen any.
Dwight
While watching me struggle with the cards in my OSI C4P, someone at VCF
East (I can't remember who, sorry if it was you) suggested a product (I
can't remember what, I was a bit distracted) that they used to clean and
lubricate contacts. I just did a little googling and there seem to be
two "major" products: Stabilant 22 and DeoxIT. Anyone care to share
their experiences with either of these or make another recommendation?
Thanks,
Bill
*********************************
Hey Bill,
That was me - while DeoxIT is great for cleaning contacts, the lube I
told you about is Nygel - check out www.nyelubricants.com - which is
more like the Dow silicone that Dwight mentioned. It's especially good
on the pin-type connectors used for the SS-50/30 buses, OSI, etc. as
well as Heathkit H8 and H89. You could even use DeoxIT first to clean
the contacts. You won't believe the difference after you've applied an
appropriate lube.
best,
Jack
While watching me struggle with the cards in my OSI C4P,
someone at VCF East (I can't remember who, sorry if it
was you) suggested a product (I can't remember what, I
was a bit distracted) that they used to clean and lubricate
contacts. I just did a little googling and there seem to
be two "major" products: Stabilant 22 and DeoxIT. Anyone
care to share their experiences with either of these or make
another recommendation?
Thanks,
Bill
my job takes me a lot of different places. Two years ago, yes, TSA was not as organized or as efficient as today. They are doing a necessary job to keep planes flying and people going where they want to go. Due to the fact that I worked for TSA two years ago, I am very familiar with what they have gone through. Now, all you do is check your bags in and they open them only if their MRI machine spots something with enough mass to potentially be a problem. They don't make you wait in line much longer now than you did before TSA was there. Passenger screening is also very efficient at most large airports anyway. They started with the notes inside when they quit having you stand in front of them while they checked your bags. I haven't been through any in the last year that did it the old way.
As for it being BS, I disagree. I would rather have things safer than welcome another attack on US soil because things weren't being checked.
best regards, Steve Thatcher
-----Original Message-----
From: "Joe R." <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
Sent: Aug 6, 2004 7:02 PM
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Holy cow...
At 02:14 PM 8/6/04 -0700, you wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Joe R. wrote:
>
>> >You know when your bag was checked because the TSA puts a form in your bag
>> >saying they did.
>>
>> I beg to differ. I sat in Kansas City airport two years ago and spent
>> abut 3 or 4 hours with the security people and watched as they opened
>> numerous bags and I didn't see them put a sticker on ANY of them. Even when
>> flying and reclaiming baggage I've never seen one of those stickers.
>
>Have you flown recently?
No and I have no intentions of flying as long as this crap continues. I
have a very low treshold for BS! So don't expect to see me at VCF or
anywhere else if it involves flying.
Joe
At 02:51 PM 8/7/2004, you wrote:
>der Mouse, you obviously know nothing about what it takes to get a
>concealed weapons permit in the US. I have a concealed weapons permit and
>I also have done practical pistol shooting. I would not want untrained
>individuals putting my life at risk. Having a permit in the US does not
>require training or anything but the money and no criminal record. I did
>my training at different opportunities in my life and without any
>requirement to do so.
South Carolina requires training and has a written test and a shooting test
that people must pass before receiving a concealed weapon permit. Most
other states have training requirements also.
But, none of them are very arduous and yes many states don' t have training
requirements at all as you say.
But it really doesn't seem to matter.
The majority of people in the USA live in areas where good citizens can and
do legally carry concealed firearms,
even in places that serve alcohol.
And innocent people are just *not* being hurt by people with a concealed
weapon permit -- training or no training.
You're more likely to be hurt by a PC or an iPod (woman in Tennessee
killed her boyfriend with an iPod)
http://www.liquidgeneration.com/rumormill/ipod_killing.html
or by a police officer or government storm trooper than a citizen legally
carrying a concealed weapon.
You don't even *need* a permit to have a loaded handgun in your car in
South Carolina, Georgia, Flordia, North Carolina and Virigina.
Yet people aren't having shootouts in parking lots or on the highways.
Just the occasional rapist or carjacker being blown away is all you hear about.
I don't know what training people would think necessary to carry on an
airliner, but I'd be happy with anyone who could shoot a decent score on an
IPSC or IDPA classifier stage.
http://www.ipsc.org/ics/short/CLC-01.jpg
But training or not, Glaser Safety Slugs or not, I'd much rather be on a
flight where people with concealed weapons permits could carry
than one that could be splashed by some highly trained F16 pilot because
some bureaucrat, worried about "training" (read CYA), denied me the means
of effective self defense.
Until they start asking, "Carrying or Non-Carrying?", I'm like Joe, if I
can't drive, I likely won't go.
Ed
At 12:33 PM 8/7/04 -0400, Steve wrote:
>the last thing I would want is some average guy with a concealed weapons
permit having a gun on board... getting a permit is too easy and without
proper training would be more dangerous than safe.
Personally, I'd take my chances with a CWP holder over a hijacker ANYTIME!
Joe
I am considering having an exhibit at the next Vintage Computer Festival (7.0). I was wondering what the security is like for the exhibits. Do you need to packup up each night? I would like to here comment from those who were there (Computer History Museum) last year.
Michael Holley
www.swtpc.com/mholley
as I said, you can intrepret things in any way you choose and you certainly did with no personal knowledge of facts. You took words, created your own meaning of what I was saying just so you can say you are right - amazing.
end of thread...
-----Original Message-----
From: der Mouse <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca>
Sent: Aug 7, 2004 3:17 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Holy cow...
> der Mouse, you obviously know nothing about what it takes to get a
> concealed weapons permit in the US.
I didn't, no; nor did I need to, since my response was based on your
reaction, and thus your perception, rather than whatever the reality
behind it was.
> I would not want untrained individuals putting my life at risk.
> Having a permit in the US does not require training or anything but
> the money and no criminal record.
Sounds as though I was right, that your issue is with concealed-carry
permits themselves rather than with whether people with them are
allowed to have their weapons with them on aircraft.
Or do you think that a weapon in the hands of an untrained person is
somehow not dangerous anywhere but on an aircraft?
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
While cleaning out the workshop, I decided to plug in a few old Apollo
workstations.
I was eventually able to get one machine (DN4500?) to boot into the
Display Manager.
The major trick was, I had to set the calendar date back prior to Y2K,
otherwise the DM
program would crash with an 'unable_to_map' error message.
The Fuji SMD drive on my DN660 spun right up, and the 660 appeared to
boot, but I have
a minor video cable problem that prevented me from seeing the action
(other than on the disk
controller status leds).
Anyone interested in some Apollos?
der Mouse, you obviously know nothing about what it takes to get a concealed weapons permit in the US. I have a concealed weapons permit and I also have done practical pistol shooting. I would not want untrained individuals putting my life at risk. Having a permit in the US does not require training or anything but the money and no criminal record. I did my training at different opportunities in my life and without any requirement to do so.
With reagrds to before 9/11 and after, the paradigm shift is a fact and has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not people are allowed to carry weapons on a plane. People would have risen up and brought those first plaines down if they had a clue that the planes were going to be used as weapons and they were dead already so to speak.
You can take my views however you want to in any way you care to. It wasn't your country that was attacked and left thousands dead. You have already pointed out what you think of America and its people in one of your earlier emails
-----Original Message-----
From: der Mouse <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca>
Sent: Aug 7, 2004 12:39 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Holy cow...
Sounds to me as though your issue is with getting concealed-carry
permits rather than with having people on board who are, almost by
definition, trusted with concealed weapons.
It sounds to me as though this is more an argument to scrap the whole
idea of keeping weapons out of the hands of airline passengers (at
least while they are on the plane).
On Aug 7, 11:56, Ed Kelleher wrote:
> At 08:12 PM 8/6/2004, you wrote:
> >As for it being BS, I disagree. I would rather have things safer
than
> >welcome another attack on US soil because things weren't being
checked.
>
> Sorry, it is BS. If we wanted to make things safer, we'd let
citizens with
> concealed weapons permits carry guns on planes.
Not without some suitable training and glaser safety ammunition.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of John Honniball
> Sent: 03 August 2004 18:32
> To: General(a)encke.easily.co.uk;
> Discussion@encke.easily.co.uk:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: rarest computers. was: RE: Xerox Alto
> Restoration + Emulation
>
>
> Jules Richardson wrote:
> > Apple /// (possibly lots worldwide; there don't seem to be many
> > people this side of the pond who have seen one though)
>
> I have one! It came with the ProFile external hard disk, and
> a box of expansion cards, too. I rather like the two-click
> cursor keys, where you can press harder on the key to make
> the auto-repeat go faster. And I like the big holes in the
> expansion cards to help you to lever them out with a
> screwdriver. The whole of the machine chassis is one big
> diecasting and acts as a heatsink.
Yeah. I ended up with 2, one for spares, and it was a good job since I
was crashed into bringing it home and it ended up with a mashed
keyboard. Must get round to fixing it one of these days. I've also not
managed to get my spare profile working with the other working machine
yet, but it's 250 miles away and low priority :)
Cheers
--
adrian/witchy
owner & curator, Binary Dinosaurs - the UK's biggest online home
computer collection?
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the Museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - former gothic shenanigans
www.aaghverts.co.uk - the place to whinge at adverts!
the last thing I would want is some average guy with a concealed weapons permit having a gun on board... getting a permit is too easy and without proper training would be more dangerous than safe.
9/11 was a paridigm shift from hijacking being a "take me where I want to go scenario" to guaranteed death. I would believe that any passenger jet that was taken over by any means would not succeed now because of what passengers would do rather than sitting back and waiting. Those days are gone.
We all have different levels of tolerance, Some of the stuff is BS with regards to what coould be considered a weapon or even that 80 year old people were searched as possibilities. In my opinion, it is not all BS. What the puiblic hears about is a fraction of what goes on. What we do hear about, we have the giovernment and media all spinning the stuff in different directions.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Kelleher <Pres(a)macro-inc.com>
Sent: Aug 7, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Steve Thatcher <melamy(a)earthlink.net>,
"General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Holy cow...
At 08:12 PM 8/6/2004, you wrote:
>As for it being BS, I disagree. I would rather have things safer than
>welcome another attack on US soil because things weren't being checked.
Sorry, it is BS. If we wanted to make things safer, we'd let citizens with
concealed weapons permits carry guns on planes.
Ed
I just heard the very end of a TV news report, where they said some airport
terminal was shut down for hours today due to a bomb scare. They described the
potential bomb as a small, odd-looking box with wires and various electrical
parts. Then they said "It turned out to be an antique microphone."
Which makes me wonder... has anyone here ever had a problem explaining vintage
computers to airport security? When I flew out to VCF last fall I proactively
told the security officer that my bag contained vintage calculators and
handheld computers, in case it looked odd to her in the X-Ray machine, but she
looked at me with an expression of "Why the heck do you think I'd care?" LOL,
however that may be more of a comment on how poor the airport security hiring
rules are.
I'd like to hear some feedback, however, please let's NOT turn this into a
rambling thread about politics or any similar B.S....
Rumor has it that David V. Corbin may have mentioned these words:
> >eyeglass screwdrivers and even nail files were taken off the list later
>last year.
> >I'm glad to hear that. But they shouldn't have
>
>Just after 9/11, my son daughter-in-lay...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I gotta ask: Typo, Freudian slip or exact description of the situation? :-O ;^>
>[snip]...After they got home by son
>realized he had a swiss army knife in an inner coat pocket [a letal weapon
>compared to a baby's fork!] that was noit detected by the same guard at the
>same time.
Admittedly, I haven't flown since 9/11, but I flew just before that, and
airport security had no problem with my leatherman. I removed it where you
"remove all metallic objects" right with my belt, they asked me what it
was, I said "Pliers." No problem... 2 knife blades, a saw blade that could
easily rip off a finger (or jugular) or just adding weight to my punch to
give it more "punch." ;-)
<RANT>
At least for the US, what we need for "Midflight Security" is a revival of
the "minuteman" concept for flying. There should be a *totally volunteer*
photo ID system of anyone willing to lay down their life in defense of the
country[1], and they get to walk on with any type and quantity of
non-projectile weapon(s) of their choice.
"But what happens when a bad apple gets a card and tries to use it" you
ask? 10 "Good apples" could easily subdue the bad one, and said "bad apple"
is tried & convicted of treason and hanged[2][3].
Despite the fact that I'm old and fat, if I have my leatherman on me and
know that there's a darned good chance 5 more people have similar, I'd go
up against a couple of bastards with boxcutters...
</RANT>
Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
[1] World, for that matter...
[2] Or shot... I could live with shot... ;-)
[3] Assuming he survives... Attempting to hijack a plane with a bunch of
good guys with knives on board could prove fatal...
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger | "Bugs of a feather flock together."
sysadmin, Iceberg Computers | Russell Nelson
zmerch(a)30below.com |
At 08:59 PM 8/6/04 -0400, Steve wrote:
>eyeglass screwdrivers and even nail files were taken off the list later
last year.
I'm glad to hear that. But they shouldn't have been on the list to begin
with! That's one of my points, airport security is nothing but a show to
make the public think the government is actually doing somehting about
security. But all too much of it is meaningless and useless measures such
as this. Eyeglass screwderivers and nail files have never been a threat to
an airliner that I know of! BTW metal toothpicks ARE still on the list of
"weapons". Can you tell me exactly how many airliners have been hijacked
with a toothpick?
> The people that are there are doing their job and are not given the
ability to make decisions and exceptions on their own. People making
>exceptions and doing their own security thing on 9/11 resulted in
thousands of dead people.
WRONG! The airport security people did exactly what they were supposed
to do according to the rules at that time. The 9/11 commishion found where
many mistakes were made, particularly in the intelligence area but to my
knowledge they found no procedural errors in what security did. They
actually found that some security people were suspious of the hijackers but
allowed them to board the planes because they were NOT allowed to use their
own judgement and had to follow fixed idiocic rules.
>
>Sure, the borders need to be protected better, but at least a person
running into the side of a building will only give the person a headache.
Wait a minute! What's this crap about running into buildings? Why don't
you stay on topic? A number of the 9/11 hijackers came over from Canada the
day before they hijacked the airliners on 9/11 yet you dismiss border
security my merely saying that the borders need to be better protected and
then jump to some totally irrelevent rambling about people running into
buildings. Our borders should be our first line of defense against
terrorism but they're wide open to even the most illiterate Mexican peasant
to simply walk across. It's a good thing that Alqueda doesn't wise up and
simply walk in 10,000 or so terrorists across the Canadian or Mexican borders.
>Of course, I would suppsoe that he would sue the buiding manufacturer and
win because there is no sign warning someone of getting hurt if they >do
that...
>
>As for missing badges, most security systems require the badge and an ID
code to enter, so just having a badge doesn't help much unless security is
already lax at the airport. People are to badge in, enter their code, and
then close the door so the next person does the same procedure.
That's another thing that found, people letting other people through the
doors and in some cases blocking them open and leaving them standing wide
open for anybody that came along. In addition, they've found that there
are 100s of missing airlines uniforms and a whole hosts of other security
problems. They've also found a high number of convicted felons working
there because the airports were lax about getting background checks. Like I
said, hardly a week goes by with some new revalation about problems at the
airports.
>
>If Miami is ruuning that badly then there is a good problem to start with.
Miami running badly is an understatement! It's been that way for a LONG
time and for some reason they can't seem to straighten it out. Too many
airport operators looking to pince pennies, minoritie rights, unions,
underpaid employees and other specail interest I suppose but that still
doesn't excuse the smoke and mirrors approach to security that the
government is using. Inspecting every airline passenger three and four
times before he gets on a plane isn't going to do much good when you have
drug addicts, ex-criminals and thieves working in the ground crews and wide
open access for nearly anyone that wants to get on or to an aircraft while
it's sitting on the ground.
Joe
>
>Steve
>
eyeglass screwdrivers and even nail files were taken off the list later last year. The people that are there are doing their job and are not given the ability to make decisions and exceptions on their own. People making exceptions and doing their own security thing on 9/11 resulted in thousands of dead people.
Sure, the borders need to be protected better, but at least a person running into the side of a building will only give the person a headache. Of course, I would suppsoe that he would sue the buiding manufacturer and win because there is no sign warning someone of getting hurt if they do that...
As for missing badges, most security systems require the badge and an ID code to enter, so just having a badge doesn't help much unless security is already lax at the airport. People are to badge in, enter their code, and then close the door so the next person does the same procedure.
If Miami is ruuning that badly then there is a good problem to start with.
Steve
I just got an HP9000 K Class K570 server. It's got dual 200Mhz PA-RISC
processors and 1GB RAM, plus some arsenal of hard drives.
I've never worked with HP PA-RISC machines before. What's this equivalent
to in terms of Intel processor power?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Hi all,
Sorry for barging in like this. I still have a DSSI cable
plus 7 DSSI terminators in my trunk. One list member needed
3 terms, another needed a cable and 4 terms. Can these
people please contact me off-list with their shipping info,
so I can unload them from my poor, overloaded car?
Now, back to our regular silence,
Fred
which uses AT&T WE32100 CPU? I have a small gift for
you if you have such a system.
vax, 3900
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Hi
I know someone that has a 11/45. I've been thinking
of making an offer on it but have no idea what people
consider the going rate for such a machine. Does
anyone have any idea? I don't want to insult him
but then I don't want to pay way beyond what I could
get one elsewhere.
Dwight
Some time back, someone (Tom?) got a Furguson BigBoard from me in a trade.
I've found a little documentation and the distribution CP/M disk. I'd
like to send
this stuff off to the board's new owner.
(was this part of the Imlac deal maybe???)
On Aug 6, 8:32, Joe R. wrote:
> I went to a HP Calculator conference in England about 6 or 7 years
ago
> (pre-9/11) and I carried a LOT of calculators, parts, accessories and
tools
> with me. I was very concerned about going through security and
customs but
> had almost no trouble.
I've not had any trouble recently, but here are three instances from
the past. I used to fly regularly from Edinburgh to Belfast in
Northern Ireland, or to London.
On one occasion I was taking a pre-production Acorn Archimedes to demo
in Belfast, but since I was flying I didn't take the monitor. Needless
to say, that was the time security (actually, Special Branch) asked if
they could see it working to prove it was a computer (didn't look quite
like a PC), and eventually I had to dismantle it to persuade them.
Once (late 1980s) I was travelling to Belfast with just a briefcase and
small shoulder bag; in the shoulder bag was my toilet bag, spare shirt,
socks, etc. In the toilet bag was the usual toothbrush, etc and a
teaspoon and a small scalpel. The young lady operating the security
scanner took about a 5 millisecond glance at the blurry image and said
would I "mind leaving the scalpel behind, please." We compromised --
she kept the (detachable) blade.
Last one: travelling from London back to Edinburgh I arrived with just
a few moments to spare, only to be stopped by security who spotted my
small toolcase in my bag. All the tools were OK, though they insisted
on pulling most of them out, but they took everything out of the small
side pocket until they found a small ziplock bag containing the rather
grubby damp sponge for my soldering iron. "Would you mind telling me
what this substance is, sir?"
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> > I would kill for a VAX 6000 in the UK. Mmmmm... *dribble*
>
> :D I walk past a 6000-410 every time I go upstairs here, and there's a
> 7000 just round the corner in stores. They're both backup machines for a
> customer though so you can't have 'em.
Bastard. Dibs! ;)
> > I'm still a student though, so i've not got a permanent base
> > to keep one at. And I thought a uV-II in a BA123 was a
> > bastard to heft around every end-of-academic-year...
>
> BA23 is the way forward, though still bloody heavy.
I was just chatting to Greg this morning about swapping my worldbox for a BA23. Sad to see it go because it's so pretty and noisy, but I can rack a BA23 and get some work out of it.
alex/melt
At 08:12 PM 8/6/04 -0400, you wrote:
>my job takes me a lot of different places. Two years ago, yes, TSA was not
as organized or as efficient as today. They are doing a necessary job to
keep planes flying and people going where they want to go. Due to the fact
that I worked for TSA two years ago, I am very familiar with what they have
gone through. Now, all you do is check your bags in and they open them only
if their MRI machine spots something with enough mass to potentially be a
problem. They don't make you wait in line much longer now than you did
before TSA was there. Passenger screening is also very efficient at most
large airports anyway. They started with the notes inside when they quit
having you stand in front of them while they checked your bags. I haven't
been through any in the last year that did it the old way.
>
>As for it being BS, I disagree. I would rather have things safer than
welcome another attack on US soil because things weren't being checked.
It is BS when 10 million illegal Mexicans and others can simply walk
across the border and enter (and stay) the US. And lets not even get into
how many TONs of drugs are shipped into the US everyday. I live near one
of the busiest airports in the US (OIA) and there's hardly a week goes by
that I don't hear of a bust at OIA or Miami or some other majot airport
where baggage handlers are smuggling in TONS of illlegal drugs, weapons,
animals and other material. A recent check at OIA revealed that there were
several HUNDRED badges missing that would allow anyone with one of them to
get into the secure areas of the airport. INS recently raided Miami airport
and arrested allmost 50 baggage handlers that were illegal aliens yet they
still had access to secure areas of the airport. I could go on and on but
my point is that the passengers being screened and harassed over and over
but there are PLENTY of other areas in the airports, ports and borders of
this country where security is non-existant! If 10+ million mexicans can
walk across the border don't you think 10 terrorists can do the same thing?
Security is one thing but mindless, pointless inspections and taking away
things like eye glass screwdrivers is something else altogether.
Joe
>
>best regards, Steve Thatcher
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Joe R." <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
>Sent: Aug 6, 2004 7:02 PM
>To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Re: Holy cow...
>
>At 02:14 PM 8/6/04 -0700, you wrote:
>>On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Joe R. wrote:
>>
>>> >You know when your bag was checked because the TSA puts a form in your
bag
>>> >saying they did.
>>>
>>> I beg to differ. I sat in Kansas City airport two years ago and spent
>>> abut 3 or 4 hours with the security people and watched as they opened
>>> numerous bags and I didn't see them put a sticker on ANY of them. Even
when
>>> flying and reclaiming baggage I've never seen one of those stickers.
>>
>>Have you flown recently?
>
> No and I have no intentions of flying as long as this crap continues. I
>have a very low treshold for BS! So don't expect to see me at VCF or
>anywhere else if it involves flying.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
Do NOT stay at the Pacific Lodge Hotel. That's also right on El Camino. I had
my original reservation there last year, and left after the first night because
it was a total dive.
Here's a bunch of stuff I have to get rid of. I really hope there's a good
home out there for the somewhat rare Sparc I have, I think it's a pretty
one-of-a-kind device.
- A portable Sparc I have that was custom manufactured for the US
military. Built to mil-spec, it comes in an imposing grey briefcase.
Somewhat portable, has a battery backup that seems to consist of 22
NiCad AA batteries. Has a mysterious IC slot on the bottom with no
chip in it that is not part of the original Sparc hardware it's based off
of. 64mb RAM, it's an IPX under the hood. Has no disk, and the disk
enclosure uses some kind of proprietary connector that you might be able
to get to work with a normal SCSI drive. It has all sorts of cool features
like an airtight enclosure and a depressurization valve for lugging it
through the desert and changes in altitude. Last time I powered it on
it worked fine and was able to netboot SunOS 4.1.4.
- Two C64s + drives, an apple 2c, mac plus (4mb RAM), apple imagewriter
dot matrix printer with about a 50 yr supply of ink cartridges and
refill kits.
- A real VT220 with a dodgy power button that could probably be fixed
easily.
- A miscellaneous assortment of external SCSI enclosures.
All this (or part of this) can be yours for S&H. I'm not part of this
mailing list so please e-mail me privately.
Steve.
which uses AT&T WE32100 CPU? I have a small gift for
you if you have such a system.
vax, 3900
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
I was toying with going to vcf west in october. Is San Jose the closest
convenient airport to fly into? Also, can someone recommend a cheap hotel
close to the venue?
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Rescued a complete Atari Mega 2 from work that was getting thrown out. It was
quite dirty being on a mailroom production floor.
Anyway, my wife told me about these Mr Clean magic eraser things and they do
the best job with cleaning just about anything. It got this Atari nice and
clean, sun damage notwithstanding.
These eraser things clean off china marker, smoke stains, dirty fingerprints,
grease, permanent marker, and just plain dirt. They work perfectly on
textured surfaces like plastic computers and car interiors and has not harmed
anything I have used it on.
I don't know how it works since it's a sponge of some sort, but give it a
try. Better than any spray cleaning product I've ever used.
I have the follow STD boards with user manuals. These are spare boards
>from a system and are in excellent shape. I am looking for $15 each or
$40 for all plus shipping.
1. Pro-log model 7606 parallel I/O care
2. Enlode Inc. Model 200-1 realtime clock and prog. interrupt gen.
3. Datricon, model ANA10 analog I/O card
4. Cubit, model 7040 CRT controller (two styles of boards)
thanks Norm
At 11:35 -0500 8/6/04, jhfinexgs2(a)compsys.to wrote:
< ...compsys.to ?? cool, is Toronto its own nation now, or what?
>Can anyone comment as to what level of ID is helpful, in addition
>to a Passport and Driver's License, both with picture ID? Is
>company ID helpful as well when electronic stuff is carried?
Southwest Research Institute periodically has engineers
transporting spacecraft power boxes, compute boxes, and scientific
instruments. We cause minor headaches at security because many of
these are contamination sensitive and want to stay inside of their
dry-nitrogen-backfilled sealed ESD bags.
The engineers carry drivers' licenses and passports (where
applicable) and letters on SwRI or NASA letterhead and a contact
number at SwRI for security to call and verify they are who they say
they are. YMMV, but we have rarely if ever had problems. But then, we
all look like geeks anyway (Mike Gemeny, you can confirm this with
your brother :-) ).
We do call security in advance, but since there's usually a
shift change before we arrive, I think it rarely makes any difference.
>How do security people get through security?
>Or maybe I should not even be asking that question?
Can't help with that.
--
- Mark
210-522-6025, page 888-733-0967
The date for VCF 7.0 has been changed to November 6-7. A more formal
announcement is forthcoming.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Vintage
> Computer Festival
> Sent: 05 August 2004 20:21
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: RE: rarest computers
>
> On display until late October:
>
http://www.kahaku.go.jp/english/
I couldn't see anything about computer dinosaurs there, just dinosaur
bones :)
Cheers
w
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Can anyone identify the classic computers in the new Dell commercial?
It has a tech duct taping a bunch of old machines to keep them running
longer.
- --
Collector of vintage computers http://www.ncf.ca/~ba600
Looking for: PICMG, Nabu CP/M disks
Open Source Weekend http://www.osw.ca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBEvq/LPrIaE/xBZARAgm+AJ4wfP7zCsF/7/wx/7giJaWPs35ffQCeOOxQ
NzWjEEfOPnGud3r9yvH88kA=
=JTMS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > 7000 just round the corner in stores. They're both backup
> > machines for
> > > a customer though so you can't have 'em.
> >
> > Bastard. Dibs! ;)
>
> You're in the queue after me :)
I know, but I would just like it known in case something... mysterious happens to you ;)
> > I was just chatting to Greg this morning about swapping my
> > worldbox for a BA23. Sad to see it go because it's so pretty
> > and noisy, but I can rack a BA23 and get some work out of it.
>
> Why not get one of the VAXstations he got from Jules? Do you have a
> requirement for a QBUS box or summat?
Yes, i'd like to transplant the fully-functioning guts of the MicroVAX-II in the BA123 into something a bit smaller. I've got various MicroVAX3100s around doing jobs too. Variety, man!
alex/melt
> > > > > 7000 just round the corner in stores. They're both backup
> > > > machines for a customer though so you can't have 'em.
> > > >
> > > > Bastard. Dibs! ;)
> > >
> > > You're in the queue after me :)
> >
> > I know, but I would just like it known in case something... mysterious happens to you ;)
>
> For a small fee I could lock him up in D Block at Bletchley this
> weekend... :-)
*paypal sent*
alex/melt
I just saw a snippet of the movie "The Towering Inferno" where they were
in a security control room and there was a panel in the background with a
grid of large rectangular lamps all blinking like mad. Was this a real
computer? If so, what was it?
If no one can answer, I'll just get the movie in my next Netflix batch and
suffer through it to check.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Many things went to Boston's Science Museum as well.
> What became of the Boston Computer Museum, anyway? And what happened to
> their collection, such as it was?
It moved to the west coast and became the Computer History Museum.
--
I'm trying to recall the name of a machine made back in the 80's, I
think. I'm pretty sure it was 68000 based, had 2 1/2 or 1/3 height 8"
floppies stacked, was as wide as the floppy drives, about 8" tall
(guessing), and maybe 6" to 8" deeper than the floppy drives. I was
thinking it was a Sage II or Sage IV, but those all had side-by-side
5.25" drives. I'm not positive, but I think this was a Pascal
P-machine, or at least was in it's native configuration, if it was
68000. Anyone remember what I'm trying to think of?
--jc
Hi
It doesn't look like it has enough on it to be a
RS-232 converter but it could be a 20 to 60 mil
converter.
You might look at the circuit layout around the
thansistors labeled Q1 to Q4. Tracing this part
out will most likely figure out what the intent
is. It looks like it does replace some of the power
supply sections of a ASR33 so that would explain the
look of a power supply.
You can power the unit up and look at the voltages
on the DB25. I tend to agree that missing both
pin 1 and pin 7 would indicate that it wasn't a
RS232.
Dwight
>From: "Brian Knittel" <brian(a)quarterbyte.com>
>
>Hi,
>
>For those of you who asked to see the MITS
>Teletype Interface board I mentioned a couple
>of days ago, I've put a picture at
>http://www.ibm1130.org/misc/mits-tty-interface.jpg
>
>The molex connector at the bottom left below the relay
>is where the data cable connects. The other end is
>a DB25 connector, and the wires go to pins 2-6. Since
>there is no connection to pin 7 (signal ground) it must
>be current loop.
>
>Brian
>
Now that I'm back on the list, by dint of unsub + resub (which I really
should have thought to do earlier, rather than waiting against the time
Jay finally emerges from the aftermath of VCF East)....
I'm trying to build a KA630 emulator, more because I think it'll be fun
and will teach me stuff than because I actually have a use for such a
thing (there are plenty of good open-source VAX emulators out there
already). I picked the KA630 because it's the only VAX implementation
I have enough information on to even really attempt to build a
simulator for.
I dumped the ROMs from one of my KA630s (e/l/p/n:3fff 20040000, plus
some postprocessing of the capture file) to get firmware. But the
emulated VAX hangs at selftest step B. The manual I have
(EK-KA630-UG-001) says this means that the IPCR is not working properly
(probably broken Qbus electronics, on a real KA630), but it doesn't go
into any significant detail.
Furthermore, if I break to the simulator and manually advance it past
the "blbc r0,." that it's hanging at, it continues, but ends up with an
error at step 7 - apparently it can't find any working memory(!).
Now, the manual could be simply wrong. I've found it lying (or, let me
be charitable, "not matching the machine I have") at once already; it
claims certain bits are write-only, but the ROM code depends on being
able to read them.
Or I could be mis-emulating the Qbus stuff.
Or I could have a bug in the emulation of an instruction somewhere.
So, I'm looking for either or both of (a) someone who's enough of a
KA630 guru to help or (b) some kind of VAX instruction-set test suite,
to help verify that I have the instruction emulations right. (I caught
one instruction emulation bug already, quite by chance; there is surely
at least one more.)
Thoughts?
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>From: "Paul Koning" <pkoning(a)equallogic.com>
>
>>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Koning <pkoning(a)equallogic.com> writes:
>
>>>>>> "Steven" == Steven N Hirsch <shirsch(a)adelphia.net> writes:
> Steven> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, ben franchuk wrote:
> >>> PS. Years ago in BYTE ( early 1990's? ) they had spoke up of a
> >>> CPU designed for reliable operation for real time control of
> >>> things like power plants or subways or aircraft. They claimed it
> >>> was so simple that programs could be proven to be bug free. I was
> >>> wondering if they manufactured or sold any the devices.
>
> Steven> That would be the British "Viper" CPU. Computational theory
> Steven> suggests (proves, perhaps? - it's been a few years) that use
> Steven> of hardware or software stacks renders behavior
> Steven> indeterminate.
>
> Paul> Baloney. Anyone who has paid any attention to Dijkstra knows
> Paul> that such a statement would have to be complete and utter
> Paul> nonsense.
>
>PS. It is certainly true that programs can be proven to match their
>specification. That's not quite the same as proving them bug free --
>it now requires the specification to be bug free.
>
>But such proofs in no way require the absence of a stack. That's
>actually rather obvious, because any program that uses a stack can be
>rewritten into a program that does not use one. But in fact such a
>rewrite does not help readability at all.
>
>It probably is not a coincidence that the scientist who did much early
>work on stacks is also the scientist who spent a lifetime working on
>program correctness (E.W.Dijkstra).
>
> paul
>
Hi
I think that it is interesting that there is a programmer
in the UK that produces one of the few provable program
products for correctness ( to specification ) that meet
some standard ( I forget which ) and his programs are all
done in Forth ( that uses two stacks ).
My understanding is that most of the reason he can produce
this is that the language it self is built and verified
by him and that even though there are stacks, use is
usually more controlled and maximum depths can be calculated.
Most Forth processes are done with cooperative tasking rather
than the more random effects of preemptive. This also means
better predictability.
The other part is that Forth programs tend to be highly
factored. This means that hierarchical verification is
more practical. It is easier to understand the range
of valid inputs for each piece and how those effect the
next level up.
He writes program for such things as subway control systems.
His products need to meet tight controls that need to be
absolutely correct or people die. Strange that he would
use a language that not only uses a stack but uses two stacks
and still produces verifiable results. He considers that
choice to be a most important one.
Dwight