I snagged a Wang PC-280 from destruction today. Email me if interested.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
The way I understood the post, the only thing on the screen is about one
inch high, with black every place else, which means vertical deflection
is pretty much gone. It's been too long since I looked at crt stuff,
but probably vertical deflection transistor.
JOe Heck
I realize that the 2 questions I have are NOT within the 10 year
rule, but I really could use some help!
While I have been using computers for over 40 years, I
have stayed with very old systems as far as programming
and writing programs is concerned. Thus, under Windows 98
SE and Netsacpe 4.78 (which is what I am using to access
the internet and this news group), I am ONLY able to use
the operating system and the application; I am NOT able to
make any modifications which is how I usually proceed when
I encounter any problems.
Last week, the web site that I usually access in a very standard
manner using Windows 98 SE / Netscape 4.78 no longer provides
the information I used to obtain. The reason is that the company
which controls access to the web site decided to add additional
features which require the use of at least Netscape 7.0 by the user.
And while I agree that the company has every legal right to do so,
at the very least some sort of warning could have been provided
which was much more apparent other than placing the information
under a link titled "required browsers" that I understand did provide
some advance notice. However, at the SAME time, the error page
which informed users that cookies were REQUIRED listed (and still
lists) Netscape 4.x and Netscape 6.x as the required browsers if
cookies were turned OFF.
Some more background information:
Because I ALWAYS run Netscape with cookies turned OFF,
except when I am required to have cookies enabled to access the
2 web pages that I normally use, I often encountered the error
page which listed Netscape 4.x as one of the required browsers.
Since EVERYTHING works when cookies were enabled, I never
bothered to access the "required browsers" link as the error page
certainly seemed to provide that information when I forgot to turn
cookies ON - which usually happened at least once a week.
ALSO, while I am not able to fully use the web site, I am able to
"log in" (with a userid and password) to get to the first level of
information that I request. It is only subsequent screens that I
am unable to FULLY access, i.e. when I request the next level
of information, the next screen is reached, but the changing
information is no longer displayed under Netscape 4.78, ONLY
the top portion with the headers, etc.
I have 2 questions:
Based on the information on the error page, would a normal user
be ALSO expected to look at the "required browsers" link when
the specific naming of Netscape 4.x was (and still was when this
post was made) displayed as an acceptable browser when I
forgot to turn cookies ON?
Could the company have continued to allow users access to the
web site under Netscape 4.78 by the expedient of NOT
providing those users the additional features that users of
Netscape 7.0 and later are provided? NAMELY, do the
fellows setting up the program have the ability to check as to
which version of Netscape is being used and could the program
have retained the old code for those users who stayed with
Netscape 4.78 and used to new code for those users who
shifted to Netscape 7.0 and later?
I realize this post is very long, but I hope it should be possible
to answer both questions with a simple YES or NO! If
you wish to add an explanation, that would also be VERY
MUCH appreciated!
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.
Symptom: a one-inch high band of horizontally scrolling
garbage in the center of the screen.
Any ideas before I go in there and poke around?
Later --
Glen
0/0
This was a B+ tree package produced by Peacock Systems
(Walter Peacock) for MS-DOS (and written in C) in the late 80s
Some applications I wrote 15 years ago have
come back to haunt me and I no longer have the library source.
Any help out there?
TIA --
Glen Goodwin
0/0
Hi,
Sorry for clogging up classiccmp with this message, but it is sort-of
classiccmp related (I wanted to build an EPROM emulator to make ROM
development on my BBC Micro a little faster).
I've been trying to get my EPROM emulator design to work - I can't see any
errors in the wiring and AFAICT all the ICs are fine. I've uploaded the
schematic to <http://www.philpem.me.uk/epemsch.png>. If anyone spots a design
error, please let me know - I've gone over the schematic a few dozen times
and I'm almost at the point of giving up :-/
It looks like data is getting loaded, but isn't getting output to the
target device properly... %DEITY knows why, though...
Thanks.
--
Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice,
http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI
... Psychoceramics: The study of crackpots.
I'm looking for an original copy (not pdf or other electronic format) of the
"HP Pocket Reference Guide to the 2100 Computer". Unlike the title suggests,
it's hardly pocket-sized. It's about 450 pages, with roughly 5x8 pages.
I'm willing to pay non-trivial sums of cash, or provide lopsided trades, for
said book.
Regards,
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
I have the following to offer:
1. Digital Research CP/M-86 operating system manual, release 1.1, 1982,
has the user guide, system guide, programmer's guide, hard shell box,
all in very good condition, includes well used command summary pamphet.
Software 5 1/4" disks: GSX-86 version 1.1, CP/M-86 version 1.1,
CBASIC/86 Version 1.4-- untested
2. Digital Research CP/M-86 operating system manual, release 1.1, 1982,
has the user guide, system guide, programmer's guide, hard shell box,
all in very good condition, includes mint command summary pamphet.
Software 8" disks: CP/M-86 version 1.1, Sealed-unopened, untested
If you are interested, shoot me some offers.
Thanks Norm
I have been salvaging old computers now for over 6 years and have kept all the CPU chips that I have found in them. Most of the chips being from 386, 486, and Pentium I computers. Is there a list anywhere that identifies which of these chips might be rare or hard to find? Before I scrap them for the gold content, I'd like to find out if any of them might be worth keeping or selling to someone interested in a particular chip.
Thanks for any information you can give me.
Bill Machacek
Colo. Springs, CO
I have a Decwriter III (LA120) available. Never plugged it in, somewhat
yellowed case, missing the break key. Very dusty but otherwise in good
condition. It's taking up way too much space so I want it gone quick -
otherwise it gets pitched or stripped for spare parts.
Also have available 2 or 3 VT100 keyboards. Fairly yellowed, one is missing
one keycap, the other is missing about 5 keycaps. Good for parts - they get
pitched if no one claims them.
Jay
Maybe not quite vintage... but I have these, and no need for them, and would
rather trade or give them away than toss them.
I have four memory modules labled as follows:
Series 800/900 Memory 32mb A2511-69001
The extractor handle on each module (and the label) says 32mb. But being
somewhat familiar (although rusty) with HP part numbers and modules of this
type, it is possible that even though it says 32mb on each module that each
one is really 16mb, as modules were always sold in pairs for these
particular systems.
Knowing the origin of this memory, it mostly likey came from a G machine, or
possibly a K machine. I cant be sure, but I suspect they are working fine.
If anyone wants them let me know quickly...
Jay West
Boy, you don't pay attention to subject lines, do you??? ;-)
I seem to have stopped receiving cctalk postings... so this is just a test.
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger --- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
zmerch(a)30below.com
Hi! I am a .signature virus. Copy me into your .signature to join in!
Mark Wickens <m.wickens(a)rhodium-consulting.com> wrote:
> List the best keyboards you have ever used.
Right now the keyboard I insist on using is LK201, but that's only
because I'm a nut about DEC VTxxx terminals and don't want to use a
keyboard whose set of function keys does not directly correspond to
the set of VTxxx transmitted escape sequences. I like LK201 better
than LK401 because I have no use for the latter's "Alt function"
keys, because I don't like how they shrunk from 4 to 2 LEDs, and
because LK201 is more sturdy while LK401 is more flimsy.
The really interesting keyboard I've used (for Western readers) is
the Soviet KOI keyboard. Unfortunately I never got to use the
"real deal" (Soviet serial terminals), but I've used the KOI kbd on
the BK0010, the Soviet home computer based on the 1801VM1
microprocessor, a Soviet PDP-11 clone, a single chip microprocessor
roughly equivalent to an LSI-11. It was a home computer for which
you were expected to write all software yourself from the ground up,
by entering octal codes at octal addresses (assuming you wanted
something other than BASIC or FOCAL that they had in ROM). I really
miss that mentality (I still believe every hacker needs to write his
own operating system as a rite of passage).
Soviet KOI keyboards are really interesting. They are based on
KOI, which is the Soviet reinterpretation of ASCII. In Latin mode
KOI is identical to ASCII, but thought of differently, in that
all characters from 100 octal up are considered Latin letters, so
in the mind of a Soviet hacker, '@' is the 0th letter of the Latin
alphabet, '[' is the next Latin letter after Z, and the last Latin
letter is '_'. In Russian mode characters from 100 octal up are
given alternative graphic renditions (Russian letters, not surprisingly).
Note that it's the *graphic rendition* of the character that changes,
not the character itself; the coded form is the primal form: a
compiler will recognise a keyword equally well regardless of whether
the tty displays it with the Latin rendition or the Russian rendition.
The KOI keyboard was designed around this mentality, i.e., the
upper/lower case switch acted on all keys that we considered letters.
'{' is the lowercase '['. The layout was different. When we got the
first PeeCees I at first couldn't stand their kbd because of the top
row layout: how ridiculous it is that '^' (a letter) is on top of '6'
(a digit). That drove me nuts. The KOI keyboards were much more
rational in that the key layout directly corresponded to the ASCII/KOI
chart. The top row keys were in their ASCII/KOI order. The encoding
logic was a breeze since with this layout all modifier keys (Ctrl,
Shift, upper/lower case switch and the RUS/LAT switch) only had to
twiddle bits.
MS
At 10:23 -0500 8/27/04, Mark Tapley wrote:
>From: "John Allain" <allain(a)panix.com>
>Subject: Re: Best keyboards you've used ever!
>
>the Workhorse
> IBM model M with ps/2 connectivity
>
>the Beauty
> Apple MacIntosh ADB #1, where the keyboard
> is hardly bigger than the keycaps.
>
>.....
>
>honorable mention
> DEC lk201. It needs the custom edit/edt/tpu editor and custom DEC
> terminal stand, etc. But great in that environment.
>
>John A.
What he said. Exactly.
Favorite keyboard I've never had the privilege to use:
I have a picture on my wall. PS-2 connector, goes to a small keyboard
unit. Unit says "Microsoft" on upper left corner and "intel inside"
on upper right. The only three keys on it bear the legends:
<Ctrl> <Alt> <Delete>
:-)
Worst keyboard is anything with the little eraserhead pointing device
in the middle. Distracts from typing, useless for pointing.
--
- Mark
210-522-6025, page 888-733-0967
>You would get the 2 versions that I already have :-). I'd like to see the
>6809 fig forth (I assume it existed, and used the 2 hardware stack
>pointers, etc).
It's not fig, but if you are interested, you can take a look a my tiny little
FORTH implementation for the 6809 - Docs are a bit sparse, sorry - it was done
on a weekend in response to a collegue who had been boasting that he had created
a version of FORTH for the 09 that was faster than any other - I truly enjoyed
the look on his face the next monday morning when his test program ran
significantly faster on mine...
Of course I cheated - my FORTH compiled to directly executable code, which
eliminated the interpreter and chaining through threaded links - this has a bit
of overhead (3 byte JSR instruction instead of 2-byte link address), however it
is offset by the fact that I reduced the header to just the word name (no
difference between word types - everything is "native"), which saved me 16 bytes
(IIRC) over the wordsize in his dictionary. Yes, it uses both hardware stacks.
If you are interested in playing with it, it's available on my museum web site,
in the section on my D6809 homebuilt. The source code is included, and if you want
to try it out, you can run the D6809 emulator, mount the included disk IMAGE,
boot up my CUBIX OS and type FORTH - this will launch a ready to run version of
my itty bitty FORTH (about a 2.5k executable as I recall).
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of David Vohs
> Sent: 26 August 2004 18:02
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Best keyboards you've used ever!
>
> 2. The Original Macintosh keyboard.
> 3. The Tandy 100/102/200 keyboards.
Yes, I'd forgotten about those. The 100 one is excellent, and therefore by
association so is the NEC equivalent.
> Funny that a company that can't make a decent operating system to save
> their, uhhh, assets can make such a comfortable keyboard! Go figure!
I suspect they had as much input in the design of that as I did :)
Cheers
w
Dear Jim,
I followed this thread and tried the "FTP" addresses that were given
regarding downloading the Inverse Assembler Development Package. Sadly
without success as the directory structure has been changed. Therefore is
there any chance of obtaining the software from another source. Funnily
enough I have the reference manual as this is downloads from a couple of
web sites. I am currently building a 68008 based system and I would like to
have an inverse assembler for the HP1650A that I will be hooking up to it.
Regards,
Rupert.
Sellam wrote
>I suppose you're also going to tell me there's a South Carolina! HA!
Having geographic knowledge is a dying interest.
When there were still phone operators calling my relatives in New Mexico
occasionally was a problem because the phone operators think it's an
international call.
However my patents live in Waverly which is near Dover, Lexington,
Napoleon, and Wellington. Most of these towns are less than several
hundred. I'm sure in the 1800's we borrowed the names from some foreign
country.
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Patrick/VCM SysOp
> Sent: 26 August 2004 19:43
> To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> Subject: RE: OT: Dream keyboard
>
> Hmmmm, daydreaming... The Microsoft version, the "Natural Beverage
> Keyboard USB/IBA". You have to buy a client license for each glass
> you use. The keyboard oozes turpentine when you press the "Jack" key
> while in Outlook, until you install hotfix K987666. ;-)
Heh, I'd like a keyboard with all of these:
An ANY key
Separate F1 for when the keyboard is missing.
An 'I know what I'm doing' key A 'just fucking do it!' key And
a cluster of ctrl-alt-del keys to make 3-fingered salutes easier to do :)
Cheers
w
Hmm, my first ever floptical drive just landed on the doorstep amongst a
pile of hardware. Never seen one before now, and it seems there's very
little info on the web about the technology.
I assume that although it'll (probably) read/write normal 3.5" floppy
disks, it needs special media to reach the 21MB that I keep on seeing
quoted in various places? (i.e. it can't reach that figure combining the
optical tracking technology that it uses with standard magnetic media)
(the drive's an Insite I 325VM, likely culled from an SGI I think)
cheers
Jules
At 07:12 AM 8/27/2004, David V. Corbin wrote:
>Go to a decent Harvest Festival [there are many on the East coast US]!
>While peanut butter is much more common at the southern ones, it can be
>found further north. A completely different taste, but as pointed out, it
>seperates almost immediately and does not "look good".
Here in Wisconsin, I've never had trouble finding "real" only-salt-added
peanut butter in jars on the shelf. I can't imagine any part of the
US that wouldn't have it in an ordinary grocery store, and certainly
health-food stores carry varieties as well as many that have
their own grinders.
- John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Vintage Computer
> Festival
> Sent: 26 August 2004 17:32
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: WORST keyboards ever (was Re: Best keyboards you've used
> ever!)
>
>
> How about the absolutely WORST keyboards?
>
> 1) Sinclair ZX series
> 2) Coco 1
> 3) Coco 2
> 4) Aquarius (my first)
> 5) Original PET
Sharp MZ80K
Memotech MTX (this pains me but they weren't the best) Any lightweight/cheap
membrane job (see current peecee manufacturers)
Kinnell, I can't think of any more right now, and that can't be right :)
Cheers
w
> List the best keyboards you have ever used. You might like the feel,
> number of function keys, layout (let's not forget Dvorak or more
> esoteric designs) or pure keyboard<->computer love (you might really
> get off on Vaxen).
Original IBM peecee - nice and clacky
Apple Lisa, same reason and therefore ditto early Macs Later model RM 380Z
(black one) ACT Sirius 1/Victor 9000 Acorn ACW VT1xx (wish I could
peecee-ify it!) DEC LK201 (lack of ESC worrieth me not, I'm an EDT-head :)
Atari Mega ST keyboards CPT 8520 (currently dead) Mac Design II keyboards
(early fat ones) Apple ][GS NeXTstation (another one I want to peecee-ify)
My current peecee keyboard (compaq heavy edition from a few years ago) Apple
][ and ][e
There's probably more but you get the idea :)
Cheers
w
Finally really digging into my toshiba 3200 and have a few questions maybe
others know:
1) Even after adjusting the contrast & brightness knobs on the side, I can't
get a black background. The background is decidedly orange-ish still. It's
been over 20 years since I used a plasma screen. Is this normal, or is my
screen possibly challenged?
2) I want this thing to work on my home wireless network. I'm assuming there
are no ISA wireless cards, especially with DOS drivers. So I was thinking
Xircom pocket ethernet adapter and a wireless bridge. Anyone have any better
ideas?
Thanks for any advice!
Jay West
>From: "Fred Cisin" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>
>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Mark Wickens wrote:
>> WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40
>> WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40
>> WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40 WD40
>> Need I say more?
>
>REAL mechanics may or may not know anything about any of the
>other characteristics of lubricants, but they do, at least,
>know that there that there are many different viscousities
>of lubricants, and that you need to use one of appropriate
>"thickness".
>
>It's a drag to repair damage done by amateurs, putting
>WD40 on things that actually needed a heavy grease.
>
Hi Fred
My grip is finding a screw that was obviously intended for
a #2 Philps but someone has buggerred it up with a #1. Not
only that, the #1 driver they used is also buggered up because
they have been incorrectly using it as well.
Most Philps screws are actually #2 and not #1. Make sure
you have a #2 in your tool box. If you have a good screw driver
and you place it in a screw, and the driver feels loose, it
means you are using the wrong size driver! Don't judge this
by the amount of blade that isn't in the screw. The screw
driver will be snug in the screw when right. Much of the
blade may not be in the screw.
Dwight
The long Torx screwdriver needed for Macs is available at Sears for about $10.
They have the PC version for about $6, but of course the Mac version works
better.
OK, time to clear out more junk. Each of the following is $2.00/each, plus
shipping from 10512:
1) Colecovision steering wheel Expansion Module, with extra joystick.
2) Some sort of 68000 based Western Electric AT&T modem board for a PeeCee
- it actually looks like pretty much a standalone 68K based thing, with
some WE chips and three connections to the outside world. 56K CSU?
3) PeeCee card with four serial ports and three bidirectional parallel
ports, with cables. Unknown maker. For the I/O junkie.
4) AT&T KDB301 keyboard, I think for that Unix PC thing. It has a DE9
connector.
5) Miniscribe model 8425 hard disk on a PeeCee card (Hardcard lookalike).
6) AT&T American Bell (a Baby Bell I never heard of) model EASI-1B
synchronous to asynchronous RS-232 convertor. A true black box of magic.
7) Pre-Borland copy of Brief v1.33 editor, with original disk.
8) Intel PLDshell PLD design software, still sealed. I think this only
does Intel chips, so don't get too excited.
9) Book, using the Horizon Spreadsheet with the Unix Operating System, by
D. H. Beil. A fairly disgusting early 80s spreadsheet.
Stuff is untested (including the book), but generally in decent shape. I
take cash, checks, MOs, Paypal (but NOT to this email account! Please
ask!), coins, favors, and begging. I might add a little on to shipping for
my time ("handling").
First come, first served, but I can change the rules if I either like or
dislike you.
William Donzelli
aw288(a)osfn.org
>My first 'PC Clone' was made with one of those old 63.5 watt IBM
>supplies. In a totally non-matched Leading Edge Model D case. To fit
>the supply in such a case, the supply circuit board had to be completely
>removed from the steel case and just bolted inside the Model D case.
I converted a bunch of IBM ATs into AMD K6-2 machines. And all still run
happily today, whereas others built at the same time made with newer AT
power supplies, all have died, and almost without exception, it has been
either the power supply itself, or something damaged from the power
supply.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hello List,
Thank you to all who have replied privately and/or on the list. A fellow listmember is sending a set to help me revive this Mac SE.
Sincerely,
David Ward
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
Ed Kelleher <Pres(a)macro-inc.com> wrote:
> Worst keyboard: DEC LK201 on VT220 terminals - no <ESC> key, misplaced
> angle bracket <> keys (both on same key),
Yeah, that's the only big disadvantage it has. Everything else is
great, but here they just screwed up. On VT320, though, there is a
setup option to turn the '`~' key into ESC (putting ESC where it
belongs to the left of 1), move '`~' down to where the screwy '<>'
key is, and put '<>' where they belong on top of ',.'. Needless to
say, that's the mode I use.
Of course what I would really love would be a Classic keyboard with
the original Classic ASCII layout, i.e., ESC immediately to the left
of '1', Ctrl immediately to the left of 'A', separate CR and LF keys,
separate BS and DEL keys, and all of the previous 4 plus BREAK being
in the area where you find Enter and Backspace today. Having the
top row keys in ASCII order would be nice too, as would having the
kbd send ready ASCII down its wire instead of funky scan codes.
MS
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf(a)siconic.com>
>
>On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, David Vohs wrote:
>
>> Funny that a company that can't make a decent operating system to save
>> their, uhhh, assets can make such a comfortable keyboard! Go figure!
>
>It's the least they could do to help you get through the horrible
>experience of using their software.
Hi
Just remember, a picture is worth a thousand words. So what
if they are all the wrong words? Learn to work with it.
Dwight
I recently obtained a number of modules from a SAGE AN/FSQ-7
(or-8) computer, and seeing that I will never even come close to thinking
about having the whole thing, I could probably part with one or two.
These are the real deal - complete with the original IBM numbered tubes. I
don't know what the modules do.
I'll trade one (or more) for something interesting (I think most people
know what I like), or maybe sell one or two for a good pile of cash.
William Donzelli
aw288(a)osfn.org
Can anyone out there tell me what Burroughs part numbers look like -
specifically the house numbers they used for TTL and such? I have a bunch
of chips with 1471-**** numbers that I strongly suspect are Burroughs ECD
types, but I would like to confirm before I decide if they go to the
refinery.
Pickier question: Did the Burroughs mainframe people use the same house
numbering scheme as the ECD people?
William Donzelli
aw288(a)osfn.org
Does anyone know of a free or cheap DOS (i.e. not requiring Win32)
command-line e-mail client? I'd like something that I can use to send off
short messages with just the command line from DOS with TCP/IP drivers
already installed (via MSNC).
I Googled but only found programs for Win32.
Thanks!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Where I worked in the early 80s had a reference printout that gave the
conversion between Burroughs part numbers and the industry standard
parts. Thought some of that series were Farchild microCTL chips used
in systems like the B6700. Sorry, don't have access to the printout as
it would have been dumped years ago.
Regards,
Garry
Tony Duell wrote:
>
> ...The one that's hard to get is
> the System Zero. This looks like an inverse torx (The screw head is
> male, with slots round the outside, the driver is female), but it's
> designed so that nothing but the right tool will get it out (the sides
> of the screwhead taper slightly so that you can't grab it with pliers or
> a Mole Wrench (self-locking wrench), for example).
>
> Yes, I have a set of those tools -- one of my EPROM programmer [1] is
> assembled with them, for what reason %deity only knows.
>
> [1] A thing called a Ferret. It's a combined EPROM programmer, breakout
> box, RS232 / current loop / centronics converter, Z80 computer, strip
> printer, etc in a portable case.
Nintendo also uses them on their Super NES / Famicom Deck housing and game
cartridges (not sure about the original NES/Famicom). They managed to pretty
much defeat their purpose by placing them in "wells" in the plastic so you
can wedge a pair of correctly sized tweezers between the well wall and the
screw head and apply enough traction to get them out. Been there, done that
(to investigate how to replace coin cell for save-game feature).
--
Arno Kletzander
Stud. Hilfskraft Informatik Sammlung Erlangen
www.iser.uni-erlangen.de
NEU: Bis zu 10 GB Speicher für e-mails & Dateien!
1 GB bereits bei GMX FreeMail http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
Great! Thanks, Ben.
Had not found this one. "coco" is a good term to include in
the search :-) Will continue looking, but if no cheaper source
turns up, I think I will spend the $31 out of curiousity to see
the actual performance it claims.
The page says that the 63C09 runs cooler than the 6809.
I can confirm that the 68B09 at 1 MHz is warm, but I heard from
Vince that the 6809 at 1 MHz gets quite warm!
tnx,
- Henk.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of ben franchuk
> Sent: donderdag 26 augustus 2004 8:01
> To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: dos electronics software?
>
>
> Gooijen H wrote:
> > Hmm, I tried to post this yesterday ... probably something
> went wrong..
> > I am looking for a 63C09E or 63B09E. Anybody knows where I
> can buy it??
> > I found a source in Australia, but that is the 63B09. The
> suffix "E"
> > is important, it is the *external* clock version, as used
> in the Core
> > Board of the Blinkenlight project (40 pin DIL case).
> > I have a PDP-8/e simulation running on th Core board, but could use
> > a performance increase. Upgrading to the Motorola "B" parts
> will allow
> > to double the clock frequency, but the Hitachi 63B09 is even faster,
> > as it does many 6809 instructions in less cycles.
> > Interested in the sim? Check my 'Homebrew PDP-11' page,
> the link there
> > is "spin off" ...
>
> You really don't want to know the price!
> you better Sit down.
>
>
> Sit
> ...
>
>
> sit
>
>
> ...
>
> sit
>
>
> ...
> Now beg for the doggy snack.
> Oh Sorry. :-) Here is the link.
> http://www.cloud9tech.com/index.html
> The price is about $32 US each.
>
> > - Henk,
>
> PS. If you ever get a good single board 63C09 computer design
> thats runs OS/9 level two let me know. I have always wanted a
> real computer and the COCO never quite made it.
>
>
Hmm, I tried to post this yesterday ... probably something went wrong..
I am looking for a 63C09E or 63B09E. Anybody knows where I can buy it??
I found a source in Australia, but that is the 63B09. The suffix "E"
is important, it is the *external* clock version, as used in the Core
Board of the Blinkenlight project (40 pin DIL case).
I have a PDP-8/e simulation running on th Core board, but could use
a performance increase. Upgrading to the Motorola "B" parts will allow
to double the clock frequency, but the Hitachi 63B09 is even faster,
as it does many 6809 instructions in less cycles.
Interested in the sim? Check my 'Homebrew PDP-11' page, the link there
is "spin off" ...
- Henk,
www.pdp-11.nl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of ben franchuk
> Sent: donderdag 26 augustus 2004 5:21
> To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: dos electronics software?
>
>
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:17:34PM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote:
> >
> >>Also, if you're looking for something "more updated"
> there's always the
> >>Hitachi 63C09 - it's 4 Mhz, and has more registers, a
> 16-bit integer
> >>multiply (with a 32-bit result) and clock for clock is
> faster than the 6809.
> >
> >
> > Is it pin-compatible with the 6809?
> >
> > -ethan
> >
>
> Off hand I think it is pin compatable since it was a 6809
> replacement part.
> The gota is the hardware designers upgraded the core
> instruction set to
> switch instruction sets from the 'Motorola 6809' to the
> 'Enhanced 6809' mode
> with a mode changing instuction.Since they had a license to sell only
> 6809 parts
> this information was never documented other than hardware
> hackers on the
> internet.
> More information can be found here.
> http://www.concentric.net/~Alxevans/index.html
>
>