Hi,
Something for the Toaster users among us - video
tapes:
- Studio 16
- LW Essentials
- LW #1 2.0
- LW #2 2.0
- Modeler training, Toaster 2.0
- Displacement mapping, bones, morphing
- Toaster Surfaces 2.0
They are all copies, but I viewed them, they are good.
You can have them for the price of shipping (8
pounds).
Also, I need ROM 016 for my "chicklet" PET 2001.
Any givers?
Steve.
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
der Mouse <mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca> wrote:
> The above is a rant. It is only a rant. If this had been a serious
> message, the attitude presented would have been drastically different.
> This concludes our test of the Rant Line. We now return you to your
> regularly scheduled list.
Well, it IS a serious matter for ME. If Jay is going to make this list
hostile to people who actually run their entire business operations on
Classic computers in the Classic manner (and exercise their right to
use their own servers and not someone else's for sovereignty reasons),
it looks like those of us *TRULY* into Classic computing need to start
our own list (hosted on a Classic list server of course). der Mouse,
can I count you in? I'm sure I can count on Tony... He is certainly
*THE* most intelligent and most worthy person on this list.
MS
More finds from today's trip. One HP mini-cartridge factory marked "DGL
Demo Mini #2 Mini Cart, PE, FMGR 24998-13309 Rev 2040". I don't know what
the software if but someone here should know. The other tape appears to be
a backup. It was orginaly marked "DB1000 CRTG#5" but that has been marked
out and "!BCK03 R2540" has been marked in pen.
Joe
I went scrounging today and found this. I can't use it but it's too good
to waste so I thought I'd see if anyone here could use it. It's on a small
tape spool and is marked "4010A01 Plot 10(R) Terminal Control System Level
5.01 (C)Copyright Tektronix Inc 1988 Format IBM ASCII 1600 BPI Label:
None Serial No. B074512 Record: 80 Block: 800 Option: 08".
Joe
Jim,
I understand where you're coming from, however the way the product was presented, it stated it could read various formats, what wasn't mentioned on the site for the product or during the purchase process is that the "product is capable of reading such formats - if someone actually writes the code"
My Atari 800 could run linux - if someone ports it, could run CP/M too if someone wants to write the needed code, could read IBM disks on its disk drives - if someone writes it...
All of our equipment can do a lot more then it is normally capable of --- if someone takes the time to write it.
So what I'm saying is I bought the product because it stated it could do certain things which I was expecting out of the box when I bought it, just there was no fineprint saying that there were no actual s/w or drives to actually make the card work that way yet.
Curt
-----Original message-----
From: Jim Battle frustum at pacbell.net
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:00:33 -0500
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Catweasel opinions, sources of info etc.
> Jules Richardson wrote:
>
> > OK, thinking about getting a catweasel board for the museum.
> >
> ...
> > 2) Opinions of the board would be much appreciated, particularly in the
> > context of what it *can't* do, how easy it is to code for, how easy it
> > is to get hold of others' code to handle a particular format (rather
> > than reinventing the wheel), how well the board copes with media errors
> > etc.
>
> There are now four generations of catweasel cards -- the fourth is just
> coming out now. It is an FPGA design where the FPGA gets set up via
> software, so the developer can actually fix bugs and add features. The
> mailing list was quite busy for a few weeks there but has been strangely
> silent for a couple -- maybe I got unsub'd somehow.
>
> The MK3 and earlier were OK for soft sectored/unsectored disks, but
> reading hard sectored disks was significantly harder and writing them
> much harder yet. The MK4 supposedly has/will have features to make
> reading/writing hard sectored disks reasonable.
>
> The "3rd party drivers" for TRS-80's that someone else mentioned in this
> list was written by our own Tim Mann.
>
> I think people have the wrong idea about this product. There isn't
> corporation behind these cards -- it is a labor of love by one
> individual supported by a number of hobbyists. It is a real company
> making them, just a tiny one. Yes, you will have to write your own
> software if you are expecting to read/write disk formats that aren't
> already supported.
>
> To give you some idea of the ethics of the company/individual (jens), I
> bought a MK3 card a bit over a year ago. I wrote software to decode
> some PTDOS disks that I have. I fed back some information to Jens about
> how the MK3 fell short for reading/writing that particular format. He
> had to spin the MK3 design to make the MK4 anyway (one of the key parts
> was end-of-lifed), and he is incorporating some of that input into the
> design. 9 months goes by. I get an email, apparently sent to a few
> dozen people, saying: "What is your home address? I'm going to mail you
> an MK4 card." A $100 card for free.
>
> My only regret is at the moment I don't have the time to work on the MK4
> card, but I will soon.
>
> One pain about using the card was that I had to use it on an Win98
> machine so I could do simple I/O to the thing. XP doesn't allow it
> without drivers. Apparently under linux is isn't so hard. Anyway, this
> time around they are working on a driver with a mostly common API
> between linux/XP/otherthings so that you don't have to mess with the low
> level IO and just program the thing without jumping through hoops.
> Supposedly it will also be able to drive MK3 cards.
>
> There are no hard real time constraints to programming it, making it
> very simple. On MK3 boads you manually step it to the track you care
> about then you tell the controller to read or write a track. All the
> transition information gets captured in a RAM. When it is done you read
> out the data or write the next track to the RAM. MK4 adds more logic to
> tell apart the index hole from sector holes plus a state machine and
> some other control bits to allow reading/writing individual sectors on
> hard sectored devices.
>
> If you expect it to be plug & play for some oddball format, you will be
> disappointed. If you don't mind spending a week of evenings writing a
> decoder/encoder in software, then it is a great card.
>
>
On Mar 4 2005, 21:54, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:01 +0000, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > On Mar 4 2005, 10:56, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
> >
> > > I think many don't realize the damage that can happen
> > > when the group becomes a "Please fix my PC" group.
> > > I watched this happen to a news group that had too many
> > > people that tolerated such off topic post. From Jim's own
> > > words, he thought that this was a general computer
> > > group.> [ snip ]
> >
> > FWIW, I'm in complete agreement with Dwight, and well remember the
> > newsgroup he means, having used it from 1994 until its eventual
demise.
> > Actually, it's still there - but has become an alt.fix.my.pc
group.
>
> Not alt.comp.homebuilt? I think I looked there a while ago and gave
up
> when I saw how many PC posts there were.
Actually it's alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt, and it started as a group
for people interested in building or modifying hardware in the sense of
using a soldering iron or perhaps VHDL, but gradually newbies started
appearing and asking about PCs they had "built" in the sense of
sticking their ISA cards on a new motherboard. At first they got
politely asked to try elsewhere, but quite quickly, first one or two,
then more, other newbies started saying "well, it was a polite
question, with a simple answer, so why not just answer it?" and in
quite a short space of time the please-help-me-fix-my-PC brigade
outnumbered the on-topic posters by 100:1. Various solutions were
tried but too late and all failed; eventually all the regulars moved
elsewhere. Some started a new group called comp.arch.hobbyist; maybe
not the best choice of name. It gets about one post a week. On a good
week.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Well, I'm about to be 43, born June 21 1962 (exactly a
year older than one of the other posters recently...).
I first encountered Personal Computers in 1978 at a
Star Trek Convention where I poured $20.00 into a .50
a game Star Trek Game hosted on a TRS-80 Model I.
I asked the author for his address so I could buy a
copy, but I guess he thought that a 17yo kid would
never buy a $1000 computer.
By January 1979, I was the proud owner of a TRS-80
Model I, Level I, 16k computer. The Manager of the
store said I didn't need Level II. Turns out he was
having problems moving Level I machines, and was stuck
with this one.. LOL!
Shortly thereafter, I upgraded to Level II and went to
work for Radio Shack.
I bought an expansion interface in 1980 and I think I
have the singular honor of being the only person I
know whose warranty was voided BEFORE I took the E/I
home.
Being that I worked in the store, I took it home
BEFORE I had finished paying the layaway, installed
the 32k of RAM I had bought mail-order, tested it...
And brought the unit BACK to the store.
I bought my first Floppy drive for $321.00 which was
an MPI drive that ejected floppies like a toaster. We
never got that drive to run...
I then got a Wangtek Flippy Drive (Two sided by
turning the floppy over, it had two sets of sector
hole and write protect sensors) and a Percom Doubler.
I worked for an LNW Dealer in NYC (Stoney Clove
Computers) and coveted an LNW Model I for some time.
I also worked for Lawrence S. Epstein Assoc. and sold
Corvus Hard Drives for the Model I/II/III, etc...
I almost bought a ZX-80 instead of the Flippy Drive at
the Trenton Computer Festival in 1980...
Over the years I've owned just about every American
Micro Computer: Atari 400/800, Atari ST, Amiga
1000/500, Apple IIe, IIgs, IIc, Laser 128/128ex,
MacPlus, Duo 230, PB 1400, Wallstreet G3,
PowerComputing Power Center 132, Power 100, ZX-81
(built in an hour from the kit), TS1000, TS 1500,
TS2068, ZX-Spectrum (American Prototype), Coco I, II &
III, All sorts of PC Clones starting with an American
XT (8mhz Turbo V20) and currently with a self-built P4
3.2ghz.
I worked for Zebra Systems and Spectrum Projects and
developed a lot of products for the Timex/Sinclair and
Color Computer Community...
At Zebra, I used and fell in love with an Imsai 8080
upgraded with a Z-80 board. I did a lot of
"typesetting" with a program called "FancyFont" on
CP/M using an FX-80 printer and eventually a Laserjet
500.
I also co-authored the Coco Greeting Card Designer
while at Zebra and worked on the SC-01 Votrax Speech
Synthesiser implementation on the ZX-81/TS1000 and the
TS-2068.
Two of the dream computers I'd like to own is an Imsai
and an LNW-80 Model II.
I ran several BBS's in the mid 80's: Rainbow Magazine
BBS (5 lines), Omni*Net BBS, Outpost-80 BBS, Computer
Concepts BBS, Zebra Systems BBS using mostly TBBS on
TRS-80's.
I helped develop a fork of Connection-80 BBS in NYC
called "Nybbles 80" BBS with Paul Oves and Stoney
Clove Computers. I added threaded messaging,
passwords, and color...
I was a Novell CNE from 1989 - 1996 (I never upgraded
to 4.0 and above).
Today, I am a network engineer supporting MacOS X
Servers...
I can't imaging my life before I had computers in
it...
I still have my TRS-80 Model I which has been heavily
modified using the TRS-80 and Other Mysteries Book by
Dennis Kitsz. It has Lowercase, High Speed Mod, Alpha
Joystick built in, Reset Switch, Internal speaker and
Amp, Composite Video Out, better keyboard with
keypad...
It's not working right now, it won't recognize either
of my E/I's.
It was stolen twice and recovered due to all the mods.
It was easily identifiable, and I got lucky to get it
back twice when stolen.
I just bought a Mac Mini to add to my collection, and
am selling my G4 500 on eBay to fund it...
I put $50 into the coupon for an AmigaONE, and may be
getting one of those this year too.
That's it!
Al
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Just found the following snippet in a 1990 document (someone's review of
a GUI show which they'd attended). Just struck me as interesting in that
I never knew there was an alternative to 8.3 filenames in the
DOS/Windows world prior to Win95, nor have I ever heard of HP NewWave
before...
Apparently also included macros/activity recording, associations between
data and application (e.g. double-click on a spreadsheet file and it
opens in the spreadsheet app etc.), and context-sensitive help. Sounds
like a winner, only I've never even heard of it...
Apologies to the original author (who almost certainly isn't on this
list!) for the cut & paste!
(I do like that first line :-)
-------
NewWave is a 'front end' to MSWindows to make them useable. It provides
a Filer facility which tarts up the MS-DOS filing system to enable 30
character filenames with no obvious character set limitations (ie it'll
accept a space in the filename) and a framework to interchange and
combine multiple data types into one document. This framework manages
dynamic links between the document and the original object which is
contained in the document such that when the document is reconstructed
any changes to, say the spreadsheet data, get reflected in, say, the
report. Parts of foreign objects can also be imported with the same
results, eg a few rows and columns of a spreadsheet can be imported to a
word processed document.
On Mar 6 2005, 12:26, Tom Jennings wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5 2005, 10:06, Ron Hudson wrote:
> >> I am running OS8 on a pdp8 simulator in my iBook.
> >
> >> it prints out the header, then prints
> >>
> >> ME 10
> >>
> >> Well, it's a very simple BASIC statement, did I get
> >> it wrong? (or is the simulate broken?)
>
> > The statement is fine, the program as a whole isn't. "ME" means
> > "Missing END".
>
>
> There's a way to coerce the BASIC interpreter to not need the
> missing END statement. Change the program to read:
>
>
> 10 PRINT "ME 10"
>
> Then there would be no problem.
>
> You're welcome. Invoice for services in the mail, NET 30.
LOL! Yes, that'll produce the expected result!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Now that is weird. I read somewhere (or saw a survival show) that EVERYONE
>should carry a center punch in their cars just in case you car gets
>submerged in water. Use the center punch on you side windows to get out,
>otherwise it would be impossible to open the door....
Although I can't dispute this idea, I've been curious exactly how hard it
really would be to open a car door under water. You have air pressure
inside the car trying to escape, and although the door would be slow, it
shouldn't cease to open.
But I admit, that is one of the few car accident scenarios in which I
have not trained. (We don't really have deep enough water in my covered
towns to be an issue... although we did have a car in a swimming pool not
too long ago, but that was a first for us... a drunk guy drove down
someone's driveway instead of the on ramp to the highway... when we got
there, he still couldn't figure out where the highway was... and what a
swimming pool was doing blocking the road.)
I do laugh at those emergency tools that are now being sold for car
owners (that thing that looks like a mutant hammer, it has a center
punch, a seat belt cutter, and I'm not sure what else on it). With all
the accidents I've seen, any that a person would have a need to use such
a tool, they are either not in a position to use the tool, or not in a
condition to use the tool (kind of hard to cut your seat belt if you are
unconscious with the dashboard in your lap)
Personally, I see those as just another sucker product. My same feeling
would apply to anyone carrying a center punch specifically to break the
window if you drive into water. How many times in the past HAVE you
driven into water, and when you did, what was your condition at the time,
and where was the location of the punch relative to you, and how long
would it take you to get to it vs how much time do you have to escape.
All in all, its kind of silly, because the only time you will need it,
you likely won't be able to use it.
(I carry one not for my benefit, but for that of others... mine is in my
med kit in my trunk, so I couldn't access it for myself even if I wanted
to)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hi list,
I have the above, plus its BC15D-25 cable here if anybody wants it. It
goes from a Centronics-style connector to 8 MMJ sockets. I don't know
which multiplexer it's for.
Free, you pay shipping or collect. Contact me off-list if you're interested.
Regards,
Ed.
On Mar 5 2005, 10:06, Ron Hudson wrote:
> I am running OS8 on a pdp8 simulator in my iBook.
> it prints out the header, then prints
>
> ME 10
>
> Well, it's a very simple BASIC statement, did I get
> it wrong? (or is the simulate broken?)
The statement is fine, the program as a whole isn't. "ME" means
"Missing END".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
James Fogg wrote:
> It might not make a perfect solution, but you could
> take 2 nicad cells (1.25V each) of similar diameter
> and a shorter length (N size?) and place them in series
> in shrink tubing to make a replacement cell.
Yeah - I thought about that. Don't want to go there if I don't have to, though.
(I did fail to mention in my original post that it requires 2 of these
little beasts, thus making a 5V supply necessary.)
> Also check out the oddball batteries available for
> photo equipment. There's a lot of odd voltages in
> that category, though you might have to slightly
> modify the cell holder (widen it a bit).
Yeah - thought about that, too. It is a fairly tight fit already, so
widening the battery compartment doesn't look feasible.
At this point, I'm thinking that if there isn't a direct replacement for
this cell, I'll just pay the bucks to get it refurbished so it can use
something more conveniently available.
Appreciate the suggestions though!
Based on the docs I got from Ashley I was able to re-arrange the memory
section to be sane, cards were in the wrong slots. I was also able to get
the jumpers set right on the G110 card. Now when I power up I can definitely
read core correctly. There's a random assortment of data in sequential
locations and returning to those same locations I always get the same value.
That's a plus.
However, I can't store anything. Anytime I store a new value in a location,
that location gets all zeros. Moving to another location I get data, and
moving back - zeros. So it appears to be challenged in writing, but not
reading, memory. The plot thickens :)
One thing I can't be sure of that the docs from Ashley don't say for sure is
how to configure a less than full section of memory. I ASSumed you start
>from right to left, but in the HP core section that would be a bad
assumption. Humm... But if I had that wrong, I'm suprised I'd be able to
consistently read memory locations. A different G231 and G110 and H214
didn't change the problem.
Jay
Yesterday I picked up a 6 ft rack loaded with a
PDP-11/23, two RL02 drives, an RX02 drive, an
RL02 pack, 3 boxes of RX02 floppies, and a bunch
of cables. The rack was complete with side panels
and top pink/purple panel. Today I figured how to
get all 400+ pounds of it out of the back of my
pickup truck and into my shop with just me and my
wife. I then hooked it up to a VT100 and powered
it on.
It comes up with an octal address (177something)
followed by the @ prompt. I'm used to unibus
M9312 console emulator prompts and the 11/03
prompt where you can type in a two character
code for a supported device and it will attempt
to boot that device (ie DL, DX, etc).
I'm going to search for the 11/23 ODT info, but
in the meantime if someone can give me a quickie
command set so I can try to boot off the RL02 or
RX02 drives, I would greatly appreciate it. Is
there a command to tell it to boot from the RL02
or RX02?
Thanks in advance for any help that anyone can
provide!
Off to Google for 11/23 and ODT commands and to
check Al's bitsavers.
Ashley
From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
Subject: Re: Re installing XP on Sony
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> "well, it was a polite
> question, with a simple answer, so why not just answer it?"
Any suggestions for a starting point for the main jet sizes for
replacing the 4 Keihin carbs on a Honda S800 with 2 DCOE Webers?
---------------------------------------
ROTFL!
Interesting point, though: I owned one and may even still have the service
manual somewhere; alas, that won't help you with your high-performance
mods :). But if I could have helped you, you never would have known
if you hadn't posted here. Never hurts to ask, I say.
BTW, in case you do actually own one, I think I still have a nice
wall-sized poster.
mike
Hmm, I have sent this to the list earlier.
Perhaps it did not make it ...
The M7800-YA is the current-loop only version.
> Jay wrote about a DL11:
> If I exam 776500, I get a 200,
> but anytime I store a value and read it back, there's all
> zero's in the data register.
I will dig up my notes getting characters in and out a M7800
in my 11/35 resurrection using the front panel several years
ago.
This is also an advice: make notes of *everything* you do on
a system, no matter how trivial at this time. Changing a wire,
trying some toggle in tests on the console, behaviour, measured
voltages on pins, etc.
If problems occur later you can go back and do all tests from
your notes. That's why I can write my tests with the M7800 when
I get home (in a few hours from now).
- Henk, PA8PDP.
These are a few of my notes.
Console board: 2 versions. M7800 and M7800-YA
M7800:
Xtal = 4608 kHz, has 1448/1449
jumpers: A3,A4,A5,A7,A9
open: A6,A8,A10
base address = 776500
baudrate = 1200 Bd.
M7800-YA:
Xtal = 1152 kHz, no 1448/1449 (20mA current loop only)
jumpers: A0,A7
open: A4,A5,A6,A8,A9,A10
base address = 777560 (console)
baudrate = 1200 Bd.
console registers:
RCSR 777560
RBUF 777562
XCSR 777564
XBUF 777566
Hit the key "1" of the keyboard
If RCSR contains 0200 it means that a character is received.
To check this:
1) set the SR to 777560.
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777560
3) press EXAM
4) the DATA LEDs show 000200
RBUF should contain 061 (ASCII "1").
To check this:
1) set the SR to 777562.
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777562
3) press EXAM
4) the DATA LEDs show 000061
Load 065 in XBUF --> the screen should show a "5".
Operation:
1) set the SR to 777566.
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777566
3) set the SR to 000065
4) press DEP
Simple test of the CPU.
1) set the SR to 777570 (the switch register address).
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777570
3) set the SR to 000777 (this is BRA . branch to myself)
4) press START
The ADDRESS LEDs show 777572.
CONSOLE LED is off, RUN, BUS, PROC LEDs are on.
When you press HALT, CONSOLE LED goes on.
- Henk, PA8PDP.
On Mar 6 2005, 0:41, Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > Tony wrote...
> > > My idea was going to be to hang a terminal off the card (assuming
you
> > > have an RS232 lead and can decode the word foramt and baud rate
settings
> > > [1] and then try writing to the transmit data registers at 777566
or
> > > 777656. See if you can transmit chracters to the terminal.
> > I have the appropriate cable from the card to mate & lock, I'll
cobble
>
> That sounds like a current loop cable. Do you have a terminal with a
20mA
> loop input?
That's my thought too, but Tony beat me to it.
> The RS232 buffer (and the companion 1489 receiver) were not fitted on
all
> versions of the DL11. It's worth checking if your card as them, if
not,
> they can always be fitted (I think all PCBs have the pads and tracks
for
> them), but you may need to fit some extra passives too. If you need
to do
> this. I'll dig out my prints and tell you just what to do.
>
> If you do have the RS232 buffer, then you can connect the output of
that
> section (which is routed to a pin on the BERG connector) to the RS232
> receive input of a terminal.
It's easy to add the parts; I've done it a couple of times. AFAIR, to
get the full version, it's three RS232 chips, half a dozen resistors,
and a capacitor. Maybe a diode.
In case it helps, here's the pinout of the Berg connector, and the
connections to make an RS232 cable and a 20mA loop cable. The
"interlock" may require some explanation... The seril out from the UART
is connected to both the RS232 and 20mA buffers, so when it transmits,
it does so on both. However, you don't want both to be connected to
the UART receiver at the same time, so you have to jumper *either* the
20mA receiver *or* the RS232 receiver to the UART, and this is what the
"interlock" does:
Numbers are DB25 pin numbers (for the BC05C) or Mate-N-Lok pin
numbers (for 7008360):
Berg pin Signal BC05C 7008360
A Ground 1 Prot.Ground (blue/wht) - ground
B Ground 7 Signal Ground (brwn/wht)
C 25 Force Busy (red/org)
D 13 Secondary CTS (org/red)
E TTL serial in - interlock in - interlock in
F EIA serial out 2 Transmit Data (wht/blue)
H 20mA interlock - interlock out
J EIA serial in 3 Receive Data (org/wht)
K +20mA serial in 7 + Rec.Data
(green)
L 24 External clk (brwn/red)
M EIA interlock - interlock out
N 15 serial clk xmit (grey/grn)
P 19 Secondary RTS (lbue/blk)
R 17 serial clk recv (grey)
S -20mA serial in 3 - Rec.Data
(red)
T 5 Clear To Send (grn/wht)
U
V EIA RTS 4 Request To Send (wht/org)
W 10 -ve power (wht/grey)
X 22 Ring (blk/org)
Y 9 +ve power (grey/wht)
Z 6 Data Set Ready (wht/grn)
AA +20mA serial out 5 + Trans.Data
(white)
BB 8 Data Carrier Detect (wht/brwn)
CC
DD EIA DTR 20 Data Terminal Ready (blk/blu)
EE -20mA RDR Run 3 - Reader Run
(black)
FF 11 202 Secondary TD (blu/red)
HH
JJ 12 202 Secondary RD (red/blu)
KK -20mA serial out 2 - Trans.Data
(black)
LL 14 EIA Secondary TD (grey/red)
MM 21 Signal Quality (org/blk)
NN 16 EIA Secondary RD (red/brwn)
PP +20mA RDR Run 6 + Reader Run
(black)
RR 23 Signal Rate (grn/blk)
SS
TT +5V DC
UU ground
VV ground
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 00:44 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
> > Its OK Sellam, you wont loose points. Its a common mistake, not a
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You meam, "won't lose", right? If there are any loose points, someone
> should probably gather them up before they do get lost.
>
> Sorry, "lose" vs. "loose" is one of my pet peeves.
He almost made you loose your temper?
Sorry, couldn't help myself.
--
Tore S Bekkedal <toresbe at ifi.uio.no>
I have a couple of questions that I haven't been able to find in my books.
(1) there has been much discussion in this list about capacitors failing. I
recently had a cap on a QIC-24 drive fail with a bit of sound and fury (axial
tantalum). Is there any way to test for this other than desoldering every cap
(at least every electrolytic) and testing it on a cap meter? I don't want to
fry my IMSAI, but there are a lot of caps in there and it would take forever...
(2) (flame risk) My Tek 555 popped and blew a fuse when I had it plugged in
last. I disassembled the PS and cleaned off the dust, and I want to test it by
itself, but the power-on relay won't close. Any hints, or is this like
amplifiers where the tubes need a load?
- Scott Quinn
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:53:21 -0800 "Eric F." <elf at ucsd.edu> Inquired:
[...]
> I have a hand held lab computer (manufactured & purchased in 1990)
> which
> takes quite an unusual battery.
>
> The battery is the size of a regular "AA", but is 2.5V Lithium. The
> company who used to manufacture them (SAFT) no longer does so. The SAFT
> battery model # is "LCP 6".
I'm straining to remember if the 2.5V Lithium batteries were
rechargeable. The pictures of the device (below) do not indicate if
there is a charging port... Current technology for primary cells is 3
V.
[...]
> http://home.san.rr.com/instep/labpartner-front.jpg (~58KB)
> http://home.san.rr.com/instep/labpartner-back.jpg (~44KB)
I have a number of odd instruments that have taken all sorts of
batteries that are no longer in use or, if available, would take a
large part of my net worth. An old portable radio with a 90V battery
comes to mind.
My solution to the problem has been to use a regular battery that will
fit in the space along with a buck or boost converter to generate the
total voltage required. In your case I would use a regular alkaline AA
in one compartment and a boost circuit in the other. Your use might not
be quite as long as that of a Lithium, but alkalines are cheap.
[...]
> (And what's with the designer(s) decision to use such an obscure
> battery type?)
I, like that designer, have yet to find a good source of hindsight to
use when designing in components :-))
CRC
9000 VAX wrote:
> I guess the lab computer uses 5v CMOS devices and the
> 2x2.5V battery let them skip the voltage regulator.
That does have rhyme & reason to it -- yes.
(And you are correct in that it takes 2 of these 2.5V lithium cells -- I
failed to mention that in my original post.)
I suppose it just couldn't have been foreseen by them that SAFT would
discontinue manufacturing this particular battery at some point down the road.
Still, though, wouldn't manufacturing a device which relies on a sole
provider for its power cells raise a flag or two during the design process?
It is not like these batteries are as common as dirt -- like your typical
Duracell "AA". (Then again, I'm no hardware engineer, so I'm not familiar
with how these decisions are made.)
>Is this one of those laws where if you're caught in the middle of the
>night on a stranger's doorstip with a set of lockpicks then you're
>comitting a crime (which IMHO is quite reaosnable) but if you happen to
>be at a friend's house repairing a PDP11/o5 then you do have a legal
>reason to have said lockpicks?
Yup, that is exactly the kind of law it is. It really isn't enforced by
itself (they don't round people up for owning lock picks), it is just
used as an aid to arrest/detain someone that you have a really strong
hunch is up to no good (and as a way to confiscate the tools from someone
that you are sure plans to use them to commit a crime... this is done in
inner city schools when kids pass thru metal detectors and are found to
have various items that have perfectly legit uses... but you know the kid
doesn't have it for one of those reasons... box cutters are the most
common item)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Where are the young people on the list ? ;-)
I'll turn 23 in a month and have been working on oldish and "cool" computers for approx. 7 years now.
Started with a Philips P3200 (286, heavy stuff) which infected me with the bug...
I can't talk of nostalgia as my machines are mostly from the time, I couldn't walk yet... DEC and CDC stuff,
but also some SUNs from the time I started going to college.
There's also stuff before I was born, like my PDP-8/a. It's funny to think about that.
As adrian said, nostalgia from my time would be 386 and 486 and so on, which obviously aren't very interesting to investigate time on. Moreover, there's nothing you can repair on these things by yourself...
Pierre
______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
From: "Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: minor list changes
Sellam wrote....
...
> Can you please change that to something like 3 times with 2 hour
> intervals? Or at least allow it to try more than twice. This still
> doesn't help someone who has a 24 hour server outage thanks to their
> stupid ISP (like I've been experiencing lately).
Ok, I can do that. But bear in mind that providing for a particular persons
mailserver to have an extended outage, means that because of YOUR outage, 14
other people won't get their email for a while. How far do I try to
accomodate one person at the expense of others?
I'm still considering options....
----------------------------------------
Well, if I had been one of those 14 people today it wouldn't have mattered;
as a matter of fact, *my* ISP (a public commercial ISP in a major city
(Toronto)) was down for most of the day today while they moved their equipment.
Even two of our major banks had their respective Canada-wide credit card
& on-line banking networks go down for almost a day recently, so it does
happen to the best of them.
But I understand your problem, and BTW, let me join the list of people
expressing their appreciation for the time & effort you put into running this list.
mike
Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Actually, I can't think of the last time I've seen ANY domain that didn't
> have more than one MX record.
For the record (no pun intended), I have no MX record at all. They are
optional and unnecessary if the host receives its own mail.
> Except for someone trying to run a service out
> of their house. To do so, is... well...
Harhan Engineering Co's physical facility is not a house.
MS
[This post involves a hand held lab computer, of which this particular
model was made/purchased about 15 years ago. Similar models have since
been made, but without the problem I describe below.]
I have a hand held lab computer (manufactured & purchased in 1990) which
takes quite an unusual battery.
The battery is the size of a regular "AA", but is 2.5V Lithium. The
company who used to manufacture them (SAFT) no longer does so. The SAFT
battery model # is "LCP 6".
Picture of battery (and a regular "AA" for comparison):
http://home.san.rr.com/instep/saft-lcp6.jpg (~42KB)
Picture of lab computer:
http://home.san.rr.com/instep/labpartner-front.jpg (~58KB)
http://home.san.rr.com/instep/labpartner-back.jpg (~44KB)
The company who made the lab computer still offers to refurbish the unit
for a new (more readily available) lithium battery pack, but I want to
avoid doing that if at all possible. They also don't have any suggestions
as to where to find a 2.5V Lithium "AA" sized battery.
AND -- I've Google'd high & low for an equivalent, but nothing pops up.
So I've come here to ask: does anyone know if an equivalent battery exists?
(And what's with the designer(s) decision to use such an obscure battery type?)
> I have a hand held lab computer (manufactured & purchased in
> 1990) which takes quite an unusual battery.
>
> The battery is the size of a regular "AA", but is 2.5V
> Lithium. The company who used to manufacture them (SAFT) no
> longer does so. The SAFT battery model # is "LCP 6".
>
> Picture of battery (and a regular "AA" for comparison):
>
> http://home.san.rr.com/instep/saft-lcp6.jpg (~42KB)
It might not make a perfect solution, but you could take 2 nicad cells
(1.25V each) of similar diameter and a shorter length (N size?) and
place them in series in shrink tubing to make a replacement cell.
Also check out the oddball batteries available for photo equipment.
There's a lot of odd voltages in that category, though you might have to
slightly modify the cell holder (widen it a bit).
Doc Shipley <doc at mdrconsult.com> wrote:
> Anybody who has access to the skills and time to run a
> mail server most likely has access to a *Tah-Dah* backup server. It's
> trivial if you have nameservice control of your domain. If you don't,
> you shouldn't be running your own mail at all.
Again, who gave you the right to dictate so? Yes, as the sole owner of
Harhan Engineering Company I of course have total control of the Harhan.ORG
and Harhan.COM domains, but why in the hell should I spend money on a
backup server just because YOU decree so?
Many many many original ARPANET sites did just fine with one single mail
server for the organisation. It was a Classic computer, like a VAX-11/780
running 4.2 BSD UNIX, or a FOONLY running TENEX, or whatever. They were
kept up diligently with tender loving care, just like I maintain my VAXen,
but boards DO go bad sometimes, and PROPER hardware troubleshooting (the
kind that Tony Duell practices) takes more than 35 min.
MS
> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:20:15 -0800 (PST)
> From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com>
> Subject: MS Network Client under DOS 3.3 working
> For what it's worth:
>
> I got Microsoft Network Client working under DOS 3.3 on a 386/33. It
> works very well. I was able to connect to my WinXP system and copy
> over
> just under 500 files.
>
> I also got it to work reliably with a 3Com Etherlink III. Before, I
> whined that it kept crashing. Well, this time when I was setting
up, I
> realized that the MSNC setup program advises that it will use more
> memory
> to optimize network performance but gives you the option to forgo
> optimization. I had it forgo optimization, and I think that made all
> the
> difference.
>
> At some point, if it becomes necessary, I'll also test on an 80286
and
> even an old XT system.
>
> Once again, if you want to download MSNC, I have it all bundled up
in a
> zip file here:
>
> http://www.siconic.com/download/network/
>
> (Note: I changed the location from where it was before.)
>
> This directory also contains the 3Com 3C5x9 configuration utility,
but
> it's also included in the ZIP file, so no need to download it
> separately.
>
So, let me get this straight; as long as the client is running on
a 386 or older (even though the files are dated 1996) it's on
topic, but if someone were to ask how to network a Pentium II
running DOS 6.22 to his XP system, you'd presumably tell him to
FO & get the files from Microsoft; have I got that right?
<rolling of eyes & shaking of head>
BTW, does your package include the addon to make it bidirectional,
or is it one way only?
I've used the MS client for years without any hiccups, but it is
VERY memory hungry. It IS free though...
mike
>> I haven't had very good luck with paper clips. A better tool is a used
>> dental pick, because this is tempered and holds up when you put stress on
>
>Or just buy a set of lock picks. They're not expensive. I think I
>paid under $15 for a reasonably nice set.
Depending on where you are, owning a lock pick set may be illegal if you
do not have a reason to own one.
Last I knew, lock pick sets were illegal to own in NJ unless you are
someone that has a "legal" use for one. Of course, since legal use isn't
really defined, it leaves it pretty wide open. (It is also illegal to
have a police scanner in your car, as well as carry a center punch...
again, unless you have "legal" reasons for the above... of course, being
a volunteer firefighter seems to get me past the legal requirements for
all of the above... so naturally I own all the above... and carry a
center punch in my car most all the time, as well as a lock pick set in
my tool bag)
Of course, IANAL, and I could be mistaken on the laws, or the exact forms
of them... but it is a heads up for those that may be planning to
purchase a lock pick set and run around with it in their back pocket...
they should just verify that they are allowed to do such before they find
themselves being accused of being a terrorist ;-)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Sellam Ismail wrote:
> I got Microsoft Network Client working under DOS 3.3 on a 386/33. It
> works very well. I was able to connect to my WinXP system and copy over
> just under 500 files.
I have it too working under VMWARE for running programs that no-longer
work under Windows XP DOS windows (e.g. Turbo-C).
However, I do not have the library that allows programs to use the IP
facilities. If anybody has this library, please let me know. Microsoft
used to have it on their web site, but I can't find it.
Thanks
**vp
Hello, all:
Looking for recommedations for a color ASCII terminal for my
computer lab. I know about the B&W/green vintage ones (ADM, Hazeltine, etc.)
but I'm not too familiar with color terminals. Are there any that look
reasonably "vintage" or is that a pipe dream?
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
I am running OS8 on a pdp8 simulator in my iBook.
I get the . prompt,
I run BASIC, type in the single line
10 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
RUN
it prints out the header, then prints
ME 10
Well, it's a very simple BASIC statement, did I get
it wrong? (or is the simulate broken?)
It's a nice simulator with a front panel-blinkenlights
Anyone know how to boot the PASCAL-S Disk? The simulator has a menu
selection that
fat fingers in the RK8-E boot loader (strictly cheating I know.) but
once that is set
in motion nothing seems to happen.
--------------Original message:
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:08:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com>
Subject: Re: Cromemco Software - what to do with it?
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 mhstein at canada.com wrote:
>> There are numerous systems out there, and Herb and Howard et al are
>> doing a great job of archiving the documentation, but what about the
>> software? Is anybody archiving the various versions of CDOS, Cromix &
>> Unix, and the languages & applications?
>I know I've got lots of various versions of this stuff on various media.
>Nothing concerted, however.
--------------------------
That's my point; I'm sure there are many bits & pieces out there but,
unlike the manuals, there doesn't seem to be much on the 'net anywhere
in any organized way.
Randy has suggested that Gaby might put it on her site, so that might
be the answer.
Maybe those of us who have some Cromemco S/W could get together
here or off-list and compare who's got what.
How about it Randy, you're doing such a fine job with the 8"/3.5" issue,
feel like organizing something else? It's even relevant...
==============
>> For that matter, is there any point? I don't see many people writing
>> Cobol or Fortran programs to run on a System 3...
>Yes. There's always value in preserving this stuff. Even if not apparent
>to us now. And it only takes the space of a floppy disk (or no space at
>all once it's been converted over to a modern hard disk).
--------------------------
Well, that brings up the second point: if it's going to be archived on
the 'net, in what format?
As discussed elsewhere, PC images of Cromemco disks can be a
problem because of their SD/DD mixed format.
Ordinary CDOS files are less of a problem since they're 8.3 file names
with no subdirectories; they can fairly easily be copied to a PC & ZIPped,
and copied back to a CDOS disk.
CROMIX & UNIX files are a little more problematic, because of the
long file names & subdirectories. They can be TAR'd, but again,
Cromemco being Cromemco, they used several incompatible
TAR/TARZ80/FTAR formats.
BTW, Cromix V31.58, for example, consists of 10 FTAR disks,
although the Z80 versions are much smaller (2 disks)
And of course there's still the problem of the mixed format boot disks.
Any thoughts/a consensus?
===============
>> So, any ideas what to do with it? (no obscene suggestions, please!)
>Stick it up your hard drive?
------------------------------
Well, that's what I've been doing, but a good dump would be welcome :)
Just need an appropriate site.
===============
>> BTW, any news about what happened with Don Maslin's collection?
>I'm wondering the same thing.
------------------------------
And what about Al Kossov's site?
mike
It is interesting to note that when I read this mail on gmail that one of
the adds posted was for lockpicks.
They are not illegal in Oregon nor are Scanners. The only scanners illegal
here are ones that scan the cellular band and that is a federal rule.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
>Guess I'll be hunting for a centre punch too ...
You can get one of them at any decent tool dealer (or any non decent
dealer that sells more then 4 plastic handled screwdrivers).
A center punch's "true" purpose is to mark or ding items. ie: before
drilling a hole in a metal sheet, you can use the center punch to ding
the metal so the drill bit won't slide around as it gets started.
They are really handy for breaking tempered glass cleanly. (just never
use one on your leg, as I found out the hard way... it hurt so much I
thought I exploded my femur).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> My vans (both of them) have those stupid power windows that won't operate
> unless the car is running. Oh, and the back windows don't open at all
> (well, OK, they open a couple of inches for ventilation).
Guess I'll be hunting for a centre punch too ...
--
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Le fascisme est la dictature ouverte de la bourgeoisie. -- Georg Dimitrov --
>Where would one buy a set, anyway? I'm in ... well, see sig. ^_^
I got mine from Galls, but that was about 10 years ago... I just did a
fast check on their web site, and I didn't see them now. However, I
didn't really try searching too hard... so they may still be worth
looking into (mine came with a book on how to use it as well... I've
never gotten very good at it however).
I think I may have also seen them at one point in an MCM Electronics
catalog (same set I have with the book).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> I am in the process of scrapping out my Telecom gear. I have
> some LA 120's and other Dec boards that I will be listing.
> The printers are not very economical to ship, so my thoughts
> are that there may be some interest in the parts. If that is
> the case, please let me know.
Where are you located?
All:
I had an idea for an Easter Egg within the Altair32 Emulator. I
remember a story that you could run a certain program on the Altair and hold
an AM radio next to the Altair and you would hear music. IIRC, the song was
"Daisy" as was played in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Does anyone (1) have this program in source and/or binary and (2)
can someone make a high-quality WAV file of it for me (since I don't have an
Altair)?
I figure I could take some liberties within the emulator code to
checksum/MD5 hash code loaded into the emulation space and if the music
binary is loaded, it'll set a flag which when RUN is toggled, the WAV would
play.
Wadda 'ya think?
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
>I own more than one hundred locks, and sometimes I can't find the key to
>open one. In some cases, I purchase equipment with locks but no keys.
>So I think I have an entirely legitimate use for lock picks. Whether a
>court would agree is an open question.
Well, like I said, legal use is not defined, so you likely would be ok
(it boils down to, does the cop think you have it for reasons of B&E, if
so, you are in violation of the law, if not, you are good to go... NJ
also has a similar law on knives... there is actually no definition of
how long of a blade is illegal to carry, it all has to do with intended
use... technically, if I had a valid reason, I could strap a 3 foot long
sword to my side and walk around with it... on the other hand, if I have
a box cutter in my pocket for no valid reason, I can be arrested... mind
you I've carried a pocket knife every day for most of my life, and I've
never been so much as questioned about it... that includes the two times
I was removed from my car at gun point and then searched)
>> (It is also illegal to have a police scanner in your car,
>
>Contradicted by the Communications Act of 1934, which being Federal
>law should override it.
I know if a few people that have gotten in hot water for having police
scanners in their car. Mind you, it is ONLY in their car (although
portable may be covered as well). Having them in your house is just fine.
>Now I'm baffled. I can see reasons for banning lock picks and police
>scanners, even though I vehemently disagree with those reasons. But
>why on earth should center punches be illegal? I don't carry one
>routinely, but if I'm going somewhere that I expect to need one,
>I carry it.
The idea is, a center punch is a rapid access tool for quietly and
cleaning taking out a car window. So it becomes a B&E tool... much like
your bolt cutters. (I actually carry a center punch in my car
specificially TO break car windows... it is in my med kit that I carry in
my trunk, and I've had to use it a few times when I've come across car
accidents).
But again, these things really boil down to can you convince the cop you
have a valid reason for having them. If not, can you convince a judge.
Anyone that has anything but an invalid reason, really shouldn't be
worried. Those that plan to use them for illegal purposes tend to be
pretty obvious (I don't know of anyone that has been harrassed over
having the items EXCEPT for people that really were using them for
nefarious reasons... I know of a few people that were questioned on them,
and I know of a bunch of people that the items are ignored, because they
have obvous legit reasons... just about all my friends have police
scanners in their cars... but just about all my friends are in emergency
services or law enforcement).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>