>From: "O. Sharp" <ohh at drizzle.com>
>
>
>Well: I finally took a leap of faith, and bought an ASR-33 from someone
>who wasn't anywhere near Seattle. After a previous (extremely bad)
>Teletype shipping experience (read: TTY dumped in box and packing peanuts
>poured on top; unit largely destroyed in transit; seller refused to
>refund and claimed damage was somehow _my_ fault; story actually got
>worse from there if you can believe that, but maybe that's enough for
>now), it took a leap of faith to try buying another one I couldn't
>personally pick up. But the seller took a _lot_ of extra care packing it,
>including bolting the typing unit to the chassis, and wonder of wonders
>it actually arrived completely intact. :)
>
>But in spite of that it needs some help, so I thought I'd ask a couple of
>questions here.
>
>-The one big problem it has is its lack of a reader power supply. The last
>owner got it from a government surplus program, but they neglected to
>supply anything but the unit itself... and so no reader supply. Does
>somebody have the schematic of one of these so I can build a new one?
>(Better yet: does somebody have a spare one I can talk them out of for a
>reasonable price?)
>
>-I'm looking at some DEC diagrams saying how the ASR-33 gets modified for
>use with a PDP-8 series interface (thanks once more to Mr. Kossow!). It
>says two "6RS205P484 Thyractors DEC #1100106" should be added to the unit.
>Okay, I admit it: I don't even know what the hell a "thyractor" _is_,
>much less what ratings I should be looking for re: these two. Can
>someone shed a little light on this?
>
>-Right now the unit is doing a lot of chattering on both Line and Local
>when powered on. Initially I thought something might be mechanically wrong
>due to being shaken around in shipping, say one of the clutches on the
>main shaft locking into an active position, but so far I haven't found a
>culprit. I'm also wondering if I'm even looking in the right direction
>for the problem, sooo here's the question: could the lack of a power
>supply for the reader be causing this behavior? (The reader itself is
>obviously inert right now, but I'm wondering if there's a missed
>connection or somesuch which could explain it.
Hi
If by the reader, you mean the tape reader? In local mode, it
should lock up if the tape is turned off and the keyboard
is reset ( H connector working ).
I've made a supply from the manual for the tape reader. The
only part that is hard to get is the power resistor. I just
used two in series to get the value. Still, this is not
needed to lock up.
Dwight
>
>...At some point I'll probably ask someone with a copyholder to take some
>tracings and measurements for me so I can fabricate a new one, but maybe
>I'll just see if I can get it working first. :)
>
> -O.-
>
>
Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Presumably such machines boot from hard disk too? (I've never seen any
> flavour of Windows boot from ROM).
Actually HP produced a version of windows 3.1 that was in ROM
They also produced a DOS system that was in ROM and a Unix
system (HP-UX 5.0) that was in ROM (not just the kernel, but
applications like csh and vi were in ROM as well).
Anyway, today you can get systems that boot from CDROM and run
>from a RAMDISK. I have seen Windows 98 (or ME) running in this
mode (really useful when booting off the network) so its not
that hard.
Finally windows CE is designed to be in ROM and you have a number
of implementations that use WinCE for its GUI.
**vp
-------Original Message:
> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:41:50 -0600
> From: "Randy McLaughlin" <cctalk at randy482.com>
> Subject: Re: 8' drive on PC troubleshooting
> From: "Geoff Reed" <geoffr at zipcon.net>
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:55 AM
> > are there any 8" drives out there that don't require 24 volts to
> work? I
> > have LOTS of powersupplies that supply GND, +5 and +12, but none
> that also
> > supply +24 :(
>
> To my knowlegde +5v & +24v are required by all 8" drives, other
> voltages
> vary from drive to drive. Before plugging in power connectors
veryify
> voltages.
>
>
> Randy
If this is on an S-100 System (and if we're talking about 8"
drives, as opposed to the very rare 8' ones :), you can try
connecting the +24V line to the unregulated +18V.
>From the installation instructions for the Quintec Tophat, a
dual 8" (TM848 Tandon) drive assembly that fits across the top of
a Cromemco Z-2:
...Using a good DC voltmeter be certain that the +18V line is running
at least 18 volts, preferably higher, around 19 volts...
And if anyone really needs a +24V supply, I *might* have one or
two in the basement somewhere (+5, +12, +24). Not light, though,
as I recall...
mike
On Mar 7 2005, 6:54, vrs wrote:
> From: "Jules Richardson" <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
> > I've yet to find anyone who can make (or even duplicate from
original) a
> > tubular key though. (Which is annoying as it'd be nice to have a
backup
> > for the steering wheel lock on my car! :)
>
> I must have lucked out. I had no trouble getting my DEC tubular keys
> duplicated at the local place (which is pretty big, as it happens).
>
> I thought everyone used BIC pens as the backup for those steering
wheel
> locks :-).
Nah, that's for Kryptonite bike locks :-)
http://www.engadget.com/entry/7796925370303347/http://www.engadget.com/entry/8154041173872584/
for those who didn't know. Watch the video.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf at siconic.com>
>
>
>So now that I've got the 8" drive running well on the PC, I am trying to
>read 8" CP/M disks. 22Disk is giving me sector not found errors
>(cylinder 2, side 0, sector 1) and the DOS CP/M tools are giving me
>"Unknown floppy disk format", even on disks that read fine on my NEC APC.
>
>I tried reading in a sector using debug but I also get read errors.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>The drive is a Tandon TM 848-02. Very little information online, but it
>seems to support DSDD.
Hi
It sounds like you have the wrong sector size.
It might also be that the disk are actually single density
and not double. It sounds like it is reading the first
sector ok. You might check the parameters for that format.
Dwight
"Stan Sieler" <sieler at allegro.com> wrote:
> "Milanowski, Don" <dmilanowski at egginc.com>
> is looking for a 09915-68000 keyboard (aka HP 98155A),
> probably as used with an HP 9915 computer.
HP 98155As are very rare. He is lucky to have one.
Best thing to do is to use the keyboard from a Series 80
computer (the matrix is the same).
**vp
>From: "Jules Richardson" <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
---snip---
>
>I've yet to find anyone who can make (or even duplicate from original) a
>tubular key though. (Which is annoying as it'd be nice to have a backup
>for the steering wheel lock on my car! :)
>
>cheers
>
>Jules
Hi
That is interesting. I just went to a local small shop
locksmith with the lock from one of my machines and
he created two keys for it at $15. He didn't even have
an original key to work from, just the lock.
Dwight
I've slowly been working through the box of carts that came with the
ISI system that
I just picked up from Erik Klein, but there doesn't appear to be a
complete binary
distribution tape set in the pile. An image or physical cart of a
version from '88 or later
(4.x or 5.x) would be helpful in trying to get the system going again.
Just to get it saved on line somewhere, the format of the cartridges is
a little tricky in
that ISI tape controllers simulate variable blocking on QIC cartridges
by appending
512 bytes of data in front of the actual data blocks. The first few
bytes are all that
matter
for example:
A1FE 0001 0002 2800 0014
is a magic number, file number, block number, and block length (10240
bytes)
On Mar 7 2005, 8:58, John Foust wrote:
> At 08:44 AM 3/7/2005, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> >Any advantage it might yield over the vagaries of SMTP has little to
do with
> >its perceived ease of use or accessibility. I'm forced to use web
boards for
> >some esoteric topics, but I get enough vintage computing on Usenet
and other
> >mailing lists, so I wouldn't make the jump. I don't like pull media.
>
> (Scratching head: Web forums not easy to use or accessible?
> Classic computing not esoteric? Mail reading (as opposed to
> delivery) is push, not pull?)
Web forums are not friendly to some browsers. They're also slow. Mail
delivery is indeed push, not pull; by the time it gets to local
delivery reading is just opening a local file, which is rather
different than downloading a page on a server at the same time as
umpteen other people. And it's a damned sight easier to search, sort
and filter a mailbox (local, or IMAP) than a web page.
I'm with Cameron, Sellam, and Jules. And probably a few other people
who wouldn't want to use web technology because they have to be online
at the time they are reading, all the time they're reading. Not
friendly to dialup users.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> 2) I changed the max time in queue for any message (outbound) to 35 minutes.
> This means the server will try to send email to you once, then again 30
> minutes later, and then it will just give up on you.
I think this is totally unfair and unacceptable. This means that if a mail
server is having even a slightest bit of downtime (hardware failure, scheduled
maintenance, whatever) that lasts more than 35 min, then all users of that
mail server lose their mail?!
MS
>From: "Bernd Kopriva" <bernd at kopriva.de>
>
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 00:00:30 -0600, Jim Leonard wrote:
>:
>>
>>Needless to say, if anyone has questions on an AT&T PC 6300 (or an
>>Olivetti M24, which is essentially the same thing), I'm your man.
>:
>do you know anything about a Z-8001 card, that should have been available
>for the M24 ? Does this one really exist ?
>
>Ciao Bernd
>
Hi
The board did exist. It was there to support the software
for the M20. It was suppose to be able to run the PCOS software.
I wonder how low a level the CP/M-8000 got? It might
be able to be run on the M24 as well, with the board.
I've seen pictures of the board so I know they did make them.
Dwight
OK, next load of questions.
I've been trying to create a "virgin" system from the install media I
have. I have so far successfully sysgenned and built RT11 v5.0, and
installed it on an RL02. Great.
However, the version that boots off one of the hard disks built into the
PDP allows me to access four partitions in total - DU0: to DU3: - but my
own version only has DU0: (same as normal) and DU1: (same as DU3: in the
version of RT11 installed on the hard disk).
If I say "SET DU2: disk=0, part=1" then I can see my "old" DU1: as DU2:,
and so on.
What do I need to change to get it to come up like this? It doesn't
appear to be a load of "SET" commands in the STARTS.COM file.
Gordon.
Anyone who wants to bask in the glory that was hp2000/access, feel free to:
telnet mickey.ath.cx
ctl-J, ctl-M until the 2nd PLEASE LOG IN
hel-t001,hp2000,1
Progs in LIB (exe-$name)
Progs in GRO (exe-*name)
Check-out:
exe-1note.x300 (nice pre-internet email...within the hp2000 system)
exe-castle.b300 (hide and seek..make rooms..wonder around, make/move objects).
exe-kingdm.g100 (kingdom...some of you might remember it--role playing game)
Enjoy!
If you want a private account, let me know.
-Bob (your sysop)
--
bbrown at harpercollege.edu #### #### Bob Brown - KB9LFR
Harper Community College ## ## ## Systems Administrator
Palatine IL USA #### #### Saved by grace
From: Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Big list of floppy disk formats?
Does such a thing exist? It'd be nice to have an online resource of all
the different floppy disk formats used by different machines.
Yes, that's one huge list, and would likely never be complete - but as I
haven't come across an attempt at all so far, it'd be better than
hunting around for the data when needed.
I'd be happy to collate stuff if it's thought to be a good idea - I
could make it available online too (although maybe one of the recognised
repositories such as bitsavers would bea better place)
Data can be fed into the futurekeep project as and when necessary, as
it's something that'll be needed there too one day.
thoughts?
J.
----------------------------------------
You probably already know this, but 22disk's cpmdisks.def has
a lengthy list of at least CP/M format details; good starting point.
>From: "Teo Zenios" <teoz at neo.rr.com>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joe R." <rigdonj at cfl.rr.com>
>>
>
>> At 10:26 AM 3/7/05 -0800, you wrote:
>> >>From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
>> >--
>> >>
>> >>Cars where the windows can be rolled down are getting harder to find.
>> >>
>> >>My vans (both of them) have those stupid power windows that won't
>operate
>> >>unless the car is running. Oh, and the back windows don't open at all
>> >>(well, OK, they open a couple of inches for ventilation).
>> >>
>> >
>> >Hi
>> > How many times do you think a person
>> >drives there car into the water and then
>> >remembers to turn the ignition off?
>> >Dwight
>> >
>>
>> How many times do you think cars go into water and have the battery
>> damaged or the electrical systems fail? Hint: here in Florida they pull
>> BODIES out of underwater cars just about everyday. AND as someone else
>> pointed out, the windows on many cars do not open at all or don't open all
>> the way. Futhermore if the driver has disabled the power window controls
>> then three out of four or even four out of four windows are disabled until
>> he remembers to unlock them. I don't carry a center punch but I should.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
>How many supersized Americans can fit through a fully opened car window
>these days?
>
>
Hi
Once the car fills with water, the door will open with
little effort ( unless damaged ).
It is rare that the battery becomes in-operative.
The switch to turn off the other windows is a good point,
though. It might be a good idea to have cars automatically
roll the windows down after a small delay when an airbag
is fired.
Dwight
Hi,
does anybody know the (up to date )e-mail address of the guy named
Sebastian Br?ckner? Are you Sebastian Br?ckner? Please contact me.
Regards,
Philipp
OK, next load of questions.
I've been trying to create a "virgin" system from the install media I
have. I have so far successfully sysgenned and built RT11 v5.0, and
installed it on an RL02. Great.
However, the version that boots off one of the hard disks built into the
PDP allows me to access four partitions in total - DU0: to DU3: - but my
own version only has DU0: (same as normal) and DU1: (same as DU3: in the
version of RT11 installed on the hard disk).
If I say "SET DU2: disk=0, part=1" then I can see my "old" DU1: as DU2:,
and so on.
What do I need to change to get it to come up like this? It doesn't
appear to be a load of "SET" commands in the STARTS.COM file.
Gordon.
Anyone have an Amiga Mouse (for use on a 4000T) for sale? It doesn't need
to be pretty, but it does need to work. I checked ePay, but most are in
Brittania where shipping would be a bear, and the few that remains are
"parts" or bundles... Unforch, I'm in a bit of a hurry for this - it rides
on getting the rest of the 4000T (which the owners have ever-so-quickly
gotten in a big hurry to get rid of, but need to remove personal data
first, and don't have the keyboard or mouse! :-/ ) I just got an Amiga
keyboard on ePay, but alas, no easy mice... (not even the Atari/Amiga
switchable ones... :-( )
Anyone have a working spare they're willing to sell? "Have Paypal, Will
Travel"...
Also... Jay:
If it'll help you track down the Reply-To: address munging "weirdness"
Evan's email address *always* comes up with the list address's's's; I
always have to manually remove his address from the To: field when replying
to a post of his.
Hope this helps, and thanks!
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger | "Profile, don't speculate."
SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers | Daniel J. Bernstein
zmerch at 30below.com |
>From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj at wps.com>
---snip---
>It seems entirely likely that Kildall's hack (algorithmically
>obscured text within the code somewhere) would only be preserved
>by some sort of mechanical translation. It's doubtful an honest
>re-write even with listings side by side would result in it being
>preserved.
>
---snip---
Hi
One can hide encoded messages by different order of
optional code sequences. There are many of these optional
sequnces in 8080 code. I'm not sure how useful this
would be in 8086 translation.
He may have reverse translated it back to 8080 to show
the hidden sequences.
Dwight
>>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/03/2329228&tid=190&tid=123
>>
>> These articles say that Kildall's CP/M easteregg appears in DOS 1.0
>> or so.
>> Has anyone here actually run the proof for themselves?
>
> What CP/M easter egg? That ensuing discussion lacks any useful detail.
For people who haven't read it, here's what it said:
"IIRC, Killdall stood up in court and entered a keystrokes at a PC
running MSDOS and brought up an easter egg he had programmed
into CP/M years earlier, proving they had used his code."
What we're trying to figure out is the keystrokes and the MSDOS version.
Here's another account: http://dfarq.homeip.net/article.php?story=935
"Back in the mid-1990s, PC Magazine columnist John C. Dvorak wrote
something curious about this operating system. He said he knew of an
easter egg present in CP/M in the late 1970s that caused Kildall's name
and a copyright notice to be printed. Very early versions (presumably
before the 1.0 release) of DOS had this same easter egg."
John A.
Free to a good home: Sun SPARCserver 1000 (not E) with one disk
tray and one processor board. Includes two SM51 50MHz SuperSPARC
CPUs I believe, 96MB of RAM (one bad DIMM in last bank), and 4 x
500MB SCA drives in "spud" brackets in the disk tray. PROM monitor
reports a fan failure, though there are several working - might
just be the sensor or cable, but Solaris 7 wouldn't load as long
as this failure is being sensed.
Chassis/case itself is in decent shape, some sticker residue,
and it's heavy. I'll consider delivering it if you're 15 minutes
away from Arlington, MA, but otherwise you'll need to pick this
thing up or pay for the UPS Store to pack it - I'm not packing it
for shipping. And of course you'd then have to pay shipping...
First come, first serve...
Thanks for the bandwidth,
--Steve.
smj (a) crash (d) com
>But
>> why on earth should center punches be illegal? I don't carry one
>> routinely, but if I'm going somewhere that I expect to need one,
>> I carry it.
>
>Yeah, what's the thinking behind that?
Because they can be used to break car windows quickly, cleanly, and
quietly. They are popular with car thieves. (much as dent pullers can be
used to yank out the ignition switch).
If you have just a center punch on you (or one with a bunch of other
tools), you likely won't have an issue... on the other hand, if you are
walking around the streets at night, have a center punch, dent puller,
screw driver, and pliers... you best be on your way to hot wire your OWN
car, of you will probably find yourself with a bunch of explaining to do.
>Centre punch, cordless drill,
>Citroen Special tool BFH-14 (Big, um, *Friendly* Hammer, 14lb),
>boltcutters, hacksaws, sockets, spanners, screwdrivers, that kind of
>stuff. If I was insane enough to move to New Jersey, I suspect the
>police would have a field day.
Nope, they would ignore it all. Unless when asked why you had it, you
started to stammer for a reason, and they thought you were only on your
way to steal a bunch of cars. (Probably just about every contractor van
in the state has a similar set of tools in it, along with all the people
that use their personal cars to transport their tools from job site to
job site).
(I was asked about a small crossbow gun in my back seat once... I
explained that I use it to run wires extended distances thru drop
ceilings... the cop looked at the two tool bags, spool of string, and
spools of phone cable also on my back seat, and went back to yelling at
me for doing 65 in a 25 zone... btw: the crossbow worked like crap to run
cable, I don't recommend it for others, it was a failed experiment).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hi, gang,
I got rid of the keyboard for my VT420 terminal by mistake. Does anyone happen to have a spare LK401 that they'd be willing to part with?
Let me know. Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"
For what it's worth:
I got Microsoft Network Client working under DOS 3.3 on a 386/33. It
works very well. I was able to connect to my WinXP system and copy over
just under 500 files.
I also got it to work reliably with a 3Com Etherlink III. Before, I
whined that it kept crashing. Well, this time when I was setting up, I
realized that the MSNC setup program advises that it will use more memory
to optimize network performance but gives you the option to forgo
optimization. I had it forgo optimization, and I think that made all the
difference.
At some point, if it becomes necessary, I'll also test on an 80286 and
even an old XT system.
Once again, if you want to download MSNC, I have it all bundled up in a
zip file here:
http://www.siconic.com/download/network/
(Note: I changed the location from where it was before.)
This directory also contains the 3Com 3C5x9 configuration utility, but
it's also included in the ZIP file, so no need to download it separately.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
>Given the task at hand, given the needs of the users, given the
>recently described hassles, is mailing-list technology the best
>design and solution for this task?
I prefer the mailing list for several reasons:
1- I am on dial-up. I can just "let it download", and then come back to
read the messages as quickly as I like - web based clients are SLOW
on dial-up, and you have to be there to click on every item you want
to read, so you have to wait for it. This by itself would probably be
a show stopper for me.
2- The list comes as nice plain text. If I want to save something, I simply
save it - Saving text from the web is usually (not always, but usually)
much more a pain in the butt.
3- Many sites nowadays use "extensions" and other goodies (and I use the term
loosly) which make them unreadable on my anicent browser... It's fine to say
"you just have to upgrade your browser", however there ARE no newer browsers
for the particular platform that I use - If staying connected to this list
means that I have to change to a "modern" OS, then I would simply wave goodbye
and bow out. I expect there are a few others who would do the same...
4- Another point relating to #3 - this system I am using does not EVER download
a "plug in" or applet and run it - attachments that I do accept NEVER
automatically launch themselves (and if they did, they wouldn't know how to
run here) ... so this machine has no "anti virus" software, doesn't need it,
and never gets "infected" (because it never auto-runs anything). I have no
doubt that a web based interface would have all kinds of neat-cool java
applets, plug-ins and other things which compromise security - Even though
the "list" site might be safe, forcing people to turn these things on will
cause trouble for those of us who choose to avoid them.
5- The mailing list has an element of privacy - Since you have to both know
about it and manually subscribe to it, there's a good chance that by the time
someone shows up here they really are more than casually interested in classic
computers. Once we get links from non-classic sites (hey, here's a place where
I've seen XP installs discussed), and indexed by the search engines, you can
bet that non-topic material will rise.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I haven't had very good luck with paper clips. A better tool is a used dental
pick, because this is tempered and holds up when you put stress on the lock
with a tool (screwdrivers are not the best tools to use, as they can
dent/flatten the lock noticeably, but in absence of a better tool they work.)
Put the screwdriver in, apply pressure, stroke the lock pins with the pick.
If you're really into it, you grind and temper a thin tool with a bump at the
end. The computer locks I've seen (excl. IBM Medeco) don't need this,
though.'
-Scott Quinn
>I've yet to find anyone who can make (or even duplicate from original) a
>tubular key though. (Which is annoying as it'd be nice to have a backup
>for the steering wheel lock on my car! :)
By Tubular key, do you mean the round style often found on vending
machines?
The locksmith near me cuts them. I've had him duplicate the key for my
soda machine at work.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I'm looking for a 1/2 to 2/3 height 8-bit ISA Ethernet card. It's for
an embedded type application. I can find "short" cards in terms of
length, but not in terms of height. Anyone have any leads for me here?
:)
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>
> Actually, I can't think of the last time I've seen ANY domain
> that didn't have more than one MX record. Except for someone
> trying to run a service out of their house. To do so, is... well...
>
> Jay
Well what?
I'm on dynamic IP space with cable service and I have great uptime. I
could use a secondary MX, I have the resources to do so. Perhaps I will.
But it doesn't change the fact I have a good performance record.
Also consider that a large number of small businesses are now on dynamic
IP space and running mail servers.
Does such a thing exist? It'd be nice to have an online resource of all
the different floppy disk formats used by different machines.
Yes, that's one huge list, and would likely never be complete - but as I
haven't come across an attempt at all so far, it'd be better than
hunting around for the data when needed.
I'd be happy to collate stuff if it's thought to be a good idea - I
could make it available online too (although maybe one of the recognised
repositories such as bitsavers would bea better place)
Data can be fed into the futurekeep project as and when necessary, as
it's something that'll be needed there too one day.
thoughts?
J.
Anyone know anything about Chorus Systemes and what they were up to
circa 1990? I'm just unravelling a lot of old internal Acorn
code/documentation and the name's cropping up quite a bit...
(I do recall using a distributed system called Chorus in the early 90's,
but I have no idea if that's at all related...)
ta
Jules
On Mar 7 2005, 10:35, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Oh to have a BT phone line (rather than an NTL one) so that I could
> change ISPs! (all ADSL vendors in the UK make it a condition of
service
> that you have to rent a BT phone line before you can use their
offering)
> </rant>
Don't some of the companies that do LLU (local loop unbundling) do it
even for a non-BT line?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 7 2005, 10:27, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 18:43 -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > In the case of DEC, there are only two locks that I know of. One
is
> > an ACE (tubular key) lock; the other is a 3 or 4 pin flat key lock.
> > They have always been keyed alike since the beginning of time.
>
> I've yet to find anyone who can make (or even duplicate from
original) a
> tubular key though. (Which is annoying as it'd be nice to have a
backup
> for the steering wheel lock on my car! :)
One of the "while you wait" places in York can do tubulars, but only
when the boss is around as they claim it's trickier to get the depths
exactly right. They cut a DEC key for me and it wasn't right so they
re-made it. One of the better ironmongers near here can do various
keys, including, I think, tubulars. They've cut bike D-lock keys,
Mul-T-Lock security keys and various other odd ones for me.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 7 2005, 10:48, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:06 -0500, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> > Unfortunately, there has been this trend lately for multi-channel
> > digital O-scopes to be Windows-based.
>
> To me that implies that the company behind such beasts have no clue
what
> they're doing, given that alternatives exist that are far more robust
> and don't have licensing requirements that push the cost up.
Well, I won't claim that this refutes the above, but I know that some
Tek products have used W95/W98 for many years. One of the grooups in
CompSci rented a fancy digital scope/analyser some years ago
((1998-ish) and discovered it was running W95 underneath.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Cameron Kaiser" <spectre at floodgap.com>
>
>> I'd love to get some information on the memory and I/O
>> mapping. It expects to use particular printers so it would
>> be nice to rewrite the driver to work well with my 3SI.
>
>I wonder if anyone has tried to write an emulator. The Cat is getting a
>lot more attention after Raskin's passing.
>
>How easily could the Cat run arbitrary applications? Or was it an
>editor, always an editor, all the time (with goodies), the Forth mode
>notwithstanding?
>
Hi
Even in the Forth mode, it was still an editor. It is
a little hard to describe from this sense. You could pick
stuff with the select and then you execute it.
It would be hard to create a software only emulator.
The physical keyboard was as important as the software
on this machine. Talking with Jeff, he said that
several efforts have been made to get the keyboards on
PC to work but there are just too many variations on
how the keyboards are handled. It was left too much up to
the builder of the machines. You really need low level
access to key strokes and the layout is wrong as well.
Dwight
Anybody has extra electrical power and nowhere to burn it?
Or anybody trying to upgrade their central heating system?
Get it now! ;-)
http://tinyurl.com/6yqbv
/wai-sun
I changed two things on the list setup tonight.
1) To subscribe to the list (new subscribers, not you guys), requires not
only a confirmation email, but also list owner approval. I'm having way to
much trouble with "people?" joining the list and all their email immediately
bouncing. It gums up the speedy delivery for everyone else.
2) I changed the max time in queue for any message (outbound) to 35 minutes.
This means the server will try to send email to you once, then again 30
minutes later, and then it will just give up on you. It won't unsubscribe
you at that point, it takes like 7 days of bounces to get you unsubbed. But
it won't try to send you any given list post more than twice now. Same
reason as above.
For those sendmail inclined.... I considered setting up a secondary queue
for slow delivery where any emails that take longer than X time get moved to
a low priority queue. Quite frankly, I don't want to deal with it. I'd just
get more complaints about posts being out of order ;)
Jay
VCF wrote:
>>> http://www.siconic.com/computers/Swyft%20Apple%20IIe.jpg
>>> http://www.siconic.com/computers/Swyft%20Card.jpg
Ethan wrote:
>> Pretty slick... any idea what the LM311 and the PAL
>> do? Copy protection?
VCF wrote:
> I have no idea, and the man best suited to answer the
> question is gone now ;( I'm sure some documentation
> still remains. Bruce Damer of the DigiBarn might
> actually have some relevant stuff. And least of all,
> I'm pretty certain all of Jef's notes and such will be
> preserved.
Perhaps this fellow could provide some insight as well:
http://www.regnirps.com/resume.htm
Scroll down about half-way to the end of the page to read about his time &
involvement with Information Appliance, Inc.
Bonus: there's a way-cool photo of a Swyft prototype (in a plexi-glass
shell, no less) for the Canon Cat on this web page.
On Mar 3 2005, 0:12, Jay West wrote:
> I'll have to figure out what address my console card is.
The console on all PDP-11s is at the same place, 777560-777566 (add
"17" in front for a 22-bit system, though). The first word is the
receive control and status register (CSR), the next is the receive
buffer register, then the transmit CSR, and lastly the transmit buffer
register. So if you have a terminal connected, and with baud rate,
parity, and word size to match the M7800 settings, simply DEPositing a
value into 777566 should cause the corresponding ASCII character to
appear on your terminal. If you type a character on the terminal, it
should appear in the lowest 8 bits of 777562.
> However, if I have a unibus problem, isn't the M7800 which is in an
> SPC slot still going across the unibus?
Yes. But trying it will tell you if the problem is in the CPU drivers
or the memory buffers, for example.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
All the discussion on stacking two PC supplies and cutting
grounds to try and keep them isolated seems like asking
for trouble....
I've had good results using a PC-AT supply, and a little
homebuilt linear (and nicely transformer isolated) 12v
supply stacked on it's output to power an 8" drive. (The
12v supply is actually built on the outside of the cover
of the AT supply).
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Joe,
I would like that tape if it hasn't already been claimed.
Thanks,
John
> I went scrounging today and found this. I can't use it but it's too good
> to waste so I thought I'd see if anyone here could use it. It's on a small
> tape spool and is marked "4010A01 Plot 10(R) Terminal Control System
Level
> 5.01 (C)Copyright Tektronix Inc 1988 Format IBM ASCII 1600 BPI Label:
> None Serial No. B074512 Record: 80 Block: 800 Option: 08".
>
> Joe
>
>
>
Fellow scroungers,
I'm going to be in Las Vegas around the latter part of July. I would appreciate knowing about any surplus electronics places that would be worth a look.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"
I have an IBM ThinkPad 700C that boots Windows 95 (it actually runs
nicely, I dare say better than Win2K3 on my current 1Ghz desktop). The
display hinge is broken, so its aesthetics are lacking a bit, but if
you've got another 700C that isn't working, this is a good machine for
parts. Comes with power adapter, original docs, and battery (unknown
condition). I'll ship to you for cost (US only, sorry), or if you're
local you can pick up.
If there are no takers, I'll be tossing it. Hopefully it finds a good
home. It's a nice little machine, just outside my collecting scope.
http://www.vintagecomputermarketplace.com/view.cfm?ad=1610
Thanks!
Patrick
I quite agree. Here in Canada Radio Shack has moved into the mass consumer
market leaving the electronic hobbyist to fend for himself. Here in the
Toronto area we have access to specialty electronic stores that cater to our
needs.
Murray
Message: 36
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:20:06 -0700
From: woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
Subject: Build your %$@! computer here.
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <422B9026.30003 at jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>We sadly live in an era when people are considered 'technical' if they
>>can point the right end of a phillips screwdriver at a bunch of clone
>>parts and 'build their own' PeeCee.
>>
>>
>>
Heck with everything all on one mother board your lucky if you can
change the video card.
%$!@ old PC , $#!@ new games that want the latest video.
>>I remember checking into the homebuild newsgroup, thinking maybe they
>>were wirewrapping TTL together or something cool.
>>
>>
My ISP does not seem to suport news groups any more, so I can't say
what is being built.
How about changing the name to alt.I've.added.lights2my.case. I notice
here in Canada
Radio shack has got away from selling almost any kind of real electronic
componemts but
it shure has a lot of small light bulbs and big heavy switches.
>>.
>>
>>
>>
So were you planning to build a computer?
If so what kind?
Ben alias woodelf
>Also, I need ROM 016 for my "chicklet" PET 2001.
IIRC the 016 ROM is F000-F7FF.
You can get the images of all the PET ROMs from funet.
Depending on the board you have and the available
replacement devices, you may have to build a little
daughter card to adapt the selects - I did this many
years ago when a ROM died in one of my 2001's - copied
the ROM from the other, and made a board to adapt a
standard 2716 - still going strong!
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html