I have a reader power supply for the 33, you can have it for $20 + shipping.
Also have a copy holder that I'll throw in. As for running open in local mode,
I'd start at the H lever especially after just being shipped, they seem to
pop out. FYI, the H lever mechanically connects the keybd. to the printer.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:40:54 -0800, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> At 11:15 AM +0800 3/9/05, Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
> >I'm building my personal library for vintage computing. I need to
> >probe the collective wisdom of the list in what books must a "wannabe"
> >collector (like me) should have on his/her bookshelf.
> >
> >Although I collect primarily DEC stuff, I don't want my knowledge to
> >be just restricted to what DEC had to offer.
>
> If you're primarily interested in DEC stuff, a good collection of DEC
> Handbooks is a must, as is a Doc Set for each of the OS's that you're
Yeah. I do have a growing collection of handbooks. But I'm missing on
the peripherals side for the mid-70s; i.e. between 75-79. Do you have
surplus?
> interested in. If you're into PDP-8's, the 3 Volume -8/e/f/m
I have printed vol1 from bitsavers. The few that came up on ePay was
way out of my budget. I did, however scarfed an original vol2. I also
noticed that vol3 in bitsavers are not really complete though...but
good enough for a working copy I suppose.
The 8/m/e/f engineering docs are also something that I have been
searching for 1 year plus already...all the usual places don't have
it. And the only person I know who has it doesn't have a scanner.. :-)
Can anyone contribute the 8/e/m schematics to bitsavers?
> Maintenance Manual set is excellent as well. Remember any DEC
> hardware from before the 90's is going to be *well* documented, if
> you can find copies of the books!
>
> >p.s. Don Lancaster's books are the first on my list. :-)
> >
> >/wai-sun
>
> I've got the TV Typewriter book, and I think some other stuff by him,
> and as a DEC collector it's only of mild interest.
Ah. But I'm also an electronics tinkerer too.... :-)
/wai-sun
Kevin's book is out of print, however, I've been talking with him lately about
posting it on the newsletter web site. I should know more in the next week or
two and will announce it here.
- Evan
>
> "A guide to collecting computers and computer collectibles",
> by Kevin Stumpf. quirky, quirky.
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> In case no one caught my previous post on this, a few days ago I moved =
> the queue retention time back up to a reasonable value.
Thank you!
> I suspect Michael Sokolov is testing this out for me, his name servers =
> (and thus email) have been down a few hours.
Do you really think that I, after having earned the trust of my circle of
friends (who all have accounts on my various servers, and use and depend on
various services hosted at my data centre) as a competent, reliable and
trustworthy professional system and network administrator for our Circle,
would deliberately shut it down, screwing all our users?! There must be
something seriously wrong with your thinking if you indeed thought so.
We (yes, we, not I, I'm not the only person at Harhan, and this server is
not the only one) had been down from about 02:30 UTC to 21:42 UTC (2005-03-08)
due to our enemies tampering with the SDSL line that connects our data
centre to the outside world. All of our servers were still running, but
the entire facility was isolated from the net for about 19 hours.
Apparently someone tried to wiretap the SDSL line and broke it in the process.
Time domain reflectometry indicated a problem in the line somewhere between
our facility and the local telco's CO from which the SDSL line is served.
The techs at the SDSL NOC assumed it was an open circuit, but I know this
was not the case, since during the downtime there was still *some* signal
coming from the SDSL line, it was just apparently too distorted for the
DSLAM and the CPE to sync up. So the problem detected by TDR, which they
dispatched a local telco tech to fix, was NOT an open, but something else.
I very strongly suspect foul play.
The fix took so long because the ISP apparently considers business SDSL
customers not worthy enough to fix in the middle of the night, so even
though I reported the problem last night, it wasn't until this morning EST
that they even looked at it, and then they had to have the local telco
dispatch a technician, and the tech had to get to it... I'm glad they fixed
it, but it's too bad I was at school at the time so I didn't catch the
telco tech and thus wasn't able to ask him what he found as the source of
the problem.
I'm now catching up with the backlog of mail...
MS
>From: msokolov at ivan.harhan.org
>
>Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> In case no one caught my previous post on this, a few days ago I moved =
>> the queue retention time back up to a reasonable value.
>
>Thank you!
>
>> I suspect Michael Sokolov is testing this out for me, his name servers =
>> (and thus email) have been down a few hours.
>
>Do you really think that I, after having earned the trust of my circle of
>friends (who all have accounts on my various servers, and use and depend on
>various services hosted at my data centre) as a competent, reliable and
>trustworthy professional system and network administrator for our Circle,
>would deliberately shut it down, screwing all our users?! There must be
>something seriously wrong with your thinking if you indeed thought so.
Lighten up. Jay was just kidding.
---snip---
>DSLAM and the CPE to sync up. So the problem detected by TDR, which they
>dispatched a local telco tech to fix, was NOT an open, but something else.
>I very strongly suspect foul play.
>
---snip---
Wow, you are paranoid. It was more likely that some other
tech ( while trying to find another clean line to fix
a complain about noise ) accidentally bent a wire to cross
your line at one of the junction boxes. This kind of thing
happens regularly ( about every 6 months or so ) to my home
line because I live in an area with a lot of noisy line ( water
in cable ).
Why does everything that happens need to be a conspiracy.
Clumsy techs are much more common than sneaky people. If someone
was actually doing what you suggest, they would most likely have
done a better job. If it wasn't working for you, it most likely
wasn't working for them either.
Dwight
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I know that this one has probably been covered countless times before
and has been shot down but I am new to the list and have not seen this
discussion before so please hold back your flame ;)
I understand the trouble of unreliable mail servers, I have been
afflicted with this problem myself recently, so why not look at a
technology that was specifically designed to fill this job.
We could set up a private news server using INN. This way we could even
divide the chat up into appropriate groups i.e. ccmp.offtopic,
ccmp.dec.pdp8 etc etc so that people who are just interested in a niche
collection don't have to bother with all the talk of other classic
computers. However people also still have the option of reading
everything on the list
I also understand that one of the main attractions to this list is that
it is subscription based which I guess keeps a lot of the spam from
reaching it. However NNTP does support authentication. We could have a
web interface similar to the one that we have at the moment that allows
read-only access to the groups so that other people can search them.
But we also could limit posting only to people with logons.
From what I have read I also see that people like the mailing list
approach because it allows them to connect to the internet for a short
amount of time and collect all of their email and read it later. I know
of many NNTP readers that allow offline viewing via synchronization.
This means that people who move about a lot can view over the web if
they want but it also keeps the people who use their ASR33's happy
because NNTP is a clean protocol. (By clean I mean that it has not been
infected with HTML).
just my $0.02
Regards
- --
Chris Blackburn
E-Mail: cblackburn36NOSPAM at softhome.net
E-Mail: cblackburn36 at NOSPAMgmail.com
PGP Public Key: http://makeashorterlink.com/?C2AF31929
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCLdJ8xsNEmi5WofsRAlTNAKC4O/xYRlc/4DDDKEGLR66nT7yCsgCeMSG8
VX7DM3VgCHU9Op8u4NjTicE=
=S/1B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mar 7 2005, 15:32, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Adrian Graham wrote:
>
> > Isn't that something to do with using DUX.SYS instead of DU.SYS or
am I
> > getting confused with RT11XM and something like RT11SJ? It's been
16 or 17
> > years since I last sysgenned an RT11 box :-\
>
> What's the difference between RT11XM and RT11SJ? What do the last
two
> letter signify?
SJ is the Single Job monitor, which allows you to run one thing at a
time from the console.
FB is the Foreground/Background monitor, which allows you to run a
background task as well.
XM is the eXtended Monitor, which is like FB but in addition allows the
use of more than 56kB memory (by paging). Device drivers for XM have a
three-letter filename, with the third letter always being 'X'.
BL is the BaseLine monitor, which is what is on the distribution media.
It's like SJ, but includes all the devices you're likely to want to
boot from (so you can do a SYSGEN and transfer your customised monitor
to your preferred boot medium) and excludes all the frilly bits you
might want but aren't needed for a SYSGEN.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
For the last couple days I have been reading the Origins of Cyberspace
auction catalog that Christie's put together and it's really a very nice
book (except for the prices). It shows me several things I need to be on the
lookout for to put into the museum's library and on display. Check it out
if you can.
>Yes, but does anyone here actually save every message? I delete
>everything that's not of interest to me in the present. This doesn't
>help me for the future, though, so chances are slim I'd be able to
>search my personal archives for references to a previously unknown device.
I'm actually amazed how many people DO save every email.
In fact, most of the people I work with, not only save every email, but
also never move them from their inbox. They just have these huge,
multi-megabyte inbox files (they would be multi-gigabyte, but I have
everyone save for 1 person and myself set to use Eudora, which IMO
properly handles attachments by detaching them from the email when it is
received... so you don't end up with every last 20 MB attachment filling
up your email database).
And then you have my wife, that knows how to delete, and knows how to
file messages... and still has some OCD issue with saving every email
that isn't spam. (I'm the opposite... I throw out just about every email
I get... if it isn't important to my life in some way, it gets junked as
soon as I am done with it).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Got these in the mail the other day a copy of TV Typewriter Cookbook by Don
Lancaster, the Cheap Video cookbook by Don Lancaster, and a digital VT1200 -
Installing and Using The VT1200 Video Terminal manual. I believe that I
have other copies of the both the Don Lancaster books down in storage
someplace.
Roger,
>>>>>> The guy ended the auction early, so it's mine! $55 shipped, and already
paid for.
That is great news! Please tell me what I need to do (i.e., how much $$ you
want me to send) to get a copy of the BASIC.
Evan
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
>From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
>
>> Be sure to check the labels on the stepper motor. Some years ago I had a
>> brief "aquintance" with a SSSD drive from Control Data. I binned it
>> immediately, as it showed that the steppermotor needed 115VAC !
>
>Never! I've enver seen am 8" drive with anything but a 24V stepper motor.
>
>The spindle motor is often mains powered (and often 115V, to be powered
>by an autotransformer if you have 230V mains). It's a capacitor-run
>induction motor, and you generally have to change the pulleys (and maybe
>the belt) when going between 50Hz and 60Hz mains, to get the spindle
>speed right.
>
>My P851 and P854 systems have CDC floppies (and I have the CDC service
>manual for them). They have 24V steppers and AC-line powered spindles.
>
>-tony
>
Hi
I looked at the manual for the SA800/801 and the +24V is used
for the stepper and head load but it is also used for some
of the electronics. Where the exact voltage is critical, there
is a zener. It would nost likely work anywhere +- 2 or 3 volts.
Dwight
On Mar 8 2005, 17:18, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> They use 'eyelet' rivets, not pop rivets, but for home use, as long
as
> the pop rivets don't touch the boards above or below, you should be
> OK.
> I won't say that no 3rd party ever made a plastic-handle hex card,
but
> it is awfully wide to not have a stiffener of some sort. ISTR some
> 3rd party tape controler (TC-131?) had some kind of machined block on
> either corner for extractors, but I don't recall what they did to
keep
> the board from flexing; perhaps a metal L bracket?
I've got one hex comms board and one 3rd party memory that have no
stiffeners, the comms board has plastic blocks on the corners with
extractor levers. Both are a pain because they flex a lot, and both
are sitting on a shelf somewhere in the workshop, not in a machine.
Even quad QBus cards without some stiffening are a pain.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 8 2005, 22:09, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Lots of corporate entities will have transparent web proxies
> intercepting port 80 though. I'm not sure how clever they are - do
they
> intercept *all* port 80 traffic then either process it or fail, or do
> they pass through non-HTTP traffic on port 80 as though it was never
> touched by the proxy at all? I imagine both types exist, at least.
Most that I know of interpret the traffic, so NNTP on port 80 would
fail on those.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner wrote:
> Not when I first sent it in January of 1999, and certainly not this time
>
>(somewhere I have the code I wrote to generate this ... where that is, I
>have no idea ... )
>
> -spc (But hey! You inline replied!)
>
>
If you're on Linux/Unix, check '/usr/games/morse'.
Fair chance of something being there.
At 08:21 PM 3/7/2005, Jim Brain wrote:
>One can't help but wonder if the web forum thread is half-serious, half troll.
>Especially considering the list makeup. I probably should feed the troll,
>but the stereotyping thing seemed a bit overkill.
Yes, not only am I trolling but I'm also playing the devil's advocate
because I grow tired of the unending Windows bashing. (I'm plenty capable
of that, too, have no fear.) It's not necessary for an enthusiasm for
classic computers, so it's off-topic and flame-baiting. But I began to
suspect that the bashing was often, at root, bashing against today's
entire computer environment: anti-web, anti-GUI, anti-high-bandwidth.
Why is it necessary to say that today's technology is bad just to
affirm that yesterday's is/was good?
At 07:17 PM 3/7/2005, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>> There's also a persistent geek belief-system where, once they
>> believe a device is technologically superior, they think it
>> should be popular and all those who believe otherwise are idiots.
>
>The irony is, one person here seems to have precisely that perspective
>when it comes to web forums. I wonder who that is. Hmm.
For the record, I rarely consult the web version of this list.
My earliest message from it is dated November 1997, and all my
archives of it are in 'mbox' format.
>> To wit, I'll summarize some of the savvy arguments posted so far against
>> web-based forums: Web sites are slow. Not all browsers can use them.
>> [...]
>
>And these are bad arguments why? Are these reasons somehow unjustified?
>Especially things like connect charges, software incompatibilities, ...
For a group (there I go, stereotyping and lumping again to create a Them)
that's technologically adept and eager to invest immense amounts of time
and energy and even money in obscure archaic technologies, you'd think
They'd be wise enough to recognize that today's Web users and developers
face exactly the same issues we faced 30 years ago, and they're just as
capable of addressing and solving them in their own way, driven by their
perceived needs.
Surely there are assumptions to be questioned. To wit, a web user is less
concerned about hoarding precious ASCII files. They assume the connection
will always be "on". They have no need to 'grep' a local copy because
they assume it'll still be Out There somewhere. They don't need to 'grep'
a local copy because the web site has an index or search engine or
they can rely on Google. If it's valuable enough, it'll be mirrored.
If they really want an offline copy, they can make it, but it'll be
in HTML, and they know how to cut-and-paste to ASCII if they need it.
If you want to edit in your favorite editor, just cut-and-paste. BFD.
I bop between web, Windows, Mac, Linux and DOS all day long.
At 07:03 PM 3/7/2005, Tony Duell wrote:
>Well I cetainly can't do any of those. I have never been offered a PC
>faster than a 286. I certainly can't afford broadband.
I don't know your circumstances. You're in the UK. I suspect
broadband is available your area for about $30 a month. If time
is worth anything to you, it'll be worth it compared to dial-up.
What do you pay for dial-up?
Around here in East Bumblefrick USA, clients are begging me to haul away
their old 600 Mhz PCs as well as any previous generations. You find them
on the curb. Are you truly not using a web browser, ever?
>And I don't mind
>admitting I am not clever enough to repair modern PCs, I don't have a BGA
>rework station
You're trying too hard. See above for a source of a new PC.
>I much prefer mailing lists to web fora. I prefer large-format film
>cameras to digital cameras. And so on.
I just picked up a gorgeous Leitz Focomat IIc enlarger for $300,
I'm debating whether to keep it or eBay it and get ~$3000.
At 10:39 PM 3/7/2005, der Mouse wrote:
>I don't dislike reverse video because it's New and Modern; I dislike it
>because I've used it and find it significantly more tiring to my eyes
>(when used for any significant length of time - reverse video *is*
>easier to read for very brief stuff, say a line or two, but gets very
>wearing for much more than that, at least on self-luminant displays).
Footnote for future-kids reading this in the archives: Note that
'der Mouse' refers to "reverse video" and means "illuminated glyphs
on a dark phosphor background" although at this point in history,
the vast majority of Web-using computerists considered that mode to
be "reverse video" because web and GUI interfaces typically drew
non-illuminated glyphs on lighter backgrounds.
- John
Hi,
I think I have arrived at pretty much the same point as Jay on my 11/45. Ive stripped it down to the minimum - processor, memory management, memory (UFUM) and timing generator.
Toggling in from the front panel, I can see the data lines change, but I'm not getting address data on the Unibus.
My next test, is to try and look at the address data between the processor and the memory management module.
Does anyone have any other tips?
Thansk
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
> You are seriouisly suggesting that I carry a pile of service
> manuals, classic computers, and test gear (all of which I've
> been known to use in order to answer questions here) to
> the local internet cafe?
>
Of course not.... you set them all up there as an exhibit!!!!
Hi I noticed on the internet that you or whoever have owners manuals if you still have them I would be intrested in the
O2 Workstation Owner's GuideIRIS Software Installation Guide IRIS Workspace User's Guideif you still have these what is the condition and priceThank YouGreg Pishko
On Mar 8 2005, 17:59, Chris Blackburn wrote:
> All the email/news clients I have used support it, these include
>
> 1) Microsoft Lookout (express)
> 2) Mozilla Mail
> 3) Mozilla Thunderbird
Most traditional ones, like tin, do so as well.
> > 3) Some people don't have NNTP access.
>
> I truly hadn't thought of this one. If it is a problem then we can
tell
> INN to run on a nonstandard (and usually available) port and tell
> people to set up their news clients appropriately.
Except that firewalls with a "default drop" policy, ie block everything
except that which is "known" to be "safe", are becoming more common --
so using a non-standard port would make matters worse, I suspect.
OTOH, you could use port 80 if the NNTP server wasn't also a web
server.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 5 2005, 17:53, Eric F. wrote:
> The battery is the size of a regular "AA", but is 2.5V Lithium. The
> company who used to manufacture them (SAFT) no longer does so. The
SAFT
> battery model # is "LCP 6".
>
> Picture of battery (and a regular "AA" for comparison):
>
> http://home.san.rr.com/instep/saft-lcp6.jpg (~42KB)
Lithium/thionyl chloride cells are 3.6V, and lithium/iron disuplhide
are 1.5V per cell, so it's probably lithium/manganese dioxide which is
usually described as 3V. Varta make an AA size Li/Mn02 with PCB tags,
which you might be able to cut off. Sorry, I don't know the part
number, but it's still shown as current in my CPC[1] catalogue.
Sonnenschein, SAFT, Maxell, and others also make 3.6V lithium AA cells,
if that's any good. They're (or were) used in a few computers,
including Compaq Portables and some older Tandon and Toshiba models.
Some companies make 1/2-AA size cells. They're usually 3.6V
lithium/thionyl chloride and commonly used in Apple Macs, but I think
I've seen 1/2-AA 1.2V NiCd or NiMh ones as well (2/3-AA are quite
common).
[1] CPC, aka Combined Precision Components, is a supplier of
electronics and other items in the UK. However, it's part of the
Farnell Group along with Farnell Electronic Components and Newark so
you might be able to find the same things on Farnell's US web site.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 8 2005, 19:18, Jim Beacon wrote:
> 31/4 drives were used on the old Amstrad word processing machines
(forget
> the number - do any of the other UK members know?
I think you're thinking of the PCW range, and they used 3", not 3.25".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 8 2005, 12:54, Randy McLaughlin wrote:
> An email is forever if your server lets you keep a large enough
back-log or
> if you download it to your machine and it never ever fails (who ever
hear of
> a computer having trouble anyway).
>
> NNTP is forever through people like google groups.
Only for groups on public servers, which peer with other Usenet
servers. If we're talking about private servers, google groups doesn't
enter the equation.
> The true problems with NNTP are: not everyone has access to Usenet
will and
> those that do would have to talk their Usenet provider into including
it.
Only if the group(s) is/are public, and propagated through Usenet.
They don't need to be; lots of groups are private and restricted to a
few servers (eg the local York Uni groups, the tin newsreader groups).
> I love NNTP and have several groups I follow on it. I see no
practical way
> to switch to Usenet. The list works, it may not be perfect [...]
Agreed :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Ming_Mae wrote:
> No you can't use a RLL with an MFM controller. Similar but not the same.
If you're talking about using drives with the ST506/ST412 interface, you
most certainly can use an "RLL drive" (e.g., ST277R) on an MFM controller.
Of course, you'll only get 2/3 the capacity that you would get with an
RLL controller.
Using an "MFM drive" with an RLL controller often works, but it depends
a lot on the drive. In my experience high-quality drives like the Maxtor
XT1000 and XT2000 series always worked fine.
Eric
I'll happily split the cost of the BASIC ROM is you can make me a copy.
Someone else is selling an EO 440 and the bid is up to $108. Crazy! If it
were mint condition with all manuals and accessories, etc., then MAYBE it would
be worth $100. But this one is not.
>>>>>>>>> --- Roger Merchberger <zmerch at 30below.com> wrote:
> It's nutjob-expensive, if you ask me - but the guy's 2 - one he's epaying
> alone ($50 USD opening bid, BIN for $75) and he's got another complete
> machine with the BASIC ROM in it for $115 BIN, IIRC. No bids on either
> one... should I snag the ROM to make backups of it? :-O
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
> I _think_ I see a little initialization data pass down the
> line, to the mouse, when I first power up the device, but
> my o'scope isn't a memory type, so it might just be power
> up noise.
If you repeatedly pulse the MCLR pin you can repeat the reset
sequence often enough to view it on the scope. If it is power
up noise it may be confusing the mouse enough to stop it working.
Lee
.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi,
Has anyone successfully built one of the PS/2 -> Indigo adapters off of
the following page?
http://rshockley.dyndns.org/indigo.htm
I'm having a devil of a time getting the mouse portion of things to
work.
When I hook my scope up to the clock and/or data PS/2 lines, I see no
data being received from the mouse.
I'm wondering if the mouse init code is not liking any of the PS/2 mice
I've got around. (I've tried 4 different ones.)
If you've got one working, what sort of mouse do you have?
I freely admit, I'm not a PIC expert, as this is my first project w/
them. :-> So any clue's anyone cares to beat me about the head and
shoulders w/ will be appreciated.
I do know the PIC's are "running", as the dozen test program I wrote
toggles the pins on PortA, and the keyboard side of things appears to be
working. I'm also pretty certain that my config word is right,
particularly external oscillator, and watchdog timer is off.
Anyone got one working? Or do I get to experience the joy's of reverse
engineering the code?
Thanks,
David
Hi,
a few days ago, I found a set of schematics for an 11/45 processor (KB11), I think on the site of someone on this list.
Like an idiot, I didn't bookmark them, and now I can't find them :-(
Can anyone help - they were in TIF format.
Thanks
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
Am I right in assuming that a VAX 4000/705A can only contain one CPU?
Thanks for the help,
Mark
--
Mark Wickens
Rhodium Consulting Ltd
Filetravel (8154) Ltd
Hi
Is anyone going to VCFe6, this spring, from northern
California? I'm looking for someone that might be able
to bring a box of paper tapes back for me from a fellow
in Germany.
Dwight
>From: "O. Sharp" <ohh at drizzle.com>
---snip---
>>
>Thanks for the excellent suggestions regarding likely mechanical causes
>for the chatter on Local. I'll be walking through the machine with them
>tomorrow, and hopefully they'll solve the current problem. Then I can look
>to see if there are more exotic problems. :)
>
Hi
You can try holding the armature of the selector coil with
a small screw driver. This will tell you if it is a mechanical
or electrical problem. If held, and you start the power,
all should lock-up. If it doesn't, it is a mechanical
issue. If it does, you have a break in the electrical
circuit someplace.
Be careful not to damage things near the coil. An
orange stick would be safer than a regular screw driver
but I've always just used a small screw driver.
You can see the selector clutch on the left side of the machine.
This is the clutch that starts everything. If you are
uncomfortable with powering on with your screw driver in there,
you can just spin things manually. Just turn the fan on
the motor. As each clutch releases, squeeze it to completely
release it or it will drag. When the motor is running there
is enough inertia to completely release it but when running
by hand, it needs to be done by the additional squeeze.
Dwight
I've weeded out a bunch of accounts that were slowing the list down
(virtually all inactive members who's "no mail flag" being cleared wreaked
havoc with non-delivery). Seems to be noticeably faster and such.
So... once again I'll ask... is anyone having any problems posting to or
receiving from the list? If so, please contact me immediately off-list.
Soon as no one responds to one of these RFP's, I'll move on to the FAQ :)
By the way... no one has mentioned if they tried the search feature on the
archives. Work ok?
Jay
> For the clock of course ... the .0001 hz hourglass has to flip
> correctly.
> >- John
Might be better if we refer to the clock speed in kCpy [Kilo-Cycles per Hr] = (approx) 3.15576 kCpy!
>From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
--
>
>Cars where the windows can be rolled down are getting harder to find.
>
>My vans (both of them) have those stupid power windows that won't operate
>unless the car is running. Oh, and the back windows don't open at all
>(well, OK, they open a couple of inches for ventilation).
>
Hi
How many times do you think a person
drives there car into the water and then
remembers to turn the ignition off?
Dwight
All:
I picked-up a copy of the 9/76 BYTE magazine on eBay the other day
and as I was thumbing through it last night, I noticed an ad for the Texas
Instruments Microprocessor Learning Kit.
The LK is composed of four modules in clear plastic cases. The first
one is the Microprogrammer Learning Module and contains an array of data and
address switches. The second one is the Controller. The third is the memory
and the fourth is I/O. They connect through what appears to be 40-conductor
ribbon cable. From the ad, the coursework appears to center around
microprogramming and developing your own CPU instruction set as a learning
tool.
Has anyone used one of these or has one in their collection?
Rich
>From: "Ron Hudson" <ron.hudson at sbcglobal.net>
>>
---snip---
>>
>An If you have electric windows like my Saturn ION, you will need to
>break them.
>The motors may or may not work after being submerged.
>
>
Hi
It has been shown that the windows will work for several
minutes, even in salt water. You do have to remember to
not turn the ignition off while trying to get out of the car.
Dwight
> > > Not much different from a relay computer really, I suppose.
> > > Just slower.
> > > And more sandy.
> >
> > And relay computers don't like salt water, but administrators might.
> > Hmmm, seaside computing. I think we hit on something.
>
> I'm waiting for someone to invent a display that can be used
> in direct sunlight, so I don't have to work in what is
> affectionately called the 'coffin' aka 'caravan by the sea
> with windows blacked out'.
>
> When will that be...?
>
> Talk to me goose.
Done! See, that was easy.
Braille terminals. The have a bed of pins and set the state of each pin
(up or down) as needed. Or use a text-speech converter.
I helped a blind guy fix his computer once, he used a soundblaster and a
text-speech program. It "spoke" so fast I had no idea what it said but
he could follow it just fine.
John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
> [...] yet these same folk claim to be unable and
> unwilling to locate and revive a cast-off PC with sufficient power
> to run a contemporary web browser [...]
To me it is a matter of religion. I see the purpose of my life in not
using shitty "modern" technology, and I am ready to die for my cause and
to shed the last drop of my blood on the battlefield for it. But all you
miscreants who are busy making the world unfit for me to live in, I will
NOT give up without a fight! I have guns, and I *WILL* shoot at least
a bunch of you before I go down. Heck, my philosophy is that if I kill
at least ONE miscreant before I die, I will not have lived my life in
vain.
> phrase "Techno-Amish".
I've used it to describe myself a long time ago.
MS
Ok, since everyone seems to be in ancient PDP-11
troubleshooting mode, I decided to get out my 11/35
and see what I can do with it.
I've double checked all the processor options and
the CPU boards all seem to have the jumpers set
correctly. The only questionable jumpers are the
two jumpers that indicate parity memory is present,
but since the system seems to have some problems,
I've disconnected the M981 from the MF11-LP core
backplane and replaced it temporarily with an
M9302. There is also an M7800 console card in
the SPC slot.
I've checked all the voltages and they look ok.
When I power the system on, it comes up with the
following lights lit:
Address: 000026 (octal)
Data : 000002 (octal)
The PROC, BUS, and CONSOLE lights are also lit.
If I press HALT and then press START, all the
DATA lights come on. The RUN light also comes
on, along with the PROC, BUS, and CONSOLE lights.
The load address, deposit, and examine switches
don't seem to do anything, although I know they
are functional.
Ideas? Does anyone know what the ADDR 000026 and
DATA 000002 lights indicate when the system is
powered on?
Thanks,
Ashley
No you can't use a RLL with an MFM controller. Similar but not the same.
Run length limited verses modulated frequency.
I have an RLL controller laying around somewhere in an antistatic bag if he
is interested.
In case no one caught my previous post on this, a few days ago I moved the queue retention time back up to a reasonable value.
I suspect Michael Sokolov is testing this out for me, his name servers (and thus email) have been down a few hours.
And can we move on to classic computers now? I think we've beat all horses to death a few times ;)
Jay
I just got done watching the 1969 "The Italian Job". In it, the Turin,
Italy traffic system is controlled by a mainframe. All that was really
shown up close was a few tape drives. I paused, and advanced frame by
frame, but still had a hard time identifying the make. It looked like
the reals had a "H" printed on them. Would they have been HP drives? I
couldn't make out the plates on the very top of the racks.
FWIW, I liked the modern Italian Job better, although some of the cars
and scenery were pretty cool, in the old one.
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
Well: I finally took a leap of faith, and bought an ASR-33 from someone
who wasn't anywhere near Seattle. After a previous (extremely bad)
Teletype shipping experience (read: TTY dumped in box and packing peanuts
poured on top; unit largely destroyed in transit; seller refused to
refund and claimed damage was somehow _my_ fault; story actually got
worse from there if you can believe that, but maybe that's enough for
now), it took a leap of faith to try buying another one I couldn't
personally pick up. But the seller took a _lot_ of extra care packing it,
including bolting the typing unit to the chassis, and wonder of wonders
it actually arrived completely intact. :)
But in spite of that it needs some help, so I thought I'd ask a couple of
questions here.
-The one big problem it has is its lack of a reader power supply. The last
owner got it from a government surplus program, but they neglected to
supply anything but the unit itself... and so no reader supply. Does
somebody have the schematic of one of these so I can build a new one?
(Better yet: does somebody have a spare one I can talk them out of for a
reasonable price?)
-I'm looking at some DEC diagrams saying how the ASR-33 gets modified for
use with a PDP-8 series interface (thanks once more to Mr. Kossow!). It
says two "6RS205P484 Thyractors DEC #1100106" should be added to the unit.
Okay, I admit it: I don't even know what the hell a "thyractor" _is_,
much less what ratings I should be looking for re: these two. Can
someone shed a little light on this?
-Right now the unit is doing a lot of chattering on both Line and Local
when powered on. Initially I thought something might be mechanically wrong
due to being shaken around in shipping, say one of the clutches on the
main shaft locking into an active position, but so far I haven't found a
culprit. I'm also wondering if I'm even looking in the right direction
for the problem, sooo here's the question: could the lack of a power
supply for the reader be causing this behavior? (The reader itself is
obviously inert right now, but I'm wondering if there's a missed
connection or somesuch which could explain it.)
...At some point I'll probably ask someone with a copyholder to take some
tracings and measurements for me so I can fabricate a new one, but maybe
I'll just see if I can get it working first. :)
-O.-
Anyone interested in an AT&T PC6300? No idea of the whereabouts. Contact
original sender. See below:
Reply-to: lkrupp at pssw.com
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:41:43 -0700
From: Louis Krupp <lkrupp at pssw.com>
To: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com>
Subject: AT&T PC 6300, AT&T CRT 318H
Any use for an AT&T PC 6300 and an AT&T CRT 318H?
Louis
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
> It would certainly get rid of me, and a fair few others, I suspect.
Me too of course, but see below.
> 2) None of my machines can run a modern web browser.
Same here of course.
> Yes, I'd miss this list, but I think I could live without it...
Don't worry, you'll be the first person I'll invite to mine!
<EXTREME RANT MODE>
Screw the rest of them. Do we really need them, those modern computer
wallopers? A true Classic Computist is one whose Classic Computers are
his newest computers. I judge people by their newest computers. If you
have an XP box and use it, to me you are a worthless XP luser, and I don't
care whether or not you also happen to have a PDP-11 or whatnot in your
basement. It's your newest and most actively used computer that counts
to me. If you have a PDP-11/45 and want me to respect you as a PDP-11/45
user, then make that PDP-11/45 your main and primary computer and throw
that XP box out the window.
</EXTREME RANT MODE>
--
Michael Sokolov
Engineer / Researcher / Truth seeker / Freedom fighter
http://ivan.Harhan.ORG/~msokolov/
on 3/7/05 5:29 PM, Adrian Graham at witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>> I now get a message that says
>>
>> waiting to form or join a VAXcluster system
>
> Odd, it should've done that from the word go, but never mind. It should also
> form a cluster on its own but I guess if there's no license for it it might
> not. At the SYSBOOT> prompt just SET VAXCLUSTER 0 and that'll stop the
> clustering in its tracks. For completeness also add SET SHADOW 0 just in
> case there's any volume shadowing active....
>
Mr. West ,
Due to the fact that your "unsubscribe" reminder feature is
inoperative , could you take the time to check into that??
It would be of great help to some of us that are growing
a bit tired of having our mailboxes filled up with unwanted
emails.
davess111 at juno.com
___________________________________________________________________
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!
>>>>> > phrase "Techno-Amish".
>
> I've used it to describe myself a long time ago.
>>>> Just a quick note -- the real Amish are pacifists, and don't believe in
warfare. I am pretty sure they'd be mightily offended by you using their name.
<<
-----
Heck, I'm offended by it, and I'm Jewish!
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
Hello,
Having a bit of a problem starting VMS 5.1. It seems that it begins
execution of the startup procedure, but then it hangs. I'm wondering
if there's a way to bypass the startup procedures so I can find out
what's wrong. Here's the messages I get:
KA630-A.V1.3
Performing normal system tests.
7..6..5..4..3..
Tests completed.
Loading system software.
2..1..0..
VAX/VMS Version V5.1 Major version id = 1 Minor version id = 0
..
$! Copyright (c) 1988 Digital Equipment Corporation. All rights reserved.
The VAX/VMS system is now executing the system startup procedure.
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 7-MAR-2005 08:07:07.89 %%%%%%%%%%%
Logfile has been initialized by operator _OPA0:
Logfile is SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]OPERATOR.LOG;769
%LICENSE-I-LOADED, DEC FORTRAN was successfully loaded with 50 units
And then nothing. Almost looks like a system ready to be logged into,
yet pressing Enter does nothing. I know the terminal emulator works
because I am able to halt the system and type commands successfully
at the >>> prompt.
Thanks in advance!
John