willisjo at zianet.com wrote:
> However, I am a tad concerned about what will happen
> to our prized hobby when such items as 9-track tapes,
> TK50s, and TU58 DECtape-IIs truly become absolute
> unobtainium.
As I have stated many times before, I believe the solution is for us to
open our own factories to make them.
MS
termination is 150 ohms (for 5.25" floppy drives) to +5vdc... one of the reasons that one drive only can be terminated otherwise the output drives can't handle the current and if there is no termination then there is not a valid logic high level.
best regards, Steve Thatcher
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Sudbrink <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
Ah, yes, in each of my tests, the unpowered drive was set for
DS2 (drive B) and TM (termination) and was at the end of the
cable. But, I thought that the termination was to ground?
On Mar 20 2005, 19:20, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
> After a good bit of
> trying to figure out what was wrong, I discovered that the
> +5 volt pin in the power connector I was using for the #2 (B)
> drive had pushed out of the nylon plug so that the drive was
> unpowered. Having either of the drives unpowered on the cable
> caused the other drive to screw up. The two drives cooperate
> just fine when both have power. I don't remember ever seeing
> this kind of problem before... I seem to remember having unpowered
> drives hanging off of cables with no ill effects. I guess that
> some of the signals (write gate for instance) must be getting
> pulled low by the unpowered unit. Is this normal floppy
> behavior and I'm just remembering wrong?
Usually that's OK. Is perhaps the one without power also the one with
the terminators, or do neither have terminators?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Is the H720 the correct power supply for the TC11/TU56
> combo, as is indicated in some document I've looked at?
> I'm at work and don't have my notes. Are there other
> compatible DEC power supplies that will work with the
> TC11/TU56?
>
On a related note...any special concerns on an initial powerup of a TU-56 that has not been turned on for possibly 5+ years....??
I just ran across this and thought it might be of interest for anyone
doing a low level format on a PC (not AT) type controllers. It was taken
>from a February 13, 1989 issue of Tech Times that appears to be a
ComputerLand Confidential publication (this is a copy.) My usual
procedure was to unassemble C800:5 or C800:6 and G=????:? the address
that was a jmp instruction. I've never used the :800 or tried to format
a Xebec controller.
*******************
Company Debug Command
Adaptec -G=C800:CCC
DTC -G=C800:5
Omti -G=C800:6
Western Digital -G=C800:5 or
-G=c800:800
Xebec Series of commands
-l322
-l321
-o322 0
-l321
-o320 04
-0320 00
-o320 00
-0320 00
-0320 05
-0320 07 (use 17 if embedded servo dr)
At this point, the LED on the drive should come on to indicate that the
drive is formatting. When the light goes off, coninue:
-l321
-l320
The last entry should get 00 status back, indicating a successful
format.
If anyone's interested, I've recently updated my Star Trek page
somewhat. More BASIC versions, a little more blurb, and Java and
Z-code versions at http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/startrek/
As always, corrections, additions, and comments are welcome.
Anyone got a FORTH or APL version?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 20 2005, 16:39, Dave Dunfield wrote:
> Couple of weeks ago, I was contacted by a guy who said he had seen my
site,
> and has an "Black Apple" (Bell and Howell edition of Apple II for
schools)
> I responded by asking him for a price - he said $150
> He's left me on his mailing list, and since than has reported that he
had
> an offer for $500, then $1000, and this morning he says he has an
offer for
> $2000. I corresponded with him again and he says:
> >ok right now got offer for 2000 from people in uk. have 2 different
people
> >in uk that want it for good money.
There's one on eBay right now, in good condition, with working drives,
at $355 Canadian with 19 hours to go. I've seen them go a little
higher. I can't imagine why anyone would pay very much more than that,
and I suspect he's not had any offer near $2000. If he had, and you'd
already told him you weren't interested at $150, why would he bother to
contact you again? Anyway, don't forget you'd pay VAT and possibly
import duty if you bought one from the States.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I figure this might be a decent place to ask..
Does anyone know of a program I can use (preferably under Linux, but DOS
would probably work as well) to read a flux-transition level image off a
disk using a catweasel card? I'm trying to read some 2.4MB (5.25")
floppies from an IBM 3174 controller (using an 2.4MB floppy drive), and
am able to read in 1.2MB floppies using cw2dmk just fine, but it doesn't
do so well at processing the (aparently) mixed-density floppy I've been
screwing with since yesterday. Using the "testhist" program included
with cw2dmk, I can get information about the "unreadable" tracks, but
cw2dmk won't process them. I'm trying to make a backup image of a disk
so that I'm not screwed when the disk stops being readable...
For those interested, it appears that "2.4MB" floppy drives are 96 TPI
just like 5.25" DS/HD drives, but they support a higher bit rate.
Here's what testhist tells me for a "normal" HD track:
mii-300:/usr/src/cw2dmk-3.4# ./testhist 0 0 0 1 2
Reading track 0, side 1...
0: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000
8: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000003 000001
16: 000008 000005 000002 000005 000012 000006 000010 000479
24: 003590 012073 083091 150788 000112 000013 000004 000004
<snip>
peak 0: mean 26.52101, sd 0.67534
peak 1: mean 41.56100, sd 1.04145
peak 2: mean 55.25931, sd 0.90741
drive speed approx 360.943152 RPM
MFM data clock approx 510.486128 kHz
And for a higher density "2.4MB" track:
mii-300:/usr/src/cw2dmk-3.4# ./testhist 0 0 1 1 2
Reading track 1, side 1...
0: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000
8: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000324 000605
16: 000579 000472 006881 107754 120911 001047 000736 000639
24: 000743 000819 000079 000019 000003 000005 000000 000006
<snip>
peak 0: mean 19.51057, sd 0.82054
peak 1: mean 33.65562, sd 1.27275
peak 2: mean 48.29739, sd 0.48487
drive speed approx 374.227723 RPM
MFM data clock approx 653.668108 kHz
I don't care so much about being able to interpret the data that's there
as much as just being able to make a duplicate of the disk which is
acceptable to the 3174 controller when this disk bites the dust.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
>He's left me on his mailing list, and since than has reported that he had
>an offer for $500, then $1000, and this morning he says he has an offer for
>$2000. I corresponded with him again and he says:
>>ok right now got offer for 2000 from people in uk. have 2 different people
>>in uk that want it for good money.
>
>This seems completely ludicrous to me --- I know B&H Apples are considered
>desirable by some, but $2000 (and shipping from US->UK)!!!
There is on on eBay right now, known working, although not with black
drives (but with a working Apple II drive, there are two black B&H drives
also available for $20 each in another auction). $355 with 15 bids and 20
hours remaining. The pics aren't loading for me, but the description says
it is near mint condition. I could see it getting up to $500 before it
closes, but $2000... I'd be surprised.
The $150 price he asked was probably a good price (I'd have likely taken
him up on that price). But whether he really has $2000 offers vs he is
just claiming that to make you feel bad for passing on $150 deal (and
possibly hoping you are an ignorant collector who will suddenly think the
thing is worth thousands and offer him $2500 for it).
But who knows, there has been some insane prices on things recently.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Unearthed a Sun 2/120 yesterday (CPU cabinet plus disk cabinet plus mono
screen) but unfortunately no sign of a keyboard or mouse.
Anyone know if a later Sun keyboard and mouse can be wired via an
adapter to work? We've got a couple of Sun 3 keyboards & mice kicking
around which would be enough to test the machine out at least.
Both the keyboard and mouse connectors on the Sun 2 are 6-pin RJ45-style
connectors (they're probably not called RJ45 in this case as they're
smaller, but you get the idea).
Actually, I have a feeling that the mouse on our Sun 3/50 uses the same
connector (where it plus into the back of the keyboard) so that might be
the exact right part. The keyboard on the 3/50's a DB15 though...
cheers
Jules
Anyone interested in a user guide for Microsoft Word 2.0 specially made for
GE (General Electric) ? Its basically a normal manual with 848 pages but
with a GE cover and the text "GE Business Use Only" on it.
Stefan.
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.oldcomputercollection.com
Hi All,
Anybody able to tell me the difference between the M8728 (11/70 MOS memory board)
and the M8750 (11/750 MOS Memory board) or why DEC decided to assign 2 numbers
to it (the M8750 has this number stamped on the handle, but the board bears
the number M8728!)
Thanks,
Ed
--
edward at groenenberg.net | Collector of PDP-11's.
http://www.groenenberg.net
Unix Lives! M$ Windows is crap.
'05 GSX-R1000
I have just come into possession of a NextStation, unfortunately sans
media. Can anyone point me to where I can get iso images or CDs for this
beast? It's got NextStep 3.3 installed, but it would be nice to have a
means for recovery.
Also looking for the development environment and/or docs.
Thanks for any tips!
Steve
Awhile back I was looking for a caddy for my RRD40, but the ones I
found and received (thanks Joe) weren't for the RRD40 but for RRD42.
RRD40 takes a weird plastic-only caddy that looks like a pair of
pincers, precariously pinching a CD at the edges...(anybody who'd like
a pic can email me offlist).
Anyway, my RRD40 I discovered unfortunately was nonfunctional *sigh* :-{
The caddy with VMS7.1 was jammed inside and I had to strip the drive
down to the internal unit to extricate the caddy and CD. There doesn't
seem to be an EJECT button for the RRD40????
So after I've extricated the caddy/CD by raising the motor/spindle
clamp manual, I discovered I cannot insert/load the caddy/CD with
raising the spindle clamp. Of course I could only do that with a
topless unit...
I could only conclude that the load/eject mechanism is kaput....
Any clues anybody? Or time to look for another RRD40....
/wai-sun
p.s. I had hopes for the RRD40 to be a boot device for my u/VAXen...
Yipppeeee! The 9915B now works. My remaining worry is that I do not
know why! After removing things to allow me to check them in isolation
and then putting them back, I started providing power to the different
parts of the PSU. First the +12V supply worked, then the -5V and -12V
supplies worked, then the +6V, and finally the +5V. Every time I expected
the fuse to blow, but it didn't. So now the whole thing works fine.
The 9915A still does not work, but I have found that C45 (the thin tall
390uF capacitor connected to pin 4 of transformer T2 via diode CR12) is
shorted. That removes power to the V+ supply taking out the +6V and
the +5V supplies.
Now all I need is a replacement for C45 and I am in business.
Many many thanks Tony.
BTW the first time I looked at the 9915 motherboard I freaked out,
because the PSU is all over the place. In some cases analog components
are located right next to the digital logic. But with Tony's help and
his schematics, I managed to map my way around the board. Now when I
look at some part on the underside, I know which components are on the
other side. Like an adventure game that you have played many times and
have the layout in your mind.
Real fun.
**vp
I have two IBM Model 5150s (one original rev, and a rev b). I think I've
explored every single inch of the hardware except for light pens -- I would
really like to experiment with one and write some software that interfaces with
one. Does anyone know:
1. What light pens were available and for which PCs? (I also own Tandy 1000s,
and they have "light pen" ports too)
2. Does anyone have any light pens for sale or trade?
I've already tried googling and searching usenet -- the only references I can
find are companies selling light pens for modern machines, and tech info that
states the obvious (ie. "The IBM PC supported a light pen"... yeah, thanks :-)
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Want to help an ambitious games project? http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
Done completely in Flash. Pretty damn amazing:
http://myoldmac.net/webse-e.htm
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
>From: "woodelf" <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
>
>Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>>Hi
>> I've always been looking at using a DSP chip for this job.
>>I did expect to read parts of a track at a time and then
>>reassemble them as condensed data. Chips like the Analog
>>Devices 2181 have some 80Kbytes of onboard RAM. Although,
>>it can't all be used for storage at the same time and
>>some is needed for program space. These chips can be
>>implemented with a real minimum of outside circuits.
>>they even have a serial SPI that can be used to read
>>disk data at higher speeds. These processor run at 30 MIPs
>>plus. They can run some operations, such as data moving
>>to arrays in single cycles, including updating of pointers.
>>They can do as many as 5 operations in a single cycle.
>> The can bootstrap from simple slowspeed EPROM of FLASH.
>>One could easily connect one of these to that USB chip
>>that someone pointer to earlier.
>>Dwight
>>
>>
>>
>Look what you are doing is building a generic floppy disk controler.
>The only high speed device what you use to sync the data/clock pulses
>to the system cpu clock. The rest is software. I'd sooner use a CPLD
>designed for generic bit sampling but a PIC would also work with
>a digital data/clock seperator. Now would getting the people who do
>cat-weasel create a USB version be a better goal?
>Ben alias woodelf
>PS. What about hard-sectored floppy disks, that too may need reading
>too?
Hi
I think you are missing what I am saying. The SPI is just
a shift register that takes an external clock. It can be programmed
to automatically DMA transfer into memory. It is the perfect zero
additional logic circuit to use. You don't need to build a
data/clock separator or anything. Just sample the data.
One could even make the output SPI provide write data. These
chips are designed to load their programs from a single
flash or EPROM so the entire hardware requirement is almost
nothing.
I see others on comp.os.cpm talk about using a 50MHz variant
of a Z80. I think most miss the point. These DSP's are 30 MIPS+
not just 50 MHz clocks. They have enormous capabilities in
a relatively small package. It was like they were designed for
this project. You don't need to create a CPLD since the hardware
part is already done for you.
Dwight
Maybe a little OT, but..
I just laid hands on a Friden EC-130 calculator, and I'll be darned if I can figure out how to take the top cover off of it.
The cover *seems* to come off by sliding forward, but there are a pair of pins in the rear that keep it in place. I've tried to flex the cover enough to clear the pins, but the resistance encountered is more than I am comfortable with.
How does this thing come off?
--
---------------------------------------------
-. William W. Layer .- -. St. Paul, MN USA .-
---------------------------------------------------
-. Cheif bottlewasher, Atma-Sphere Music Systems .-
-. http://www.atma-sphere.com .-
--------------------------------
Hi All,
after a few days frustration, I have got a little further with my 11/45.
The power supplies checked out OK with respect to ripple and output, but a
couple have them have the odd VERY fast spike on them - is this normal? (I'm
using a 100MHz 'scope - I suspect they may not be visible on a slower one).
After reducing the machine to its basics, I found I could load an address
>from the front panel, but not write or examine any location successfully.
The address and data lines became active, but the processor then goes into a
pause state. I found that the MSYN line was not being asserted, and it
appears that one ic on the Unibus controller (M8106) is not providing the
correct ouput - grounding the scope probe will force the line, and the
processor completes its bus cycle (Yes the inputs to the ic are correct!).
I have found a spare serviceable UBC, so I'll try that when I next get
chance, and if that fixexs the fault, I'll repair mine.
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
On Mar 19 2005, 23:43, Jules Richardson wrote:
> We couldn't get it to work with any transceiver we tried (SQE test
was
> off, FWIW), whether hooked up to a hub or not - it still gave a
> complaint about heartbeat at startup and then subsequent "no carrier"
> errors (and the "Ethernet jammed" errors).
The complaint about "heartbeat" is because the interface is expecting
to see the SQE test appear a few bit times after the end of the frame.
"Ethernet jammed" might mean it's seeing a continuous jam signal, or at
least sees a jam signal when it listens to the wire to see if it can
transmit. A jam signal is what a repeater puts on the wire when it
detects a collision (and it would see the SQE test signal as a
collision). It's an alternating set of 1s and 0s that lasts 96 bit
times, as I recall (an ordinary station can also generate a jam signal
but not such a long one), and the object of that is to force everything
to see a collision and back off. Now it so happens that 96 bit times
is also the interframe gap length, so if you have a repeater with a
transceiver set to do SQE tests, it sends an SQE test starting a few
bit times into the IFG, then generates a jam which will still be there
slightly after the end of the IFG, just when the station might be
checking for carrier again. Have you got another repeater somewhere
with a transceiver on it? Or are you missing a terminator so that the
voltage is out of spec and might look like a collision?
> As said in a private mail just now though, we'd had this problem with
> our PDP 11/84 - on the advice of an ex-DEC chap, it'd only talk to
one
> of these DEC units rather than any kind of AUI-equipped hub (or a
> transceiver). On a whim we tried the same with the Sun, and it seems
to
> have improved matters.
I've had various DEC machines, like my 11/83, attached to both
thickwire and thinwire with non-DEC transceivers and never had a
problem. I do check the SQE test, though :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>
> > > 2. Does anyone have any light pens for sale or trade?
> >
> > No, but it's not hard to make one if you don't require high resolution.
> > There was at least one design in 80-micro for the Tandy 1000. There were
> > plenty of designs for the Beeb (most of them use the Honeywell 'Sweet
> > Spot' devices). Thoese were not as good as the Torch one I mentioned, but
> > they do work.
>
> There are a couple on ePay at the moment, too.
It may be worth mentioning that microcomputer light pens tend to be
somewhat interchabeable.
They need either +5V, +12V, or both as power, The actual light pen signal
is a pulse that occurs when the light pen detects light from the CRT
screen, it's almost always TTL level, and the only possible problem here
is that it's the wrong polarity, which can be trivially fixed with a
74x04 inverter. If there's a pushbutton switch on the light pen, most
likely it just grounds the appropraite wire when pressed.
DEC lightpens (at least the one on my GT40) are different. They're just the
phototransistor, the amplifier, etc, is inside the display. Microcomputer
lightpens tend to put the electronics in the pen or its interface box.
-tony
On Mar 19 2005, 21:32, Jules Richardson wrote:
> The Ethernet card may be a source of trouble. It seems to want
something
> that provides an external heartbeat - we hooked up a DEC hub to get
> around that problem, which stopped the "no carrier" messages on the
> console. However, it's still throwing up "Ethernet jammed" messages -
> and ideas what that's about?
Have you got the "SQE Test" turned on on your transceiver? You have to
turn it off if you have the transceiver connected to a repeater (which
is probably what your DEC hub is). What the SQE test does is send a
test signal after every frame, to test the collision detect circuitry,
but the repeater will see this as a real collision and will send a jam
signal.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
A friend has a large number of 3-1/2" HD diskettes with IBM Filing
Assistant files on them.
Does anyone know of a way to open and read those files so that they can be
brought in to a current database program or spreadsheet?
Jay wrote:
> Yeah, I'll give you a primer on the capacitors on the TU56.... to get
> replacements is about $70 each! For the four motor run caps anyways.
>
> I'll get to refurbing my TU56 "Someday".
I hope to bring my TU56 back to life this year too ...!
One note on the ### motor capacitors.
AFAIK there is a difference between motor *start* caps and *run* caps.
If I am wrong I would like to know, else what is the difference?
- Henk, PA8PDP.
On Mar 19 2005, 11:19, GManuel \(GMC\) wrote:
> It must be able to somehow. I have used a light pen on a Commodore 64
with a
> Graphics Program called Picasso's Revenge and have drawn on the
screen with
> it even on a completely black background. Not sure how it does it
though.
It's just a question of sensitivity. The black portions of the screen
are rarely quite black, because the electron beam is not quite turned
off. Thus a suficciently sensitive lightpen can still detect the spot
as it scans past the pen's location.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
I finally got a VME Bus for me to start experimenting. I want to connect
this to my Ultrasparc 2 using my Performance Tech Sbus-to-VME controller.
Unfortunately, I am a total newbie when it comes to VME. I got a VERO-BICC
Vme chassis that apparently once held a Force CPU. There are a bunch of
connectors on the VME backplane itself. Also, how does one even set up
these guys? The chassis has 5 VME slots. I want to use the Performance
Tech as the master controlling the VME Bus? and connect 2 (or more)
transtech/inmos VME boards....
Thanks,
Ram
Here's a list of the docs that came with the INFO 2000 disk setup,
aka PerSci 277 double drive and 1070 disk controller.
I know most of this is already available online, but I can scan any
of it on request.
PERSCI 1070 INTELLIGENT FLOPPY DISK CONTROLLER 12 pg. glossy
by Robert A. Stevens
Reprint of an article from Sept 1977 /Interface Magazine/
AN ADVANCED DISC-BASED SYSTEM 4 pg. glossy
by Michael Busch and Dan Gaines
From same magazine issue
INFO 2000 DISK SYSTEM 8 pg. sales brochure
for Heathkit H8
Digital Group
All S-100 Computers
PerSci Mass Storage Systems - Specifications 2 pg. glossy
PerSci Model 70 Diskette Drive - Specifications "
PerSci Model 277 Dual Diskette Drive - Specifications "
USERS MANUAL
Intelligent Diskette Controller
Model 1070
~40 pg. April, 1978
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
Intelligent Diskette Controller
Model 1070 22 pg. June, 1977
WESTERN DIGITAL MOS/LSI FD1771
APPLICATION NOTE FLOPPY DISK FORMATTER/CONTROLLER
20 pg. March, 1978
Installation and Maintenance Manual
Duak Diskette Drive
Model 277 44 pg. July 1977
Logic & Schematic Diagram
Diskette Drive
Models 270/272/277 31 pg. January, 1978
Product Specification
Diskette Drive
Model 277 24 pg. January, 1978
Installation and Maintenance Manual
Duak Diskette Drive
Model 70 Series 39 pg. October 1976
Product Specification
Diskette Drive
Model 70 24 pg. January 1977
Product Specification
Diskette Drive
Model 299B 36 pg. not dated
USERS MANUAL
Dual Density Controller
Model 1170 62 pg. March 1980
Doc
PerSci, Inc.
Product Price List 1 pg. November 18, 1977
I picked up a KJ Instruments Model 506 Disk Drive Analyzer. It's a tester
for MFM drives. On the front are the data and power connectors for a
standard MFM drive, plus knobs, switches, LED displays, etc. On the back
are two DB-25 connectors.
Has anyone got a manual by some remote chance? Has anyone ever used one
of these?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Ethan,
I wrote the post about the TI 9900 processor cards. What are the
dimensions of the cards, and how many pins? I have two ram boards that may
be similar to yours, perhaps a little older based on the RAM chip numbers
you list below (assuming smaller number means older). I have the details
of my TI 9900-related stuff on
http://vintagecomputer.net/ti/TI-990-101/readme.txt. Here is a URL of pdf
links to TI-related hardware http://computer-refuge.org/bitsavers/ti/ and
try http://www.mainbyte.com/ti99/ in the event that you have a card
originally from an expansion unit for a 99 4/a. If you can read Japanese,
this page appears to have some info as well
http://www.orchid.co.jp/computer/hardware/parts/tms9900.html
Bill
>I was going through the basement at my old place today and ran across
>some boards that I bought at Dayton a large number of years ago. They
>all seem to be RAM boards of one type or another, one marked "24K",
>the other "8K w/ECC", loaded with different amounts of TI4060 RAM
>chips (approx the same package dimensions as, say, 5101 SRAMs). I
>don't have a net connection there at the moment, and I didn't have my
>camera with me, or I'd have taken pictures to post, but I thought I'd
>start by asking if anyone knows of a repository of TI board pictures
>like some of the Qbus field guides that are out there. I could then
>do a little browsing to figure out what these are from.
>One guess is that these look like what I've been reading about on the
>list recently about the TI990(?). They look newer than the boards in
>my TI980, and a little larger than those.
>I also found what look to be like TI laptop parts - a couple of
>daughter cards that seem to be some kind of video controller, and more
>of a main board, but without a CPU.
>I have no particular use for them except as a source of parts. If
>these sound interesting to anyone here, I can do a little more digging
>and/or take down part numbers and take pictures.
>No CPU or I/O cards, sorry.
>-ethan
------------------------------
Does anyone know a true (not a homebrew hack) multitasking environment that
will run in 16K or less, preferably with available source?
I was looking at Mini-UNIX for the PDP-11 and that's something similar to
what I'm looking for, but I wondered what other alternatives there were. Any
architecture will do, but I'm particularly interested in minicomputer
architectures for this project (DG, DEC, IBM, etc., would all be appropriate).
Thanks for humouring my odd request ^^
--
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- The steady state of disks is full. -- Ken Thompson -------------------------
I was going through the basement at my old place today and ran across
some boards that I bought at Dayton a large number of years ago. They
all seem to be RAM boards of one type or another, one marked "24K",
the other "8K w/ECC", loaded with different amounts of TI4060 RAM
chips (approx the same package dimensions as, say, 5101 SRAMs). I
don't have a net connection there at the moment, and I didn't have my
camera with me, or I'd have taken pictures to post, but I thought I'd
start by asking if anyone knows of a repository of TI board pictures
like some of the Qbus field guides that are out there. I could then
do a little browsing to figure out what these are from.
One guess is that these look like what I've been reading about on the
list recently about the TI990(?). They look newer than the boards in
my TI980, and a little larger than those.
I also found what look to be like TI laptop parts - a couple of
daughter cards that seem to be some kind of video controller, and more
of a main board, but without a CPU.
I have no particular use for them except as a source of parts. If
these sound interesting to anyone here, I can do a little more digging
and/or take down part numbers and take pictures.
No CPU or I/O cards, sorry.
-ethan
Thanks Tony for the advice:
> Fuse still blows? Remove the diode between pin 6 of T2 and the -12V line
> and the diode between pin 4 of T2 and the V+ line (RH side of sheet 1 of
> my CPU board schematic). With those lifted, the supply is reduced to a
> simple 12V one driving no load.
I did so and the fuse held. I meassured the +12V line and it gave me
close to 12V (+11.98V). I also reconnected CR13 (the one at pin 6
of T2) and got the -12V and -5V supplies as well.
Unfortunately, when connecting the other diode (CR12, pin 4 of T2), the
fuse blows.
> I'd supsect (a) a short in one of the output regulators _and_ (b) a
> problem with the current sense circuit (round U31, LM311).
Any ideas on how to debug this?
Thanks
**vp
BTW I have another question related to another 9915 with PSU probs.
What would cause the -12V supply to produce only around -5V (i.e.
the volatages on either side of the 332 Ohm resistor are around
-5V (not equal, but close).
On Mar 18 2005, 10:07, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
> >From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
> >There, "run" caps are generally oil, and "start" caps are
> >generally electrolytic. The exception being the occasional
"start/run" cap,
> >whatever that is.
>
> I believe that refers to how it is used. During the start,
> it is connected to a high current coil but during run, is
> is connected to a high resistant one to create phase shift.
>
> >The original caps in the TU56 are high capacitance, and clearly
> >electrolytic. But they appear to be wired for continuous phase
shifting
> >duty. Hence some of the people on the list insisting that they are
"run"
> >caps, and that the beefier, more expensive "run" cap should be used.
>
> Most likely to make the motor run smoother, as though there
> were more phases to the AC.
Simplified explanation: In "capacitor-start, capacitor-run" motors,
which run from single-phase AC, there are two sets of coils. The coils
need to be fed with AC out of phase with each other to cause the motor
to rotate. The AC supply is fed directly to one set of coils, and
through the capacitors to produce the phase shift for the second set of
coils. To start the motor, you need lots of current and a big phase
shift, so the "start" capacitor in parallel with the "run" capacitor is
a high value. A centrifugal switch in the motor disconnects that once
it gets to some fraction of its nominal speed, and then only the "run"
capacitor is left in series with the second set of coils.
Capacitors passing AC have an impedance, analagous to resistance but
frequency dependant, so they dissipate energy proportional to their
impedance and the square of the current. The "start" capacitor is only
in circuit for a short time, so it doesn't need to be as robust as the
"run" capacitor, which will be dissipating energy all the time the
motor is running. Of course if the load on the motor is low, so is the
current, so the capacitors may not need to handle too much energy once
it's running normally.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Huw Davies" <huw.davies at kerberos.davies.net.au>
---snip---
>
>Are the risks in preemptive scheduling just ones of complexity? I guess
>that it is much harder to "prove" that this type of scheduler is going
>to to the right thing at the right time. I know that,
>for example, the scheduler for VMS has gone from a couple of pages of
>assembler
>to something like 75 pages of BLISS!
>>
Hi Huw
I think it is more about predictability. Large preemptive
systems can lock up in unpredictable ways. They are hard
to confirm as operating correctly under all conditions
since the number of permutations of conditions is so large.
This makes them dangerous for critical systems.
Most non-preemptive system are easier to find bugs because
they tend to fail right away if there is such a flaw.
Also, preemptive taskers often have to save greater amounts
of information since they may break a task at in opportune
points.
For a general purpose OS, preemptive makes sense. For
RTOS is really doesn't.
As an example of simplicity, for an embedded machine, I used
a non-preemptive tasker to run 50 pid controls, a keypad,
paper printer log and a LCD display. This was all easily handled
with a single 2MHz Z80.
Dwight
>From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
---snip---
>
>What you are saying is consistent with what I see on most sites selling
>these things. There, "run" caps are generally oil, and "start" caps are
>generally electrolytic. The exception being the occasional "start/run" cap,
>whatever that is.
I believe that refers to how it is used. During the start,
it is connected to a high current coil but during run, is
is connected to a high resistant one to create phase shift.
>
>The original caps in the TU56 are high capacitance, and clearly
>electrolytic. But they appear to be wired for continuous phase shifting
>duty. Hence some of the people on the list insisting that they are "run"
>caps, and that the beefier, more expensive "run" cap should be used.
Most likely to make the motor run smoother, as though there
were more phases to the AC.
---snip---
Dwight
Does anyone have a discription of how drives are mounted in a 7012/7030 RS/6k
with the 2 front accessible 5-1/4 bays? (not the case with the card-edge
connector for narrow SCSI) I think I need some type of sled or cage, but I don't
know how it attaches or the IBM lingo for it (so Google doesn't work).
- Scott Quinn
>From: "Giuseppe Sarno" <gsarno at nortel.com>
>
>Hi I own an Old Xerox 820 machine,
>Can anyone help to find documentation for it ?
>Also is there a way to download programs onto it using the serial/parallel
>port ?
>
>I have seen some info at
>http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html
><http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html> but
>I couldn't find more.
>
>Thanks.
>
Hi
You didn't mention if you have a disk that boots and
has PIP under CP/M on it. If you do, you can transfer
information as ASCII like a BASIC source program or even
transfer .COM files by first converting them to .HEX
files and then using DDT on the 820 to move them
to .COM files.
If you are attempting to bootstrap with no disk, you'll
have to check with others. One may be able to do it
if it has a built in debug monitor.
Of course, on can always write some of ones own code
and replace one of the internal EPROMs. It is not
as impossible as it sounds. You just have to explore
a little.
Dwight
>From: "Eric Smith" <eric at brouhaha.com>
>
>Paul wrote:
>> all too often, priorities
>> are used to hide the fact that the builder didn't analyze the job
>> sufficiently, and simply hacked the priorities until things seemed to
>> work in test.
>
>True. You wouldn't believe how many times I've seen other engineers
>trying to set the priority of their task higher than those of other
>tasks just because they have some vague idea that their task is
>"important", rather than any understanding of actual relationships between
>the tasks.
>
>A good rule of thumb is that in the absence of a rational basis for
>one task having a higher priority than another, all tasks should have
>the same priority. Far too often a person's intuitive idea of what
>the relative task priorities should be is wrong.
>
>Eric
>
>
Hi
If it is important enough to need immediate attention,
it should be interrupt driven and not a general task.
Many confuse interrupts with tasks. I suspect this is
mostly because most preemptive systems use the interrupts
to switch task( not very efficient in a RTOS ).
Even in a non-preemptive, one can have some priority.
Management of the task queue can give similar effects.
Dwight
Hi everyone,
Well, I am finally getting around to trying to recover some 26
9-track tapes I have been holding on to for
at least 10 years. Some are closer to 25 years. I found out six of
them had no data, and a bunch more I
have been able to read and decode, including some RT-11 tapes and some
VAX SIG tapes. Sorry this
monologue won't make much sense to you non-DEC folks, but you might have
ideas on converting from 800
to 1600 BPI anyway.
Here is my dilemna. I have 6 tapes that look like they are 800 BPI, and
were most likely written on an RSX-11
system. I have no 800 BPI setup, and if I did, it would be on a VAX,
which may not be able to restore the
savesets anyway. That is because I have a few more tapes that I can
read (or at least dump) but I cannot unpack
the savesets. It would appear that the tapes were written in the early
days of VMS when the backup and restore
utilities were really RSX-11 BCK/RST derivitives, and the current BACKUP
program does not recognize
the container file as a valid saveset.
The label on the front of several tapes date them early 80's and talks
about BCK format. The dump sort of looks
like BCK stuff. The blocksize is 2064.
I've had a couple of offers to try to recover the data, but I was
checking to see if anybody was set up to easily
read and recover the data, without a lot of reconfiguration or hassle.
I'm open to suggestions. I suspect if I knew
the layout of a BCK container/saveset I could unpack them myself (except
for the 800 BPI stuff). Any ideas??
I also have an XXDP tape, labeled MSDP, which makes me think it is
bootable. It would be nice to duplicate
it, as it is not easily read to disk. The first block is 14 bytes, and
the rest look like 512 bytes.
And finally, I have a tape that is readable, is mountable under VMS and
I can copy nearly everything off of.
That is, the 400+ files up to the file that is marked HECK.BCK. That
file is 2064 byte blocks, which makes
me think it is also a BCK/RST format. Can't figure how I got it on the
end of the tape and haven't figured
out how to get it back.
Cheers,
Joe Heck
It's not-quite-on-topic but it's a well-developed evolutionary
dead-end; a platypus display. It *could* be done on old gear...
>From Tim Pozar:
Vector drawings on an o'scope using a sound card on a computer....
http://www.sensi.org/~svo/pr0nscope/
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 Bj?rn <bv at norbionics.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0100, Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com> wrote:
>
>> Ethan writes about bytes on the PDP-10:
>>> On the -10,
>>> one stores 6 6-bit characters in a machine word, and one speaks of
>>> bytes that are 6 bits.
>>
>> Not necessarily. On the PDP-10, the byte size could be anywhere from
>> zero (really!) to 36 bits. Seven bits was the most commonly used for
>> general ASCII text, with one leftover bit per word. In fact, this
>> was so common that the KS10 CPU has special dedicated hardware to make
>> the 7-bit byte case more efficient than the other supported byte sizes.
> ...
>
> A byte is the smallest INDIVIDUALLY addressable unit of data on a system.
Nonsense! Where did you get that?
The PDP-10 is an excellent example of when this isn't true.
The smallest addressable unit is a word, which is 36 bits.
A byte is, as noted, anything between 0 and 36 bits. Bytes are stored in a
word, as many as can be fitted.
To access bytes on a PDP-10, you have a byte pointer, which consist of a
word address, and a bit pointer, and byte size. So it points to the
correct word, and then you have a bitfield in that word that a nice
instruction can extract, and also move the bitfield pointer ahead the
correct amount and move on the the next word, if the next byte would not
fit in this word.
A byte is simply a convenient number of bits enough to store a character.
No explicit definition of how many "convenient" is, nor what character set
we're talking about with "character". A byte is just that. A convenient
size typ for character data.
The fact that people today seem to believe that byte addressable is the
only possible thing, along with a byte being 8 bits, is plain and simply
because they haven't seen any other.
> It was usual to speak of a character when a part of a whole word was
> extracted. I do not remember any details of the Univac 1107 (I only
> programmed in FORTRAN and Simula on it), but I think the normal character
> was six bits. I am fairly certain that was not a byte, it was extracted
> from an 18-bit halfword or a 36-bit word. A byte is something you can load
> and store to an individual address, and the hardware takes care of the
> rest. A character needs some software or firmware mapping in order to read
> or write just one of them.
Bah. A sixbit character can very well be a byte, it's just a question of
if you choose to call it that.
Byte addressable is not usable as a definition of a byte.
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> It's not-quite-on-topic but it's a well-developed
> evolutionary dead-end; a platypus display. It *could* be done
> on old gear...
>
> >From Tim Pozar:
>
> Vector drawings on an o'scope using a sound card on a computer....
>
> http://www.sensi.org/~svo/pr0nscope/
WAY too much time on their hands :-)
Quoth Paul Koning (i think), regarding LK401 some weeks back:
>Then again, if it's a stuck key or something like that, the keyboard
>is beyond repair. LK201 keyboards are cheesy low quality membrane
>switches that cannot be disassembled or cleaned or repaired. If
>moisture ever gets in them, your only option is to scrap the board. I
>found this out the hard way.
Does the same apply to LK401 keyboards? I have one with a
non-functioning key (try resetting passwords on VMS when you can't get
a 'Z'....), and the melted-post construction seems the same. Am I best
just looking for a replacement and if so, anyone in the UK got a spare
I can make an offer for? Be nice to the moderators and contact me
off-list :)
Cheers,
Pete
--
Pete Edwards
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future" - Niels Bohr
>From: Saquinn624 at aol.com
>
>Coming in on this a little bit late, but if you haven't checked out the
>Library of Congress you should.
>www.loc.gov/preserv gives you a basic run down of ways to care for archived
>materials, and the NIST/CLIR puts out Special Publication 500-252 "Care and
>Handling of CDs and DVDs - A Guide for Librarians and Archivists" (e-version
>available). Other tips- gold disks, AZO dye are reputed to last longer.
>The phenomenon of failure from the outside in has interesting possibilities-
>have software write a known pattern in the outermost section of the disc and
>pop up a warning when it starts to deteriorate. Hopefully this would give
>enough time to move data to another disk.
>
>- Scott Quinn
>
Hi
This does require regular reading of the archived disk. This
is not necessarily an easy thing to do.
Dwight
Eric wrote:
> However, I don't *really* think you want to spend the rest of your
> life writing your own FPGA development software. It's a hard problem
> and there are hundreds of thousands of man-years of development effort
> in the Xilinx software. By the time you got your own software working
> for one family, that family would have long since been discontinued.
Scott wrote:
> I would suspect that while there might be hundreds of thousands of man
> hours, that there just can't possible be hundreds of thousands of man
> *years* involved.
Xilinx is putting in hundreds of man years this year alone. They have been
at it for over 20 years so their development software amounts to 1000s of
man years of work. (I was in the PLD/FPGA software development business
>from 1982 to 1997.)
>From the Xilinx Web page
http://www.xilinx.com/company/press/grounder.htm
Headquartered in San Jose, California, Xilinx is a publicly traded company
(NASDAQ: XLNX) with approximately 2,600 employees, with nearly half of its
engineers dedicated to software development.
Michael Holley
(Sorry about the last blank message)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5173766870&
It's quite overpriced, probably times 5 or times 10. I kindly and
tactfully wrote to the seller explaining this, but of course I'll
lack credibility with them.
The seller ("gold-snipper") is a recycler in Portland OR, maybe
someone could contact them and go visit?
If they're bothering to list on eBay, that's a good sign. They
know it might have some value other than by-weight. Who knows what
else they have up there.
There's a tape and an SMD interface, alarm/clock, and a lot of
memory. I'd be interested in a memory card, maybe a basic IO, on
the faint chance someone visits them, and gets a bargain on the
whole box, and wants to part it out.
Clearly it was chopped from some ssytem, there appears to be no
cables etc.
While it's missing peripherals, if someone could scrounge up a
disk or floppy system it would be a decent 1970's-era mini.
There's no shortage of software for it.
Is anyone interested in helping me do the
TU56/TC11 restoration as a "virtual restoration
project"? I know you California guys can get
together in person and meet and work on your
PDP-1 restoration. I'm stuck here in South
Carolina and don't have a face-to-face group
to interact with.
I'm going to add a projects page to my site,
and add the TU56 project under that. I've
taken some pictures of it the way it is today,
which is pretty much how it arrived, except
that I've located a couple cards that were
missing.
I don't know if anyone has ever done anything
like this remotely in a "virtual mode" before,
but the idea of a team project sounds interesting
to me. David in New York could restore his
TU56 in parallel. In my current job I work
daily with a team in India. We never see one
another face-to-face except when an occasional
developer comes to the U.S. to spend some time
learning our procedures and processes. We are
able to accomplish our goals with teams
working on opposite sides of the globe.
Several folks have already privately been in
correspondence with me and have already been
a big help. You know who you are.
If anyone's interested, let me know. The
project would have a plan that folks could
help me put together, to do things in a
reasonable and logical order. Things like
clean the backplanes, check the flip-chips,
re-form the capacitors, etc. I don't know
what would be in it for everyone else, other
than to know that you helped when it finally
spins up a DECtape and can read and write to
it as the unit is connected to one of my
PDP-11s.
Call me crazy if you wish. I suppose I've
been involved in too many group projects over
the past 20 years and this seems like a fun
opportunity to try out the group/team concept
in a different way.
Ashley