Hi, I just picked up a Sun 3/80 chassis from the local university surplus. It
looked lonely sitting there. It's dusty inside but appears to work (checked
console via serial port). Has a floppy, 8MB memory, no hard drive, and a dead
NVRAM. I'll consult the various faq's on the web about the NVRAM, and maybe
drill some mounting holes for a hard drive (didn't come with a hd carrier, and
I can't find any).
I'll run it headless with netbsd, since I don't have room for another monitor.
I don't know much about the Sun 3 series though - most of what I see from a
google search is about the 3/50 and 3/60's. Is the 3/80 an ignored bastard
child from sun? A 68030 in a pizzabox, not a classic Sun 3, but not a Sparc
either?
Are the hd carriers hard to come by?
Thanks,
Jeff
>From: "Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org>
---snip---
>
>Ok, total neophyte input here on my part. But most of the techniques I've
>seen involve doing the casting inside a small dixie cup. If the problem is
>air bubbles, what about using a common (at least back in the 70's) device
>that many people still have in their kitchens... a "seal-a-meal". Mine has a
>vacuum attachment, to suck the air out of the container. So what about
>putting the cast inside a mason jar, to which you've hooked up the
Hi
Just be careful using glass containers with a vacuum.
Usually these jars have some nice gooey stuff inside them
when they fail from a vacuum. Without that stuff inside,
the glass can go flying everywhere. Use safety glasses.
Even metal containers can be dangerous when they collapse.
Still, glass works well because you can watch for the
stuff outgassing and making too much foam. It is much
easier to regulate how fast the vacuum it done.
Dwight
>seal-a-meal (or maybe the backend of an aquarium pump) to suck out all the
>air and let the cast set in a vacuum?
>
>Maybe a nutball idea, as I haven't a clue about this stuff. Just a thought.
>
>Jay
>
>
>
>From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
---snip---
>
>I'll have a look, thanks! One of my goals is to stick with technology we
>can (theoretically at least) do at home with a minimal investment. If I
>spend a ton of time buying or building equipment, I start to feel like I
>need a business plan :-/.
>
> Vince
>
>
Hi Vince
Like I said, the pump can be made from an old
bicycle hand pump. If you need a chamber, watch
garage sales for an old preasure cooker. Most
of these are strong enough to hold a vacuum.
They should be big enough to hold a small mold.
Dwight
Just a quick comment on this one--
You want an scope with several times as much "bandwidth" as the frequency of
the fastest digital signal you will examine-- 4X minimum. The analog
frequency content of a digital signal is much faster than its clock rate.
Without a substantial margin, the signal will be badly distorted.
Analog scopes are cheap and widely available, but they have limited value
for troubleshooting digital electronics. They can only show you repetitive
signals, or the envelope of a randomly changing signal. They can't show you
something that happens only once, or very rarely, but that's the nature of
most digital problems. Expensive analog "storage" scopes can hold a signal
on the screen, but only if you can figure out how to capture it in the first
place. You might as well spend the money on a digital scope.
If you're getting a digital scope, you need a "sampling rate" that is also
much faster than the frequency of your fastest signal. The Nyquist theory
says you need 2X the sampling rate to reconstruct a signal, but that theory
applies ONLY to reconstructing a known waveform given a large number of
samples. Again, in practice, you want a sampling rate at least 4X your
digital clock rate, and preferably more like 10X. This ratio determines how
accurately you can measure the position of your signal edges.
You will find old digital scopes that quote two sampling rates. The higher
figure will be a "repetitive sampling rate" specification that applies ONLY
to reconstructing periodic signals such as radio carrier waves or computer
clock signals. For non-periodic sources such as logic signals, only the
lower "raw" or "real-time" or "one-shot" or "instantaneous" sampling rate
matters.
Today, even for under $1,000, you can get a digital scope with a true
sampling rate much faster than you'll probably ever need. These are usually
priced according to analog bandwidth. For troubleshooting old computers,
even 100MHz is probably more than sufficient.
A good probe reduces the load on the signal being observed, as David Holland
said. An o-scope input has a 50-ohm impedance; that kind of load will stop
many circuits from working. So-called "active" probes present an almost
undetectable load, but you will rarely need anything that sophisticated.
If you're going to use a scope for ANYTHING, get this book:
Troubleshooting Analog Circuits, Bob Pease, ISBN 0750694998
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0750694998/
Or buy an autographed copy from the author by emailing rap at galaxy.nsc.com.
Though written about analog circuits, all of these electrical principles and
troubleshooting techniques apply to digital circuits. Let's face it, the
circuits themselves are analog anyway.
. png
> Ok, total neophyte input here on my part. But most of the
> techniques I've seen involve doing the casting inside a small
> dixie cup. If the problem is air bubbles, what about using a
> common (at least back in the 70's) device that many people
> still have in their kitchens... a "seal-a-meal". Mine has a
I think the usual approach is a vibrating table shake the bubbles to the
surface.
>Subject: Re: Oscilloscope question
> From: "John Allain" <allain at panix.com>
>Subquestion Number one for me would be the reasoning why
>those probes are so important. How bad are readings taken
>with just direct wired connections?
The probe is the "interface" between teh scope and the circuit.
The wrong type of connection will either pick up undesired
signals, load the signal resistively or capacitively. The
latter is signigicant as digital signals are time based and
the capacitive load of raw coax cable and alter that timing
or worse introduce ringing into the circuit.
>Should a scope rating 2X the computer clock speed keep the
>readings useful?
Scopes are like telescopes, even the cheapest can see Mars,
slightly better can see the bands on Mars. Relating the
bandwidth to CPU clock is mostly meaningless. The parameters
your are mesuring is timing of the waveform and possibly
the waveshape. If the bandwidth (and corosponding rise
time of the scope amplifiers) is not adaquate you will distort
the waveshape and if the timebase(X or horizontal scan time)
is either porrly calibrates or cannout go fast enough it may
be impossible to determine if a event occurs 450nanoseconds
(10^-9) later.
Risetime is a measure of how fast the amplifer in a scope
can go from 10% to 90%. Usually you want that to be faster
than the waveshape you wish to view by more an two and as
much as 10 times. Note most TTL have rise times well under
20ns and even some of the older logic families can be very
fast rise and fall times. So this is why a 50mhz (465b)
scope of better is used. The key here is risetime is the
measure used to understand the faithfulness of the reproduction
for a given wave shape. An example may be a very fast rise
time square wave can end up looking more like a saws teeth
when reproduced using a scope with inadaquate risetime in the
most extreme case.
For the math types 1/risetime+falltime give an approximate
repetition rate or frequency 1/40ns=25,000,000 Reptitions/Second.
So 2x that is only 50mhz! Also bandwidth and rise time are only
related as a scope can have good rise time but limited bandwidth
or the reverse.
>I suspect the approact to an oscilloscope for the typical person
>on this list wouldn't be the same as for a "rank dummy".
Yes. In both cases there is a requirement to understand
electronic basics and what waveforms result from basic
circuits. Complex circuits are just many simple ones
combined in many ways.
Allison
Hi list,
A contact has the following up for grabs:
Euromagnetics "Calculus Mk III" 9track tapes, 6250BPI, 7 off
Unknown brand (but ex-UK MOD so will be *extremely* high quality)
DC600A tapes, 60MB, 10 off
All are brand new and still sealed in their packaging.
If you would like to buy any, email an offer (he doesn't know what
they're worth, neither do I ;) to chrissi(at)ntlworld(dot)com.
The tapes are located in Cleethorpes, UK, but he will ship anywhere.
Regards,
Ed.
>Subject: Re: Oscilloscope question
>
The whole thing of O'scopes is manifold.
Having a scope adaquate for tha task. Generally an operational
Tektronix 465B, 475 or the newer equiventls are an excellent bet.
However..
The other is having the right probes, knowing where and how to
hook up.
With all that accomplished you fire it all up and are faced with
a display that doesnt match what you wish(hope) to see. So you
twiddle the knobs and its still different. The problem is now
interpreting the display and taking the required action IE: adjust
scope or adjust equipment at hand or maybe even fix broken equipment.
The latter part is far harder as most people have no point of
referece to what it all means. That the part of learning to use a
O'scope many of the books and site may not even touch.
Sometimes if your tweeking a disk the manuals will provide a
procedure down to the nth detail and if followed and the drive
is otherwise working it's easier. The usual problems is "I made
xxx adjustment and I'm to the end and it's still a bit off. What
do I do?". There knowledge and experience really helps.
If your tweeking a RK05, one suggestion. Find a mentor
(EXfield service guy maybe) that has done it before. Even if
it's dim memory it maybe very helpful.
Allison
Hi,
A quick question raised by my ongoing work....
Is it possible to write directly to the "display register" - the one
accessed by one position of the data switch. I think it should be at memory
location 777570, but I can't get data into it, either using deposit from the
console, or moving data under program control.
Have I got a fault, or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
On Apr 8, 2005 1:39 AM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> No kidding! I've got a 3rd party framebuffer for my PDP-11/73, but
> have never gotten it working, in part because I'm not sure what it
> would take to hook up a monitor or even what type monitor would be
> needed. In my case I've got drivers for RSX-11M, but they existed
> for RT-11, and maybe other OS's.
Interesting... I have a Qbus framebuffer, too. I got it from my old
boss from a project where we built a QA training station for an
ultrasonic inspector. My (MACRO-11) code would slice a portion of a
large (multi-megabyte) data file and display just the desired
component (out of a tray of dozens) on the screen at
1000-pixels-per-inch resolution on a 512x512 screen. It happened that
we were manupulating grey scale data, but the framebuffer would do
color. The card has three odd LIMO-like connectors for
RGB-sync-on-green and that's it. I have one cable (for the green
channel, naturally).
I have *no* idea if there are drivers for anything aside from RT-11,
since that's what I was given for the project. I still have a few
listings, and I _may_ have an RL01 and/or RL02 pack with source code.
I'd be interestded to see pictures of your framebuffer. Mine is
accessible, but not here, so if desired, I could do the same.
-ethan
On Apr 8, 2005 3:12 AM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> Is what you have the DEC board?
I should have been more specific... this is _not_ a DEC board.
>I do know where the manuals are and it appears that it is called
> a "Supervisor Single Board
> Display (SBD)", and the board is based on the 68k.
I think mine has a 6845. I'm sure doesn't have its own CPU.
-ethan
On Apr 7 2005, 8:59, Stan Barr wrote:
> My 11/73 has quite a small hard disk and small memory, and I'd like
> to keep it running RT-11 as it has some sort of colour frame-buffer
> card and the software for that is RT-11 (though I've not figured it
> out yet - must take the covers off and see exactly *what* the card
> is!)
Sounds interesting!
> SGI is one one my list, a few people have suggested Sun and HP as
well.
> I simply want a machine to demonstrate traditional unix
It would give you a very nice unix.
> > BTW, I also saved a hub and a terminal server for
> > you...
> Still having difficulties with transport, may be going to Bradford
soon
> and York is not much further - we'll see...
OK. I really can give you an Indy, if that's an incentive, and we're
just off the A64, not right in York.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
MS-DOS 3.3 has a limit of 512 entries in the root directory. I have a
need to put more than this.
Was there ever a way to put more than 512 files in the root directory?
Some sort of patch or utility?
Did previous or subsequent versions of MS-DOS allow more entries in the
root?
Another question:
When using the SUBST command in MS-DOS, you cannot aparently substitute
the C: drive. I seem to recall that MS-DOS 6.0 allowed this, although I
might be confusing that with the ability of LANtastic to redirect the C:
drive to a network drive.
At any rate, what I'm trying to do is overcome the limit of 512 file
entries in an MS-DOS 3.3 root directory.
Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
Thanks!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
First off, if anyone ever needs some server space to just dump stuff, I've
got about a gig of space I can dish out for files and stuff, and ~15 gigs of
b/w a month for usage, over charges are negligable anyway, so feel happy to
have fun with whatever you upload (email me for info)
Also, I've got an O2 with all sorts of goodies (loaded with ram, analog a/v
board, etc) but no drive sled! I check ebay often but (unless I'm doing
something stupid) I don't see any.
Finally, does anyone have OS (Tru64 or else) that will run on a 3000-300x?
It's got 256 megs ram, and two internal 4.3's that I'm not sure will
actually work, but I've no way to test, anyone who knows anything about this
info I'd love to hear from you.
Thanks!
--
Gary G. Sparkes Jr.
KB3HAG - FM19t
Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote:
> Which sub-model of 4 DOES take the Postscript SIMM?
4Si. I have one, it's one of my favourite printers. 3Si and 4Si are both
Canon NX engine, very few differences, but the formatter board is HP, not
Canon, and the 4Si one is quite different from the 3Si one. The 3Si one
takes discrete ROMs for PostScript and the 4Si one takes a ROM SIMM (I have
one in mine of course, since I don't believe in PCL - PostScript forever!).
I think this PS ROM SIMM is specific to 4Si and other models using PS ROM
SIMMs have different ROMs.
MS
I remember becoming LaserJet certified in 1989, and
after taking the class, 2 other students and I had to
break down a LaserJet I and put it back together.
The instructor said not to worry, this one was broken
and if we just got it back together with all the parts
in the right place it would be ok...
I was working with one of the Help Desk Girls (non
tech), and the guy who managed the parts room (also
non-tech). They did all the work as I directed them.
We broke it down, put it back together and just for
kicks and giggles, started it up...
Wouldn't you know it worked perfectly...
Needless to say, the three of us were LaserJet
authorized a few minutes later...
I remember a set of articles in Computer Shopper from
a guy (whose name I can't remember) that had a whole
website (and in those days, having your own website
was no small trick..) about modding LaserJet and
LaserJet 500's to take an Apple LaserWriter logic
board to convert it into a Laserwriter.
I wanted to do one of those SO bad.
I ended up with a LaserMaster Printer that was a
LaserJet IIP engine with an external controller that
went in a PC and did all the PostScript processing in
your PC.
They called it a 'WinPrinter'.
Before that, I used my Atari ST with the MagicSac Mac
Emulator (not Mac Plus, Mac 128/512k) using MacOS 6, a
program called EpStart (to be able to use an Epson
Printer in place of an Imagewriter), and my still
working today IBM PC Graphics Printer (an MX-80, IBM
branded) to print.
My first ever printer was an old Okidata Microline-80,
7 pin DotMatrix that used typewriter ribbons and roll
feed paper on my TRS-80 Model I.
Those were the days...
Regards,
Al
__________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
On Mar 24 2005, 23:48, David V. Corbin wrote:
> But some of the things that strike me are.....
> It STILL takes the same amount of time [ for lots of things ]
I've just come back from a network conference
(http://www.ja.net/conferences/networkshop/index.html) where we had a
wonderful talk from Vint Cerf (see http://www.mci.com/cerfsup
particularly the presentation about the Internet and IT which has some
of the same slides he used yesterday). He made the point that in
several decades we've seen hardware get bigger and faster by several
orders of magnitude, but software hasn't done anything of the sort.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I registed to a local freecycling group. I receive several tens of
emails each day. 80 percent are wanting and 20 percent are offering. I
would expect the reversed ratio.
vax, 9000
Glad to hear about the card. Thank you, Lyle, for answering what must have
seemed an idiotic question. It looks like my machine will stay with a loose
disk, as the previous owners stripped (what would be) the card guides as well as
the mounting card from it (possibly so that the terrorists would be denied
internal hard drives?) The 370 was intact, though.
- Scott Quinn
>From: "Dave Mabry" <dmabry at mich.com>
>
>Joe R. wrote:
>
>>
>> One of the problems is that the "extra" drives I have use completely
>>different boards from those used in the MDSs, even tough they're both
>>Shugart 801 drives. They even have a lot of differently marked jumpers so
>>comparing the two drives is very confusing.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Joe,
>
>Are you saying that you have trouble getting some 801's to work in the
>MDS? These are drives that you know are otherwise good? Any chance of
>some photos of the board of those drives? I _think_ I have gotten
>800/801's with three different boards to work. Maybe we can compare
>notes on that. Seems to me that all the different boards have similarly
>marked jumpers, though. So maybe your drives are different than mine.
>
>Dave
>
Hi
There were two or three significant rev changes to the
SA800/801's.
I think only one of these was used with the MDS800's.
It seems like I recall there being a letter after the
number on the drives that distinguished them from the
normal drives. I recall a "R" but I think I may be confusing
that letter with hard drives. It might have been something
else.
Dwight
Are you sure that Drive A on a PC won't work on a straight cable?
Something in the back of my mind says that I used to change the drive
select jumper *AND* make sure a terminator was installed for the floppy
to work fine on a straight cable as Drive A. I do know that not having a
terminator installed (on the last drive of the string) can make for some
really strange and intermittent behavior on both HDs and Floppy Drives.
>
> On the hard drive cable the twist merely changed the drive select signals,
> on the floppy drive cable both the drive select and motor on gets twisted.
> The floppy drive cable must be twisted to have drive A work properly the
> hard drive can work with or without a twist.
>
>
> Randy
> www.s100-manuals.com
>From: "Joe R." <rigdonj at cfl.rr.com>
>
> I have the schematic of the cable and adapter board somewhere but I won't
>have time to look for them anytime soon. The adapter board has some tricky
>wiring on it and IIRC the cable IS NOT straight through. I've had a hell
>of a time getting non-Intel disk drives to work in the MDSs. I have quite a
>few of the same model drives (with different revision boards) and I haven't
>gotten ANY of them to work in a MDS. Yes, I've set all the jumpers. I've
>spent at least three days trying various drives but never could get one to
>work. My suggestion is to search out an Intel drive in the surplus places.
>Intel sold a LOT of these systems and there used to be a lot of them in the
>surplus equipment places.
>
> Joe
>
Hi Joe
When I worked at Intel, ( I recall ) I was told that the
M2FM drives had a few capacitors changed in the input amp section
to increase the high frequency response. You might compare
the components from an Intel drive with the same model
drive ( mostly SA800's I thought ). It might be resistors
but it seems like I recall being told it was capacitors.
You could then post this for people that were bringing up
their MDS800's but didn't know where to find drives.
If I get a chance this weekend, I'll look at the drives
I have to see what changes there might be.
Dwight
On Apr 7 2005, 13:31, Ashley Carder wrote:
> I actually could use a "3" button if someone has one. I have
> two RL02s and an RL01 on my system. I plan to add a
> second RL01 so I can copy images directly from one RL01
> to another, but I need a "3" button.
I forgot to mention: my problem was exactly the same: two RL02s and two
RL01s, but the pairs were in two adjacent systems. For a while,
instead of a terminator on each pair, I had them connected with a spare
cable (just make sure only one system tries to access the drives at a
time!).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Apr 7 2005, 13:31, Ashley Carder wrote:
> I actually could use a "3" button if someone has one. I have
> two RL02s and an RL01 on my system. I plan to add a
> second RL01 so I can copy images directly from one RL01
> to another, but I need a "3" button.
I now have genuine DEC buttons, but before I got the "2" and "3" I
worked out how the numbers are encoded on the fingers, and made my own
out of Perspex. Each button was made in five parts: four sides, and a
front piece. I cut the pieces from sheet, glued them together with
perspex cement, filed the fingers to the correct length, and cemented a
piece of acetate sheet to the front for the number. The digit was
laserprinted in reverse onto the acetate, so once cemented, it was
protected by the acetate itself. Took an evening to make four of them.
Kludge alert: Before I made the perspex buttons, I used matchsticks
inserted into the finger slots, but I had to re-adjust them
periodically because the vibration made them shift.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Joe R." <rigdonj at cfl.rr.com>
>
>At 08:19 AM 4/7/05 -0700, you wrote:
>>> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&it
>>> em=5181545036&rd=1
>>>
>>>
>>> Odd - even the board artwork reads Bus Grantosaurus Rex. It looks like
>>> someone made some custom PC Bus Grant boards and needed a laugh. Making
>>> such a board at home would be a simple project.
>>
>>Except perhaps for the gold plating.
>>
>> Vince
>>
>
> That's easy enough. Everybody has a gold tab plated in their garage
>don't they? :-)
>
> Joe
>
>
Hi
One could get one of those gold finger plating repair kits.
They are slow but it can be done.
Dwight
I used to have a copy of the Cipher M990 service manual, and I can't
seem to find it now. Does anyone have a scanned copy?
I'd love a pertec to scsi interface card like the Cipher CSC100 too if
anyone has one they don't need. ;-)
--
Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - TimR at Debian.org
Linux Technologist - Tim at TI.com - http://www.TI.com/
BZFlag maintainer - http://BZFlag.org/ - for fun!
*** Please reply to me off-list***
Apologies for the OT message, but I'm looking for recommended software
>from people I trust.
I'm looking for battery management tools for my Titanium Powerbook.
(400 MHz, 512MB RAM, 20GB HDD).
I've found these via the magic of Google, but they are all
monitor-only applications...
iBatt 1.2.1
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/22968
Gets mixed reviews...
X-Charge
http://www.pol-online.net/index.php?page=freeware
XBattery
http://www.kezer.net/xbattery.html
Or are these not smart batteries that can be managed?
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
test
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Roberts [mailto:oldbear at arctos.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 1:51 AM
> To: Classic Computer tech list
> Subject: Digital Equipment stuff available
>
>
>
> It's finally come to that time when I have to reduce the amount
> of stuff I have been hoarding. (My wife wants to move to a smaller
> house.)
>
> I have a number of items of DEC hardware and software from around
> 1980. I haven't done a complete inventory, but among the items
> are:
>
> 2 Rainbow 100 personal computers both with hard disk
> (5mB? 10mB?), extended memory and accessory "I-drive"
> for reading IBM pc-format double sided diskettes.
>
> 1 Decmate II word-processor using PDP-8 architecture
> in a form factor similar to the Rainbow.
>
> 1 Decmate word-processor. This is a the VT-100 type
> terminal containing a PDP-8 processor, mounted on
> a pedestal base which contains dual 8-inch floppy
> drives and power supply. (The VT-100 type keyboard
> has some missing key caps.)
>
> 3 VR-201 monitors (At least one is amber, the others
> are green and possibly white phosphor CRTs.)
>
> 2 VR-241 RGB color monitors incl. BNC cables.
>
> 1 VT-240 serial terminal
>
> 3 LK-201 keyboards. Two of these have the "gold key"
> word processing key caps.
>
> 1 Floor stand for Rainbow. Holds system unit in a
> vertical position. Designed by DEC for proper
> airflow.
>
> 1 LQP-02 wide letter-quality impact printer.
>
> 1 Diablo 620 daisy-wheel impact printer with selectable
> serial or parallel interface.
>
> 2 LA-50 dot matrix printers.
>
> 2 DECpc 420sx personal computers.
>
> Interconnecting cables for the monitors and printers, etc.
>
> Many various "DEC certified" software packages.
>
> 3rd party software for things like graphic design,
> calendaring, telecom, etc.
>
> DEC handbooks, support documents, catalogs of DEC and
> 3rd party software, users group newsletters, early
> FIDO bbs software and manuals, transcripts of online
> discussions about DEC pc hardware, and more.
>
> Several boxes of 8-inch diskettes for use in the
> RX01 drives of the Decmate I. Color plastic storage
> boxes for these diskettes. Also, DEC-formatted
> 5.25-inch diskettes for Rainbow and DECmate II.
>
> Printer ribbons, extra daisy-wheels in many fonts,
> some internal components such as OEM disk mounting
> hardware and cables for the Rainbows, etc.
>
>
> I am located in an inner suburb of Boston and would like to send all
> this stuff to be adopted by a good home.
>
> If interested, please email me at oldbear at arctos.com
>
> Regards,
> Will
>
>
>
Hi, I just picked up a Sun 3/80 chassis from the local university surplus. It
looked lonely sitting there. It's dusty inside but appears to work (checked
console via serial port). Has a floppy, 8MB memory, no hard drive, and a dead
NVRAM. I'll consult the various faq's on the web about the NVRAM, and maybe
drill some mounting holes for a hard drive (didn't come with a hd carrier, and
I can't find any).
I'll run it headless with netbsd, since I don't have room for another monitor.
I don't know much about the Sun 3 series though - most of what I see from a
google search is about the 3/50 and 3/60's. Is the 3/80 an ignored bastard
child from sun? A 68030 in a pizzabox, not a classic Sun 3, but not a Sparc
either?
Are the hd carriers hard to come by?
Thanks,
Jeff
A set of manuals?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5181524752
No, guess again. There's a reserve on those.
Another example of where the Christie's auction helped to make people
think that things are worth *way* more than they really are.
Sigh. I usually wouldn't post something like this to the list, but I
just can't believe that someone would try to sell *manuals* that look
like they're not even in great shape for that sort of price..
And my favorite quote from his auction:
"most of these system were destroyed due to the nature/technology of the
system and fear of them getting into the wrong hands"
DONT LET THE TERRISTS GET THER HANDS ON TEH BIG COMPOOTERS!!!
I'd love to see these people do a little bit of research on stuff
they're listing on ebay, instead of just pulling info out of their ass,
or what they heard on some cable news network. At the very least, they
could say "I don't know anything about this" instead of making stuff
up....
Ok, I'm done ranting for tonight. :)
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCS --- http://www.itap.purdue.edu/rcs/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
>From: "Eric Smith" <eric at brouhaha.com>
>
>Megan wrote:
>> Years ago, someone (I don't remember who) gave the definition of a
>> computer as a "device which inputs some stuff, does some stuff to
>> it, and outputs some other stuff".
>
>Which is presumably not actually very useful as a definition of a computer,
>since a cow would qualify.
>
>Eric
>
>
And who is to say a cow is not a computer. What
do you think they are doing while quietly chewing
their cud under some tree.
Dwight
>From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
>
>>
>> Looking around the local salvation army, I spotted a LaserWriter plus.
>> I've searched the archives and discovered it's a PostScript enabled laser
>> printer with RS-442 interface. It seems. No disucssion of the "plus"
>> specifically. If it helps, there was a DB-25, a DE-9 and small (4? 6?)
>> dip switch on the back (that I remember, I don't remember any mini-DIN).
>>
>> I'd be interested in having a "real" postscript printer. But I'd like to
>> test it before buying.
>>
>> - Is there a way to print a test page w/o pluging into a computer?
>
>IIRC it's based on the Canon CX engine. In which case there should be an
>engine test button above the connector panel. Pressing that will get it
>to print a page of vertical lines. That proves the mechanism is working,
>and the 'DC controller board', but doesn't tekk you anything about the
>state of the formatter board.
---snip---
Hi
At least on the 3Si, one holds one of the main buttons
on the front panel ( I think the line switch ) and it
prints the test page. Most 3Si's come with postscript
built in and many also have a duplexer. The only
bad point is that most office machines only came
with the ethernet thin connector. To get serial or
parallel it takes another board. I've seen these
occationally on ebay for about $20 or so.
The 4Si has all three connections in one card and
600 dpi ( not that I've ever seen any difference).
The 3Si is a heave unit that will out last the lighter
machines.
Dwight
I was lucky enough today to score an as-new Atari Portfolio. In the box was
the following "OWNER'S MANUAL ADDENDUM": (All caps as per original)
USER WARNING:
1. DO NOT END A DOCUMENT IN THE TEXT EDITOR WITH A Space FOLLOWED BY A
Return.
If you do end a text file with a Space Return, a serious system error will
occur when you load the file. This error will require you to remove the
batteries from your computer, causing loss of all data from drive C:
2. NON-WEEKEND REPEATING ALARMS DO NOT WORK. DO NOT USE THEM. USE OF
NON-WEEKEND REPEATING ALARMS MAY REQUIRE A COLD BOOT AS ABOVE.
Imagine a product being released today with such brazen, data-destroying
bugs! Then, it was par for the course. Just remember to end your files with
_two_ returns and all's OK! Forget about repeating alarms during the week.
It's only software so work around it. Beta testers? Not in Atari with the
Tramiels in 1989!
Cheers
Phil
> > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&it
> > em=5181545036&rd=1
> >
> >
> > Odd - even the board artwork reads Bus Grantosaurus Rex. It
> looks like
> > someone made some custom PC Bus Grant boards and needed a laugh.
> > Making such a board at home would be a simple project.
>
> Except perhaps for the gold plating.
>
> Vince
A friend on another list mentioned he had seen such boards before. Would
someone have manufactured these to address the bleeding knuckle problem
- perhaps before DEC made the full-height boards?
IIRC the LW+ would by default always print a test page. If you wanted to
suppress this you could remove the tray at power on as has already been
suggested, a more elegant solution was to send a small piece of postscript
code which would change the internal settings so that it would not print at
power on. I used to achieve this by putting the code together in an editor
then copying it to the serial port. If it has been turned off no doubt it
could be turned on. If I can find the code I will post it.
Does anyone know of somewhere to get old SGI parts? I'm still looking for
something with a R3010 on it for my 4D/25 (IP10/12 board or similar . . .). Most
places (Reputable) seem to not have anything older than I2/Indy (and seem a
bit pricy- but I guess that comes from having to keep an inventory etc.)
(2) I'm still trying to figure out mounting the HDD in my 3CT. I looked at
the IBM manuals, and they all seemed to reference the SCSI extender card (as
used on my 370), but that won't fit in the 3CT. It's one of the ones with the two
externally accessible 5.25" bays and the floppy mounted on top. It looks like
some sort of drive rails, but I don't see the screw hole for securing the
drive. I've got the drive loose in the cage, and it might have to stay that way,
but it would be nice to know how it was really mounted.
>No one remember which dip controled this?
<http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=3704>
That tells you how to turn on and off the Test Page. It isn't done via
dip switches as I thought I recalled it being. It is done programatically
(as someone else reported).
Chances are really good it wasn't turned off, and simply powering on the
printer will cause you to get a test page.
>Actually, anyone know if the manual is online somewhere?
<http://manuals.info.apple.com/Apple_Support_Area/Manuals/printers/Laserwri
terLaserwriterPlus.PDF>
When you can find it, Apple's web site actually has a decent amount of
info on most all their products dating back to the Apple IIe. The problem
can be finding it, they don't tend to make it easy, and I swear every
time someone figures out the logic, they rearrange the site to better
hide the old info.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> > > Bill Maddox said:
> > >
> >
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=5181545036…
> > >
> > > --Bill
> >
> > I want it!!!
> >
> > Ashley
>
> Maybe this is somebody's humorous answer to preventing their knuckles from
> getting
> torn up by trying to reach between the big boards to get to those little G727
> cards.
>
> I'm bidding.
>
> - Ashley
I bid, but I probably should have waited till the last minute. If I had waited,
those
folks who are secretly stalking me on ebay would perhaps not have known about
the existence of the rare and elusive Grantosaurus Rex. That is, if they had
not
read Bill's original post with his paleontological discovery.
Ashley
> > Bill Maddox said:
> >
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=5181545036…
> >
> > --Bill
>
> I want it!!!
>
> Ashley
Maybe this is somebody's humorous answer to preventing their knuckles from
getting
torn up by trying to reach between the big boards to get to those little G727
cards.
I'm bidding.
- Ashley
> Megan wrote:
> > Years ago, someone (I don't remember who) gave the definition of a
> > computer as a "device which inputs some stuff, does some stuff to
> > it, and outputs some other stuff".
>
> Eric Replies...
> Which is presumably not actually very useful as a definition of a
> computer,since a cow would qualify.
>
Of course, that makes it a cowputer....
On Apr 6 2005, 9:39, Stan Barr wrote:
> I'd like to get a straight (ie no X) Unix running on some sort of
> older, but not necessarily ancient, hardware. My Micro-11/73 is
> not really suitable, and PDP-11s that are seem to be a bit thin
> on the ground over here in the UK. I've seen a few Vaxen and
> MicroVaxen on the market lately so my thoughts are turning in
> that direction. I know a few people here run such machines and I'm
> seeking advice on the best machine to look for and, at the risk of
> starting a religious war, the best unix to run on it... :-)
A micro-11/73 would run 2.11 BSD quite well. I have one like that
(actually it's an 11/83 but not very different). An 11/23 would run
7th Edition, but it would be slow, and have no TCP/IP networking. A
microVAX would do BSD quite well. Or if you want something classic but
not *too* old, my favourite would be something like an SGI Indigo. An
R3000 with Irix 5.3 would be quite nice (I have three of them). If
you'd asked 6 months ago you could have had one of my spares, and a
monitor. Maybe you'd like an SGI Indy, with Irix 5.3? I certainly
have a spare Indy. BTW, I also saved a hub and a terminal server for
you...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj at wps.com>
>
>Well all seemed fine, I was working on Kermit, making good
>progress, then I/O PARITY ERROR AT xxxx -- disk read error. Diags
>etc, another shows up. Then another, but a previous goes away...
>
>Clearly there is a soft(ish) read error. Probably all those cheap
>ceramic disks on the read/write/amp board. So I will order nice,
>new, correct monolithic caps, and replace all the replacements.
>It's almost certainly in the analog read/write section, and not
>hard logic, said hypothesis boosted by the fact of my fiddling in
>that arena.
>
>I ran memory diags and all that stuff, but I am assuming it's the
>electronics I fiddled. I'll go do the job Right.
>
Hi
I know that you'd like to blame the capacitors but
if these were all bypass capacitors, it is unlikely that
they are the source of your problem.
I have found that when bringing up older electronics of
this complexity, that has not been operational for some time,
that active parts tend to fail over the next 2 or 3 months
of operation.
I expect that the culprit is moisture. When the unit is always
powered, the heat of each part keeps moisture from accumulating
within the plastic IC packages. When turned off for some
time, moisture builds up inside the parts. When power
is applied, this causes some electrolysis inside that destroys
the part.
I've thought that it might be better to bake the boards in
a dry N2 environment at about 120F for a few weeks before
powering on units that have been sitting for a long time.
Not having any way to confirm if this would work, I've
not been able to verify it.
This would be bad for electrolytic capacitors but these
are often more easily located and replaced.
Good luck, we are all hoping things will be easy to
find for you.
Dwight
In a haul of DEC (and other) stuff last week, I got a DEC H734A power
supply, not attached to anything. Can anyone tell me what this goes
to? Google doesn't have very many hits, and it's on the the qbus/unibus
field guide.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org