On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:25:19 -0600, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
> FYI...
> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/260999371487>
>
> If you've been looking for this stuff, now is your chance...
Wow, what a collection!
And a Trigger Trace Analyzer, we had one, an expensive option IIRC, a
logic analyzer built in to a board in the 8540 reading the emulated
processor's signals and states directly. 4 separate triggers IIRC which
could be interconnected in all sorts of ways by operating system commands.
IIRC the 8540 is based on a rather unusual processor, Signetics 2650.
/Jonas
Looking for any version of Micro-PROLOG by LPA. This was a modified version
of Prolog for small systems and was most notable for translating the typical
Horn clause into an almost Lisp-like syntax, but could still do a surprising
amount of the language within limitations of the host computer. There were
versions for Z80, 8086 and 6502, and possibly others. 6502 preferred but
any version, especially with source code, appreciated.
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- FORTUNE: You're wise, but not wise enough not to read this sort of drivel. -
I got the weird idea that the odd keyboard cable hood for the Commodore
sx64 could be made out of wood fairly simply. Is there anyone here who is
good at woodworking who'd be interested in doing some tinkering with me?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
>When, like me, you don't know a lot about electronics beyond some
>theoretical study as a student many years ago, it is especially satisfying
>to make a repair like this.
>
I have a degree in electronic engineering. However it didn't help very much
repairing old computer equipment. I had to figure out how to do that for
myself from resources such as this list.
>
>With regard to your doorstops, if they are RD5x disks then I would be more
>than happy to take them off your hands :-) Alternatively, I can share what
>little I know about getting them working again (mainly RD53).
>
None of them started out as RDxx disks. Many were from a skip (dumpster) outside
a closed PC repair shop. Others were pulls from old PCs that were being dumped
at work. Some never worked but others worked well enough for me to format them
using a VAX 2000 and gave reasonable service for a while before giving up with
various problems.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Hi
Does anyone have info on the jnt pad. We have one here at the museum but dont have docs. Looks like it works but not found a console access yet.
Thanks
Dave
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Guys, look at the picture in this eBay item.:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/260976748947?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p39…
Anyone tell me what computer these modules belonged to?
Many thaks,
peter vp
|| | | | | | | | |
Peter Van Peborgh
62 St Mary's Rise
Writhlington Radstock
Somerset BA3 3PD
UK
01761 439 234
|| | | | | | | | |
I seem to recall bitsavers.org keeping old Tandy manuals, but I must have
been mistaken or something changed. Who collects these? I just now
noticed that the scans I made of the TRS-80 PT-210 user and service
manuals are nowhere to be found through Google.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
I've received reports that Lattice GAL16V8D's don't program correctly
when fed National GAL16V8 JEDEC fusemaps. Has anyone else run into
this? I mean to dig into this, but if anyone knows off the top of
the head, it'd save some work.
EQN2JED was used as the assembler in both cases. I'm going to try
CUPL and see if the results are the same.
--Chuck
I recently acquired an HP Envizex II Netstation X-Terminal which I
would like to try out. I have a base HP-UX 10.20 OS running on an HP
B160L and I have an original set of HP-UX 10.20 install media CDs, but
apparently a Codeword is necessary to install the B4474FA HP
Netstation Software from the CD. I don't have any Codewords for this
set of install media CDs.
Is there any way to obtain a Codeword to install the Netstation
Software from the HP-UX 10.20 install media that I have?
http://www.hp.com/softwarereleases/releases-media2/media/3710366.htm
HP9000 Series 9000/700
HP-UX Application Software
CD Part Number - B3782-10366
B4474FA, HP Netstation Software, Codeword Required: Yes, Size: 115622777
-Glen
Having finally got back onto this project a few months ago, I have
prepared another release of the code from my IBM 360/30 emulation
project for the Digilent Xilinx Spartan 3 board.
The main differences from the previous release are:
* 64k storage in external static RAM
* 1050 Console typewriter/keyboard implemented using the serial port
* Main storage initialisation from a file stored in the flash rom
(This can be generated from a Hercules PCH file)
* Lots of little bug fixes
The main limitation is that the 1050 is the only peripheral available.
There is a known bug: The first character output by the 1050 on each SIO
is duplicated. There are probably lots more hiding.
Everything is available at http://www.ljw.me.uk/ibm360/vhdl/
Future tasks:
Implement printers/readers/punches via multiplexor channel
Implement tapes/DASD via selector channel and flash disk
--
Lawrence Wilkinson lawrence at ljw.me.uk
The IBM 360/30 page http://www.ljw.me.uk/ibm360
>
>Just in case anyone is interested, replacing the failed Darlington
>transistor fixed the problem. The RD53 now spins the disk again. Thanks to
>everyone who helped.
>
Some people enjoy repairing things. I find it a bit of a drudge.
What I enjoy is the feeling of satisfaction when a repair succeeds :-)
Well done to all involved.
I am now looking with renewed interest at my pile of doorstops which once spun.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
I acquired an RD53 disk recently. I have just been trying it out. The heads
were stuck, as usual, but the main thing is that the disk itself will not
rotate. The locking mechanism that keeps the heads parked releases on power
up but that is all that happens.
I have not come across this particular kind of failure before, does anyone
have any suggestions for common causes of this kind of failure?
Regards
Rob
>
>The Terminals Wiki is open for public browsing!
><http://terminals.classiccmp.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page>
>
>This is a joint project between myself (username Legalize),
>Jason T (username Silent700) and Ian Primus (username Sark).
>I am the wiki administrator.
>
>My intention was to create a single reference site for everything we
>can find about terminals.
>
Well done - this looks like it will be a useful reference point.
I have a user guide for an ICL model 6402 Character Display Terminal which
I used in 1988. It may be compatible with a Televideo 950 (or maybe 925). I
only used it as a fairly basic terminal but IIRC it seemed to have an endless
number of features that I never felt the need to use. I only have the manual,
not the terminal. If someone has the terminal and not the manual, I would be
happy to give them the manual or scan it for them.
I am looking for a maintenance manual for a Lear Siegler ADM-5. I found
the manual for the ADM-3A on bitsavers (thanks Al!) and this helped me to
fix one of my ADM-5 terminals but my other one has a fault that I think is
in an area with significant differences to the ADM-3A.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Frankly, IBM terminal land is completely unknown to me. I am looking
for a volunteer to contribute information about terminals from IBM and
other manufacturers that were intended for the IBM mainframe world.
Let me know if you're interested! The pay is nonexistent and it's
entirely a labor of love on your part, but I think we're off to a good
start. However, the wiki is almost completely lacking on IBM
mainframe type terminals.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 version available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
>Its a X25 Packet/Assembler/Dissasembler. It allows ordinary Async
>Terminals to be connected to an X.25 network. In the UK all Universities
>had such networks under the umbrella of JANET. Some at Janet probably
>has a manual. I have forgotten almost every thing I know about them. I
>have asked one of my former colleagues if he has any info.
>
These were also to be found in Irish Universities where early networking
was also X.25 based.
I have a small stash of X.25 capable kit which I have no real interest in.
It is available for free to anyone interested and is located in Dublin, Ireland.
I would prefer collection but will consider shipping if someone is really keen.
Among the bits and pieces are two Satelcom X.25 switches. Both are marked
MegaPAC E but they are different sizes. Also a DEC DEMSA and two DEMSB X.25
routers (manufactured in DEC's former facility in Clonmel, Ireland) and some
cables.
And the connection with this thread? The DEMSA has a sticker on one of the
ports which says "Camtec".
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:23:49 +0100, "Rob Jarratt"
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> I need to replace a transistor in my H7140 PSU for my PDP11/24. The
> transistor is marked GPSA55J3 and the printset identifies it as "XA
> 55 PNP
> 500MW SI 60 50 P", it is in a TO-92 package. I have tried to find
> specs for
> an A55 and can only find partial matches, so I am not sure what
> today's
> equivalent would be. Can anyone help me work out what the equivalent
> today
> would be?
>
> Thanks
>
> Rob
Sounds like a 60V, 500mW device. BC556, MPSA-56. A BC161 might also
work, except it is in a TO-39 case, or a 2N2907 in a TO-18 case.
Looking at the printset on vt100.net, none of the A55 transistors
appear to be doing anything terribly demanding, so any of the above
ought to work.
/Jonas
>
>There are orher problems now with that VIM Source, the files blowfish.c and
>sha356.c take very very much time to compile. I do have an account on
>Vaxmans VAX7000/820 and even on this machine the compiling was not done after
>13hrs of CPU Time. SHA356.c behaves pretty much similar.
>I'll look later this day if the compiling gets done on this machine, on my
>VS4000 the same process is running now for 12hrs on the CPU and the
>VS4000/90 isn't the slowest VAX so far as I know...
>
Well, my curiosity got the better of me. I downloaded VIM73-69 for VMS and
attempted to compile blowfish.c on my VAX 4000/100A with VAX/VMS 7.1 and
DECC V6.4-005. I don't have MMS or MMK installed so I had to hack a little to
make it work.
I found that after some seconds work, the compiler went into a CPU bound loop
and seemingly did nothing useful after that (unless it is thinking hard and
will come up with something useful some time from now!).
The source is not large so I was able to find that the part that the compiler
was having difficulties with was these two lines of macros in bf_e_block():
F1(0) F2(1) F1(2) F2(3) F1(4) F2(5) F1(6) F2(7)
F1(8) F2(9) F1(10) F2(11) F1(12) F2(13) F1(14) F2(15)
I found that if I commented out F1(10) F2(11) F1(12) F2(13) F1(14) F2(15)
the compile would complete in just under a minute.
Next I tried commenting out just F2(11) F1(12) F2(13) F1(14) F2(15)
and then the compile completed in around 7 minutes. It took about the same time
if I only commented out F1(12) F2(13) F1(14) F2(15).
If I commented only F2(13) F1(14) F2(15) the compile took nearly two hours!
Finally, it dawned on me to try compiling the original code with /NOOPTIMISE
and this completed in 30 seconds!
So, it appears that something in those two lines is causing the optimiser to
spend way too much time doing something.
At least the good news is that if you compile blowfish.c (and perhaps sha356.c)
without optimisation, it should be possible to get it done in a reasonable
amount of time. Maybe the compile you are currently running will also complete
eventually.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bill Sudbrink <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net> wrote:
> ? Interesting that one of your partners goes by Silent700
> ? but there are no Texas Instruments terminals in your wiki
> ? yet. ?If you're interested, I'm going to be bringing one
> ? of the last variants of the 700 to VCF East next month to
> ? use as a printing terminal on my SWTPc.
Yeah yeah.....it's all In the Works, Check's in the Mail, Real Soon
Now. Richard probably has more S700s than I do, anyway ;)
Seriously, though, Richard has done a ton of work on this, from
wrangling his own voluminous collection to deciphering the WikiSpeak
necessary to make this a pro job. I look forward to contributing!
-j
--
(Real Soon Now)
Greetings;
Long-story-short, a couple of years ago I picked up six Onyx2 racks and
have been moving them around with me without ever actually firing them up.
I've finally got myself sorted and have been slowly working through
bringing things up and having some successes, but every step closer has me
finding a new problem.
My set-up right now has one graphics head and five compute nodes cabled
together in a daisy-chain (not enough CrayLinks for anything else). It
appears all but one of the MMSCs are shot, so I'm doing manual start-ups
using the keys.
My current confusion is how to nominate which system becomes the Global
Master. For some odd reason whenever I bring up three racks the machine
I've "picked" as the master (keyboard/mouse/gfx head) comes up just fine
and boots into IRIX, but whenever I add two more nodes things get a bit
more fuzzy and the Global Master appears to migrate around.
I had initially believed that the last rack in the power-up sequence would
always become the Global Master, since it goes and finds all the rest, but
this apparently is not the case... or perhaps there are corollaries I'm
unaware of.
The more times I turn this thing on and off the more hardware is failing
on me, not unexpectedly. I've lost a PSU, a node board and now one of the
racks has started making a worryingly hot-electrical smell. I'd really
like to get it all working together just once before I get old and grey.
Cheers;
- JP
>
>I have cleared this in the meantime with some help of B. Ulmann aka vaxman.
>The paging file was much to small, I've diabled swapping and created a
>much bigger pagefile.sys (500000 blocks), raised PGFLQUOTA to 130000 blocks
>and some other things. The compiling doesn't stop now anymore because of
>vm-space outage.
>
I'm glad the original problem is solved.
>
>There are orher problems now with that VIM Source, the files blowfish.c and
>sha356.c take very very much time to compile. I do have an account on
>Vaxmans VAX7000/820 and even on this machine the compiling was not done after
>13hrs of CPU Time. SHA356.c behaves pretty much similar.
>I'll look later this day if the compiling gets done on this machine, on my
>VS4000 the same process is running now for 12hrs on the CPU and the
>VS4000/90 isn't the slowest VAX so far as I know...
>
You can check what the compiler is doing with the command:
$ SHOW PROCESS /CONTINUOUS /ID=xxxxxxxx
where xxxxxxxx is the process id of the process doing the compile.
You can also use MONITOR to see what the whole machine is doing.
$ MONITOR MODES
will tell you which processor modes are in use most. If it shows mostly user
mode, the compile is CPU bound. If it shows mostly kernel mode or interrupt
stack, there is an i/o bottleneck. If it shows mostly idle, something is wrong
and the compiler is not getting sufficient access to the machines resources.
$ MONITOR PROCESSES /TOPCPU
should show the compiling process as getting most of the CPU. If something else
is getting a significant amount of CPU, there may be something wrong.
I've compiled a fair amount of C on my VAX 4000/100A which is also pretty fast
and on my VAX 3100 model 76 which is less fast and I don't remember any single
source file taking anything like even 1 hour to compile. Are the sources
involved particularly large or complex? Does the compile show any signs of
making progress (for instance, is the object file or listing file growing in
size) or could it be stuck in a loop doing nothing useful? Is there too much
detail being logged in the listing file resulting in a huge listing output?
You haven't said whether you did an AUTOGEN or not. If you have not, I would
suggest doing one as this should help sort out any other system parameters
that might be incorrect.
>
>I'll report later what happens..
>
I'd certainly be interested to know what's going on.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
In article <06fa01cd1743$79aea9f0$6d0bfdd0$@sudbrink at verizon.net>,
"Bill Sudbrink" <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net> writes:
> Interesting that one of your partners goes by Silent700
> but there are no Texas Instruments terminals in your wiki
> yet.
Yes, isn't that interesting?
I'll let him defend himself on that point. :-)
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 version available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
----- Original Message:
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:18:16 -0400
From: Keith Monahan <keithvz at verizon.net>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Jack Tramiel passed away
Message-ID: <4F834408.8020104 at verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 4/9/2012 3:35 PM, David Riley wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Keith Monahan wrote:
>
>> On 4/9/2012 2:29 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>>> That's a shame. His impact on computing is frequently forgotten these
>>> days.
>>
>> It should probably be noted that Jack was a pretty ruthless business man
----- Reply:
Umm, why "should it be noted," especially a few days after his death?
Whether it's Bill Gates, Steve Jobs or Jack Tramiel, why do some people feel
the need to insult and criticize (especially immediately after their death
in the case of the latter two) these people who did what they had to in
order to survive and be competitive and make the huge contributions that
they did to the field which is a hobby and a vocation for most of us?
Being "nice" doesn't usually succeed in a cutthroat field like computer
hardware and software; I don't think I'd call Jack "ruthless" but perhaps
his time in a concentration camp did give him a stronger sense of what it
takes to survive than some people.
>> and made decisions that were contrary to a stable and reliable machine
>> and accessories.
I don't know; all my PETs, VIC20s and all except one C64 are still working
as well as when they were new; other than C64 power packs and PALs
overheating, what decisions resulted in unreliable and unstable machines and
accessories? The drive interface issue you mention was precisely the result
of a compromise to make it reliable and stable (albeit slow).
>> I hope I'm remembering correctly, but I think the 1541 was a victim of
>> Jack Tramiel's rush-to-market engineering.
Again, I don't know if Jack was personally responsible, but yes, getting new
product "out there" before the competition has always been crucially
important and yes, sometimes decisions are made that have repercussions long
afterwards due to backward compatibility issues (640Kb oughta be enough for
everyone...)
In any case, the VIC20/1541 issue created an opportunity for numerous
third-parties to market speed-up solutions.
Let's give Jack the respect and credit he deserves and let him rest in
peace.
m
>
>Ok, THX guys,
>I've managed to get this thing running again, don't ask me how :-)
>
It's hard to know how to advise you where to go next when you don't tell us
where you are now :-)
>
>But my first problem, the cause of the fiddling with the system paramaters
>persists.
>
>This is the VIM73-69 source for VMS:
>
> The adequate command for mmk is:
>
> mmk /descrip=Make_vms.mms
>
> NOTE: Because of empty /auto/config.h (needed for Unix configure)
>build
> will fail with very strange messages. Therefore before building, it is
> recommended to make one clean up, to prepare everything for OpenVMS
> development. The command is:
>
> Buffer: INSTALLVMS.TXT | Write | Insert |
>Forward
>
>
>
>$ mms /descrip=Make_vms.mms
>
>using DECW/Motif/XPM environment.
>creating OS_VMS_MOTIF.OPT file.
>cc /def=("FEAT_BIG","HAVE_CONFIG_H","FEAT_GUI_MOTIF","HAVE_XPM" )
>/opt/prefix=
>all /include=([.proto],decw$include:) BLOWFISH.C
>%CLI-F-TEXT, Compiler abort - virtual memory limits exceeded.
>%SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
>%MMS-F-ABORT, For target BLOWFISH.OBJ, CLI returned abort status:
>%X0000002C.
>-SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
>$
>
>
>I've googled for the error and found this:
>
>http://www.jcameron.com/vms/em12.htm
>
>...that was the beginning of the problem.
>
[snip]
>
>So what should I do next to try to compile that VIM source (hopefully w/o
>to destroying the system again)
>
That webpage has some good advice. The C compiler installation guide should
include details on what SYSGEN parameters and user quotas need to be set to
for the compiler to function properly as well as how to set them.
If you don't have the installation guide, I would suggest finding out what
VIRTUALPAGECNT is now and if it is "small", increase it is smaller steps
than previously using AUTOGEN (not using SYSGEN, if that's what was used
before).
$ WRITE SYS$OUTPUT F$GETSYI("VIRTUALPAGECNT")
will tell you what VIRTUALPAGECNT is set to now. Suppose it 64000. You could
try adding the line:
MIN_VIRTUALPAGECNT=100000
to the bottom of SYS$SYSTEM:MODPARAMS.DAT using the editor.
and then use the following command to run AUTOGEN:
$ @SYS$UPDATE:AUTOGEN SAVPARAMS SETPARAMS
Then review the log files that AUTOGEN says it is producing and if things
look good, shut down and reboot.
Next, make sure that the userid running the compile has as much page file quota
as VIRTUALPAGECNT will allow:
$ SET DEFAULT SYS$SYSTEM
$ RUN AUTHORIZE
MODIFY HOLM /PGFLQUOTA=100000
If the userid is already logged in, be sure to log out and log back in to get
the new user quota to take effect. Then retry the compile. If it still fails,
check that VIRTUALPAGECNT has indeed been increased as expected and use:
$ SHOW PROCESS /QUOTA
in the same process as attemtped the compile to see what its pagefile quota is
set to. If they are as expected and the compile still fails, try increasing
both items some more as per the above procedure. Maybe try 150000 if 100000
is not sufficient.
>
>The VS4000 has 64 Mbytes of Ram, I think that should be sufficient to
>compile something like this, so it seems to me that some quote values are
>the problem.
>
What a process sees is virtual memory, not physical memory. The amount of
virtual memory a process can use depends on system parameters such as
VIRTUALPAGECNT (and BALSETCNT as pointed out by someone else) and user quotas
such as PGFLQUOTA and the size of the page file on disk. The process can end
up seeing less memory than physically exists or more memory than physically
exists depending on how various system parameters are set and how big the
page file is. VMS has lots of parameters to control memory allocation in order
to try to avoid just giving processes what they ask for and ending up leaving
other more important processes starved for memory when they need it.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Does anyone know offhand if it's possible to use the "BCT" slot for an
RH70 in the PDP-11/70 backplane as a standard Unibus slot, for, say, an
RX211 or something like that? It would seem to be a normal Unibus slot,
it even requires that a grant card be installed if that RH70 board set
isn't installed.
I can dig through the print sets for hours to find this out, but if
someone knows offhand I'd appreciate an express clue delivery.
Thanks,
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Less than one month to go .... we're up to 21 exhibits, four or five
lectures (I forget exactly; adding one more this week), and seven
technical workshops. All the details are posted at
http://www.vintage.org/2012/east/ and http://www.facebook.com/vcfeast8
.... if ever you considered attending VCF East, then let this be the year!
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:25:47 -0500, Adrian Stoness <tdk.knight at gmail.com>
wrote:
> whats a scratch monkey?
Scratch monkey is from a lab accident where real monkeys were killed
owing to diagnostics being run on a computer:
http://edp.org/monkey.htm
This may or may not be an urban legend
/Jonas
Guys, just got confirmation from his son Leonard, a friend of mine.
I'm sorry to say that Jack passed away yesterday. The man was an
immense influence in the consumer electronics/computing industry whose
legacy allowed many of us to enjoy years of great memories. My
sincerest thoughts goes out to his family in their time of loss.
Curt and I were supposed to interview him next week for the book on
Atari Corp. Was really excited to get the chance to meet and spend
time him. :(
--
Marty
Jonas Otter wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:30:23 +0200, Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've tried to compile the VIM-7.3 Sources on my freshly installed VS4000,
> >and entered a pitfall here.
> >Since the C Compiler was complaining that the virtuel memory is exhaustet,
> >I'veed the PGFLQUOTA for the user to 104826 and the VIRTUALPAGCNT SYSGEN
> >Value to 2097152 (max was displayed as 4194304)
> >I've let run autogen and ebooted.
> >
> >Now the system ewfuses to boot:
> >
> >%SYSBOOT-W-WS default and quota raised to PHD+MINWSCNT
> >%SYSBOOT-F-VASOV, system virtual address space exeeded
> >?06 HLT INST
> > PC= 00009631 PSL=041F0000
>
> From the VMS error messages manual at
> http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/73final/6023/6023pro_019.html :
>
> VASOVF, system virtual address space limit exceeded
>
>
> *Facility:*SYSBOOT, System Bootstrap Facility
> *Explanation:*The combination of SYSGEN parameters used to specify
> various capacities within the operating system have pushed the size of
> the operating system address space over the limit allowed by the VAX
> architecture.
> *User Action:*Reduce one of the parameters (BALSETCNT or VIRTUALPAGECNT
> (VAX only)) that contribute to the virtual address space size required
> by the OpenVMS system. By using AUTOGEN to set these values for your
> system, you avoid selection of parameter combinations that cause system
> space to overflow its architectural boundaries.
>
> To recover, perform a conversational boot (i.e. the boot process will
> let you modify system parameters to recover from a situation like
> yours). It is described here:
> http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/82final/aa-pv5mj-tk/00/00/34-con.html
>
> Use the "booting with default system parameters" section. You probably
> then need to reduce VIRTUALPAGECNT below the value you have set (which
> gives a 2GB virtual address space) because the VAX architecture allows
> max. 2 GB virtual memory and you are probably just over the limit.
>
> The VMS documentation is excellent, you will find it online here:
> http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/
>
> and this is a good manual to start with:
> http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/82FINAL/aa-pv5mj-tk/aa-pv5mj-tk.HTMl
> (you will find it from the page above by following the link "OpenVMS
> Operating System" to the left.
>
> /Jonas
Ok, THX guys,
I've managed to get this thing running again, don't ask me how :-)
But my first problem, the cause of the fiddling with the system paramaters
persists.
This is the VIM73-69 source for VMS:
The adequate command for mmk is:
mmk /descrip=Make_vms.mms
NOTE: Because of empty /auto/config.h (needed for Unix configure)
build
will fail with very strange messages. Therefore before building, it is
recommended to make one clean up, to prepare everything for OpenVMS
development. The command is:
Buffer: INSTALLVMS.TXT | Write | Insert |
Forward
$ mms /descrip=Make_vms.mms
using DECW/Motif/XPM environment.
creating OS_VMS_MOTIF.OPT file.
cc /def=("FEAT_BIG","HAVE_CONFIG_H","FEAT_GUI_MOTIF","HAVE_XPM" )
/opt/prefix=
all /include=([.proto],decw$include:) BLOWFISH.C
%CLI-F-TEXT, Compiler abort - virtual memory limits exceeded.
%SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
%MMS-F-ABORT, For target BLOWFISH.OBJ, CLI returned abort status:
%X0000002C.
-SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
$
I've googled for the error and found this:
http://www.jcameron.com/vms/em12.htm
...that was the beginning of the problem.
$ set proc/priv=all
$ r authorize
UAF> sh holm
Username: HOLM Owner: Holm Tiffe
Account: UIC: [200,201] ([HOLM])
CLI: DCL Tables: DCLTABLES
Default: DKA0:[HOLM]
LGICMD: LOGIN
Flags:
Primary days: Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
Secondary days: Sat Sun
No access restrictions
Expiration: (none) Pwdminimum: 6 Login Fails: 0
Pwdlifetime: 90 00:00 Pwdchange: 3-APR-2012 20:05
Last Login: 7-APR-2012 11:40 (interactive), 7-APR-2012 11:34
(non-interactive)
Maxjobs: 0 Fillm: 300 Bytlm: 32768
Maxacctjobs: 0 Shrfillm: 0 Pbytlm: 0
Maxdetach: 0 BIOlm: 40 JTquota: 4096
Prclm: 2 DIOlm: 40 WSdef: 256
Prio: 4 ASTlm: 100 WSquo: 512
Queprio: 0 TQElm: 40 WSextent: 1024
CPU: (none) Enqlm: 200 Pgflquo: 40960
Authorized Privileges:
ACNT ALLSPOOL ALTPRI AUDIT BUGCHK BYPASS CMEXEC CMKRNL
IMPERSONATDIAGNOSE DOWNGRADE EXQUOTA GROUP GRPNAM GRPPRV IMPORT
LOG_IO MOUNT NETMBX OPER PFNMAP PHY_IO PRMCEB PRMGBL
PRMMBX PSWAPM READALL SECURITY SETPRV SHARE SHMEM SYSGBL
SYSLCK SYSNAM SYSPRV TMPMBX UPGRADE VOLPRO WORLD
Default Privileges:
NETMBX TMPMBX
UAF>
So what should I do next to try to compile that VIM source (hopefully w/o
to destroying the system again)
The VS4000 has 64 Mbytes of Ram, I think that should be sufficient to
compile something like this, so it seems to me that some quote values are
the problem.
Kind Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
On 04/07/2012 01:43 PM, Scott Mickey wrote:
> I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
> more than $1K:
> eBay auction -
> "DEC PDP-8 paper tape software, books and core memory card"
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320880958746
> At first I thought it was a gag, but then I looked at the number of
> bidders and the amounts.
Do you know any (for example) classic car enthusiasts? Do you know
any of them who have TRULY rare or historically-significant cars? Ask
them how much they'd pay for parts, or for entire vehicles. But, I
respectfully submit, if you have to ask the question, you wouldn't
understand the answer.
> I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
> PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it. However, at
> some point each comes to the conclusion that unless they want to be
> buried with their computers, the same as the egyptian pharaohs were
> buried with their gold, they need to find a new home for them.
> A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
> longer kindly give me two fully loaded VAXServer 3400's for free.
> A few years later, from another retired gentleman, I received a
> VT103 (11/23), VT100, RX02 (dual 8" flop drives), a pair of
> CDC 9427H "Hawk" drives (which about KILLED me when I lifted each
> one by myself), dozens of floppies, and a dozen 14" rigid platter
> disk cartridges. I got all of this for free too. I did pay $100
> for a MicroVAX II, with all original tapes and manuals. It has been
> very educational learning all this old hardware and running the
> early UNIXes on real hardware (not an emulator). I found all these
> people and all of this stuff locally on craigslist. So when I see
> bits of DEC paper tape and core memory going for more than $1000,
> I am flabbergasted. Completely. Shouldn't this money be staying
> in your retirement account? (No offense intended). Why is this
> particular stuff so valuable?
"I got this amazing, incredible deal once (or even got lucky enough to
get such a deal TWICE!), therefore they're all like that."
No, I'm sorry, that's not the way it works. You got lucky. Twice.
Don't take it for granted. I know people who would skip meals for the
hardware you listed. I wouldn't, but there ARE computer-related things
I'd skip meals to acquire, with no hesitation.
Just like any REAL classic car person...except the car stuff is a lot
more common.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Sorry for psoting this publically, but a private reply to Rob got a
bounce 'due to unacceptable content'. OK, I probalby wouldn't talk about
soldering iron bits in polite compnay, but I cna think of many worse
words to use :-)
-tony
> > Hello Tony,
> >
> > If you recall I got a Weller TCP probably just like yours. I have a couple
> > of PT-AA8 tips, but they seem a bit too big for working with some of the
> > boards I need to work with.
> >
> > What tips would you recommend for working with the H7140 PSU (and the RD53
> > motor control board)?
>
> Well I use a PT-AA8 for just about everything. There is a finer one
> (PT-O8???) which I use for some SMD work (but a lot of that gets done
> with the PT-AA8 actually).
>
> Certainly it should be OK for the PSU and RD53 boards.
>
> -tony
>
indeed
http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/1291/boxus.jpghttp://img856.imageshack.us/img856/9946/atomcomps.jpghttp://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg717/scaled.php?server=717&filename=atom005…http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg803/scaled.php?server=803&filename=atom004…http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg189/scaled.php?server=189&filename=handboo…http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/228/2dec.jpghttp://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg842/scaled.php?server=842&filename=boxsx.j…
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Scott Mickey <scott.m.18 at atsgate.com> wrote:
> Adrian Stoness wrote:
>> i was bidding on it from the start quite strongly . . .
> I switched to JBidwatcher recently, as I have always preferred to
> bid against the clock, not other people.
> http://www.jbidwatcher.com/
> It is a Java app and will run with Solaris or Linux. ?Launch with:
> java -Xmx512m -jar JBidwatcher-2.5.jar
> Or if you ahve more mainstream hardware, it runs on Windows or OS X.
> It's free. ?I have only used it for a couple of auctions so far,
> but have found it works well. ?-For what it's worth.
> And on your free pdp8a, I think it is true that the free stuff is
> often the best. ?Maybe just because of the hardware itself, or
> perhaps also because it was given with an unspoken contract that
> you are to take care of it.
> Scott
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Stoness" <tdk.knight at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 5:56 PM
> Subject: Re: pdp8 tapes trays core memory ebay auction
>
>>i put a 500$ bid in on that auction didn't expect this and it proly
>> shot up that high cause i was biding on it from the start quite
>> stronglyv and my bid was based on what i have seen these individual
>> items go for so i am kinda shocked
>>
>> as for freebees i score a free pdp8a my pride n joy of my collection
>> and have been aquiring parts for it ever since like rk05's and
>> controllors rl02's
>>
>> as for you talk about freebees mines not as nice as ur stuff but i did
>> score a pdp8a with all its software manuals drawings asr33 x2
>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Scott Mickey <scott.m.18 at atsgate.com>
> wrote:
>>> I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
>>> more than $1K:
>>> eBay auction -
>>> "DEC PDP-8 paper tape software, books and core memory card"
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320880958746
>>> At first I thought it was a gag, but then I looked at the number of
>>> bidders and the amounts.
>>> I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
>>> PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it. However, at
>>> some point each comes to the conclusion that unless they want to be
>>> buried with their computers, the same as the egyptian pharaohs were
>>> buried with their gold, they need to find a new home for them.
>>> A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
>>> longer kindly give me two fully loaded VAXServer 3400's for free.
>>> A few years later, from another retired gentleman, I received a
>>> VT103 (11/23), VT100, RX02 (dual 8" flop drives), a pair of
>>> CDC 9427H "Hawk" drives (which about KILLED me when I lifted each
>>> one by myself), dozens of floppies, and a dozen 14" rigid platter
>>> disk cartridges. I got all of this for free too. I did pay $100
>>> for a MicroVAX II, with all original tapes and manuals. It has been
>>> very educational learning all this old hardware and running the
>>> early UNIXes on real hardware (not an emulator). I found all these
>>> people and all of this stuff locally on craigslist. So when I see
>>> bits of DEC paper tape and core memory going for more than $1000,
>>> I am flabbergasted. Completely. Shouldn't this money be staying
>>> in your retirement account? (No offense intended). Why is this
>>> particular stuff so valuable?
>>> Thank you for your time today.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Adrian Stoness"
>>> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>>> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:19 PM
>>> Subject: pdp8 tapes trays core memory ebay auction
>>>
>>>> i put bid in and went to work at 6am and see this when i get back
>>>> 1100 bucks :O
>>>>
>>>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&_trksid=p4340.l2557&rt=nc&nma=
>>>
> true&item=320880958746&si=6c9FJZXW%252BgdjnHCVq%252FpYYQ4M3tI%253D&viewitem=
>>> &sspagename=ADME%3AB%3AEOIBUAA%3ACA%3A3160&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
>>>>
>
>
Adrian Stoness wrote:
> i was bidding on it from the start quite strongly . . .
I switched to JBidwatcher recently, as I have always preferred to
bid against the clock, not other people.
http://www.jbidwatcher.com/
It is a Java app and will run with Solaris or Linux. Launch with:
java -Xmx512m -jar JBidwatcher-2.5.jar
Or if you ahve more mainstream hardware, it runs on Windows or OS X.
It's free. I have only used it for a couple of auctions so far,
but have found it works well. -For what it's worth.
And on your free pdp8a, I think it is true that the free stuff is
often the best. Maybe just because of the hardware itself, or
perhaps also because it was given with an unspoken contract that
you are to take care of it.
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Stoness" <tdk.knight at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: pdp8 tapes trays core memory ebay auction
>i put a 500$ bid in on that auction didn't expect this and it proly
> shot up that high cause i was biding on it from the start quite
> stronglyv and my bid was based on what i have seen these individual
> items go for so i am kinda shocked
>
> as for freebees i score a free pdp8a my pride n joy of my collection
> and have been aquiring parts for it ever since like rk05's and
> controllors rl02's
>
> as for you talk about freebees mines not as nice as ur stuff but i did
> score a pdp8a with all its software manuals drawings asr33 x2
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Scott Mickey <scott.m.18 at atsgate.com>
wrote:
>> I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
>> more than $1K:
>> eBay auction -
>> "DEC PDP-8 paper tape software, books and core memory card"
>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320880958746
>> At first I thought it was a gag, but then I looked at the number of
>> bidders and the amounts.
>> I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
>> PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it. However, at
>> some point each comes to the conclusion that unless they want to be
>> buried with their computers, the same as the egyptian pharaohs were
>> buried with their gold, they need to find a new home for them.
>> A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
>> longer kindly give me two fully loaded VAXServer 3400's for free.
>> A few years later, from another retired gentleman, I received a
>> VT103 (11/23), VT100, RX02 (dual 8" flop drives), a pair of
>> CDC 9427H "Hawk" drives (which about KILLED me when I lifted each
>> one by myself), dozens of floppies, and a dozen 14" rigid platter
>> disk cartridges. I got all of this for free too. I did pay $100
>> for a MicroVAX II, with all original tapes and manuals. It has been
>> very educational learning all this old hardware and running the
>> early UNIXes on real hardware (not an emulator). I found all these
>> people and all of this stuff locally on craigslist. So when I see
>> bits of DEC paper tape and core memory going for more than $1000,
>> I am flabbergasted. Completely. Shouldn't this money be staying
>> in your retirement account? (No offense intended). Why is this
>> particular stuff so valuable?
>> Thank you for your time today.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Adrian Stoness"
>> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:19 PM
>> Subject: pdp8 tapes trays core memory ebay auction
>>
>>> i put bid in and went to work at 6am and see this when i get back
>>> 1100 bucks :O
>>>
>>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&_trksid=p4340.l2557&rt=nc&nma=
>>
true&item=320880958746&si=6c9FJZXW%252BgdjnHCVq%252FpYYQ4M3tI%253D&viewitem=
>> &sspagename=ADME%3AB%3AEOIBUAA%3ACA%3A3160&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
>>>
> On 04/07/2012 01:43 PM, Scott Mickey wrote:
>> I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
>> more than $1K:
>> eBay auction -
>> "DEC PDP-8 paper tape software, books and core memory card"
>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320880958746
>> At first I thought it was a gag, but then I looked at the number of
>> bidders and the amounts.
On Saturday, April 07, 2012 5:20 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
> Do you know any (for example) classic car enthusiasts? Do you know
> any of them who have TRULY rare or historically-significant cars? Ask
> them how much they'd pay for parts, or for entire vehicles. But, I
> respectfully submit, if you have to ask the question, you wouldn't
> understand the answer.
>
>> I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
>> PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it. However, at
>> some point each comes to the conclusion that unless they want to be
>> buried with their computers, the same as the egyptian pharaohs were
>> buried with their gold, they need to find a new home for them.
>> A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
>> longer kindly give me two fully loaded VAXServer 3400's for free.
>> A few years later, from another retired gentleman, I received a
>> VT103 (11/23), VT100, RX02 (dual 8" flop drives), a pair of
>> CDC 9427H "Hawk" drives (which about KILLED me when I lifted each
>> one by myself), dozens of floppies, and a dozen 14" rigid platter
>> disk cartridges. I got all of this for free too. I did pay $100
>> for a MicroVAX II, with all original tapes and manuals. It has been
>> very educational learning all this old hardware and running the
>> early UNIXes on real hardware (not an emulator). I found all these
>> people and all of this stuff locally on craigslist. So when I see
>> bits of DEC paper tape and core memory going for more than $1000,
>> I am flabbergasted. Completely. Shouldn't this money be staying
>> in your retirement account? (No offense intended). Why is this
>> particular stuff so valuable?
>
> "I got this amazing, incredible deal once (or even got lucky enough to
> get such a deal TWICE!), therefore they're all like that."
>
> No, I'm sorry, that's not the way it works. You got lucky. Twice.
> Don't take it for granted. I know people who would skip meals for the
> hardware you listed. I wouldn't, but there ARE computer-related things
> I'd skip meals to acquire, with no hesitation.
>
> Just like any REAL classic car person...except the car stuff is a lot
> more common.
>
> -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA
>
Dave,
Thanks for your perspective. Where I live (near Denver), both Maynard
Massachusetts and Silicon Valley are a long-long way away, and always
have been. I think that is one reason why when older computers go up
on craigslist here, I am often the only person to email the seller.
I should have stopped at my original question, and left out the info
about DEC machines I have acquired, as it completely diverted attention
away from what I was asking. I was just shocked by the dollar figure
of that eBay auction, and telling my own story is how I reacted. So,
back to the question: What were the valuable items in the auction?
I don't think it was the books. And I doubt it was the core memory,
but I could be wrong. I think it must have been the paper tapes with
the original DEC labels. Those are somewhat fragile, and while a
computer can sit in a corner for years with little degradation, the
same likely cannot be said for the paper tapes. Or maybe people tossed
those tapes over the years with little thought, so now they are very
rare? But still, $1K, wow! Makes one think twice about tossing
anything, doesn't it?
Scott
i put a 500$ bid in on that auction didn't expect this and it proly
shot up that high cause i was biding on it from the start quite
stronglyv and my bid was based on what i have seen these individual
items go for so i am kinda shocked
as for freebees i score a free pdp8a my pride n joy of my collection
and have been aquiring parts for it ever since like rk05's and
controllors rl02's
as for you talk about freebees mines not as nice as ur stuff but i did
score a pdp8a with all its software manuals drawings asr33 x2
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Scott Mickey <scott.m.18 at atsgate.com> wrote:
> I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
> more than $1K:
> eBay auction -
> "DEC PDP-8 paper tape software, books and core memory card"
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320880958746
> At first I thought it was a gag, but then I looked at the number of
> bidders and the amounts.
> I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
> PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it. ? However, at
> some point each comes to the conclusion that unless they want to be
> buried with their computers, the same as the egyptian pharaohs were
> buried with their gold, they need to find a new home for them.
> A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
> longer kindly give me two fully loaded VAXServer 3400's for free.
> A few years later, from another retired gentleman, I received a
> VT103 (11/23), VT100, RX02 (dual 8" flop drives), a pair of
> CDC 9427H "Hawk" drives (which about KILLED me when I lifted each
> one by myself), dozens of floppies, and a dozen 14" rigid platter
> disk cartridges. ?I got all of this for free too. ?I did pay $100
> for a MicroVAX II, with all original tapes and manuals. ?It has been
> very educational learning all this old hardware and running the
> early UNIXes on real hardware (not an emulator). ?I found all these
> people and all of this stuff locally on craigslist. ? So when I see
> bits of DEC paper tape and core memory going for more than $1000,
> I am flabbergasted. ?Completely. ? Shouldn't this money be staying
> in your retirement account? ?(No offense intended). ?Why is this
> particular stuff so valuable?
> Thank you for your time today.
>
> Scott
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Stoness"
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:19 PM
> Subject: pdp8 tapes trays core memory ebay auction
>
>> i put bid in and went to work at 6am and see this when i get back
>> 1100 bucks :O
>>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&_trksid=p4340.l2557&rt=nc&nma=
> true&item=320880958746&si=6c9FJZXW%252BgdjnHCVq%252FpYYQ4M3tI%253D&viewitem=
> &sspagename=ADME%3AB%3AEOIBUAA%3ACA%3A3160&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
>>
>
>
On 4/7/12 10:43 AM, Scott Mickey wrote:
> I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
> more than $1K:
>
> I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
> PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it.
> A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
> longer
> Shouldn't this money be staying
> in your retirement account? (No offense intended)
I find your na?vet? refreshing, if offensive.
You'll be 'old' some day too.
Let's see how you feel when a kid comes along eying your collection.
> about KILLED me when I lifted each one by myself
Learn about dealing with heavy equipment before you do permanent
damage to your back. It's easy to ignore this when you're young
and stupid.
I need someone to educate me as to why this DEC hardware is worth
more than $1K:
eBay auction -
"DEC PDP-8 paper tape software, books and core memory card"
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320880958746
At first I thought it was a gag, but then I looked at the number of
bidders and the amounts.
I know there are a lot of older fellows out there holding on to their
PDP and VAX hardware because they are quite fond of it. However, at
some point each comes to the conclusion that unless they want to be
buried with their computers, the same as the egyptian pharaohs were
buried with their gold, they need to find a new home for them.
A fellow who was on oxygen and too weak to pick up his computers any
longer kindly give me two fully loaded VAXServer 3400's for free.
A few years later, from another retired gentleman, I received a
VT103 (11/23), VT100, RX02 (dual 8" flop drives), a pair of
CDC 9427H "Hawk" drives (which about KILLED me when I lifted each
one by myself), dozens of floppies, and a dozen 14" rigid platter
disk cartridges. I got all of this for free too. I did pay $100
for a MicroVAX II, with all original tapes and manuals. It has been
very educational learning all this old hardware and running the
early UNIXes on real hardware (not an emulator). I found all these
people and all of this stuff locally on craigslist. So when I see
bits of DEC paper tape and core memory going for more than $1000,
I am flabbergasted. Completely. Shouldn't this money be staying
in your retirement account? (No offense intended). Why is this
particular stuff so valuable?
Thank you for your time today.
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Stoness"
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:19 PM
Subject: pdp8 tapes trays core memory ebay auction
> i put bid in and went to work at 6am and see this when i get back
> 1100 bucks :O
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&_trksid=p4340.l2557&rt=nc&nma=
true&item=320880958746&si=6c9FJZXW%252BgdjnHCVq%252FpYYQ4M3tI%253D&viewitem=
&sspagename=ADME%3AB%3AEOIBUAA%3ACA%3A3160&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
>
Hey guys
I work for an ewaste company, thought id share what we have in right now
10 Dell Precision 390s
2.4ghz Core 2 Duos
3.5 Floppy Drive- BIOS Supports 5.25 drives as well
Dual 160GB SATA HDDs
2GB RAM
XP COA on each machine
Asking $100 dollars each for them + Shipping or come to my door in
Flushing MI and get them
Steve
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:30:23 +0200, Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to compile the VIM-7.3 Sources on my freshly installed VS4000,
> and entered a pitfall here.
> Since the C Compiler was complaining that the virtuel memory is exhaustet,
> I'veed the PGFLQUOTA for the user to 104826 and the VIRTUALPAGCNT SYSGEN
> Value to 2097152 (max was displayed as 4194304)
> I've let run autogen and ebooted.
>
> Now the system ewfuses to boot:
>
> %SYSBOOT-W-WS default and quota raised to PHD+MINWSCNT
> %SYSBOOT-F-VASOV, system virtual address space exeeded
> ?06 HLT INST
> PC= 00009631 PSL=041F0000
From the VMS error messages manual at
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/73final/6023/6023pro_019.html :
VASOVF, system virtual address space limit exceeded
*Facility:*SYSBOOT, System Bootstrap Facility
*Explanation:*The combination of SYSGEN parameters used to specify
various capacities within the operating system have pushed the size of
the operating system address space over the limit allowed by the VAX
architecture.
*User Action:*Reduce one of the parameters (BALSETCNT or VIRTUALPAGECNT
(VAX only)) that contribute to the virtual address space size required
by the OpenVMS system. By using AUTOGEN to set these values for your
system, you avoid selection of parameter combinations that cause system
space to overflow its architectural boundaries.
To recover, perform a conversational boot (i.e. the boot process will
let you modify system parameters to recover from a situation like
yours). It is described here:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/82final/aa-pv5mj-tk/00/00/34-con.html
Use the "booting with default system parameters" section. You probably
then need to reduce VIRTUALPAGECNT below the value you have set (which
gives a 2GB virtual address space) because the VAX architecture allows
max. 2 GB virtual memory and you are probably just over the limit.
The VMS documentation is excellent, you will find it online here:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/
and this is a good manual to start with:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/82FINAL/aa-pv5mj-tk/aa-pv5mj-tk.HTMl
(you will find it from the page above by following the link "OpenVMS
Operating System" to the left.
/Jonas
>
>I've tried to compile the VIM-7.3 Sources on my freshly installed VS4000,
>and entered a pitfall here.
>Since the C Compiler was complaining that the virtuel memory is exhaustet,
>I'veed the PGFLQUOTA for the user to 104826 and the VIRTUALPAGCNT SYSGEN
>Value to 2097152 (max was displayed as 4194304)
>I've let run autogen and ebooted.
>
VIRTUALPAGECNT is specified in pages and 2097152 pages is 1GB.
>Now the system ewfuses to boot:
>
>%SYSBOOT-W-WS default and quota raised to PHD+MINWSCNT
>%SYSBOOT-F-VASOV, system virtual address space exeeded
>?06 HLT INST
> PC= 00009631 PSL=041F0000
Your VAX probably doesn't have enough page file to back 1GB of virtual
memory per process. Perhaps some process is defaulting to grabbing as
much as it can and you are running out of pagefile?
>
>What can I do now to boot this thing again?
>
I would suggest doing a conversational boot and setting VIRTUALPAGECNT back
down to something more reasonable. How to do a conversational boot varies for
different types of VAX but usually it is something like:
>>> BOOT /R5:1
or
>>> BOOT /1
You should end up at a prompt ( SYSBOOT> I think) where you can alter SYSGEN
parameters. Enter something like:
SET VIRTUALPAGECNT 64000
CONTINUE
and hopefully your system should then boot up ok. If you already entered a
very large value for VIRTUALPAGECNT into SYS$SYSTEM:MODPARAMS.DAT, you should
probably change it to something smaller before you run AUTOGEN again.
AUTOGEN defaults to shutting down and rebooting the system after it sets the
new system parameters. This is fine if everything worked out well but is not
so great when things go wrong. A better way to do it is to tell AUTOGEN to
exit after setting the new parameters and before shutting down, for example:
$ @SYS$UPDATE:AUTOGEN SAVPARAMS SETPARAMS
When this completes, you can review the logs that AUTOGEN produces and then
manually shut down and reboot if all went well or fix things and run AUTOGEN
again if it didn't.
>
>PS: I'm new to VMS, don't expect any knowledge, I'm a Unix guy...
>
Hope I pitched it right...
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Hi,
I've tried to compile the VIM-7.3 Sources on my freshly installed VS4000,
and entered a pitfall here.
Since the C Compiler was complaining that the virtuel memory is exhaustet,
I'veed the PGFLQUOTA for the user to 104826 and the VIRTUALPAGCNT SYSGEN
Value to 2097152 (max was displayed as 4194304)
I've let run autogen and ebooted.
Now the system ewfuses to boot:
%SYSBOOT-W-WS default and quota raised to PHD+MINWSCNT
%SYSBOOT-F-VASOV, system virtual address space exeeded
?06 HLT INST
PC= 00009631 PSL=041F0000
>>> _
What can I do now to boot this thing again?
Kind Regards,
Holm
PS: I'm new to VMS, don't expect any knowledge, I'm a Unix guy...
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
At 04:53 AM 4/6/2012, Sander Reiche wrote:
>Rosewood always has a nice look.
Did anyone actually establish, with CCC pedant levels of certainty,
that the -8 case in question was actually rosewood?
That's the biggest chuckle to me.
- John
Hi guys,
has someone, perfered in Europe because of the shipping costs, an M8190
with FPU to sell? (Hobbyist use).
If yes, please contact me..
Kind Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
Well, finally figured out how to use the vmsbackup program to unpack
a backup save set - it sure wasn't obvious.
First, after reading in the whole tape, you need to extract the backup
save set file with no formatting. So, it won't handle a tape container
format. So, you want the XXX.BCK file put into a file with just a
stream of raw bytes, with no blocksize value like in the container
format. Then, you use vmsbackup like this :
vmsbackup -xe -b <blocksize> -f <filename>
Jon
Sorry, don't got any 75 to 1 manuals.? I've got two 200 to 1 sets and a 150 to 1.??
Good luck in your quest.? If you can find it that's great, or look further for a different set with a manual.? Anyway a lesson how "ephemera" as they call it can be really more valuable that the actual thing,?? Including the model number in any future messages may help.?
Regards, Jim
p.s. Are you near the SF Bay area, maybe I could just give you one of the other sets?? I'm getting to the age of reducing, but not quite to the age of shipping.