Hi! There are plenty of PCBs still available for anyone who would like to
build their own home brew computer. Building a home brew computer is
highly entertaining and a great way to teach about computer fundamentals,
electronics, digital logic, etc.
http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/page/35044530/PCB%20Inventory
These are available from myself and others on the N8VEM mailing list.
Feel free to sign up and ask questions.
http://groups.google.com/group/n8vemhttp://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
PS, all you need is the SBC V2 to start and it will boot to CP/M 2.2 from
ROM with a RAM drive. Next builders add an ECB backplane, a DiskIO V3 for
storage, and ColorVDU for display but those are optional.
Howdy, people!
I'm trying to help N8VEM project (and a local project) into making a
SCSI emulator. I'd like to have a SCSI bus preprocessor on my HP16500C to
help. Maybe someone has a spare stashed somewhere and wants to sell by a
nice price? :o)
Ok, it is not easy to find, but what is the problem in asking? ;o)
Thanks a lot,
Alexandre Souza
---
Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
Meu site: http://www.tabalabs.com.br
----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:32:25 -0700
From: "Rick Bensene" <rickb at bensene.com>
>
> This same person is selling the guts from a Sharp COMPET 361 calculator.
> What's so special about this? Besides the K@@L NIXIE tubes, this model
> featured CORE memory.
>
> "...sold as is but carefully taken out..."
>
> I say people suck++
>
Arggghhh! This is total sacrilege to an old calculator enthusiast such as
myself.
It hurts to see a machine like this gutted out and sold as a trinket. It
hurts even more because the Compet 361 is a machine I've been looking to
find for the museum for a very long time.
I agree...many people do suck!
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
--------- Reply: ---------
--- My query to the seller:
Dear nancytemple202020,
May I ask what happened to the rest of this calculator? Are any other parts
still available as well?
--- Her reply:
I wish there was I would have sold it whole it was sitting for so many year
rust got to alot of it and it was the only board that was very nice and
clean.
- nancytemple202020
So, does she deserve to be insulted for not realizing that a nasty, rusty
piece of junk is worth more to some people than the only nice and clean
board out of it, or should we be grateful that she at least saved that board
and made it available?
S**t happens, life is full of disappointments and people don't always do
what we want them to; get used to it!
Sheesh!
Thanks to Dave Dunfield, I now possess some TEAC FD-55B units for the
Kaypros. I popped one in and it booted CP/M fine. Formatted a disk fine.
But, before I install them, I thought I should ensure the jumpers are
correct for the drive. Reading the manual, I have a few questions:
* Should IU (head load on pin 4) or HL (head load on pin 4) be enabled?
* Any reason to leave ML (motor running) on and have the motor run all
the time?
* What combination of IU/U0/U1/UR should I use? I tried IU+U0
thinking the light would be on only when the drive is running, but
that's not true.
* HS + MS or HM + MS? Neither seems to make any difference on the Kaypro
* teac notes it ships the 55B with HS,DS0,IU,SM,and PM. I have DS0
(or DS1), HM, SM, and PM. The unit had ML strapped, but I removed it.
----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:35:31 -0400
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
On 06/14/2013 12:13 PM, MikeS wrote:
>> ...But now that I know that buying and selling parts from gutted old gear
>> are 'crimes', I'll throw them in the landfill first thing tomorrow
>> morning (after first using them for target practice of course). I
>> certainly don't want you, Dave, N0body H0me, etc. to think that I suck;
>> bad enough to be chastised by Dave for scrapping for parts some LA100s
>> that I'd offered several times with no takers.
> Ohhhh no you don't! *I* did not speak out against BUYING stuff like
> this. I spoke out against the morons who tear it apart! If I had an
> extra $200 lying around, I'd have scored that auction in a heartbeat, for
> all the Pro boards. You take my name right out of that list.
> -Dave
----- Reply: -----
There's that reading comprehension problem of yours again...
But I'm sure someone will come up with the rosewood/whale oil argument that
by buying this stuff you would in fact encourage the 'morons' like me...
Just think: if instead of boring us with your current average of 6 largely
OT posts per day you invested that time in paying work, you might well have
that extra $200 and then some...
m
No connection to donors
---
Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
Meu site: http://www.tabalabs.com.br
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris and Veronica Schneider" <c.v.schneider at att.net>
To: <ti99-4a at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:20 PM
Subject: [TI-99/4A] Free TI stuff
> All,
>
> I have quite a bit of Free TI hardware, software, books, etc..
>
> I'm in the Houston area, must pick up all at once.
>
> I have, a few consoles, a couple of PEB's, carts, books, etc.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
Hi
I have a number of items for sale on vintage-computer.com forums.
These are classic NorthStar CP/M and their early PC work-alike known as the
Dimension.
Due to size, weight, and fragility these are pick-up only items in the
Dayton Ohio area.
http://www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?28-Vintage-Computer
-Items-For-Sale-or-Trade
There is also some NorthStar original software, some terminals, and a
Panasonic Pinwriter P2200 24 pin printer.
Please contact me at LYNCHAJ at YAHOO.COM to discuss. Thanks!
Andrew Lynch
I'm trying to locate a source code file called "dandd.pas". This was a
game engine that spawned the room-oriented BBS software called Citadel.
I've been unable to locate this at all. Google only returns information I
already have. :(
Help!
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_!
----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:09:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
> ...At the same time, it really is the responsibility of the seller to
> research something to see if it has value even in a distressed condition
> before scrapping it, and if necessary, find someone knowledgeable in a
> particular field who can help them properly evaluate it.
Really? If I find a rusty old calculator I don't feel any _responsibility_
whatsoever. Although I'm sure there are people on here who would pass a law
if they could, along with laws _forcing_ programmers to use obsolete
hardware, users to pass an exam, and in general do and think 'the right
way', I think I still have a choice about what to do with it, if anything; I
will concede though that posting a video on Utube of my using it for target
practice would be in bad taste.
Like I said, I happen to have an almost identical board out of a calculator
that was not repairable (IMO, which is the only opinion that counts IMO) and
I've had no qualms about removing a few Nixies for use elsewhere; I was
thinking of offering it to Rick or Brent for parts but since that just earns
insults and condemnation instead of appreciation I think I'll just hang on
to it and maybe make the core into a piece of 'art'...(hmm... add some tiny
LEDs, maybe two or three of the Nixies... an image is starting to form...)
> You wouldn't scrap an antique car and attempt to sell just the floor mats
> and seats just because of some body rust and a non-functional engine. You
> wouldn't sell the light bulbs and shelf pegs out of a lighted china
> cabinet because of scratches or dings in the finish or a missing drawer
> pull.
Ridiculous comparison.
> The outer chassis of my Commodore SuperPET is /very/ rusty, yet it can
> still be cleaned up and repainted. It sat on the floor of the former
> owner's garage for an unknown number of years before he put it out on the
> curb (literally).
And aren't you glad he did, instead of 'researching it', properly
'evaluating' it, and flogging it on eBay for an appropriate amount or
more...
----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:24:32 -0700
From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com>
> Let's see...
> We've had the discussion about the Raspberry Pi, and how it doesn't have
> enough pins...
...
...
> ...oh God make it stop make it stop make it stop.
> - Josh
----- Reply: -----
You forgot the one about how "People suck++," especially housewives who,
when they see a dirty rusty useless old calculator in the ditch, don't rush
home with it and spend the next day or two cleaning it up, researching it,
consulting with calculator experts, etc. before finally offering it on eBay
for next to nothing (lest she be called a greedy thief and worse) or, better
yet, offering it for free.
m
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:17:21 -0400, David Riley <fraveydank at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think a lot of the problems we experience with the USPS is the
> "last mile", i.e. the actual delivery. For the most part, I'm
> sure the USPS is fine at*processing* packages; then they hand
> it off to your local postal service for delivery. Presumably,
> Sweden's government sees fit to adequately fund your postal
> service?
Sweden's postal service is a government-owned corporation, owned partly
by the Swedish and partly by the Danish government. It is as far as I
know not publicly funded, but required to pay dividends to the
governments. It has gone downhill, but is still better than the other
alternatives. Schenker (owned by Deutsche Bahn) is cheaper for parcels
but IMO rather less good. Usually the Post Office works reasonably well,
but just this week they appear to have lost a parcel from Germany which
was one of those signed-for things, which arrived while I was away and
supposed to have been sent to the local pick-up place. However they do
not know where it is. Very annoying. If it is lost they will pay for it,
but that takes time and I will have to order my stuff all over again.
/Jonas
So I decided to write a TU58 emulator for my 6809 SBC to serve "tapes"
>from an SD card. So far, I've only implemented a first version of the
read side. It seems to work on an XXDP image I found online.
However, when I try to boot an RT-11 tape image, I get:
@1000G?BOOT-W-Error reading handler
?BOOT-W-Error reading handler
...
?BOOT-W-Error reading handler
RT-11SJ V04.00A
?BOOT-W-Invalid or missing TT.SYS
?KMON-U-Overlay read error
.
.SHOW
?KMON-U-Overlay read error
Any ideas on what might be causing this? I've dug up the old rtpip
code and gotten it partially working in a more current environment,
and it seems to be happy with the tape images I have. I've had this
happen on two tape images. Also the original tapes from which these
images were made are ones that I've booted from (after I made the tape
images), albeit over 20 years ago. So it looks like either something
strange in my tape images or something in my emulator that works to
load the secondary boot, but fails for loading some other parts of the
tape.
BLS
I came across about 50 pieces of raised flooring today without (yet) any of
the other parts. The owner said to make an offer. It's been sitting
outside, four stacks on a pallet. I told him I didn't want it myself but
would try to find a home for it. I couldn't bend to look at it and no way
was I going to try to pick one up. I'm sure there are several people here
who know the weight.
I'm not sure of his zip, but mine is 61853 and he is within 25 miles or so.
Feel free to contact me off list if you are interested.
Thanks, Paul
I received my "Omnibus to USB" board for my PDP-8/E a while back, but a
heavy work load prevented me from trying it out until the last couple
of days.
Review of the "Omnibus to USB" board by Philipp Hachtmann:
----------------------------------------------------------
What it is:
A KL8E compatible board which runs at a "blinding" transfer
speed. Currently, it's primary use is to dump and restore RK05 packs on
a PDP-8/E/F/M to/from a PC.
Speed: Transferring an entire RK05 pack to a PC takes less than 51
seconds. With verify it takes 1 minute and 40 seconds. Restoring a pack
>from a PC image with or without verify to the RK05 takes the same amount
of time as dumping.
Will it work O.K. on a "loaded" system?:
In short, the answer is "yes". Here's the configuration of my test
PDP-8/E:
(1) KK8-E CPU
(1) KE8-E Extended arithmetic element
(1) KM8-E Memory extension and timeshare
(4) 8KW DEC Memory - total 32KW
(1) RK05 Disk Drive
(1) VC8/E X/Y -> VT01
(1) RX8-E Interface -> RX02
(1) MI8-EP Hardware bootstrap loader for RX01/RX02
(1) KL8E Async
(1) DK8-EC Crystal Real Time Clock
(1) Omnibus to USB
This system is at the max in terms of current draw for the H724 power
supply.
How difficult is it to use?
It's very easy to use. It comes pre-configured to use I/O addresses 40
and 41. (Switch changeable). All the software below is downloadable
>from Philipp's website.
To dump an RK05 pack here's the procedure:
Load the SPEED8.RIM program into the PDP-8/E using the standard RIM
loader. (Or use SPEED8.BIN via the standard OS/8 loader). Halt the
system and set the switch register to 200. Clear/Load/Run
On a PC running Linux, run "rktool" as follows:
To dump an RK05 disk with verify: rktool -r -V filename
To restore and RK05 disk with verify: rktool -w -V filename
You can dump/restore as many packs as you like as long as you leave
SPEED8 running in your 8/E/F/M.
Is there anything to watch out for?
1) It's important to set your Linux USB port properly with the
following:
"stty -F /dev/ttyUSBx raw -echo"
2) [Change from previous email] There was a minor glitch in the original
version of rktools. If you don't ask for a verify, you will get a large
weird number of verify errors indicated at the completion of the read
or write job. This is a false indication - the image is perfect.
I found that a single variable was not initialized - so I updated
"rktool" and now it works as expected. (I just sent the updated rktool
to Philipp).
Regards,
Lyle
--
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
I received my "Omnibus to USB" board for my PDP-8/E a while back, but a
heavy work load prevented me from trying it out until the last couple
of days.
Review of the "Omnibus to USB" board by Philipp Hachtmann:
----------------------------------------------------------
What it is:
A KL8E compatible board which runs at a "blinding" transfer
speed. Currently, it's primary use is to dump and restore RK05 packs on
a PDP-8/E/F/M to/from a PC.
Speed: Transferring an entire RK05 pack to a PC takes less than 51
seconds. With verify it takes 1 minute and 40 seconds. Restoring a pack
>from a PC image with or without verify to the RK05 takes the same amount
of time as dumping.
Will it work O.K. on a "loaded" system?:
In short, the answer is "yes". Here's the configuration of my test
PDP-8/E:
(1) KK8-E CPU
(1) KE8-E Extended arithmetic element
(1) KM8-E Memory extension and timeshare
(4) 8KW DEC Memory - total 32KW
(1) RK05 Disk Drive
(1) VC8/E X/Y -> VT01
(1) RX8-E Interface -> RX02
(1) MI8-EP Hardware bootstrap loader for RX01/RX02
(1) KL8E Async
(1) DK8-EC Crystal Real Time Clock
(1) Omnibus to USB
This system is at the max in terms of current draw for the H724 power
supply.
How difficult is it to use?
It's very easy to use. It comes pre-configured to use I/O addresses 40
and 41. (Switch changeable). All the software below is downloadable
>from Philipp's website.
To dump an RK05 pack here's the procedure:
Load the SPEED8.RIM program into the PDP-8/E using the standard RIM
loader. (Or use SPEED8.BIN via the standard OS/8 loader). Halt the
system and set the switch register to 200. Clear/Load/Run
On a PC running Linux, run "rktool" as follows:
To dump an RK05 disk with verify: rktool -r -V filename
To restore and RK05 disk with verify: rktool -w -V filename
You can dump/restore as many packs as you like as long as you leave
SPEED8 running in your 8/E/F/M.
Is there anything to watch out for?
1) It's important to set your Linux USB port properly with the
following:
"stty -F /dev/ttyUSBx raw -echo"
2) There's a minor glitch in the current version of rktools. If you
don't ask for a verify, you will get a large negative number of verify
errors indicated at the completion of the job. This is a false
indication - the image is perfect. My solution is to always verify
(-V). The board is so fast that there's no reason not to verify.
Regards,
Lyle
--
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:13:18 -0400, David Riley <fraveydank at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> Brazil isn't Italy! The postal service works (sort of) and it is not usual
>>> >>for mail and packages "vanish" from nothing
>> >
>> > You should see the postal service here. I had what is possibly the last
>> >remaining copy of some Forth documentation sent to me a few days ago. It
>> >arrived mangled, about 1/3 of the pages missing, with a note from the postal
>> >service telling me how much they care about the package, and that they're
>> >"sorry". Fucking assholes. I wish they'd just go out of business and be
>> >done with it. They've been limping along for years on gov't subsidies.
> Ugh. Was that the stuff mentioned recently on the list? If so, at least
> it got scanned first, but still. Ugh.
>
> It's a shame, really. The USPS used to be my preferred shipper, because
> they did the best job for the lowest price. Things have gotten REALLY
> bad in the past few years, especially where I live in Philadelphia; most
> of the carriers genuinely do not care. There are a few of them who don't
> even bother knocking when they come with a package and leave it on our
> doorstep on a BUSY CITY STREET. We've even had one rubber-band a package
> to the door handle. Someone tried to stuff a padded envelope full of
> 6502s into the slot in our mailbox and gave up halfway because it got
> stuck (I had to cut the package in half; fortunately, I could cut BETWEEN
> two of the chips).
>
> Most of the time I swear they don't even knock (I work from home, so I
> should be able to hear them knocking). One time a few weeks ago, we
> got a slip in our mailbox when we never heard a knock, and when my wife
> went to the post office the next day to pick it up, there was a line out
> the door (in a post office that's not usually even busy) full of people
> with the same story, all of whom had the same carrier who apparently
> hadn't even brought the packages back to the post office. We eventually
> got it the next day, but it was pretty much the last straw; I avoid USPS
> shipping altogether now if I can help it.
>
> We have one older carrier who always knocks loudly and waits more than 3
> seconds for an answer at the door and never leaves the package on the
> step. He's the ONLY ONE out of about 7 different carriers, and he's
> about to retire. What a shame.
>
> I wonder if people didn't grouse so much whenever postage went up with
> rising transit and administrative costs (and a drop in junk mail, which
> also subsidized the service) the system might be better. A few months
> ago, they were going to stop Saturday deliveries because no one would
> accept a hike in postage rates, but our Congress decided that that just
> wouldn't do and MANDATED that they continue Saturday delivery (without
> actually offering any more money to sustain it). It's such a broken
> system.
>
>
> - Dave
And yet everything (admittedly not an awful lot) I have had sent here to
Sweden by USPS has arrived quickly, at least as quickly as stuff from
Germany for instance, and in perfect condition...
/Jonas
----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:13:11 -0700
From: Christopher Satterfield <christopher1400 at gmail.com>
What I honestly find worse than the people that gut old gear to sell, are
the ones that buy it. If you were going to make a profit scrapping the
stuff off ebay, wouldn't those ebay sellers just go and scrap it or whatnot
themselves? Obviously you're buying into a bad deal.
----- Reply: -----
Ah, thanks for the heads-up!
Having had to scrap some S100 systems because no one was prepared to
pay the shipping, I thought I'd keep some of the cards and drives, etc. in
case someone needed them; I'd also have thought that offering that
calculator board (I happen to have one of those as well) on eBay was better
than throwing it in the trash.
But now that I know that buying and selling parts from gutted old gear are
'crimes', I'll throw them in the landfill first thing tomorrow morning
(after first using them for target practice of course). I certainly don't
want you, Dave, N0body H0me, etc. to think that I suck; bad enough to be
chastised by Dave for scrapping for parts some LA100s that I'd offered
several times with no takers.
m
For anybody that is interested. I am selling my Motorola M6800 evolution
kit II.
It is in perfect shape. When i say perfect, i mean it. It is UNOPENED since
1974, with no scratch. All the parts are there, nothing is missing.
Books/manuals are there also:
- M6800 Programming reference manual
- M6800 Microcomputer system design data
- MEK6800D2 microcomputer kit system expansion techniques
- MEK6800D2 evaluation kit II manual
Contact me for pictures and offers.
With regards,
Fedja
I am forwarding this request. Chris lives in Asheville, NC
Michael Holley
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Johansen <johansen at main.nc.us>
To: Michael Holley
Subject: SwTPc 6800 needs good home
Michael, recently found your website. I have a SwTPc 6800 that needs a good
home. Includes a "glass TTY" hobbyist terminal (no display). It was
working the last time it was plugged in (~35 years ago!).
It would be a shame to trash this piece of history. It is clear that I am
not going to do anything more with it. Can you put me in touch with someone
who would want it?
Hi Ethan -
Looking for Arvind. Known him since college!
Both his numbers are disconnected.
Any idea how to reach him?
Terry Easton
PS: I have a couple of PromIces, too, I think.... <gr>
I have two Xebec SCSI<->SMD bridges - and have been unable to find
documentation on them anywhere. There are no model numbers on the
boards, but from Google searches, it appears the model number may be
"Xebec S1490".
Anyone have any information on these "critters"?
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
I have two Xebec SCSI<->SMD bridges - and have been unable to find
documentation on them anywhere. There are no model numbers on the
boards, but from Google searches, it appears the model number may be
"Xebec S1490".
Anyone have any information on these "critters"?
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
Anyone here remember RangeLAN2?
Anyone have a Proxim RangeLAN2 7520 AP they'd like to sell?
None of this is exactly vintage yet, but certainly obsolete... :)
Thanks!
-Ben
All,
I've mentioned starting a museum before, and I'm getting the ball rolling, now.
https://www.facebook.com/IndianaComputerMuseum
I don't have 501c3 status, yet, but plan to by the end of July at the latest.
Can anyone identify the equipment this board came from, or the
company going from the style of part number? It's a baud rate
generator, or presumably is, given the "TTY" on the solder side. ~
10.7 MHz clock, 12-14 stage divider, late 1970's.
http://www3.telus.net/~bhilpert/tmp/brg/
Seemingly odd choice of clock frequency for a baud rate generator,
results in some error at the higher standard rates.
New scans have been posted at our document archive of the Interactive
Computer Systems OmniFORTH manuals, as well as those for its
predecessor, fig-FORTH:
http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing/InteractiveComput…http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing/ForthInterestGroup
Each time I do a scan, the original document is either stored, if I
find it to be of value, given away, if someone else does, or recycled,
if no one appears to mind. This one rides the edge of the first two
categories, so if anyone would like the original, FFS, let me know.
There is no content to be gained by having the original vs. the scan,
yet someone may still want the tactile (and nasal!) experience of 33
year old paper. Shipping will be from the 60070 ZIP.
-jht
--
silent700.blogspot.com
Retrocomputing and collecting in the Chicago area:
http://chiclassiccomp.org
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> It looks like I've found a home for it and some other stuff.
>
> Zane
>
> Great! Hate to see vintage gear wind up at the shredders.
Thanks,
- Earl
I meant to post this last night before the auctions went live, but I was
going to add some stuff and waited, forgetting I already had stuff going
live at 7pm. Only the Vax4000/300 is gone, but the rest here:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/tcp1022/m.html?item=251286765330&ssPageName=STRK%3A…
which include an Aviion m88k, Unibus expansion cabinets and other goodies.
at 7pm today 6/8 the 11/23+ and some other stuff goes up. All at buy it now
or best offer, for your instant gratification
If your a list member and making an offer, tell me just as you would when
you buy anything. I always throw in some good free stuff
Cheers
-tom P.
Hi Zane,
I'd hate to see this go in the dumpster. If nothing else, there are parts
inside (e.g., the Z80 and support chips, the Shugart 8" drive) that could
be useful.
If you don't get any takers, please let me know...
- Earl
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> Local Pickup Only
>
> It's missing the keyboard, and is untested. There are a bunch of 8"
> floppies, but no manuals.
>
> It needs a home ASAP, I don't want to see it dumped, but I also do not
> have room to bring it home.
>
> Zane
>
>
> --
> | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
> | healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
> | | Photographer |
> +-----------------------------**-----+------------------------**----+
> | My flickr Photostream |
> | http://www.flickr.com/photos/**33848088 at N03/<http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/> |
> | My Photography Website |
> | http://www.zanesphotography.**com<http://www.zanesphotography.com> |
>
>
I have some boards with gold fingers that match S100, but are obviously
not. For one, they're dated to 1973 and from Intel. Also, they're two
inches narrower and 1.5 inches taller than an S100 board. What are they?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
We're doing NetBSD and 80386 again? Evil cabal responsible for crimes
against computing again?
Jason Thorpe and others were talking about fundamental problems continuing
80386 support, what, almost a decade ago (no...the 80386 is not simply an
older 80486)? They announced the intention to drop support in 2007, and
dropped it in 2009. It was not a secret and it wasn't a smug "buy
bigger/faster/stronger" dictate; they still support VAX and a pack of
ridiculously obscure mc68k boxes, after all.
80386 support died because no one stepped up to support it, even though
proposals were made as to how to do that. Based on that, the core
developers made a decision about how to allocate scarce resources, and in 4
years the world has somehow failed to end. If a single person had stepped
forward to take on 80386 as a distinct port, it could still be in there.
It not like ns32k or mc88k, where getting things going means recreating
GCC support, figuring how to jump to ELF, etc. And yet, since 2009, no one
has picked up 80386, which pretty much tells you how really important it is
in the grand scheme of things.
KJ
Does anyone else who is reading this still use the DEC
SD: (Symbolic Debugger) under RT-11?
I have been spending some time, of late, becoming
more familiar with this software and I have noticed a
few areas which could use some improvements. This
post is in respect of version Y01.16 which runs under
the most recent versions of RT-11, and in particular
the SDHX.SYS variant which runs under a Mapped
RT-11 Monitor.
The two major aspects that could use some improvement
are to reduce the Low Memory required from 1124 words
to perhaps half that requirement. The second is a lack of
a history capability. Doing so will certainly require the use
of additional Extended Memory beyond the 8192 bytes
already in use and that is probably the major obstacle to
overcome. One other aspect that might possibly be changed
is the fact that the SDHX.SYS variant freezes RT-11 when
the user is at the DBG> prompt. While that is a major
problem, I don't know if there is a solution which would
allow the user to unfreeze the system and allow other jobs
to execute.
As for the Symbolic Debugger capabilities that are available
under RSX-11, in particular with respect to programs
with overlays which the DEC Symbolic Debugger under
RSX-11 is reported to posses - even before the overlay
is loaded, that may also be possible if there is sufficient
need under RT-11.
I would appreciate a response from anyone who still uses
SD: under RT-11, especially under a Mapped RT-11
Monitor and most definitely from anyone who uses the
version Y01.16 which DEC limits to certain versions of
RT-11, but which is capable of supporting debugging under
versions of RT-11 at least as far back as V05.03 of RT-11.
Jerome Fine
As long as we're talking about teaching & books/course materials, let me
pose the following query:
Does anyone have any good references for learning/using RT-11, RSX-11, and
RSTS (the principal PDP-11-based operating systems), beyond the various
online DEC-docs?
Absolutely not "for dummies" style books (were "for dummies" books yet been
invented in the 70's?), but neither simply a regurgitation of a DEC
reference-manual!
Thank you,
paul
Just for your amusement - and to help people who might once grep the list
archives to find the solution if they're as stupid as me...
I just carried a LA120 upstairs into my screenprinting/collection room. And I
wanted to test it because it had stayed many months on a pallet under a cloth.
After power on it just worked fine. And than the paper ran out. It made a lot of
sound with blinking and all that. So far... But when I power-cycled it - it
played dead. All LEDs on and all digits lit. I was kinda confused because the
digits are processor controlled. So it could not be completely dead. But why
didn't it complain and blink and just SAY something?!? Severe firmware
corruption? All voltages were there. No fuse blown. Nothing disconnected.
The manual helped me: If the cover is open or paper out on power-on, the LA120
will just play dead. Without any further complaints. Many of you out there might
know that. But I can imagine that there are some potential future victims of
this behaviour: You have been warend now :-)
Kind regards
Philipp
Anyone have archived CD's or ISOs of Debian Slink and Potato and Corel
Linux releases and sources...
I've got a pet project I want to start work on and I haven't been able to
work up. I had Corel Linux running pretty well on an old Pentium Thinkpad
with the modified KDE they included.
I'd like to look at rebuilding most of it with updated software and
security fixes, but I want to compare the Corel sources with the original
Debian and slowly upgrade the sources to more secure versions (I had
already done new ssh/ssl/glibc about five years ago).
I guess I'll stop at the later 2.4.x kernel revs, since they were much
better than the 2.2.
Bill
--
d|i|g|i|t|a|l had it THEN. Don't you wish you could still buy it now!
pechter-at-gmail.com
On Jun 9, 2013 9:05 AM, "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
>
> I've never seen any other books on RT-11, RSX-11M/M+, or RSTS/E that
weren't part of the doc set and were published.
This one is available on Amazon with **LOOK RARE** pricing, currently
around $120. I paid a lot less for a copy a while back. It seems as though
the sellers have an automated algorithm where if there is a low number of
copies currently listed and one sells from any seller then the remaining
copies at other sellers almost immediately get jacked up significantly in
price.
RSX: A Guide for Users (Paperback)
Publisher: Digital Press
Release date: January 1987
ISBN-10: 0137838611
ISBN-13: 978-0137838615
Hi Ethan:
I'd suggest a 3.x version of FreeBSD.
I recall from the day that a few megs of RAM will get you support for 10-20 simultaneous users. You can run all the usual servers and services. I used a 3.x box to teach an introductory UNIX class for a couple of years at a Vancouver-area technical college.
I can make you an ISO if the FreeBSD site doesn't have 3.x still available.
Kevin
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 01:38:58 -0400
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: What versions of Linux (or UNIX) are good on old 486 boxes?
Message-ID:
<CAALmimn9vrAuMHiuXZyyv6TZ6sNKBEot0JLbg1LUE9GbDcmqFQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi, All,
Going through stuff on the shelf and I've run across a couple of
486-based fully-integrated LCD/touchscreen machines. One is a SCAN
Corporation SCANtouch Model 3000, the other is a Planar Systems box.
Similarities include limited memory (2x 72-pin SIMM sockets on the
SCANtouch or 4x 30-pin SIMM sockets on the Planar, both with
"double-sided SIMM" support, so 64MB or 32MB max respectively), one
ISA socket (no PCI), onboard NE2000, serial, parallel, 2.5" PATA
disk... these systems will run MS-DOS, of course, and Win95 (the touch
screen on the SCANtouch is old enough that it apparently doesn't work
with Win98 mouse drivers, according to forum posts I dug up). I
really don't care about running DOS or Win95 on a touchscreen/LCD
machine, and the practical alternative is some flavor of Linux or
UNIX. What I'm having difficulty digging up is when the break from
low-mem/pre-Pentium systems happened and what distros are on which
side of the divide. RedHat 7/8/9 require a Pentium and 64MB minimum
>from what I can research/remember. The last time I ran Linux on a
486, it was Yggdrasil (and before that, some early form of Slackware
on a 386).
So... anyone have a "go-to" Linux distro for sticking on a 486? I
know RedHat 5.2 will work - that's what's on my PS/2-E (w/486SLC and
12MB of free mem I was recently discussing). Any other choices? At
one time, when a Dell P-133 Latitude laptop was my main machine, I ran
Solaris 7 on it (because it was a better choice than Linux at the
time) even though it still had some issues (and workarounds) with the
NeoMagic video chipset and the 3Com 3C589 PCMCIA NIC. I suspect this
is likely to have similar "challenges". I've dug up full specs on the
Scantouch 3000 innards - PCM-4890 integrated CPU board, NE2000
(Realtek RTL8019) Ethernet, C&T 65545 video chipset w/800x600 max LCD
resolution, Sharp LM10V33 VGA (640x480) 10.4" color LCD, VIA VT82C496G
chipset, , PC104 sockets... so I have little concern about getting
*something* working with it.
Getting 10-year-old RedHat working on a Pentium-class machine isn't a
real challenge, but it's been long enough since I've really fiddled
with 486s that specific memories of system configuration are getting a
bit fuzzy. At one time, over 15 years ago, it was a daily thing
knowing the ins and outs of what the 486 could and couldn't do, before
CPUs and memory and clock speeds took off like a rocket, and when 4MB
was ordinary, but more than 16MB was uncomfortably expensive for hobby
gear.
Helpful suggestions wanted.
Thanks,
-ethan
I've been working on getting shelving installed in our Garage, and as
a result, I've been digging back to some systems that have been
buried. Right now I'm moving a bunch of Sun hardware and it hit me.
What good are old UNIX systems? I'm curious, what are people using
things like Sparc 2's through 20's for? Or even Ultra 60's and
older? Part of the problem I'm looking at is that you can get
something like a Raspberry Pi that will cost a fraction of what a Sun
system costs to run.
I won't ask this about my two SGI O2's, as they're artwork.
BTW, I'll be honest, I'm actually using two Sparc 20's right now.
Each one sits on top of two Record Crates, and acts as a speaker
stand. They've filled that role for several years. Somehow though,
furniture and artworks really aren't the uses I'm looking for. :-)
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ |
| My Photography Website |
| http://www.zanesphotography.com |
Sirs,
I'm looking for the "SCSI Bus & IDE Interface, protocols, Applications &
Programming" book. Tried to buy it on amazon, and there are books from 0,01
(!!!) plus 3.99 shipping. Is there something a brazilian isn't used to, or
this book used is SO cheap?
Anyone has one around willing to sell for a fair price?
Thanks
Alexandre
---
Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
Meu site: http://www.tabalabs.com.br
Local Pickup Only
It's missing the keyboard, and is untested. There are a bunch of 8"
floppies, but no manuals.
It needs a home ASAP, I don't want to see it dumped, but I also do
not have room to bring it home.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ |
| My Photography Website |
| http://www.zanesphotography.com |
Hi
There is a discussion group for the S2I project here
http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem-s2i
I apologize for not including it in the earlier message.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 10:41:29 -0700 (PDT), Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
wrote:
>>>> > >>THIS MESSAGE IS PROTECTED BY THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT, 18
>>>> > >>U.S.C. ?? 2510 ET SEQ. THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OR
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
>> >No idea. I didn't even know about this act...I think I should have.
> Why?
> Legal citations in email signatures are not likely to have any voracity.
I should hope not. I would hate to be eaten by a mail signature.
/Jonas
I am still looking for a "horse's mouth" reference, but it seems HP has
just given the VMS community the finger.
"Ric Lewis at HP sent out a letter basically saying VMS is dead.
Support up through 2020, but 2016 is the last sale of VMS-
supported hardware."
Now, of course, "will only be sold for 2.5 more years and will only be
supported for 6.5" doesn't exactly say "dead" to me; it says "WILL EVENTUALLY
BE dead", but still, this does kinda suck. But it's awesome that it lasted
this long. From 1978 until 2020 is a great run in this industry, one for the
history books. And I'll be running it, God willing, well after that. (if I'm
still breathing!)
(Now we get to watch all the stupid suits who equate "no longer sold" with
"doesn't work anymore". Heh.)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA