Hello, Tony,
Thanks for the reply.
In reply to Tony Duell ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk, Sun Jun 16 15:49:53 CDT 2013
> > I'm trying to free up slots in my PDP-11, so I'm looking to remove the DL11's I'm using
> > and want to replace them with a single 20ma DZ11. Does anyone have a DZ1
>
> Firstly, I am probably telling you what you already know, but the DZ11
> and DL11 are totally different in software. If you are doing anything out
> of the ordinary and have sustom drivers you ahve a lot of work ahead.
Of course it requires a different device driver. ?
> > 1 20ma
> > dist panel they'd part with?
>
> Soecondly, IIRC the disptribution panel is essentially just connectors. I
> have a few of the even older DJ11 muxes and a couple of the distirbution
> panels were home-made. Berg conenctors on a bit of square pad board with
> wire-swap wire goign off to what we call 'chocolate blocks' [1]. Looks a
> right msess, but apprently it was used at a university to conenct up
> ASR33s for many years with no problems.
>
> [1] Does that term mean anything to you? It's a common term over here for
> thos plastich screw terminal blocks Modern ones are norally white,
> flexible plastic (nylon?) the very old ones were a brown brittle themoset
> plastic, hence the name.
I know them as Terminal Blocks.? The intention here is to connect
Teletype Model 33s as well.
> Given that the current loop signals are pretty low speed, you would
> almost certainly get away with taking a length of ribbon cable, putting a
> BERG socket on one end, splitting the other end into individual wires and
> puttign them on screw terminals.
>
> -tony
I'm specifically looking for the DEC distribution panel at this time, but
thanks for the suggestion though.
Regards,
-scott
Second posting since for some reason the first posting apparently didn't
make it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Gardner [mailto:tom94022 at comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 10:07 AM
To: 'cctalk at classiccmp.org'
Subject: RE: Early UNIX File Optimization
I have a vague recollection that early time sharing systems, in particular
UNIX, enforced I/O fairness by fragmenting files and thereby freeing the I/O
between fragments. However I don't recall much and this might be an
artifact of aging :-)
If so, I am curious as to how this was implemented - interleaving sectors or
some more complex physical fragmentation or ??
Anyone point me to any references?
Tom
At 16:49 -0500 6/19/13, Fred wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
> > I was quite confused when I read "adjustable spammers". ;)
>
>Find them, and we will adjust them.
Grumpy ol' Fred for President. I'll vote as many times as it takes.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
S
Sent from my HTC
----- Reply message -----
From: "Mark Martin" <storycrafter at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Yellowed/Cosmetically Damaged Apple IIGS Monitors $20 dollars each plus shipping
Date: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 9:50 pm
Whereabouts do you live? Offering local pickup?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Steven Landon <slandon110 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Got about 15 Apple IIGS Monitors that are yellowed and or lightly
> scratched. 15khz sync, Good for Amigas, Ataris, and Apple IIGS's
>
> $20 dollars each plus shipping via USPS Parcel Post
>
> Trying to empty the storage unit of these things
>
My brothers company is a specialty shop that does IT related services
(mostly custom development work) for small to mid-sized manufacturing
companies (bro is an industrial engineer by training...he speaks the
language). He periodically pings me because a client has something outside
of his core competency and he want's me to take a look and see if someone
in my network can help out. Sometimes it's a PDP-8 (or several) running an
industrial loom, or a DG Nova controlling a CNC machine the size of a bus,
or some ancient IBM thing cranking out invoices/schedules/statistics in the
back room. Or an industrial grade PC (8088 vintage) running a DOS app and
custom A/D-D/A hardware where all the menus and doco were in Italian
controlling a fabric dyeing machine about the size and shape of a Soyuz (I
got the call on this one because I can passably read Italian, not because
of a technical value add). There's a cadre of folks I can count on to help
out and never fail to miracle the odd replacement part or bit of code to
keep things going (for a price, of course).
There will absolutely be shops running things much older than a PDP-11 in
2050.
I have a vague recollection that early time sharing systems, in particular
UNIX, enforced I/O fairness by fragmenting files and thereby freeing the I/O
between fragments. However I don't recall much and this might be an
artifact of aging :-)
If so, I am curious as to how this was implemented - interleaving sectors or
some more complex physical fragmentation or ??
Anyone point me to any references?
Tom
PS: as in infrequent poster I am happy to make a small change to the
statistics
I'm working through repairing a Tektronix 31 calculator for my dad (late
father's day gift...). It seems to mostly be working now but all of the
display panels except for two are dead (as I understand is pretty
typical). The display consists of two SP-333s and four SP-332s. I've
found a source for the SP-332s (2digit 7-segment displays) but can't
find much for the SP-333s (3digit 7-segment display).
Here's the specs:
http://www.tube-tester.com/sites/nixie/data/SP-333/sp-333.htm
Found a couple of "request a quote!" type listings on the 'net but
that's about it.
I need two of these beasts to get things visible again...
Thanks in advance,
Josh
I've gotten tickets to an upcoming one of these, and besides a couple of
items which fit their profile, am thinking of taking at least a small
board or so to see what that does with their appraisers.
anyone have any experience with them. This is the US mob. I'd never
consider doing it with the UK ones. they want stuff from the 19th
century or before, or WW2, etc.
I am taking a sextant and a platinum broach. I have what I think is a
Dec trainer board I'm going to take. i doubt taking any minis would be
more interesting than the dec trainer. If they don't know that is a bit
rare, then anything else they would say about other items would probably
be useless.
I'd like to see more scientific and computer, calculators, etc., on the
show instead of the crap they sometimes have. Seems like everyone has a
Tiffany lamp, or a bit of scrimshaw to show (fake and plastic,
respectively). I was advised in an email that oddball stuff had shorter
waits.
Only guarantee is to get into the filming room where the appraisers are,
and get stuff appraised.
Will report back if there is anything useful that happens.
Jim
Got about 15 Apple IIGS Monitors that are yellowed and or lightly
scratched. 15khz sync, Good for Amigas, Ataris, and Apple IIGS's
$20 dollars each plus shipping via USPS Parcel Post
Trying to empty the storage unit of these things
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:39:32 -0700
> From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com>
Since we're 'comrades-in-arms' I was especially hoping to be able to help
you out, but alas, although I have some NOS .55" 5-series displays the only
.33" 3-series I have are the two-digit SP332s that you already have; I
assume you don't need any more?
Why not check out the various places that advertise having SP-333s; can't
hurt to ask for a quote...
I believe Heathkit also used these, although I don't remember which
size/type; might be worth inquiring on one of those lists.
mike
If you can pick up large old antique machines, instead of having them
scrapped, and can offer to pay something for them, please let me know.
We have another recycler onboard.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
(830)792-3400 phone (830)792-3404 fax
AOL IM elcpls
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3199/6423 - Release Date: 06/19/13
Can anyone send me a copy of TBOOT and standalone FIXUP for late
versions of AOS/VS for the MV DC series - ideally 7.71 or 7.70?
My MV/2500 is now loading its microcode OK and passing diagnostics, but
the system disk is corrupted so I can go no further until I either
locate a copy of the System Media or at least the above two programs.
Steve
--
/Stephen Merrony
Email: steve at stephenmerrony.co.uk
http://www.stephenmerrony.co.ukhttp://stephen.homedns.org/dg/
I was Googling for information on the control codes for an old
CalComp 1042 PCI roll plotter we have tucked away and found your 2007
message about possessing a copy of the technical manual with, I think,
the command set for plotters like this. Do you still have the data and
would you be willing to share it with me? Cheers.
Chuck (I think) mentioned that he had never seen a proper specification of the RS232 (or whatever) signals.
I think CCITT standard V.28 is much the same thing, and it can be found at :
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tbr/001_099/002/01_20_63/tbr_002e01c.pdf
It certainly seems to have reasonable descriptions of the signal electrical characteristics.
-tony
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
> Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
>> Does it look like this?
>>
>> http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/still-image/DEC/PDP-8-
>> S/dec_pdp-8-s.display_of_pdp8s.102630596.lg.jpg
>>
>> That is supposed to be an 8/s. Could it be that the first(prototype?)
>> 8/s where put in an Straigh-8 chassi?
>
> Slightly off the subject, I notice that the chad bin on the ASR33 in
> that photo is opaque. I've never seen (or at least noticed) one like
> that before. Does anybody have one?
That one might be a metal chad bin. I have one for my ASR33. Part
number is 182924 for the metal bin, 182965 for the later clear plastic
bin.
Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
Old Technology http://sturgeon.css.psu.edu/~mloewen/Oldtech/
As far as I can remember, every straight 8 I've seen in the wild and
almost every picture I've seen has the dark plexiglass panel with the
paddle switches similar to those on the 11/20. However, I have a copy
of the user's manual dated 12/64, and the picture of the machine on
Page viii has what appears to be a simple brushed aluminum panel with
little light bulb covers sticking through it and the switch register
switches are all ordinary mini toggle switches.
So my question is were there any ever shipped with that style of front
panel, or was that picture of a prototype that was revised before any
shipped?
BLS
I snagged this record off eBay because I knew it had to at least be
interesting... thought you all might get a kick out of it:
http://yahozna.dyndns.org/scratch/softwaresounds/
(mp3 and raw wav available)
It's entitled:'Software Sounds - "Music for the Computer Professional"'
and is apparently the creation of a man named Laz Bouros (who apparently
never made it as a rock star but is today an Executive Consultant, if
the Internet is leading me true). There's no date anywhere on it, but
it has to be from the early-mid 80s.
It came with a small pamphlet describing the both the record and the
record label, which I will transcribe for you:
------
The Company:
Software Sounds is an independent Canadian record company dedicated to
developing a new market in the record industry through the use of an
innovative musical product.
The Market:
The millions of computer professionals who operate, program, design, and
manage computer systems throughout Canada and the U.S. provide a dynamic
yet untapped market for the music industry.
The Products:
"Computer Songs", in a soft rock format, with lyrics that capture the
human struggle as well as the lighter side of the computer world, are
the new musical products.
The Writer:
Laz Bouros, a computer consultant and composer, has spent many years
working in the computer environment and has written many songs on a
variety of themes.
-------
Alas, music for "the millions of computer professionals" never caught
on, perhaps it couldn't compete with Devo andKraftwerk?
- Josh
>
> From: Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
> To: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:02:03 -0600
> Subject: Re: Sun-2 docs available
>
> In article <CA+oaVqyDjkS5P=7fXYymHHpvq=
> ZciuzMsV_E-n8AXrqMo90jOw at mail.gmail.com>,
> James Carpenter <jim at deitygraveyard.com> writes:
>
> > This will be useful to me. I have a (nearly) fully functional 2/120.
> > However, I have very little documentation, especially for the
> > hardware. Need anything I can get.
>
I have a fully functional 2/120 and disk tower, with a 2/50 client.
I would be happy to help with any issues that your system might have.
https://sites.google.com/site/mthompsonorg/Home/sun-microsystems/sun-2
> --
> Michael Thompson
> >
> > The part of RS-232C I _really like_ is the impedance spec, the part
> > that says that any pins or combinations of pins may be shorted to one
> > another or to any voltage source within, I think, the valid RS-232C
> > voltage range (-15V to +15V or some such - I forget the exact limits),
> > with the shorts maintained indefinitely, without damage.
> >
I have to agree with the above.
> > I also like the splitting of protective ground and signal ground.
> > You'd almost think it had actually been designed by competent
> > electronics engineers or somethin'....
On the other hand, I regard protective ground as something that seemed like
a good idea at the time but what protection it would provide and how did not
seem to be adequately thought out until much later versions of the standard,
if at all.
When making up an serial cable, I usually leave it out, not out of laziness
but because I think I'm probably as well or better off without it.
(at least that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!)
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:34:35 -0800
> From: N0body H0me <n0body.h0me at inbox.com>
> This hobby gave me a peaceful, easy feeling in those days (to borrow
> a line from the Eagles). Folks were always eager to help, always
> willing to lend a hand (and maybe a tape image or two), and we'd
> have a good laugh while we were at it.
>
> We loved our machines, and we loved to expend the effort just to
> make them 'go' and talk about how we did it. That's what our hobby
> (and this mailing list) was really all about.
>
> I'm not saying that the above isn't true anymore: I'm simply saying
> that the mood and character of our hobby has changed over the years,
> and that there are folks who used to have alot of interesting stuff
> to say, are now silent.
Well, if you check out some of the other classic computer lists I think
you'll find that the above environment is still very much alive and you'll
find some of those 'silent' folks over there instead, as I'm sure some folks
on here who also belong to those other lists can confirm; the day rarely
goes by when Chuck doesn't help someone with advice, an uploaded file or
two, even on occasion a small custom program over on Erik's Vintage Computer
List, and there are many, many other people helping each other out, trading
parts, building new add-ons, sharing experiences etc., there and on other
lists like the Cromemco list, Club100 (R-S), CBM-Hackers, etc. etc.
Sure there are more 'collectors' these days who are interested in $$s, but I
think that's really almost a separate issue altogether and I don't see much
of that on CCtalk anyway.
I'd say that it's not so much the hobby that's changed, but the mood and
character of this list, or perhaps it's only remained the same while others
(especially the VCF) have sprung up where newcomers are warmly welcomed,
birthday greetings are exchanged, 'PeeCees' and Microsoft products and users
are not disparaged or insulted, nobody quibbles over top vs. bottom-posting,
name-calling is discouraged, and for the most part people talk about classic
computer issues. As I said, you'll find some of the folks who are now
'silent' here hanging out over there instead, not to mention those folks who
are on several lists in addition to this one and generally much more active
on the other lists; even Gene tends to be much nicer on the VCF ;-)...
I have talked to several people who thought it would be useful to join
CCtalk, but after reading through a few days' worth of traffic decided it
would be a waste of time...
That's really my point when I climb up on my soapbox...
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
...
> Youse guys will hijack ANY thread!
> The original post in this thread was a perfectly normal
> off-topic/meta-topic rant about what we argue about, and
> you have moved it COMPLETELY back into classic computers!
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
> (#2, but I s'pose I could try harder to be the most prolific & offensive)
Now THAT's the spirit!!! I'm rootin' for ya!
;-)
According to the data I have (from my DEC PSE days) - 15-12782-00 was a
BUY69A
http://www.digikey.com/product-search/en?x=11&y=17&lang=en&site=us&KeyWo
rds=BUY69A
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brian Knittel
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 7:19 PM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Decwriter power supply transistors R3004
Hi all,
The LA-120 Decwriter that I got off Craigslist a couple of weeks ago has
a dead H7150 power supply. Transistors Q1 and Q2 are open and shorted,
respectively, and fusible resistor R4 is open. I'd guess that failure of
Q2 led to the other two parts going.
Q1 and Q2 are high voltage NPN power transistors in TO-3 cans, labeled
__
81 [ti logo] 41 (or maybe 4I but I'm guessing for a date
code, 41)
R3004
BRITAIN
DEC part number appears to be 15-12782-00. The printset identifies them
as "NPN 100W S1325 15". I can't find any substitution info online. There
is a NOS pair for sale on eBay. So that's one option. Does anyone know
what the modern equivalent(s) are? And what if you do, where did you
find the reference?
Thanks,
Brian
This is evidently the connector on the Kaypro keyboard:
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/TM1R-616P44-35S-150M/H11390-ND/113…
Well, close to it, anyway. The original seems to be a Berg 616p
And yes, it's erroneous to call it an RJ9, but it's easier to find in
the store if you go that route.
Before I go plunk down $7.10/connector for 5 connectors (mouser has a
bit cheaper price, but their pic is wrong), anyone have a source that's
not so steep ($36.00)?
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at jbrain.comwww.jbrain.com
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:22:28 -0400
> Subject: Re: Five PDP-11 Questions
> On 16 June 2013 21:35, Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> wrote:
> > I've used 28 or 30. 30 is more common, 28 doesn't break as easily.
> >
>
> Thanks, I'll be sure to remember that! I need to buy a wrap tool, and
> I wanted to know what the "correct" size is.
>
30 AWG is for modern wire-wrap. 24 AWG is for older systems and controllers
like the Classic PDP-8, PDP-9, TC01, TC02, TC58, and TC59.
> Michael Thompson
Hi all,
The LA-120 Decwriter that I got off Craigslist a couple of weeks ago has a dead H7150 power supply. Transistors Q1 and Q2 are open and shorted, respectively, and fusible resistor R4 is open. I'd guess that failure of Q2 led to the other two parts going.
Q1 and Q2 are high voltage NPN power transistors in TO-3 cans, labeled
__
81 [ti logo] 41 (or maybe 4I but I'm guessing for a date code, 41)
R3004
BRITAIN
DEC part number appears to be 15-12782-00. The printset identifies them as "NPN 100W S1325 15". I can't find any substitution info online. There is a NOS pair for sale on eBay. So that's one option. Does anyone know what the modern equivalent(s) are? And what if you do, where did you find the reference?
Thanks,
Brian
This was just posted to the rescue list and I am not sure it has been
mentioned here before but, they have a nice Cray setup If someone is
around to turn on the lights for you anyway. Some actual museum should
try and grab this gear.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shatle/sets/72157634133969978/
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:57:22 -0400
> From: Dave Woyciesjes <woyciesjes at sbcglobal.net>
> Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
>>I'll be back when my stress level drops a bit, or when the jerks leave,
>>and when there's something to talk about.
> I, for one, will miss your input. Come back soon.
I wouldn't worry; I don't think he'll be gone long ;-)
For the record, despite his intolerance I like Dave (and have expressed that
privately), appreciate the contributions he makes to the list and the hobby,
and even enjoy following many of the OT threads on this list and the insight
they give into different peoples' attitudes and perceptions in this
particular niche of social networking (at least until they become utterly
boring and repetitive and/or downright nasty).
It's unfortunate that my coming to the defence of people like myself who
apparently "suck" and posting those *amusing* statistics and congratulating
him on being the clear winner in the post sweepstakes (emphasis on
'amusing') was seen by him and others as an "attack" and just provoked
insults and counterattacks, with Dave taking his ball and sulking in the
corner.
But if it results in fewer banal, confrontational and same-old-same-old
posts on the list and less stress for Dave and more time to spend on his
more pressing matters, then that's a good result all around.
Meanwhile, let's all lighten up.
> The printset identifies them as "NPN 100W S1325 15".
Aha - SI = Silicon, and so on. I vaguely remember that thread now.
> So I guess you're looking for a silicon NPN transistor with 100W
> max power dissipation, a Vceo of 325V or better, and an hFE about
> 15 (and the right pinout!). Tony or one of the other PSU gurus can
> probably suggest something that'll do the job?
Likely candidates might be (from parametric search on newark.com):
BUX80, BUY69A, 2N6308, 2N6547, then.
Anyone know of any contraindications for any of these?
I'll see what Al Lasher's Electronics in Berkeley has on hand before I
shop the interwebs.
I picked up a pair of later-model TI-1500 workstations (a 1505 and 1507)
nearly a year ago, and I meant to post these photos at the time but
never gotaround to it. Was reminded of them while cleaning up some old
photos on my camera. Just in case anyone's curious, here's what the
inside of one of these looks like.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/117997069161125071032/albums/58902360564…
If anyone wants more detailed photos, let me know and I'll see what I
can do.
(Still searchingfor software...)
- Josh
Hi --
Since this is the ccTALK list, and I can therefore post about whatever I
want (per Dave), Iwas wondering what kind of underwear y'all prefer?
Personally, I prefer tighty-whiteys, but I'm afraid they might not be
trendy enough.
Thanks,
Jsoh
The jerk factor on this list has become so high of late, and the clue
factor so low, that I will take a respite for a bit.
It seems I can no longer resist the attempts by jerks to get a rise out of
me. Actually, I should say the "rise-able" people here in general, as I
don't feel singled out, except by Mike Stein this morning...I'm just a bit
more "rise-able" than I should be. But either way, for that I apologize.
I'll be back when my stress level drops a bit, or when the jerks leave, and
when there's something to talk about.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:54:53 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
>> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, MikeS wrote:
...
>> It just seems that seven or eight people have 'taken over' the list as a
>> forum for their often lengthy and OT opinions and arguments, while I see
>> familiar people with much to contribute leaving and appearing on other
>> lists instead and citing the above 'noise' as the reason (not to mention
>> the folks still here begging them to keep it down and on topic).
>>
>> A shame IMO.
>
> Oh no you don't.
>
> I've been here long enough to have witnessed first hand that no matter
> -what- computer-related topic comes up, /someone/ on the list is going to
> take offense to the topic under discussion.
----- Reply: -----
I don't know where you get the idea that I (and Josh) are *offended* by
anything; the only person who seems to be offended is Dave...
Being called a moron and a jerk and being told that I suck because I don't
see anything necessarily wrong with scrapping a system for parts could
certainly be considered rude and offensive, but that really just reflects on
the name-callers' character and maturity.
There's no question that pretty well everyone on this list has things to
contribute, including and sometimes especially Dave and the above-mentioned
high posters; what I (and, I think, Josh) are suggesting is that the noise
level gets pretty high sometimes and that perhaps the relatively few people
creating most of the noise might take a moment to think whether that
opinion, argument, whatever, is really worth the bandwidth and time to post,
not to mention the replies that it will provoke.
But predictably, it's just like asking the neighbours to please keep the
noise down a bit; the usual reply is a hostile "go f$%k yourself" and the
noise gets cranked up even more.
I still think that it's a shame when the noise drives valuable people to
other, friendlier, lists with higher S/N ratios; they don't seem to be
missed by anyone else here and I'm on those lists as well, so no problem I
guess.
IMO, other than for HP and DEC issues CCtalk is becoming less and less
relevant to many members of the community, but perhaps that's as it should
be...
So, no, I'm not offended; I'm also subscribed to CCtech so I can choose to
just read the 'edited' version, or even unsubscribe altogether if I do get
too annoyed or even "offended."
Back to our regular programming...
m
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:30:40 +0200
> From: Pontus <pontus at update.uu.se>
> MikeS: You seem to have quite a bit of time yourself, counting all those
> mail....
Well, yes I did (it was a Saturday), but it didn't take very long, even on a
486 running DOS; I was curious, it was a fun quickie program to write and I
thought maybe someone else on the list would be amused as I was;
unfortunately, and perhaps predictably, Dave was not amused by being the #1
poster and saw it as an "attack" instead.
Year to date is even more impressive: 513 posts with the third place entry a
paltry 285; surprisingly, Fred is #2 with 335, but his are usually short and
funny.
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:44:13 -0400
> From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
> I'll be back when my stress level drops a bit, or when the jerks leave,
> and
> when there's something to talk about.
You're only going to post when there's actually something to talk about ???
Who could ask for more! ;-)
Definitely, get that stress level down; it's bad for your health!
Best wishes,
m
*also* meant toshare these. Scanned in all of the boards in my Imlac
PDS-1D for reference purposes, since there are very few of these out
there (and schematics, but no PCB layouts.)
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/117997069161125071032/albums/58762337385…
I have high-res(600 dpi) scans if anyone wants them. Sure, it's
overkill but why not...
- Josh
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:20:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
> I don't consider time spent discussing the hobby to be wasted. If you do,
> as your wording seems to imply, I have to wonder, why are you here?
For the occasional post that is actually related to 'Classic Computers', as
opposed to the endless kvetching about (other) people, 'PeeCees', M$ etc.,
recurring intolerant arguments about the 'best' way to do anything, vanity
posts from folks who think we're interested in their opinions about just
about everything, etc.
It just seems that seven or eight people have 'taken over' the list as a
forum for their often lengthy and OT opinions and arguments, while I see
familiar people with much to contribute leaving and appearing on other lists
instead and citing the above 'noise' as the reason (not to mention the folks
still here begging them to keep it down and on topic).
A shame IMO.
m
I am the original owner of a Tally 2000 line printer that is free for
pickup in the Baltimore, MD (USA) area. The printer has a 128 character
set, a parallel differential interface, and was in regular use with an HP
1000 minicomputer from 1977 until it was decommissioned in 1994. Since
then, it has been stored in a heated and air conditioned office pending
refurbishing, which I no longer have the time to perform. At
decommissioning, the printer was operational but was beginning to
substitute characters, probably due to an error in the logic of one of the
character data lines. The HP 2607 was a rebadged Tally 2000.
The printer is complete with a stand, wire paper basket, and operator and
service manuals. Weight is approximately 150 pounds. Due to an office
move, it must go by June 29th or it will be scrapped.
The operator's manual is online here:
http://www.hpmuseum.net/document.php?hwfile=4090
I'd prefer to see it go to a good home rather than being pushed off our
dock into the dumpster. If you're interested in picking this unit up,
please contact me at <jdbryan at acm.org>.
-- Dave
I'm trying to add XT KB support to a project here, and I am having
trouble sorting out a few scan codes. A response over at the VC Forum
notes I should grab these two references, so I am wondering if anyone
has a link or soft copy.
I created my PS2/XT mapping using this matrix:
http://ilkerf.tripod.com/c64tower/F_Keyboard_FAQ.html#KEYBOARDFAQ_037
And that matches up with ChukG's AT2XT project, except for '\' (the link
has it as decimal 29, Chuck's project has it at 42, and he has 0x61 PS/2
code mapped to decimal 45 XT code. I don't know either of those codes.
But, that mapping does not match up with most of the maps on the net.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at jbrain.comwww.jbrain.com
Hi all,
The LA-120 Decwriter that I got off Craigslist a couple of weeks ago
has a dead H7150 power supply. Transistors Q1 and Q2 are open and
shorted, respectively, and fusible resistor R4 is open. I'd guess that
the failure of Q2 took out the other two parts.
Q1 and Q2 are high voltage NPN power transistors in TO-3 cans, labeled
__
81 [ti logo] 41 (or maybe 4I, no matter, it's a date code)
R3004
BRITAIN
The DEC part number is 15-12782-00. The printset identifies them as
"NPN 100W S1325 15". I can't find any substitutions online for either
R3004 or S1325. (Or 15-12782-00 for that matter).
There is a NOS pair for sale on eBay. So that's one option. Does anyone
know what the modern equivalent(s) are? And what if you do, where did
you find the reference?
Thanks,
Brian
I have a PC used (or at least intended) for floppy transfers, which has
a hard drive booting MS-DOS 6.22, with an 80-track 5.25" drive and a
3.5" drive connected to a WDAT-240 controller. It has the MS-DOS
network stuff installed so I can connect to a shared network drive.
It's also got a CDROM drive on its second IDE bus, and the corresponding
lines for the driver and MSCDEX are in CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT.
Most of the drivers etc are loaded in high memory (I ran MEMMAKER in the
dim and distant past).
At the moment, those two lines are commented out because if they're not,
the floppies don't work properly. Has anyone got any idea why? The
CDROM works fine if I uncomment those lines (but the floppies don't) and
network shares work fine either way.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
----- Original Message -----
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:30:25 -0400
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
> But like I said, I type fast. Nine seconds on this one. And you know
> what? I'll make my money anyway.
> Will you?
I'm doing OK; *you're* the one who doesn't have an extra $200 to spare or
you'd "have scored that auction in a heartbeat"...
Sorry to hear it, really; hope you manage to put a little aside for the next
time.
> Moron.
Ah, the usual name-calling... you are predictable, I'll say that; even funny
sometimes ;-).
'nuff said; have a nice weekend!
m
Well, I for one enjoy that you consistently add value, so don't drop off for too long.
Also, while you're off the main list, don't forget about that 3B2, and let me know if you catch wind of a 3290... :) hehe.
Thanks much, as always!
-Ben
________________________________________
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] on behalf of Dave McGuire [mcguire at neurotica.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:44 PM
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Dropping offline for a bit.
The jerk factor on this list has become so high of late, and the clue
factor so low, that I will take a respite for a bit.
It seems I can no longer resist the attempts by jerks to get a rise out of
me. Actually, I should say the "rise-able" people here in general, as I
don't feel singled out, except by Mike Stein this morning...I'm just a bit
more "rise-able" than I should be. But either way, for that I apologize.
I'll be back when my stress level drops a bit, or when the jerks leave, and
when there's something to talk about.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I was curious...
Out of 143 people who posted to the list in the first half of June, 116
posted 5 times or less.
On the other hand, only 9 people (and we know who they are ;-) are
responsible for half (462) of the total 923 posts, with Dave easily the
winner...
Must be nice to have so much time to waste...
There are a number of problems with describing scancodes unambiguously,
particularly when it comes to the backslash. Depending on the layout, it
could be found at:
Scancode in set | 1 | 2 | 3 |
--------------------------------------------------+----+----+----+
* The key above "Tab" | 29 | 0E | 0E |
* The key between "=" and "Backspace" | 7D | 6A | 5D |
* The key below "Backspace" and above "Return" | 2B | 5D | 5C |
* The key to the left of "Return" | 2B | 5D | 53 |
* The key between "Left Shift" and "Z" | 56 | 61 | 13 |
--------------------------------------------------+----+----+----+
An 84-key AT keyboard will return the Set 3 codes for these positions.
--
John Elliott
----- Original Message ----- >
> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:10:47 -0500
> From: John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com>
> If it's difficult to ship the larger item, and easy to disassemble,
> and there's a market for the parts, and it's easier to ship the parts,
> and you have too much time on your hands and don't value your time,
> then why not part it out? You can tell someone you got a sum total
> of $300 for all the pieces when they assured you you'd only get $100
> for the original.
Of course.
Unless it's a 'real' classic like the Apple I, most of the time just a few
parts will sell more easily and for more money than the system they came out
of, especially with today's shipping costs and hassle, so from a financial
perspective it makes a lot of sense to part out.
Even from the hobbyist perspective it make sense to make parts available;
often scrapping one machine will yield the parts to get three or four other
machines running again.
And of course the very people who condemn folks for breaking systems down
for parts are often the first to snap up those parts when they need them...
m