Well, I need some help.
I got an ICL Quattro PC
I repaired the PSU.
It powers up, the HD spins and seems to load something.
Then no led activity, may be it's waiting for user input.
I have no ICL terminals.
I tried to connect with a straight serial cable and a terminal emulator,
9600, 8,N,1
No answer in either port.
Tried also a null modem cable. Same stuff.
The DB25 ports have a female connector, so I tried a straight cable,
first.
The straight cable shows some random and spurious characters.
But there's also a DB15 female port.
Do you know how to connect to this old beast?
I'm getting no answer just because the Quattro is not working or I'm
wrong somehow?
Thanks!
--
Vincenzo (aka Supervinx)
--==ooOoo==--
My computer collection:
http://www.supervinx.com/Retrocomputer
--==ooOoo==--
You can reach me at:
www.supervinx.comwww.facebook.com/supervinxhttp://www.youtube.com/user/supervinxhttp://www.myspace.com/supervinx
On Mon Jan 26 21:42:02 CST 2015, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
> I initially had, but mysteriously lost the console emulator/ODT
> functionality, seems it's starting at 165000 instead of 165200 at poweron.
> Maybe a 9312 switch mis-set... So I'm booting from the panel by calling
> the address of the ODT or the rl02 boot rom, which does the trick.
I think it's supposed to be at 165020.
Check switch-pack 1, and make sure that 7 is On.
I think the default for the switch-pack is:
1, 2, and 7 = On. Everything else = Off.
T
This has been floating around here for ages, and figured I should scan &
share it out before it's lost for good. It's two JPEGs inside a ZIP
archive; I was too lazy to merge them into a single image.
IBM Hardware & Software Price List - March 8th, 1983
Tried sending this to the list as an attachment, but it was too large. You
can download it here:
http://nerp.net/~legendre/greenkeys/IBM_Price_List_8-MAR-1983.zip
OK, so I'm back to debugging busted memory cards. Again, I have a sitation
where a bit is stuck on, and I'm curious to see if anyone has any insight into
which chip (of 3) might be causing it (in an attempt to not have to try
replacing them at random :-).
Looking at the line from the memory chips (two chips - E26 and E27, if anyone
cares - have outputs wire-or'd together) to the input of an octal tri-state
latch (E40, an S373), that line goes to about +2V when the machine is powered
on (which is similar to what other bits do); then, when I run a
two-instruction read loop, (after writing 0 into that location), the line goes
to +5V and stays there (which is distinctly unlike how other bits behave).
Any guesses as to whether the culprit is the S373 or one of the memory chips?
Noel
> From: B Degnan
> there was a "rev 1" PDP11/10 that was used as a process control system.
> You could buy the 11/20 version that had the front panel. Otherwise
> they were very similar/same systems.
According to my 1971 11/20-15-R20 handbook, the 11/15 (the 'rev 1' 11/10,
KC11 processor) did have one significant difference from the 11/20, which is
that it only supported one interrupt level, instead of four (see table pg.
2). I seem to recall reading that in other places, too.
Of course, according to that table, the 11/05 (KD11-B) also only supported
one interrupt level, so maybe that table is confused.
Noel
And this question must have been too obscure to elicit any response. The
answer is C) 50.
After posting the trivia question I came up with a way on the PDP8 to
measure time events to a resolution of 1.5 microseconds and went back and
retested the High Speed Paper tape reader hardware. The earlier version
could only measure to 3.0 microseconds resolution. Here is the 1.5
microsecond version of the program:
/ ADVANCED HIGH SPEED PAPER TAPE TIMING PROGRAM
/
/ USES FIELD 1 AND LINK/AC TO MEASURE TIME DELAY
/ WITH INTERRUPTS.
*0000
.-. / INTERRUPT ENTRY POINT
RSF / MAKE CERTAIN IT WAS A HSR INTERRUPT
HLT / HOUSTON WE HAVE A PROBLEM
DCA I AUTO0 / SAVE COUNT AND LINK AS A 24 BIT
RAL
DCA I AUTO0 / SAVE LINK
JMP MORE
*0010
AUTO0, .-.
/
MORE, ISZ Z FRM1 / CHECK FOR DONE
JMP NEXT / EXIT INTERRUPT AND CONTINUE TIMING
TAD Z COUNTS / POINT AT START OF ARRAY
DCA Z AUTO0
TAD Z CNTS / GET BACK ORIGINAL COUNT OF SAMPLES
DCA Z FRM1
TLS / PRIME THE PUMP
PRLP, TAD I Z AUTO0 / GET 12 BIT PART
DCA Z BASE
TAD I Z AUTO0 / GET LINK PART
CLL RAR / RESTORE THE LINK
TAD Z BASE / COUNT IS IN LINK AND AC
TAD Z C0002 / ADD 2 WHICH CORRECTS TIMING FOR START DELAY
DCA Z BASE / SAVE FOR PRINTING
RAL / PRINT THE LEADING OCTAL DIGIT
TAD Z CHZERO / ADD IN '0' TO GET LEADING DIGIT
JMS PRINT / AND WE DONT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE LINK ANYMORE
TAD Z M0004 / INITIALIZE DIGIT COUNTER
DCA Z DIGCNT
DIGLP, TAD Z BASE / OCTAL DIGIT IS IN UPPER 3 BITS
RTL
RAL
DCA Z BASE / NEXT DIGIT IS IN UPPER 3 BITS
TAD Z BASE / NEED TO SHIFT ONCE MORE TO GET IN LOWER 3 BITS
RAL
AND Z C0007 / KEEP JUST THE LOWER 3 BITS
TAD Z CHZERO / ADD IN THE OFFSET FOR ASCII 0 CHARACTER
JMS PRINT / AND GO PRINT IT
ISZ Z DIGCNT
JMP DIGLP
TAD Z CHSPC / PRINT A SPACE
JMS PRINT
TAD Z CHCR / PRINT CR
JMS PRINT
TAD Z CHLF / PRINT LF
JMS PRINT
ISZ Z FRM1 / ARE WE DONE?
JMP PRLP / NO
HLT / ALL DONE
JMP START / GO AGAIN
NEXT,
CLA CLL / LINK AND AC MAKE A 13 BIT COUNTER
ION / INTERRUPTS ON. CIF THAT FOLLOWS DELAYS THIS
CIF 10 / SWITCH TO FIELD 1 AT THE JMP I CZERO
RFC / START THE NEXT READ
JMP I C0000 / START COUNTING (ADDS 2 TO THE ACTUAL COUNT)
PRINT, .-. / PRINT THE CHARACTER IN THE AC
TSF / WAIT FOR LAST CHARACTER TO FINISH PRINTING
JMP .-1 / WAIT
TLS / SHIP IT
CLA CLL / RETURN WITH AC CLEAR
JMP I PRINT / RETURN
/ CONSTANTS
C0000, 0
C0002, 2
C0007, 0007 / MASK
CIAC, IAC / IAC CONSTANT
CHLF, 0012 / CONSTANT FOR LINE FEED
CHCR, 0015 / CONSTANT FOR CARRIAGE RETURN
CHSPC, 0040 / CONSTANT FOR A SPACE CHARACTER
CHZERO, 0260 / CONSTANT FOR '0' CHARACTER
COUNTS, ARRAY-1 / POINTER TO COUNTS ARRAY-1 FOR AUTO INCREMENT
INITIALIZE
M0004, -4
/ VARIABLES
FRM1, 0000 / FRAME COUNT KEPT HERE
CNTS, 0000 / COPY OF FRAME COUNT READ FROM SWITCHES
BASE, 0000 / TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WORD BEING PRINTED
DIGCNT, 0000 / COUNT OF DIGITS WHEN PRINTING
*0200
START, CLA
DCA FRM1 / FILL ALL OF FIELD 1 WITH IAC INSTRUCTIONS
CDF 10
FILL, TAD CIAC / GET THE CIAC INSTRUCTION
DCA I FRM1 / PUT IT ON FIELD 1
ISZ FRM1 / BUMP AND CHECK FOR DONE
JMP FILL / NOT DONE
CDF 00 / RESTORE TO FIELD ZERO
AGAIN, LAS / READ SR
CMA / INITIALIZE FRAME COUNT FROM SR FOR ISZ
DCA Z FRM1
TAD Z FRM1
DCA Z CNTS / KEEP A COPY FOR USE WHEN PRINTING
TAD Z COUNTS / INITIALIZE THE AUTO INCREMENT REGISTER
DCA Z AUTO0
JMP NEXT / AND GO MAKE A PASS
*0400
ARRAY, .-. /STORE THE COUNTS HERE
$
The program fills field 1 with IAC instructions and then reads the switch
register to find out how many frames to process. Each frame is timed and
the result stored in words pairs starting at 0400. Counts are 0-8191 which
on a straight 8 would represent 0 - 12286.5 microseconds. The actual time
is 2 counts more than this because of the JMP I C0000 to switch fields and
start execution of the timer. Once the switch register count of frames is
reached the contents of the array plus 2 is dumped out as 5 octal digits to
the teletype. In the case of the Type 750 and PC01 the first character
read sets the flag immediately so the first entry in the table shows as 2
which for the purpose of my emulator I fixed the first entry. My emulator
of course gives the same answers as the 8 but then it has to because it
uses the table generated by the real 8. The only other place I ran it was
on Sim8 which always gives 0145 as the answer which is not even close.
I will come up with something of more general interest for the next trivia
question. I have something in mind already.
Doug Ingraham
PDP-8 S/N 1175
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Doug Ingraham <dpi at dustyoldcomputers.com>
wrote:
> Many of us on this list are collectors of one sort of computer or
> another. I don't think of myself as a collector so much as a caretaker of
> my PDP-8. Of the things it has been fairly easy to get in recent years are
> the CPU and its related cards for the models that were produced in fairly
> large numbers. What is not easy to get are peripherals for these
> machines. So here is a question relating to the Type 750 high speed paper
> tape reader found on the early models. A few years back we were working on
> getting the CPU back in good working order. We needed to read in the
> diagnostic paper tapes but the reader was not reliable. Went through the
> tuning procedure and found that it was trying to read the tape at nearly
> 450 cps. After tuning it up the full speed now sits at 342 cps.
>
> The question is how many frames does it have to read before it reaches
> full speed?
>
> A) 1
> B) 10
> C) 50
> D) 100
>
> This is probably a somewhat squishy number and would depend somewhat on
> tuning. I wrote a couple of programs to determine this so I could add
> correct delays to my emulator. I was able to obtain a 3 microsecond
> resolution count of the delay. How that was accomplished might make for
> another trivia question.
>
>
>
>
>
--
Doug Ingraham
PDP-8 SN 1175
> From: Johnny Billquist
> If that was the case, then the previous user was sloppy. In addition to
> that latch, you are also supposed to screw in four (I think it is)
> screws from the rail to the drive there too.
Yup, manual confirms 4.
Anyway, maybe that's why they got rid of that feature on the RA81 - people
were being lazy and depending on the latches, and not putting in the screws.
Noel
> From: Johnny Billquist
> You are supposed to remove the two tiny screws that holds the slide to
> the drive when you remove it.
Yeah, that seems to be the conclusion.
What's odd is that RL0x's use almost identical (maybe they are identical)
slides, but on the RLOx's, there _is_ (I think) a way to take the drive out
without undoing screws; there's a little latch at the very front of the
slide, and it looks like if one trips that latch, the rail along the side of
the drive case will slide out out of the slides.
I wonder why they didn't do that on the RA8x's as well? Maybe because those
weigh so much more?
Noel
> From: Johnny Billquist
> you then have some additional small locks and tricks if you want to
> extend them beyond their normal point, as needed if you actually plan
> to remove them from the slides.
Sorry, I was not clear enough: that is exactly what I want to do - remove
them from their slides (i.e. from the cabinet).
I do know how to do that by taking out the two machine screws in each side
which secure the slides to the disk case.
However, is there some way to remove the drive completely, without doing
that? I.e. a way to separate the slide into two parts, one of which stays
with the cabinet, and one with the disk drive?
Noel
I scanned some info on the launch of the Digital PDP11. As the documents
show, there was a "rev 1" PDP11/10 that was used as a process control
system. You could buy the 11/20 version that had the front panel.
Otherwise they were very similar/same systems. The "rev 2" PDP11/10 is the
unit most people are more familiar with, the core system is interchangeable
with the 11/05.
Most references I have seen on the WWW do not include the original
PDP11/10, anyone have one?
http://vintagecomputer.org/browse_thread.cfm?id=593
Bill
> From: Johnny Billquist
> You mean sliding them out on their rails or removing them from the
> rails?
Sliding them out on their rails. (Removing them from their rails I've figured
out how to do! :-)
Noel
I found a 1702 EPROM rattling around in the bottom of one of my boxes of
stuff. I have no idea what's on it. Can someone give me some advice on
just reading the thing with a TL866? If/when I decide I want to program
it, I'll make something like this:
http://www.tronola.com/html/1702a_prom_programmer.html
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
So, does anyone know how to take an RA81 on slides _out_ of the cabinet? The
manual gives a lot of directions on how to _install_ it, but nothing on how to
_remove_ one once one has it in.
I had to take a pair of RA81's out of some cabinets, and I could not for the
life of me find the trick! I finally resorted to undoing the two machine
screws that hold the slides onto the RA81 case, which I consider sort of
cheating (although from looking at that manual, that may be the correct,
official way...)
Noel
> From: Mike Loewen
> He's been trying to sell that for months.
Mmm. Didn't know that. I just passed the URL along because it seemed like a
not totally unreasonable price for what's there (seems to be quite a few
boards, no idea if it's a complete board set) - older minicomputers seem to
be going for $1-2K in open auctions (the last two PDP-8's both went for $2K).
Noel
Hi,
I pulled my tek4015-1 from storage (~10 years, dry but cold, had been
working perfectly then) and brought it home to my living room, much to the
dismay of my significant other. I plugged it in. it squealed a bit,
zapped a little and lit up with that signature green expanding circle. I
was able to get the line/local light to behave reasonably and it seemed to
go into local mode ok. Was hoping to echo characters to the screen, but no
love.
The screen is really bright. It's as if the whole thing was in the
lit-up state. PAGE key does blink the screen, but I remember it flashing
brightly whilst erasing in the past. Now it looks like it's just staying
bright all the time. I wiggled the boards in the cage around and managed
to get it to repeat control-g feeps (while holding those keys down), but
it's only able to do it intermittently, seems related to the positioning
(or complete absence) of the display driver board. Still no characters
showing up.
Does anyone know how to work on these?
thx
jake
> From: Paul Birkel
> Wire Lists for any/all of the following:
>
> KB11-C 11/70 Processor (or the older KB11-B)
> FP11-C 11/70 Floating-point processor (or the older FP11-B, also used
> in 11/45 and 11/50)
> RH70 MASSBUS controller
I don't know for sure about the 11/70 (I never looked at one closely), but
for the 11/45 FPP, IIRC that was part of an integral multi-unit backplane
assembly with the CPU, i.e. it was wired as part of a large wire mat that
included the wiring for the CPU. So I don't think there's a separate wire
list for the FPP. I would guess the same is true of the RH70.
DEC generally included the wire lists in the engineering drawings; do the
11/70 prints not include the wire list?
Noel
All;
I'm hoping that someone here has a back-room shoebox of DEC microfiche (or
even hardcopy!) that includes Wire Lists for any/all of the following:
KB11-C 11/70 Processor (or the older KB11-B)
FP11-C 11/70 Floating-point processor (or the older FP11-B, also used
in 11/45 and 11/50)
RH70 MASSBUS controller
MJ11-A Core memory
I'd like to get these scanned and into Bitsavers. Please contact me off
list, soonest, if you think that you can help me out.
I'd be _very_ much obliged. Thanks,
paul
[PS: Of course, if they are already online somewhere that I've overlooked,
or simply already-digital but not online, please educate me further :->.]
I?m in the process of building another HP2000/Access TSB system. I pulled a
7970E tape drive out of a shipping container (I had not opened the shipping
container since I bought it about 8 years ago). When I got the unit on the
bench to give it a going over, while it looked pristine ? someone had
dropped something very heavy (heavy enough to severely deform ?? steel) on
the top of the unit.
My thought (given there?s not a shortage of open space inside the chassis)
was to put a car jack inside and jack it up thus pushing out the top. My
concern there was that there would be an ?equal and opposite reaction?).
Perhaps a 2x4 that goes side to side under the jack would alleviate this.
But on freenode #classiccmp (where I hang out pretty much every night),
PJustice and Sark both had similar ideas for an alternative approach that
took advantage of the fact that the top of the chassis has a lot of vent
holes on top. I implemented their approach and it worked very well so I
thought I?d document it with pictures and post here. I should note that this
approach only works because the angle iron I used was 14ga. Anything less
would just bend itself.
If I had facilities to cut the angle iron, I would have put a piece on top
and on the bottom but I don?t. Failing that, I just had to pick specific
spots on top to ?pull out? more carefully. As you know when steel bends it
stretches so it would be impossible to get it back 100% perfect but I?m
pretty pleased with the results. If you want to use this method and don?t
have convenient holes already present from the manufacturer, you could
always drill one or two holes to make it work. Note that without the wood
blocks you can pull it straight but it might bend back (albeit less so), but
with the wood blocks you can pull it further than straight so it bounces
back ?mostly straight?.
http://www.ezwind.net/hp2000/7970E/
And if you want to follow the build of the 2000/Access IO-rack (which holds
tape, terminal controller and bulkhead, and disk controller subsystem):
http://www.ezwind.net/hp2000/IO-Rack/
THANKS SARK AND PJUSTICE J
J
Actually I need to learn more about this. What do they exactly do when they "palletize" things? Does that include wrapping/protecting the item and lifting/anchoring it on the pallet? How small and how large an item can they deal with? How much does the service cost? How do you "unpalletize it" at the other end? Do you need a forklift or a hydraulic pallet moving thingy on the receiving end?
Marc
>> On 01/17/2015 11:09 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>> I know palletization's not cheap
I haven't ever played with official Sugru, but how does it differ
>from ordinary relatively inexpensive Shoe Goo? Is Sugru like
slightly dried-out Shoe Goo? I find that a tube of Shoe Goo
dries out a bit after a few years and becomes a more easily worked
substance.
- John
The discussion about servos on the XT2190 prompted me to turn on a machine (Altos ACS 68000) that I have with one of these nice drives in it.? The initial sounds of the drive is it re-calibrating using a stepping sequence.? This may be done by the drive controller to find track zero, or the drive itself (I really don't know).? Since the stepping (and subsequent servo lock) happens at a low frequency, it is the sound you hear.? Sometimes it takes a couple of times to get its act together, but it works well.? This was a machine that had been off for a bunch of years (over 10?) and it came back to life nicely.? I couldn't say much about the terminal I had attached as the dust that had accumulated made some keys not function so well, but I'll take some canned air and "blow it out" to get it working well.
I note that the MFM interface does not have any "microstep" capability, only a simple step function.? I believe that the SMD interface did (it has been a few years, I never used it in my work), and the ESDI might (I never worked with that one).
Soon I'll get the MFM drive simulator working and go "solid state".
I picked up a little Atari 800XL bundle the other day (system, pair of 1050
drives, and an 850 expansion box) - cheap because it was missing cables and
power supplies.
1) When hooking this up to a TV via the RF input - is there any "magic"
involved, or will a suitable braided co-ax TV cable with a phono connector
added at the Atari end do? I know it "works" because I lashed one up
quickly (and I do mean quickly, no soldering involved) and ran the machine
>from a stray +5V PSU, which obviously resulted in a fuzzy picture - but
then when it came to making a good one, I got to thinking about those
little antenna switch boxes that US machines often seemed to come with, and
wondering if there were a bunch of passive components in there which make a
difference to the signal quality.
2) Does anyone have any spare I/O cables, or know of a source of the
connectors so I can make my own?
(I suppose while I'm here I may as well ask if anyone just happens to know
what voltage power supplies the 1050's and 850 need, but I'm sure I can dig
the answers to that up online if needed)
cheers
Jules
http://www.ebay.de/itm/HP-Agilent-16500B-Modular-Logic-Analysis-System-Main…
Wrong side of the pond.
Seller is also offering a lot of Tek scopes, Kaypro and some other interesting equipment.
Had a Convex SPP1200CD - also wrong side of the pond - I'd have love to get the board, even the Vicor DC-DC converter on the boards....
-- Andreas
Jay wrote...
----
Here is a link to pictures of the bracket, in case someone has it laying
around but doesn't realize "this is what that's for"...
www.ezwind.net/hp2000/7970E/
The bracket is pictures 0520 through 0525
----
I see. It's a more involved bracket than I thought, with 3D bends in heavy
gauge steel. It will need to be bent by hand since it's not worth making a
fixture for so few. It's going to be an interesting calculation for the hole
position if they drill them pre-bend, they might not get it right first
time. Let us know what you find out.
Marc
>
> > 1) When hooking this up to a TV via the RF input - is there any "magic"
> > involved, or will a suitable braided co-ax TV cable with a phono connector
> > added at the Atari end do? I know it "works" because I lashed one up
>
> Maybe... The modulator output is nominally 75 ohm, and should be linked to
> such a piece of coax. European TVs have a 75 ohm aerial input, often on what
> we call a 'Belling-Lee coax socket', so it's just a cable. US TVs, I am told, may have
> either a 75 ohm coax input, often on an F connector, or a 300 ohm balanced input
> (for parallel twin feeder cable) on a pair of screw terminals. For the former, just
> connect it up. For the latter you may need a matching transformer, aka a 'balun'
> (BALanced to UNbalanced converter). I am pretty sure you can buy these, but
> it must be possible to wind one if you can get a suitable core
>
I don't know whether some US televisions do this too but I have a Japanese radio
that has two screw terminals for a 300 Ohm balanced feeder and alternatively
allows a 75 Ohm unbalanced feeder to be connected between one of those terminals
and a ground terminal which is also provided.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Need input from anyone that has a HP7970 tape drive mounted in a rack.
Fortunately, all my 7970's have come with the special mounting bracket. This
is not a part of the 7970 itself. It is a long flat metal bar that mounts on
the left of the rack. It bolts in from the front, and provides threaded
holes on the side further back in the rack. While the right side of the 7970
is bolted into the rack from the front, on the left side - you open the
chassis and bolt from inside the chassis on the left wall into the threaded
holes provided by this mounting bracket.
Given that, it would appear to me that mounting a 7970 WITHOUT that special
mounting bracket would not be easily done. I'd like to know if anyone has
mounted a 7970 in a rack without said bracket and if so - how did they do
it? Since I've always used HP racks and the special 7970 mounting bracket my
experience is probably blinded, but I don't see a way to do it without the
bracket.
Best,
J
I have an Apple II Plus at home with a broken escape key - does anyone
happen to have a basket-case keyboard that they'd be able to salvage one
>from for me? There's a little bit of stem left on the keyswitch, so I think
I could possibly make it work with just the keycap, although (assuming the
machine's keyboard even uses individual switches, I've not actually
dismantled to check) I probably wouldn't say no to the associated
keyswitch, too.
It's an ex-school machine, so I wonder if it was broken off intentionally
(i.e. to stop kids quitting out of some software that they weren't supposed
to) - the system's in great cosmetic shape otherwise.
cheers
Jules
Just received the following "equipment available" email..
Vax 8600
MicroVax II
8mm & 4mm SCSI tape drives
6250 tape drive
Dec 64 bit unix
first DEC PC (Rainbow) with graphics card (1984)
a lot of manuals
an IBM AIX box too
Location is Houston, TX.
DO NOT EMAIL ME ASKING FOR MORE SPECIFICS. If you are interested in *ALL* of
the gear, contact me off list and I'll put you in direct contact with the
owner.
If you want just PART of the gear, do not email me. Email whoever winds up
getting the gear and work it out with them.
Best,
J
I don?t really do Apple, but this seems like a pretty good trade for someone. I emailed the seller (trader?), and he responded, so I think it?s a real deal...
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/sop/4845748625.html
~~
Mark Moulding
hello all,
received a box with a shugart 800-2 drive and some 8" floppies
containing IBM system/1 software and one from intel with ISIS-II
is this already online available or should I try to make images of them?
ibm disks:
rps pascal (2 of 2
ptf 5719-pc6-brg1 (2of 2)
s1-IWSRPS-RPS-VOL (1 of 1)
rps data entry system (5 of 5)
s/1 rps realtime pgmm sys v6 (1 of 1)
rps index acces method v2 (2of2)
s/1 rps realtime pgmm sys v6 (disks 21-24 of 24)
refresh-01-sm1 (1of1)
rps pgm preparation subsys v (disk 24 of 28)
the isis-II is version 3.4
--
Met vriendelijke Groet,
Simon Claessen
drukknop.nl
> From: Johnny Billquist
> The KI10, which is the one that pops into my mind here, have a
> different panel, as the cabinets are wider.
The KA10 had a mixture of narrow and wide cabinets. The two main CPU bays
were wide (as were the display panels at the top - the one I have is 48
lights wide), as was the MA10 (I think) and MF10 (pretty sure about that
one). Other bays (such as the DF10) were narrower (I think standard 19").
I didn't see much of KI10's, so I can't say for sure, but I suspect the same
was true of them: I'm pretty sure they used the same DF10, etc as the KA10.
Noel
PS: Speaking of KI10's, does anyone know the story behind the bizarro images
of the 'KI10 Indicator Panels' in the DECsystem-10 System Reference Manual
(DEC-10-XSRMA-A-D; 3rd Edition, August 1974 - although other editions may
have them too), pg. F1-5? Were those just placeholders that got by editorial
control, or was that some sort of complicated in-joke?
> From: Al Kossow
> It is the generic bulb panel they used for all of the 8/11/15 panels on
> the top of the racks.
I think for the -10, too (and that was possibly the initial use, given the 36
wide lamp array - or, at least, they had the -10 usage in mind when they did
it).
I looked at my DECsystem-10 manual, and I suspect that at least the DF10
(channel), RP10 and TM10 controllers used it (4 rows of 36 lights, in the
same aspect ratio), and maybe some of the memory cabinets (MB10, MD10) too -
they have the right size, etc but have 4 switches in the lower left corner.
Noel
I received the offer below, contact me off-list if interested.
J
I have two MicroPDP 11/73 computers I would like to sell.
Last time I checked (5 years ago) they were working just fine.
They have hard drives, no tape drives and were running DCL.
I have no manuals and no console terminal.
They are very heavy, so shipping is not an option.
I am located in Eastern Pennsylvania, between Allentown and Philadelphia.
> From: Guy Sotomayor
> I'm building a "LED" board that attaches to the MEM11. ... I couldn't
> resist more blinkin lights.
Oh frabjous day! Das blinken-litz!! Excellent!!!
Now I'm _really_ going to want a stack of these... :-)
> The LED board will display all of the indicators for the RF11
> controller in a layout similar to what was on a real RF11. ...
> It's optional and will connect to the MEM11 with a small cable (I plan
> on using RS485 drivers for the cable) so the LED board can be a fair
> distance away.
Hmm. Looking at the original RF11 display panel, some of it may be impossible
to really emulate; e.g. it displays the contents of the shift register used
to assemble words from the bit stream being read from the disk; it's probably
not feasible to emulate that... And of course, many of the error bits only
make sense with an actual disk (e.g. the various Timing Track errors).
How much bandwidth will you have from the board to the display panel anyway?
I assume there will be latches on the display panel, and one sends commands
down the link to turn given latches on/off?
Looking at the original display panel, although it had the extended memory
bits, it didn't show the memory address (it does have the disk address).
Maybe we could put that where the shift register display used to be?
(And speaking of the original display, I couldn't find a picture of one - does
someone have one, or, better yet, an actual RF11, so as to copy the look of it
as closely as possible?)
> (I haven't looked at doing an overlay to make it look pretty)
Oh, yes, please do!!!
> it'll be somewhat generic (4 rows of 36 LEDs).
I counted up (no doubt you did the same :-), and on the longest row (at the
top), there are 30 lights, plus 4 empty spaces for the gaps between blocks,
so 36 is good. Will you be grouping them in 3's, with slightly larger gaps
between each group of 3? That would really maximize the ability to look just
like the old RF11 display panel.
And warm white LED's, please (of course :-).
I'm really going to have to get going on my UNIBUS PDP-11's. I've mostly been
working on the QBUS ones, but if I can have blinking lights... :-)
I'm already planning on how I can put /, /bin and the pipe device on separate
RF platters, so I can watch the lights and see what the machine is up to.. :-)
Noel
> From: Guy Sotomayor
> the way that it works is that 144 bits will be shifted out and then
> all latched at once.
Ah. That will limit the rate at which you can update the lights, though,
right? I mean, you won't (be able to) update the panel after every word, will
you?
Although I suppose even if you only do it after each transfer, that's
probably still going to give much the same visual effect.
> Will you be grouping them in 3's, with slightly larger gaps between
> each group of 3? That would really maximize the ability to look just
> like the old RF11 display panel.
> No, it'll be just like the DEC panels. All of the LEDs (in this case)
> will be evenly spaced. The overlay masked the bulbs that weren't used.
Ah, I was faked out by the illustration (not a picture, alas!) in the RF11
manual, it looked like they were grouped.
I wasn't sure if the larger spaces between various fields were just bulbs
they didn't wire up, or if they were also masked by the overlay; I just
looked at some of my KA-11 overlays (now _there's_ a machine with blinking
lights! :-), and they are indeed blanked in the overlay, so I would
guess/asssume they did the same on the RF11.
> From: Bob Rosenbloom
> I have an indicator panel that's labeled "Peripheral Indicator Panel
> 5406458A"
> No overlays or anything to indicate what it was used for. Is it
> possibly the disk indicator panel?
That sure looks like it. Too bad you don't have the overlay...
Now that I think about it, I wonder if that panel was originally used on the
KA? The 36 bits are certainly suggestive... I'll have to see if I can find a
picture of the disk/tape controller display panel from the KA and see if that
could have been it.
Noel
Hi Guys,
Has anyone ever built an 8008 SBC using modern components like CPLDs and/or
FPGAs in place of the ancient hard to get parts used in the first 8008 based
microcomputer? I'm looking at trying to do it on a small PCB, but obviously
not sure of the exact size yet. Any ideas, thoughts anyone?
Kip Koon
<mailto:computerdoc at sc.rr.com> computerdoc at sc.rr.com
<http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Kip_Koon>
http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Kip_Koon
Many of us on this list are collectors of one sort of computer or another.
I don't think of myself as a collector so much as a caretaker of my PDP-8.
Of the things it has been fairly easy to get in recent years are the CPU
and its related cards for the models that were produced in fairly large
numbers. What is not easy to get are peripherals for these machines. So
here is a question relating to the Type 750 high speed paper tape reader
found on the early models. A few years back we were working on getting the
CPU back in good working order. We needed to read in the diagnostic paper
tapes but the reader was not reliable. Went through the tuning procedure
and found that it was trying to read the tape at nearly 450 cps. After
tuning it up the full speed now sits at 342 cps.
The question is how many frames does it have to read before it reaches full
speed?
A) 1
B) 10
C) 50
D) 100
This is probably a somewhat squishy number and would depend somewhat on
tuning. I wrote a couple of programs to determine this so I could add
correct delays to my emulator. I was able to obtain a 3 microsecond
resolution count of the delay. How that was accomplished might make for
another trivia question.
I have a couple of Nashua brand third-party RL02 packs I'd like to remove
the cover from, shown here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/104239531634140817575/albums/610685195575310…
The DEC RL02 packs have a slider release on the handle that one can use to
remove the bottom cover before inserting the pack in the RL02 drive.
However, the Nashua packs are missing this mechanism, and just lifting the
handle does not release the bottom cover. Any hints on how to release the
bottom cover off these packs?
Thanks!
Lee Courtney
Al writes:
> On 1/19/15 10:43 AM, Tom Gardner wrote:
>> FWIW, microstepping goes back to at least the CDC SMD of the mid-70s
>> and even some stepper motor drives were microstepped. So there is no
>> question the XT2190 can do it.
> Obviously, though with the limited documentation it would take some reverse engineering of the Maxtor servo system to do it. There is no way provided to do it from the 34 pin edge connector that I can see.
My belief (perhaps unfounded) always was that when a XT2190 begins emitting "squeals and beeps" it is because the MFM interface has asserted "recovery mode" and it is microstepping.
Oh, 20 years I was abandoning XT2190's whenever I could! I dreaded walking into the lab to find the RD54's emitting squeaks and beeps indicating problems reading them.
Are the squeals and beeps from the head positioner, or is there a separate piezo element for those? It was really loud and obvious and would not be surprised if there was a piezo beeper just for making them. Then again firmware in the drive may have known how to make the head positioner squeal too. Perhaps the squeals and beeps were not recovery mode but simply re-calibrating on track zero.
"Nice rack", as they say. I have an HP 7970E and was wondering what to put
it into. That is the right solution... I've seen in pictures that HP also
had some special desk-like looking furniture to put the early 7970's in,
with a slanted panel in which the tape drive would go. Never seen one of
these in the flesh.
Marc
>From: "Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org>
>And if you want to follow the build of the 2000/Access IO-rack (which holds
>tape, terminal controller and bulkhead, and disk controller subsystem):
>http://www.ezwind.net/hp2000/IO-Rack/
>J
Thanks to Lyle mentioning Manuals Plus, I acquired all of the docs that they still had
on the Futuredata 2300, which is now up under http://bitsavers.org/pdf/futuredata
If anyone still has a 2300, 01, or 02 I would like to archive the prom and floppies from them.
I've also been working through or rescanning at a higher resolution, 64100/110 docs. Information
on the 64120/64000-UX system would be interesting to find. In addition I've made progress on the
64700A/B. There is very little information on the earlier 64700A on line. Surviving software for
those emulators would be good to find. I did pick up a B3763-14604 CD from 1997 which appears to
have the PC version of the software (and the flash files). We'll see what happens when I try to
get a 68030 pod working on a 64700B that had a 68332 pod on it.
Mike wrote...
----
Someone needs to come up with the hardware equivalent of HPDrive so we don't
need to dedicate an entire Windoze system just to emulate a drive.
----
To which I replied...
----
I am not 100% positive, but I think this was already done [snip]
----
Here is the magic:
http://newton.freehostia.com/hp/
Note that this implementation uses a standard off the shelf dup reg board.
That choice has major pluses, but the downside means you have to write a
driver for any OS you want to use it with (RTE, HP2K, etc.). Maybe it's a
starting point anyways....
J
ANyone have a part like this:
"you might have the item i am looking for (from your vast collection of
parts) which is the RF Shield for the A1200. Looking for only the UPPER
or even UPPER/LOWER."
I don't have Amiga parts, but would like to help this person.
>
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:27:59 -0800
> From: Guy Sotomayor <ggs at shiresoft.com>
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: MEM11 Status Update
>
> As some of you know I've been working (on and off again) a
> multi-function Unibus board that contains all of the more difficult
> items to allow a PDP-11/20 to run Unix V1 entirely within the CPU
> chassis. Other than the CPU and the RK11-D controller, everything else
> will be on the MEM11 board. Here's the background on what the MEM11 is
> and the current progress.
>
> What's on the board is the following:
>
> * Up to 124KW of non-volatile memory
> * Console Emulator ROM
> * 4 Boot ROMs selected from 32 images on the board
> * 2 DL11 SLUs
> * RF11 controller with non-volatile memory emulating 8 RS11 drives
> * KE11 EAE
> * KW11K
> * KW11L
> * KW11P
> * KW11W
>
>
> TTFN - Guy
>
> ******************
>
I am working on a similar project for the Omnibus. I am connecting a
Microsemi SmartFusion FPGA to the Omnibus, and doing the peripheral
emulation in a combination of the FPGA and Linux running on the ARM
Cortex-M3 hard core in the FPGA. Anything with timing restrictions goes in
the FPGA. Everything else goes in Linux as a combination of a device driver
and an application.
For simplicity, I am starting with programmed I/O devices, with the paper
tape reader/punch first. I should be able to add serial ports, printer
ports, analog I/O, diskettes, card reader, and maybe DECtape. Later I will
add data break (DMA) and add disks and mag tape. I am planning to keep the
disk images in flash, load them into RAM and run from there, and save them
back to flash if the processor is halted.
The MI8E bootloader wiggles the same Omnibus signals as the front panel. I
could have the FPGA do the same, and load any one of a selection of
bootloaders.
I am not adding memory, because a nice 32kW RAM board already exists.
--
Michael Thompson
On 20 January 2015 at 17:38, David Brownlee <abs at absd.org> wrote:
> IIRC there was a bug filed against VMS to the effect that dates past
> 9999 were not supported. Have to be impressed by that belief in future
> engineering :)
There are, or were, some other forward-thinking people out there..
>from Wikipedia:
"St. James's Gate Brewery (Irish: Gr?dlann Gheata Naomh S?amuis) is a
brewery founded in 1759 in Dublin, Ireland, by Arthur Guinness. [..]
The main product of the brewery is Guinness Draught.[..]
Originally leased in 1759 to Arthur Guinness at ?45 per year for 9,000 years"
(So although it looks like our decendants may run out of Guinness
before VMS runs into date problems, no worries, they've since bought
out the originally leased property. But good thinking still.)
-Tor